|
|
while dialogue is ugly and of no real use (as has been said) i dont get the hate.
the hate is yours to have, but what gives, man?
if i say 'its a big ask', you know what i mean, right?
ad i say 'diarise', you know what i mean, right? and even if i say something as clearly symptomatic of an addled mind as 'let's dialogue', you know what i mean, right?
so if, as i believe, language is about communication rather than accurately following rules, what is the problem?
is language not about comunication?
or perhps you really don't get what people mean when they use the verb 'to party'?
i like the flexibilty of language, so that may influence my feelings on the matter. i feel it is a tool, and as such to be upgraded or switched as the task dictates.
history would seem to support my feelings, that language is an evolving thing with changing rules to suit changing people and times.
it sems to me like some people approach language with ana attitude akin to that of a miser; protecting teh valueabl asset to the detriment of the purpose of having it.
my opinion?
it might be an idea to chill the fuck out on this shit, especially if you seek continued interlocution with members of the human race.
sorry to criticise ager, but it has been pissing me off for a while.
apologies for the swears.
i still love you. |
|
|