|
|
It's been confirmed that different edition of the 'Director's Cut' have been printed as a "shell game" to keep readers guessing.
Also, the early covers for Civil War are not meant to indicate specific sides, they're just thematic "heroes be fightin!" covers.
Anyway... I feel dirty for buying this now, and not in a good way. Oh Millar. I have come to the conclusion that it's not the plot dymanics that are the problem - i.e., it's not so much that the reasons for the split and how it happens and who takes what side are that bad, or that it happens too quickly. The problem is the characterisation. Millar struggles to write his main characters as anything other than obnoxious, needlessly aggressive meatheads at the best of times, and so inevitably here Captain America and Iron Man come off as COMPLETE IDIOTS. "You shouldn't have taken down two of my BOYS, Tony!" - they've only been tranquilised, for fuck's sake! "PUNCHY PUNCH PUNCH with my METAL FISTS, Steve!" And it now becomes clear that Millar's technique for the end of each issue is "Bad characterisation, you say? Look over there! A WTF moment!"
I'd put a tenner on Hercules to die if the bookies would take it. He's established enough for it to seem reasonably important, but nobody actually cares. And it would explain Aries showing up in an Avengers book soon, which has been foretold.
I'm not sure how I can justify carrying on with this when I was so justly mean about Infinite Crisis, though. |
|
|