|
|
Anyway, the thing I did object to in this episode was: since when has Captain Jack Harkness been the kind of guy who cares if his friends change their sex/gender? I mean, I know he's supposed to have a wicked sense of humour, i.e. he wouldn't be above playing such a story for laughs, but still, "and suddenly we're supposed to start calling him Vanessa" [italics mine]? Isn't that exactly the kind of outdated 20th century attitude that Jack's supposed to be beyond?
Precisely what i was going to say, except expressed better. It would have made some sense if Jack was actually supposed to be the arrogant, authoritarian, sleazy, worst-aspects-of-Americanism bigot he comes across as, but when introduced he was meant to be Sexually Liberated HyperDude From-The-Future - hell, he's probably had relationships with beings whose gender setups are utterly different from our own...
If the makers of Torchwood wanted to portray Jack like this, it would have better if they made him a different character altogether than the Jack introduced in Doctor Who - as it is, it just makes the viewpoint of the programme itself come across as nasty, narrow-minded and transphobic...
Without that line, IMO, this episode would have been easily the best of Torchwood so far. Very Whedon-angsty, but at least (for once) emotionally convincing (well, apart from the just-very-bizarre Gwen/Owen flirting), and part of me (albeit a very shallow part of me) is pleased that both this and the last episode have made by far the most attractive character (IMO) also by far the most likeable...
(tho, i suppose, the attractiveness choices for me between recurring characters are limited to 2, and Gwen really isn't my type...)
Got to say tho i don't think the message actually was that futility and sickness at the world makes you gay, so much as that futility etc. makes you fall too easily into any exciting-yet-comforting relationship, especially one outside the circle in which you feel futile...
Queer sex stuff (especially f/f sex stuff) moves me and allows me to identify with it far more than straight sex stuff ever could. Even though i'm (as far as i'm capable of telling) "straight". Hmmm... |
|
|