|
|
"Explaining myself." Easier not to do in character...
shaky logic: The vote to lynch Flyboy was nearly a complete landslide. The mafia didn't need to throw all of their votes the same way to off him. In fact, with 3 mafia and 10 villagers, the mafia could each have accused a different person and it wouldn't have made any difference. The questionable logic is in claiming "guaranteed" innocence because you didn't accuse Flyboy.
blatant untruth: Nowhere do I see you defending Flyboy - "And people who voted for me, I might point out that I was practically the only person urging y'all not to vote for the innocent villager last time round. Now why would I do that if I were mafia, eh?" Where is that? Please explain why you were misrepresenting yourself as being supportive of Flyboy when you weren't.
outright contradictions: in one post, you claim "I had no need to PM grant about anything and was therefore not around on this or any other thread" and in another, refering to the same 'long night,' "I posted on friday and saturday, and even started a new thread in that time, so I really can't see where you're getting your 'smoking gun' from". Were you not around? If you were, why have you ignored Qalyn's request to show us what you posted?
Meanwhile, there are all your attempts to fade into the background, followed by various assurances that you are not mafia, are spotlessly innocent.
"Surely, he thinks, no mafia member could be so unsubtle as to proclaim his innocence so loudly."
Oh, yes, one could. And, I suspect, does... Defend yourself or stand accused. (one last chance...) |
|
|