BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Moderating the Temple

 
  

Page: 1 ... 2021222324(25)2627282930... 35

 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:59 / 25.09.07
The more relevant/important bit of that is the "unpacked and interrogated", I'd have thought, given that this is where a lot of the more problematic Temple posts/posters fall down. Honesty can probably be determined - if it has to be - from anybody's willingness to examine their own experiences and have others question them.
 
 
Papess
22:23 / 25.09.07
How do you intend to determine whether somebody's personal experience is honest or not, and how do you support a statement about the supernatural? ... What happens when somebody feels they are giving an honest description of something they believe has happened to them, and it just so happens it involves what sounds rather like female beings of color being sexualized in an unpleasantly familiar way? I'm curious to hear how we'll distinguish between honest and dishonest, and supported and unsupported.


Well stated, quorami. I was trying to express this very concern myself.
 
 
Seth
23:04 / 25.09.07
How do you intend to determine whether somebody's personal experience is honest or not, and how do you support a statement about the supernatural? I am thinking of moneyshot's description of his encounters with dusky SexBratz. What happens when somebody feels they are giving an honest description of something they believe has happened to them, and it just so happens it involves what sounds rather like female beings of color being sexualized in an unpleasantly familiar way? I'm curious to hear how we'll distinguish between honest and dishonest, and supported and unsupported.

These are extremely important questions and it's going to be extraordinarily difficult to find any easy answers.

The subject matter that the Temple covers deals with the personal experience of some of the deepest and most buried parts of ourselves. It deals with the unconscious. It deals with our sexuality, our dreams, our hidden desires, our motivating forces, our fears, our beliefs about who we are and what the world is like. It deals with our bodies and it deals with our pain.

Gypsy's post asks for honest personal experience... and I don't believe a place in which we can talk about our honest personal experience is something that can easily co-exist with a space where racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, etc are not tolerated for one moment. Prejudice is deeply tied into that which we are not conscious of, our fears, our defensive positions. An honest account of one's experience may have to include those elements, and if someone is asking for help in processing and dealing with their experience then we are going to encounter those elements. And people are not always going to be aware of what they're doing, where their prejudices lie, what assumptions they're making. They're not conscious of them, it's often in the space that light hasn't reached yet, associated with pain and hurt that they've not worked through.

Personal experience: see my posts to the Magical spaces and cultural signifiers thread. I couldn't process my own sexism and racism until I chose to accept difficult things about myself. When I posted them to Barbelith it was with the benefit of hindsight, I could offer all sorts of explanations, caveats and apologies for posting such material. People were gracious in response. The problems that I'm currently dealing with I wouldn't put anywhere near Barbelith right now, they have a lot to do with my sexual history, conceptions of my own masculinity, my insecurities about sex. If I were to post openly and honestly in accordance with my experience you'd find out exact how misogynist I really am, and I have no desire to parade myself around like that until I've resolved some of this stuff. I wouldn't be treated kindly here, to be blunt. But treating myself kindly, openly and honestly investigating myself, not judging myself, allowing the kind of deep exploration that only those attitudes can provide is exactly what I need to make myself the person I need to be. I know I won't heal any other way. It's the cross over between magic, psychology and self therapy and it needs someone who can operate in those spheres. But there are people who are not that aware of the audience here, people who will see an invitation to share their experience and not know what to self-censor, if they know to self-censor at all... and Barbelith is just not set up for that.

Not just because it's an internet message board and anyone can respond to a thread. In the vast majority of cases prejudice is only ever really mentioned here when we point it out in others, which we often do in quite a harsh manner. It's been said many times that it isn't incumbent on people to play nice. Fair enough. But from my own experience that reaction is sometimes the exact opposite of what someone who is being open and honest really needs. As I mention in my account on the above link, if people had condemned me I would probably have condemned myself, and I'd have been further from being better, not closer to it. I would have pressed it all down further and its manifestations would probably have become even more problematic and painful, to myself and others.

I think that could be one of the main reasons why I post less in the Temple these days. It's not equipped to handle its subject matter. When it comes to issues that aren't worked through that are to do with our psychologies you need a therapist, maybe not one who works in the trade but someone who can operate like one. But many people don't have access to that for a lot of reasons, so they come the internet. And as has been said on here many times, it's not incumbent on any Barbelith member to be a therapist or an educator. But an invitation to give honest accounts of experience will be met with... well, honest accounts of experience. Some less processed and self aware than others. Barbelith isn't suited to conversations about personal experience like that. People here are concerned with creating a safe space for some people for whom the world often isn't a safe space. That's a fine thing. But it necessarily limits accounts of personal experience in some cases.

I'm not saying that Barbelith or the Temple should change. What I am saying is that there are times when a space for accounts of honest experience and a space free from prejudice will be mutually exclusive. People who need a therapist will post in the Temple about the issues for which they need therapy. People who have problems and unconscious assumptions bound up in problematic language about sex and race and gender and sexual orientation will post in the Temple. People with unexamined beliefs and assumptions will come there in droves. That's what many people who come to temples come there to do - they're lost, frightened, assailed by nightmares, in need of guidance, in need of company or acceptance or confession or forgiveness. We will have a problem with some of the things they might say, but to expect otherwise in a place that deals with faith, magic and mysticism, bodywork, and applied psychology is insane.

The Temple will always be problematic on Barbelith. Mistakes will be made. Some people who are asked to leave will get hurt. Some people who we would want to stay will get hurt and may leave because of it. The people who want to stay and care about it will get hurt time and time and time again.

I'm interested in discussing any ways in which we can make this reality easier for people who feel regularly hurt or angered by it, and any protocols we can put in place for helping the situation. I don't have any answers myself just yet but I'll think about it.
 
 
Seth
23:13 / 25.09.07
I'll add that not everyone who posts clearly prejudicial material is seeking assistance and that being gentle with those people isn't going to work well. There are all sorts of people who will post there for all sorts of reasons. Darkmatter almost certainly wouldn't have gained anything from it, they seemed to want to talk at us and weren't interested in what anyone had to say in response. Is there any other way to proceed but a case by case basis?
 
 
HCE
05:52 / 26.09.07
An honest account of one's experience may have to include those elements, and if someone is asking for help in processing and dealing with their experience then we are going to encounter those elements.

This bit stuck out for me. I remember you talking about this process, and talking about your fears and uncertainties. I think what you identify, above, as "asking for help" was a key factor in your posts striking me, personally, as not offensive but in fact rather brave and lovely. It wasn't that they fit some kind of hippie feel-good blueprint, it was that there was some acknowledgment that the subject matter was a source of distress for you. You weren't talking about those things to help everybody else expand their reality etc., you were talking about a set of experiences that were difficult for you, and asking for help. But that, too, can be a problem -- Barbelith is not anybody's blog, and I don't think it should try to be. What you did (as I recall, and my memory may not be accurate) was try to examine some of your views, try to understand what was wrong with them and why you held them anyway. Analysis of what's wrong with racist or other problematic notions is something that Barbelith's rather good at, but what happens less often is examination of what kinds of circumstances lead good people to think and do bad things. There are some people here* who are quite good at that, and although I am not one of them, I admire their compassion and would like to give them the room they need to operate. It would be great if we could work out a way to do that which doesn't tax others, such as those who may have been subjected to abuse, unduly.

*I am thinking of you, actually, as well as alas, Illmatic (roy medallion), and id_entity (I think currently zippy cavanaugh).
 
 
HCE
05:54 / 26.09.07
they're lost, frightened, assailed by nightmares, in need of guidance, in need of company or acceptance or confession or forgiveness

Also want to point out that this is everybody, at some point, not just people in the Temple.
 
 
Olulabelle
08:49 / 26.09.07
I completely agree about Seth's posts - the point about them was that they were trying to identify and understand what the feeling was, where it was coming from, confronting that feeling and thinking about how to address it. It was definitely open and honest, which is probably something that should be a defining requirement for problematic subjects.

I'm fascinated by the idea that people use internet sites as a kind of free therapy, I've never really considered it in that way before but I suppose it's very true. As such, Seth is correct that having a 'Temple' will attract people in itself who wish to talk about their deepest fears and feelings and I suppose as long as they do it in a way which people feel comfortable with, and are genuine in their apparent desire for honest discussion then that should be okay.

I do think that sometimes that kind of discussion can make other people feel very uncomfortable but I suppose they can express their views about why it makes them feel uncomfortable and that might help with the whole conversation in the long run.
 
 
illmatic
14:10 / 26.09.07
Great post Seth

How do you intend to determine whether somebody's personal experience is honest or not, and how do you support a statement about the supernatural?

I think the questions that Gourami has asked here are really important and well worth discussion – could be a thread of it’s own actually. Largely one supports – indeed generates belief - in the “supernatural” (scare quotes ‘cos not sure if I like that word) through one’s own experiences. Something occurs as a result of whatever exercise/practice that you’re doing which is sufficiently unusual or unlikely to convince you that “something’s up”. This isn’t actually the purpose of most practices, I should add, and obsessing over weird experiences to convince yourself isn’t particularly productive either.

Anyhow, one tends to defend against any scepticism or disbelief here by appeals to this experience. It’s worth noting This is an interior process as much as an external one – most practitioners experience a swinging back and forth between the two points. “I’m conning myself, ITS ALL BULLSHIT” is one end of the spectrum, with the other being a bit more like “!” (I suppose this is the theme of books like Cosmic Trigger, Wilson’s Chapel Perilous. etc)

Where this gets problematic is, in public, here someone wants to assert their experience but doesn’t wish to interrogate or question it. I would always advocate appealing to one’s experience over books – map, territory and all that, but I would also always encourage people (myself as much as anyone else) to look at their experiences critically. Is there another explanation for that? Might I be wrong? Might I just be making that shit up? Does that explanation contain any loaded or unlikely assumptions? I think it’s this kind of flexibility that is a sign of a good magician or an honest practitioner (depending on which word you prefer) – can I open up very personal and cherished beliefs and experiences to critique? Most of the people I rate posting here have this kind of openness and understanding of alternative explanations for their experience and able to hold these kind of conversations without feeling a rigid need to defend themselves. I’m well aware of the alternative explanations for things that have occurred with my own practice though I carry on regardless. I don’t regard these explanations as the “best fit” from where I’m standing but well…. maybe. What we saw with the Ultraculture situation is people wishing to assert their own truth as an absolute that trumps everyone else’s with no willingness and openness to interrogate this.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:33 / 26.09.07
What happens when somebody feels they are giving an honest description of something they believe has happened to them, and it just so happens it involves what sounds rather like female beings of color being sexualized in an unpleasantly familiar way?

I personally thought the way people reacted to Moneyshot's descriptions of working with the Orixa Oshun in that thread was totally out of order. He was describing visionary encounters with the African Goddess of Sexuality, and I had no problems whatsoever with his descriptions of how this deity appeared to him containing sexualised imagery - even totally exaggerated sexuality - because, she's the Goddess of Sexuality! She will appear like that. She will present herself as something from your most intimate sexual fantasies, as this is her Mystery, that's what she is concerned with. That is what she looks like, or can look like, if she so chooses to.

Given the pages and pages of lengthy and fascinating insights into his visionary practice that Moneyshot had previously contributed to the Temple, I felt that there was an abundance of supportive material for understanding the context in which these visions had taken place, and it certainly passed my criteria of an honest account. I found it annoying how people leapt up and engaged with his descriptions of his visionary encounters with the living African personification of love, pleasure, sexuality and joy, as if he was describing some random girl he fancied on the tube and attributing this exaggerated sexuality to her. It's not the same thing. Deities will tend to appear as an exaggerated version of what they represent, hence Ogun or Thor will tend to appear as huge muscle-bound guys who couldn't possibly exist in real life (outside of the WWE). Hence, deities like Oshun, Aphrodite, and Erzulie Freda will generally present in highly sexualised forms.

I'm curious to hear how we'll distinguish between honest and dishonest, and supported and unsupported.

Honest: So I've been working with the A.'.A.'. system for the last couple of years, working through the grades on my own terms and trying understand what these things actually mean. So far I've got as far as this grade, and this is what I've learned from my experiences trying to get to grips with this material.

Dubious: So I was playing Halo 3 on my playstation at the weekend and got my highest score ever, and it was 3 in the morning and I'd been smoking loads of weed and for a split second I thought I saw something on the screen that said "ipsi". I spoke to my mate greg who has read some books on magic and he reckoned it was the voice of crowley possessing my TV and giving me the grade of Ipssisimus. Then when I put the telly back on the next day there was a bald guy on a show who said "greg", and that totally proved it. It's now my mission to lead a crack team of astral revolutionaries to bring about the supercontext by playing Halo 3 and sexing me.

Supported: I think there is an argument for looking at this deity from this perspective, because I had these experiences and this is what I took from them. This is all just my own personal gnosis, but I've looked at these academic accounts here and here, which seems to suggest something similar going on to what I've experienced myself. I've been working from this perspective for a few months and it really seems to be leading to some interesting places.

Unsupported: Diety X hates the (insert minority group here). He wants to kill them and he has appointed me as his top boy on this planet. Also, he is actually a space alien and also from Atlantis, which is where I come from in a past life. In the future, I am a ninja who will travel back to the 10th century and invent tarot cards after having a sword fight with the reptilian who will later be Aleister Crowley.

This is all I'm on about really. Just some basic guidelines as to what is considered a useful contribution to the temple. Is that too much to ask for? We're never going to hammer out a set of rules that will apply to all situations, but that's not really what I think we should be aiming for here.
 
 
*
14:57 / 26.09.07
While it often happens exactly that way, I think the details we find really amusing/offensive in these examples might distract from their crucial differences.

Yay:

I don't know too much about Orisha, but I practiced this for a few months and these unexpected results happened, which I don't expect anyone to draw any sweeping conclusions from. I've read these two books, one of which says this thing about Ogun and the other seems to say something different. I've got this idea that might work out to balance the two perspectives but first I want to hear if Author Y is generally thought to be a relatively solid source.

Nay:

I know lots about the Orisha. I practiced this ritual for a few weeks and came to the conclusion that Ogun is actually identical with some Loa not otherwise known to be connected. This is a deep inner secret and that's why it's not in any of the books or what your teachers told you. And it explains this cultural phenomenon that I'd like to theorize about, the reality of which is proven by the fact that Ogun is identical with this Loa over here.

The latter is a closed system, not open to feedback from other sources—books, people with more (or just different) experience, change in one's own experiences, anyone disagreeing with the "deep inner secret". It then attempts to draw conclusions about things outside the closed system of itself, and makes a closed loop around that—"My UPG is born out by some cultural phenomenon, and the fact that the phenomenon exists is born out by my UPG." Any or all of the insights derived from the closed process may be true or useful, but there is no way of knowing and no way to change if need be.

The former is informed and in dialogue with stuff outside itself. It's an open system receiving new information from books, from other people, from changing experiences, and checking the validity of outside information against other outside information, not just against internally generated thoughts.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:59 / 26.09.07
I personally thought the way people reacted to Moneyshot's descriptions of working with the Orixa Oshun in that thread was totally out of order. [and following]

I'm pretty disappointed by this. "Out of order" suggests to me that the interrogation of Moneyshot's posts in the thread in question should not have taken place. To my mind that is quite far away from the balance we need to strike between encouraging people to describe their own experiences and allowing other people to respond to those descriptions critically (the other extreme would be to sanction people to just tear into posts of that kind with "you just imagined it", etc).

Surely "But she actually is the African Goddess of Sexuality!" on its own is going to cut it as a defence about as much as "But Leviticus actually is the revealed Word of God!". The closest I can come to being sympathetic to this point of view is to ask whether it would have made a difference if the people who raised objections that had a political dimension had been people with more direct or secondary knowledge of the Orixa Oshun.

I also think you're missing the point if you think that it makes any difference whether he was talking about a random girl on the Tube or not. If people feel that someone's posts contain what sounds rather like female beings of color being sexualized in an unpleasantly familiar way, they have a right to at the very least question that, no matter what the reference point. Without that right, Barbelith is not going to be a place where women of colour feel welcome, which matters more to me, personally, than whether people who've had spiritual experiences that involve sexualised female beings of colour feel welcome here.

(Didn't Moneyshot recant some of the things he said during that thread, or am I thinking of a different discussion? Will check...)
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
15:10 / 26.09.07
Actually scratch that, I am thinking of something else. But having gone back and re-read the relevant discussion, I'm even more saddened that you still think it was "out of order", when myself and several other posters presented our concerns in as non-combative a manner as possible.
 
 
Char Aina
15:12 / 26.09.07
Agreed.
You should be free to criticise someone's attitude to these things wether or not you are well versed in their specific doctrine.
I think it's important to tread carefully when criticising a tradition you are not familiar with, in case your objection is purely a product of misunderstanding, but being free to object to that sort of shit should be part of the temple's culture.

To interrogate is not necessarily to persecute.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:40 / 26.09.07
I just don't understand how you can make a valid criticism of someone describing their subjective visionary experience of the personification of sexuality in a sexualised way?
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
16:41 / 26.09.07
"Out of order" was too strong, sorry. Reading over the thread again, rather than my memory of it, I don't have any problem with this criticism of moneyshot's particular use of language being made and I agree that people who feel uncomfortable with it should have the right to do so. If I were describing a similar experience that arose out of the same circumstances, I might be a bit more circumspect in the language that I used to describe it on barbelith.

However, my point is that if someone is working within an African Diaspora tradition and has a vision of deity associated with sexuality that appears very much like common sexualised representations of that deity within that tradition, and then describes that appearance as such, there is a context for both the ethnicity and the sexualised nature of the description being given. It's not happening in a vacuum. I didn't feel this was really being taken into account in the criticisms in that thread.
 
 
HCE
16:42 / 26.09.07
Just a brief note to illmatic/roy about the use of the word supernatural - it is my understanding that there is a spectrum of belief among members of this board, and while some people are comfortable with describing their beliefs as encompassing deities or gods, others are not, and believe in something less personified and more ambient. I can see how it might sound dismissive, though. I apologize for a poor word choice and welcome alternative suggestions.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
16:46 / 26.09.07
Also, can we please modify to delete the link that Petey just posted to the thread in question ASAP?
 
 
HCE
16:54 / 26.09.07
Looking over Gypsy Lantern's sample posts, I find I'm back where I was when we were talking about guidelines in the thread Tryphena started. The difference in those posts is obvious to me, and I have no idea how I'd convince somebody who didn't get it already why the first one sounds fine and the second doesn't.
 
 
illmatic
21:06 / 26.09.07
I can see how it might sound dismissive, though. I apologize for a poor word choice and welcome alternative suggestions.

No, that's okay. I didn't read it as dismissive, don't worry. It's a personal quirk to me, dislike of that word, I think. I don't see what-falls-under-the-banner-of-magic-etcetc as outside and separate to the natural world, that's all. More the opposite.
 
 
Tsuga
21:41 / 26.09.07
Roy Medallion: people wishing to assert their own truth as an absolute that trumps everyone else’s with no willingness and openness to interrogate this.

This is so true, and a problem everywhere, not just the Temple. I think it's probably at the root of most conflicts.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:03 / 26.09.07
What is up with that thread? Between the asterisks all over the place and this rather odd request to remove a link to it, I have no idea what the big mystery is.

What I am clear on, however, is that what is at issue in that thread is not the reality of the experience, and that Gypsy Lantern's description of what he felt was out of order did not, as he has subsequently agreed, actually happen.

However, we learned from that thread that if one takes a lot of mind-bending porridge and then encounters sex pixies in the form of Bratz, that experience will be respected. However, we also learned that such experience does not entitle one to absolute freedon to say what one wants without one's language being called into question. Gourami put it perfectly well at the time, I think:

Just to touch briefly on one aspect of the "dusky, super exotic, smoky Empress" -- Moneyshot objects to the issue taken with his terminology here by countering that said Empress was in fact dusky and super exotic. The problem with this isn't that it's not an accurate depiction of his experience, it's that there are many words for describing skin color, and no two have precisely the same tone, if you will. Particularly when they appear in the part of a story in which a group of feminine entities of color are tending to the whims of a man, you know, dusky/exotic is kind of pushing it.

It took a while, but I think we all reached a broad agreement there.
 
 
ghadis
23:21 / 26.09.07
However, we learned from that thread that if one takes a lot of mind-bending porridge and then encounters angels in the form of Bratz, that experience will be respected.

By Bratz i assume you mean well,Bratz.

Thats kind of taking the piss a bit much don't you think Haus? That thread is huge and facinating and obviously comes from MSs experience and parts of that experience as he translated it to Barbelith came under questioning and i can't see any problem with that. Also not sure about the rush to see the link deleted by Gypsy Lantern to be honest. But to ridicule that posters thread and ideas and beliefs by equating it with toys and crazy porridge. Its a fine line i guess between treating someone with respect and tarring them with the crazy porridge brush.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
23:29 / 26.09.07
Still unsure about the link deletion. Has the thread been deleted? If not, and it's something to be avoided, then maybe it should be. But I'm a little wary of people discussing something they don't want to actually be looked at, especially given that even when a thread IS deleted we're always told "it'll still be there to read for future reference".

I'm not a Temple mod, though, so I'll butt out now, but it seems a strange attitude to take.
 
 
ghadis
23:38 / 26.09.07
I don't think the thread has been deleted. I also don't see any reason why it should be. I think its a fantastic thread. Like i said, not sure why GL requested the link to be struck out of this thread.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:06 / 27.09.07
Thats kind of taking the piss a bit much don't you think Haus?

I don't quite understand, ghadis. Do you think I was showing a lack of respect by mentioning the Bratz?

But to ridicule that posters thread and ideas and beliefs by equating it with toys

You may not recall, and I believe that the image link no longer works, but Money $hot likened the faerie seductresses he encountered to the Bratz:

'Twas back in the OT that I mentioned the elven beauties, little pixie princesses that arrived to attend to my every whim, playing and flirting and being generally very saucy...

Incidentally, for a good idea of what these wee darlings looked like, here is a fairly close, though not perfect approximation:

[Picture of the Bratz - this is now down, but the URL - "http://www.bratz.ru/img/girls.gif" - should give you an idea of its content]

Ahhh, ain't they cute? The visionary ones were a bit less caucasian, more ethnically diverse, but basically close enough.

So, after the initial encounter with the gang, the next work I attended one of these little sauce-pots singled out of the crowd, a dusky, super exotic, smoky Empress, and basically seduced me there and then.


Another hint as to this content is provided by Dead Megatron, underneath, identifying some other sexy teenaged cartoon ladies he would like to be loved up by. So, no, I don't think a clear recollection of the thread would condemn me there. The thread also talks quite a lot about the consumption of a magical porridge, which appears to have some form of psychedelic effect. I believe that he was also performing the trabalhos in the context of which this broth was being taken quite regularly, and more frequently than one would normally expect - that is, that he was eating a lot of the porridge. The sighting of the Bratz-resembling pixies took place, as far as I understand it, after the consumption of said porridge. So, I don't see where you think the piss is being taken.

My point, rather, is that the subjective reality of that experience, no matter how unusual it is to be visited by sex pixies in the form of Bratz, was not the real issue there - what was was the particular choice of words, as they neither described an objective reality (blue, brick, wooden) or formed an objective description of reality-as-experienced-by-Money-$hot.
 
 
ghadis
00:42 / 27.09.07
Ah, sorry about that Haus. Really should have re-read far more of the thread than i did before posting. I can't remember the Bratz thing the first time round and didn't get to it tonight. In my defence....Well i don't have much defence to be honest. A knee jerk reaction to a post followed with a lame bit of research into a thread to back up an idea that was formulating in my head about what you'd posted which i'd had a problem with but wasn't grounded in anyway what you meant at all. Shouldn't post in Policy when drunk. Also shouldn't post anywhere without checking all available facts in threads. These are all notes to self! Apologies again Haus!!
 
 
ghadis
02:03 / 27.09.07
However, we learned from that thread that if one takes a lot of mind-bending porridge and then encounters angels in the form of Bratz, that experience will be respected.

Sorry, its been playing on my mind a bit, but i'm still not sure what you mean by this Haus.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
05:24 / 27.09.07
There's an edit in line to expand. Essentially, it means pretty much what it says; Money $hot's experience was taken seriously, his right to represent it as reality very much likewise. The issue was specifically, I think, the words he was using to describe it, which was not a function of cynicism but, if anything, of idealism.
 
 
ghadis
07:31 / 27.09.07
Ok. It all seems a bit clearer this morning. Bit muddled in my thinking last night.
 
 
Seth
08:26 / 27.09.07
It's very important to write up accounts of what you've experienced in dream of visionary states in the words that feel right to you when you're writing it, no matter how problematic other people will find it. That's a private journalling discipline and should only rarely be for public consumption. It's just good journalling technique - you need to suspend as much after the fact value judgement of the experience as you can for the first account. I think Money Shot's problem, which is a problem thast we'll always face in the Temple, is that he opened this initial stage of journalling open to people to read here rather than a second self-assessed and partially analysed version (more good journalling technqiue).

Everyone had every right ask him everything they did, and it's also understandable that people acted as though the questions were unfair. The words used to describe the experience are problematic, but dream journals/accounts of visionary experience are necessarily problematic documents that need to be true to your associations and unconscious assumptions. They're very rarely opened up in such detail to be read, and chances are you'll get people who've kept this kind of journal feeling defensive for the person giving the account because they're doing what they should be doing, writing it all out in the words that most accurately captured the experience for them at the time. Note the distinction: at the time. You don't use a dictionary or thesaurus when writing your first account. You use the words that feel right at the time that you write the account, which should be as close in time to the experience as possible.

The accounts shouldn't have been made public in the form that they were, essentially. Money Shot came to agree that they shouldn't have been made public. Again: Barbelith isn't really set up for open, honest accounts of this kind of experience. People won't necessarily frame things in a way it clear that it is first draft journalling, they might post these accounts without specifically asking for assistance with intepretation or processing it. People don't, as a general rule, communicate in ways that are easy to understand or are well thought through. And people will offer opinions that are bang on the money in some areas of the board but potentially a world away from what is required when dealing with this kind of account in the Temple. These type of accounts require someone skilled in dream analysis and other skills from a skill set that could broadly be described as therapeutic, a role that some here have openly renounced (it's not incumbent upon us to be...). Because the account is posted to the board everyone has the capability to reply, and suddenly something a lot more vulnerable than you might assume get's subjected to an opinion free-for-all, no matter how well it's intentioned.

I wouldn't want anyone posting first draft accounts of their visionary experience on Barbelith. It's not the place for it, it doesn't deal with it very well, because we're not a board of therapists. I would strongly advise anyone to refrain from posting accounts of such experience here until you're absolutely sure that you can account for all the elements and have already fully worked it through.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
10:25 / 27.09.07
Thanks Seth, that more or less sums up exactly what was making me a bit uncomfortable with the progression of that particular thread, and the debate that emerged out of it.

After a proper re-read, I agree that it was the specific language being used by moneyshot in his description of his experiences that came under fire, and I don't have a problem with that. As pointed out above, "there are many words for describing skin color, and no two have precisely the same tone." A better choice of language could have conveyed the essence of the visionary experience a bit less "luridly" and that would have avoided this whole episode.

I think the problem, as Seth points out, is that it was very much - right from the start - first draft journaling of some hugely personal and fairly non-ordinary experiences, made public. I thought it was a fascinating and really valuable thread because of that, as you don't often get such an honest and open insight into someone's intense practice laid out before you in that manner. But it was problematic, for barbelith, because you end up with the sort of situation that took place - where what is obviously someone's raw and open attempt to process their experience by putting it into words, gets subjected to a mode of analysis that in other contexts is certainly one of barbelith's strengths. But in the context of that thread, felt a bit invasive and heavy-handed. I felt at the time that the critique of moneyshot's use of language in the context of this thread was a bit misjudged and inappropriate, but really, it was more a case that the whole first draft confessional account itself was somewhat misjudged and inappropriate for the forum and hence automatically led to these problems. I think Moneyshot would be the first to agree with this assessment, given his requests that the thread be deleted.

Ultimately, when contributing to the temple, I think you need to find a balance where you can talk honestly and openly about whatever you wish to communicate, but you make sure that you do so in a form that is suitable for the modes of analysis that it is likely to encounter in this space. I think it's important that we have this conversation and try to thrash some of this out, to whatever extent is possible, because I see it being quite central to a lot of the problems we have in the temple. I find myself in this sort of situation in the temple all the time, usually in the interlocutor role. People turn up and rattle off some unconsidered or unsubstantiated statements about magic, and then go on the defensive when these statements are interrogated and picked apart.

Perhaps some of this friction could be lessened by trying to be a bit more upfront about the sort of space Barbelith Temple generally is, and the sort of critique you should reasonably expect when contributing something to the board. If we were a little clearer about that, then we might be able to avoid the familiar situation of potentially valuable contributors storming away from the board in indignation when their posts receive more critique than they were expecting. If you look at virtually any other occult discussion forum (and I wouldn't really recommend it...), there is a marked difference to the culture of critique and analysis that you might encounter in the temple, and there's no reason to assume that new members will automatically get that without it being more visibly sign-posted in some way.

I think a bit more transparency about the sort of space we have here would also help resolve the issue of "difficult" posters like darkmatter, and the phenomenon that has come to be known as "fnording." There would be less recourse to the defense that these posters are somehow unaware of the standard of debate that they are expected to adhere to, and hence that they are not intentionally trolling the board, if we were a little clearer about some of the ideals and expectations of the forum. How to go about communicating this more effectively is a whole other question though.

Thoughts?
 
 
Saturn's nod
11:19 / 27.09.07
How to go about communicating this more effectively is a whole other question though.

I think you've got a good point about what the rarity is, GL: it's been rare in my experience so far to find any other discussion of magickal things which isn't biased towards enabling all kinds of insanity and abuse. Lots of people do turn up here expecting to be indulged in that way. A self-aware stance against misogyny, homophobia, racism, and so on is at odds with uncritical enabling as the default attitude.

The critical engagement style could be stated explicitly in the FAQ for Temple to reflect the Temple's difference in that regard. I think the Temple History, identity and standards could do with an update as well.
 
 
Quantum
13:43 / 27.09.07
How to go about communicating this more effectively is a whole other question though.

I think we should start a thread called WELCOME TO THE TEMPLE laying out what we want to tell new posters, and bump it as necessary.
That way it's more likely to be read, but I agree with apt that we should change the wiki too, and we should probably duplicate what we put there in the WELCOME thread.
 
 
illmatic
14:18 / 27.09.07
It's possible that some of these things could be dealt with in the board general terms and conditions, should anyone ever get round to drafting it.

Sorry this is so sparse as to be almost unhelpful. I just don't have the time at present to contribute to these discussions (one of the reasons I'm no longer modding).
 
 
HCE
14:24 / 27.09.07
I'm trying to work through what Seth describes as Barbelith not being set up for open, honest accounts of this kind of experience and what GL a little more guardedly describes as the need to present raw experiences in a form that is suitable for the modes of analysis that it is likely to encounter in this space.

The undercurrent of these posts seems to me to be that there is a desire (and this coming from two people whose posts are referred to by others as models of thoughtfulness, clarity, and honesty) for the Temple to be more open to other modes of analysis, to be set up in a way that accommodates such therapeutic discussion.

I think this desire is not unique to the Temple. Many of us have had very intense, moving, raw experiences -- see the discussion around creating a new forum to talk about sex. While my own have centered around grief, abuse, and love rather than the types of experiences reported in the Temple, the descriptions are not all that dissimilar. There is often a keen desire to communicate with other people about this, but here, on Barbelith, any such communication is going to be limited by a number of things.

First, it has to be done in text. Barbelith does not support video or audio posts. In text, it is especially difficult to accurately convey the intended tone.

Second, once it's posted, it's posted. Anybody can read it, and however much we might hope for ideally sympathetic readers, we're not going to get them. This is not because people are all assholes, but because of the variety of human experience. Some people will be more sensitive to certain modes of expression than others, but we each have something we're touchy about.

For those reasons alone, and none of them specific to Barbelith, the Temple cannot become a uniquely therapeutic space any more than any message board, or indeed the rest of this one, can.

There is a third thing, but I am already late for class. Gah. Sorry for leaving half a post.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 2021222324(25)2627282930... 35

 
  
Add Your Reply