|
|
I'm certainly hopeful that's the avenue down which Thunderbolts - a title, incidentally, that I personally had never remotely once considered purchasing before this week - will pass.
Is Marvel's future so dependent on Speedball selling top 20 numbers that they HAVE to change him? Was his very existence somehow disruptive to the future of Marvel Comics? In days of yore, if a character didn't work, they simply shuffled him off to Limbo until someone felt like using him. Totally rewriting a character simply wasn't necessary.
I mean, seriously. New name, new powers, new costume, new attitude. There's a simple term for that: "New character".
Well, gross overstatement aside - of course it's not going to alter Marvel's fiscal future in any noticeable way, but then few comics are - it has generated some further heat for the title in which the character is to appear. Last week or month if you'd told me (or been told, I'd think) that Speedball was to be the most discussed character on the comics internet by some distance, it'd have been dismissed that as the ravings of a one-off man mental. So, there's some form of alchemy there that certainly wouldn't have been generated in the creation of a new character (which the notably conservative mainstream audience would have almost exactly no interest in.) So, yeah, 'shoulda been a new character' - ever the cry of people who want nothing changed to their ineffable idols, some of whom they don't even care for or about (cf: Speedball) - would not have had the same effect at all, and a legion of complainers - in lieu of some new Transformers stills this week - would be denied a lightning rod also.
Look on the upside.
In terms of the character arc I've not read Front Line so I can't really comment on that, but there is a distinct line to redemption from the central event he's largely responsible for in Civil War #1; the alternatives were imprisonment or death (I think this may have been the original plan, given he's quoted as dead in CW#2 or so, and the rest of his team are actually in the ground at this moment) pretty much, and the continuation of the character as a daft, bouncy jerk about whom no-one cared would have rung false. |
|
|