Good on him for Boo-ing the audience back though. The man has cajones.
You reckoned he was booing? Watching the eviction again on video, it seemed he was just shouting 'OHHH!' - y'know, in a 'this is attention which I am choosing to interpret as positive' kinda way.
"I never had any allegiance; I was always free," says the man who promised Victor and Jason early on that he'd never nominate them, and indeed never did so. The Davina interview is always a humanising process, leaving one more sympathetic toward the evictee - but Ahmed just came across as stupid as fuck. Thick as a shit sandwich.
Getting a bit pissed off with all this 'ahmania sweeping the nation' stuff. I can't think of anyone mentioning it, even when I've brought it up. The term seems, largely, to have been confined to the house. Everyone I know who watches Big Brother just reckons the man's a pile of arse, and his 'opinions' pitiful. It definitely seems as if, when a question's too complex for him (which happens a lot), he simply accuses the questioner of hating him, and asks if they want a fight. Jokingly, since his eviction, but a less ho-ho version while he was in the house.
And I think Victor's sudden respect for Nadia stems more from hearing the booing after his own name: if he starts to realise he cannot himself win a race, he then likes to claim he was backing the winning horse all along. He did this with Michelle. In the first week, he reckoned she was attracted to him, and he could 'ave her; when she linked up with Stuart, he then began claiming he'd been the one who'd magnanimously got them together, and their relationship was his doing.
He hates to concede that something's outwith his control. If Nadia goes on to win, I bet he'll now claim it's because he was backing her. Because, y'know, he's a player... |