BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Feminism 101

 
  

Page: 1 ... 2223242526(27)2829303132... 34

 
 
Ticker
14:23 / 15.05.07
thanks for the info Ex.

should we take it to HS as a discussion around porn/sexuality in current Feminism?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:41 / 16.05.07
I would definately read a thread like that with interest. Can't guarantee I'd have anything coherent to add, mind.


Meanwhile...

Don't want to be harassed? Stop acting like a man

From the article: "Women who display what many regard as traditional male traits - such as assertiveness, independence and ambition - are more often the targets of sexual harassment than "feminine" women, the Canadian research has found. The situation is worst in workplaces dominated by men, where women with so-called masculine personalities - described in the study as "uppity" - suffered more than twice the harassment of other women."

Hah! I could've told them that. Wouldn't characterise myself as an "alpha female" in the sense that the article uses, but I find my butchness and ambiguity has got me into a lot of trouble over the years. One of the commonest sanctions applied by the gender police (thankyou, XK/BiHB) is sexual harrassment. Putting you back in your place by reminding you--forcibly--that you are female-bodied. Reporting the harrassment is of course a nonstarter if you have 'masculine' traits, because of course Everyone Knows that only conventionally attractive women get sexually harrassed.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:22 / 16.05.07
PS: I also have a rather vague sort of question or mash of related questions about all-female spaces, and since I'm not sure where to put them I thought I'd put them here.

I'm reflecting on all-female BDSM spaces in particular. See, I want to re-engage with the BDSM world but I have certain anxieties and reservations, some of which would be allayed by being in a female-only space. However...

I tend to read a single-gender BDSM space as "queer," and thus would feel hugely, immoderately uncomfortable about horning in on that. So I guess my question is, is it really okay for me to invade a female/queer space when I'm not going to be participating in play (thus rendering myself less vulnerable and exposed than those who are), and will be to be taking myself back to Hetsville at the end of the evening?
 
 
Ticker
13:26 / 16.05.07
I tend to read a single-gender BDSM space as "queer," and thus would feel hugely, immoderately uncomfortable about horning in on that. So I guess my question is, is it really okay for me to invade a female/queer space when I'm not going to be participating in play (thus rendering myself less vulnerable and exposed than those who are), and will be to be taking myself back to Hetsville at the end of the evening?

Well I think it depends on the specific space. In Jan I was directed to a Women's inclusive (transwomen invited too) play party. It was set up that all women of all sexual interests were welcome. Some women engaged with each other to talk others to play and while the play wasn't my flavor it was a really comfortable space for everyone involved.

I'd say most female id only spaces are not strictly non hetero unless they say so specifically.

As for the less vulnerable/exposed I suspect you could end up in a few conversations that bared parts of yourself just as readily as the next woman if you elected to.
 
 
Ticker
13:40 / 16.05.07
"These results highlight the double bind faced by women who are dismissed and disrespected if feminine but scorned and disliked if masculine, limiting their ascent up the organisational ladder," Dr Berdahl said.

STRONG TRUTH.

I sometimes ride the Alpha train and yes 'bitch' is a fast tag slapped on a female who is willing and capable of management and aggressive decision making styles.

In society if I present butch I get nasty comments and disrespectful treatement from both males and females because I'm seen as a freak. If I present femme I get nasty comments and disrespectful treatment because I'm a woman. Six of one half dozen of the other some days... and with both I've felt the undercurrent threat of physical violence and experienced outright verbal attacks.

I find if I switch back and forth in a work environment it confuses the hell out of people until they usually get over it. Overalls and boots one day, heels and silk the next and you can hear their mental gears grinding.

Strangely enough being visibly tattoo'd seems to make it easier for some people who seem to gender me 'alternative' rather than butch or femme. They begin to expect me to look and behave differently. Shocked the hell out of some people when I got married, which was quite amusing.
 
 
Ex
14:10 / 16.05.07
Talks to Strangers, I second Bold in her Breeches - check any entry requirements, or contact the organiser, and they'll usually be quite explicit about who they do or don't want.

On the plus side, and to generalise hugely, the ebb and flow of political and cultural phenomena and debate mean that I don't think there are many lesbian-feminist-seperatist bdsm clubs. Lesbian-seperatist events are often informed by an understanding of oppression that sits ill with consenting ladies poking each other with sticks.

That's in terms of explicit exclusion - but I see there would be more at stake in terms of how you'd be treated at such an event, and whether you'd feel comfortable going.
For the former, nobody can guarantee that someone won't be a nob to you because you're returning to hetland. I think your best backup might be the entrance policy and any behaviour policy stuff they provide - if you can say, well, sorry you don't want me here but I checked and this is the kind of mixed, diverse and welcoming place the organisers want. Some places have dungeon monitors if you get harassed. (I know things are a lot more subtle than that, usually, and you don't want to be somewhere making people uncomfortable and being made uncomfortable in turn.)

For the latter, I'm writing as a bi queer type and thus have similar feelings about frequenting queer space, and returning to my cottage at Hetsville city limits. All I can offer is that the entry policy is what the organisers want to create, so if they want it to include het people, then you're explicitly welcome. Also, Hetsville is not the shiniest of places - it carries certain privileges but it also extracts tolls, and a lot of organisers and frequenters of women's space understand that. Straight privilege is something I keep returning to as a concept, and possibly it's my own location that makes me read it as a quite complex, quite localised, not monolithic (but not less powerful, for that). I can only add that on the board, you seem to wear your awareness of your own situation(s) thoroughly and lightly.

And in terms of exposure - it's tricky, but not everyone plays every night, and everyone has there reasons for that. And those people playing don't expect a kind of blanket-applied equality on participation, usually (for one thing, there are often queues for any equipment).
Any decent space and attendees will recognise that for some women, being there took all the guts they could summon, while for others it won't be a good night out unless they get forcefed liquorice shoelaces by an off-duty District Nurse.
 
 
Ticker
14:25 / 16.05.07
Many of the spaces are also designed to function primarily as safe spaces for women. The sexy sex part maybe the motivating factor for a lot of the people attending but that can manifest as a chance to talk shop or show off your new outfit or rope skillz.

Not every interaction has to be a sexually motivated one in these spaces but one should be comfortable with other people doing 'stuff' over there (I'm stating this more for the home audience than TTS, btw).

I often tend to make nice new friends who I later bump into at artshows this way, for example.
 
 
Ex
15:06 / 16.05.07
And if it wasn't for Lash for Lasses I'd not see half so much of mater.
 
 
Papess
15:17 / 16.05.07
Sorry to interrupt the flow of conversation, but I have a question rgarding misogyny: Is self-hatred a form of misogyny for a woman?

Please be gentle in your responses, as I am feeling incredibly vulnerable, and at a really weird crossroad in my head on this matter, which, I have been trying to work through.
 
 
Seth
15:57 / 16.05.07
Is self-hatred a form of misogyny for a woman?

I don't think it has to be that in all instances, although I can see a manner of thinking whereby that could be part of it. There have been times when I've hated aspects of myself (at this time of my life in particular), and sometimes those parts have a lot to do with a notion of maleness that I've helped myself construct throughout my life. I would be surprised if the same weren't true for a woman, but perhaps labelling it misogyny might not be helpful when it comes to processing it all and dealing with it. I usually find things get easier to manage if I can break things down into the specifics of what I'm actually thinking and feeling rather than using a broad label. It makes it easier to accept myself for who I am, warts and all, and then that makes change easier, because you're no longer fighting yourself and beating yourself up over things.

Although *easier* might not be a helpful word in this context, as it can still be really fucking hard.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
15:58 / 16.05.07
Is self-hatred a form of misogyny for a woman?

That's an extremely complicated question and actually can only be answered on an individual basis. You probably have to begin with defining what misogyny is, consider the implications in terms of the hate and how it presents itself. If I had to guess I would say no, very few people engage in self-hatred because they are female. Why do you ask?
 
 
Ticker
15:59 / 16.05.07
Is self-hatred a form of misogyny for a woman

I think it depnds on what form the self hatred is taking. For example if one was to hate herself for reasons inherent in society's gender roles ( passive, weak, stupid, sexual standards etc) rather than reasons grounded in unique experience, then yes.

So I'd phrase it that cultural misogyny can imprint on a person and cause her to hate herself for exhibiting those traits or behaviors she's been taught to devalue.

does that make sense?
 
 
This Sunday
16:22 / 16.05.07
I'd say it can be. The hate part has to be focused on, or gaining impetus from, the factor of being a woman, but it does happen. A friend of mine who went through a prolonged period of punctuations of misandry (she'd done a lot of violent/rough porn when she was younger, and came out of it with a lot of issues), to the point where a week might go by where I was the only guy she'd be willing to talk to outside of a work-necessity, and then she'd have to put on a facade of addressing me in female pronouns and making general (angry, bitter, et al) comments about men without including me in the commentary. She just recently, while dealing with the after-effects of surviving a bad bout with cervical cancer, developed the notion that it was being a woman that had resulted her being 'weak' and 'stupid' (she's not either, at all, really) and able to be debilitated by cancer or emotionally distressed/confused by porn shoots. She has imaginary facts to back it up and everything.

It doesn't have to be, though. I'm relatively sure women can hate themselves without it being tied to gender/sex. I'm also relatively sure that without a proper measuring tool, looking at self-hate/loathing as optimistically as possible, as not an end in itself, but a process or simply a punctuation, means recognizing the why and what is a good thing, no matter what those turn out to be.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
18:08 / 16.05.07
I see there would be more at stake in terms of how you'd be treated at such an event, and whether you'd feel comfortable going. For the former, nobody can guarantee that someone won't be a nob to you because you're returning to hetland.

I should be very clear that my principle concern isn't a fear that people will be meeeeen to me, and much more that I would be making the space feel less safe for people who are less privilaged than me and who need it more than I do.
 
 
Papess
18:09 / 16.05.07
Thank you for the responses so far. This question has been formulating for a few months within me. It just flooded me today when I thought that I could be acting like a misogynistic jerk to someone else. It is no wonder I have trouble dating women.


BIG TANK!: There have been times when I've hated aspects of myself (at this time of my life in particular), and sometimes those parts have a lot to do with a notion of maleness that I've helped myself construct throughout my life.

I do relate to the hating of parts of myself. I may identify on this board as female, but I feel very, very male also. That male aspect isn't all that nice. Probably because I have modelled my male aspect on images from media, or family members who were abusive or misogynistic themselves. All in all, I feel as if my "animus and anima" are having a dysfucntional relationship. It's like my alchemical marriage lead to alchemical spousal abuse, and ultimately could be a messy alchemical divorce. But, enough metaphor...

...perhaps labelling it misogyny might not be helpful when it comes to processing it all and dealing with it.

That is probably true. I have been for the past year and half trying to break unhealthy emotional patterns, and this is good example of a very destructive cycle.

bad self-image> self-loathing> self-abuse> identifying self with the abuser/jerk> part of self which identifies as victim feels angry at self> self punishes self further> bad self-image> and so on...

I usually find things get easier to manage if I can break things down into the specifics of what I'm actually thinking and feeling rather than using a broad label. It makes it easier to accept myself for who I am, warts and all, and then that makes change easier, because you're no longer fighting yourself and beating yourself up over things.

That is good advice, Seth. Thank you. I am going to do more meditation on this today.

Although *easier* might not be a helpful word in this context, as it can still be really fucking hard.

It sure is.


Anna de Logardiere: ...very few people engage in self-hatred because they are female. Why do you ask?

It is not because I am female that I am engaging in self-hatred. It is a bit more complicated than that. Let me process it a bit more so I can clearly define for you, and for myself, what exactly is going on.


Bold in Her Breeches: I think it depnds on what form the self hatred is taking. For example if one was to hate herself for reasons inherent in society's gender roles ( passive, weak, stupid, sexual standards etc) rather than reasons grounded in unique experience, then yes.

I think those two things may be hard to separate in some cases. For example: one experiences sexual abuse, and then in order to feel in control and potent, starts to identify with the male-abuser role, (because of the percieved relationship post-abuse between one's female body and victim-role) and then aims that abuse at oneself and one's own body....does that make sense. I am still processing this. As Seth said, it isn't easy

So I'd phrase it that cultural misogyny can imprint on a person and cause her to hate herself for exhibiting those traits or behaviors she's been taught to devalue.

does that make sense?


Yes, it does. I think it may relate to the example I gave you.


Decadent Nightfalling: It doesn't have to be, though. I'm relatively sure women can hate themselves without it being tied to gender/sex.

And that is a very good point!

I'm also relatively sure that without a proper measuring tool, looking at self-hate/loathing as optimistically as possible, as not an end in itself, but a process or simply a punctuation, means recognizing the why and what is a good thing, no matter what those turn out to be.

Another very good point! Dealing with destructive emotional states has been the focus of my spiritual practice, quite intensely, for the past year and a half or so. Having found that I put myself in situations that perpetuate the victim role, or hanging with people who reinforce stereotypes, or working in an industry that perpetuates those stereotypes...maybe I am just tkaing on the role of sexist, misogynistic jerk to feel in control, since it seems to me (childishly) that the manifestation of power in most societies and cultures are, well...sexist and woman-hating.
 
 
Ticker
18:37 / 16.05.07
I should be very clear that my principle concern isn't a fear that people will be meeeeen to me, and much more that I would be making the space feel less safe for people who are less privilaged than me and who need it more than I do.

Er, well that would go back to the organizers' intent regarding the creation of the space. At the last event I attended it was pretty clear the het women were supporting and holding space for all the other women there as well.

For myself I can hold space for someone who is engaging in something I don't elect to engage in and support them. If they want me to do so I am then invited to particpate in that capacity.

The next isn't directly specifically to you TTS, but more in general about navigating regulated spaces. Within the BDSM community setting boundaries is essential and is usually done in a thoughtful manner, meaning you won't be invited if the people creating the space don't want you so long as you can abide by their requested guidelines. So if you being there was in and of itself likely to oppress/restrict/repress someone they ought not be extending the invitation and most likely wouldn't. It's then up to the invited party to determine if it is appropriate for them to attend based on the guidelines.

So if you're invited to an all female id play party/space and check that het oriented is welcome, the organizers know what that means and now it's up to you to decide if you want to attend based on your personal prefs. Letting another group shape the rules of engagement is part of sharing power outside of regular formats.
 
 
Ticker
18:42 / 16.05.07
HUGGLES TO JUSTRIX!

I think those two things may be hard to separate in some cases. For example: one experiences sexual abuse, and then in order to feel in control and potent, starts to identify with the male-abuser role, (because of the percieved relationship post-abuse between one's female body and victim-role) and then aims that abuse at oneself and one's own body....does that make sense. I am still processing this.

yes it isn't a one person process though. You need external people to help you hold onto the constructs you want of yourself and the ones that were created as by-products of the abuse.
 
 
Papess
22:26 / 16.05.07
XK/BIHB: Thank you for the huggles. I huggle you back.

yes it isn't a one person process though.

So true, yet I think any type of sexism or misogyny is learned - whether from family or the rampant sexism that is simply ingrained into our culture, religion, society, and so forth.

I really appreciate all the responses from my fellow barbelithers a very difficult topic for me, regarding feminism and sexism. What I probably need is a Feminist-Therapist-Magician who is pro-sex work. Sorry to unload this here and sidetrack this thread.
 
 
*
23:24 / 16.05.07
I'm coming to the party late. Here's what I'm thinking. Some people do feel self-hatred because of one of society's isms. I sometimes feel ashamed and self-loathing because of being trans. To then turn that around and say "My God I'm a horrible transphobe" only increases the self-loathing without decreasing the ism. Not an answer.

I'll respond more later but they're throwing me out of work now.
 
 
Ticker
23:34 / 16.05.07
To then turn that around and say "My God I'm a horrible transphobe" only increases the self-loathing without decreasing the ism. Not an answer.

True but sometimes it is important to perceive the critic ranting in your head is a direct copy of an external pontif. It's sometimes not based on your own values and can be excised with work.

So in recognising the ism lodged in our noodle as not-who-I-choose-to-be* it provides a level surface to stand on to lever the brickfucker out.



*I really wanted to say not-of-the-body but figured it would be confusing. Ah well.
 
 
*
01:18 / 17.05.07
Right. Which was exactly what I was about to say when the bookkeeper pointed out that since I don't have a key to the office, I could either get out or sleep there. Sorry.

Yes, there needs to be a way to say "This is conditioning. It's not me. It is something I don't want, and it's causing me problems. It affects me even though I know myself to be a good, strong person truly devoted to equality—but by recognizing it as something outside myself that I don't want to reinforce, I can weaken it and strengthen myself."

A shorter way than all that, o'course.
 
 
Ex
07:17 / 17.05.07

I should be very clear that my principle concern isn't a fear that people will be meeeeen to me, and much more that I would be making the space feel less safe for people who are less privilaged than me and who need it more than I do.


I thought that was the case - if my response was tilted in the other direction more, it was because, being in a similar situation, I'm not in the best-advised place to speak to whether my presence has made people feel less safe and able to claim a space as their own in the past. I also feel I can't really declare 'Don't worry! Nobody will mind at all!' without looking like some kind of het-invader recruitment officer.

I can only assert things which I feel should be the case - that straight women make women's space too, and if you believe there's a need for it, they need it too.

Also, of the four or so clubs I can think of in the UK, none present themselves as exclusively about women who fancy women - more about women who want to socialise with women.

Have you considered sticking the question on a queer discussion board? (Although the former might be seen as using queer space to see if you'd bother people by being in queer space.) I'm on gingerbeer irregularly if you'd like me to post a query.
 
 
*
08:21 / 17.05.07
Talks, could this be of help? Bisexuals and straight privilege. It confronts many similar issues.
 
 
Papess
14:15 / 17.05.07
BIHB/Id Entity: Thank you both for helping me gain some perspective on this issue I am having difficulty with.

Yes, there needs to be a way to say "This is conditioning. It's not me. It is something I don't want, and it's causing me problems. It affects me even though I know myself to be a good, strong person truly devoted to equality—but by recognizing it as something outside myself that I don't want to reinforce, I can weaken it and strengthen myself."

Agreed. Well stated, Id. We not only need a way to say that, but a way to do that. I am not certain if it is all from without, but that is okay because what I do own, I can change.

I have to go weed my metaphorical garden now. However, I would like to discuss self-hatred and misogyny further. Any reccomended reading on the subject would be appreciated....if there is any.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
14:28 / 17.05.07
Justrix - I've just found a paper by two female psychologists where they propose a psychological formulation of obejctification. The abstract reads:

This article offers objectification theory as a framework for understanding the experiential consequences of being female in a culture that sexually objectifies the female body. Objectification theory posits that girls and women are typically acculturated to internalize an observer’s perspective as a primary view of their physical selves. This perspective on self can lead to habitual body monitoring, which, in turn, can increase women’s opportunities for shame and anxiety, reduce opportunities for peak motivational states, and diminish awareness of internal bodily states. Accumulations of such experiences may help account for an array of mental health risks that disproportionately affect women: unipolar depression, sexual dysfunction, and eating disorders. Objectification theory also illuminates why changes in these mental health risks appear to occur in step with life-course changes in the female body.

PM if you want the whole she-bang emailed to you. The parts I've read are very helpful for me, but it might be old news to you.
For those with access to Psychology of Women Quarterly it's here.
 
 
Ticker
15:06 / 17.05.07
Entity, that was a great link thank ya.
 
 
Papess
15:36 / 17.05.07
Wow, I must read that. Nolte, I will PM you. Thanks.
 
 
*
15:58 / 17.05.07
Ex tells me the bisexuals and straight privilege article was already linked.... oops. Sorry.
 
 
This Sunday
18:43 / 17.05.07
I knew that article had been linked somewhere on Barbelith, but I think it is a useful article. It's at least very upfront about being unable to opt out of identity politics, while expressing uncertainty about which identity (or identities) to unite or disband.

I do hope everyone finds what they're looking for (how's that for an awfully general statement), and I have to ask, for various reasons if I'm barking up the wrong tree in thinking a large number of men (at least in the States) are suffering from what I call, for lack of anything else, Little Sister Syndrome? That is, there seems to be a pervasive undercurrent of the feeling that (a) women are on some level inherently children, and (b) that child should be protected, guided, and generally denied any number of options in life because nearly every woman a guy knows on a personal level and is not actively sleeping with (although this frequently doesn't have to factor in) is in fact the little sister of all men. Collectivized by/for men as mascot/child.

This seems to be applicable a lot in my life, in terms of just watching how people behave or listening to several friends vent at any given hour, but I'm thinking maybe I'm just reading into it. Maybe it's just easy to read into. Some friends are readily agreeing with me, but very few male friends, and very few guys in general. Complicated by the fact I'm not talking about irretrievably, horribly bad people, but generally alright types who just have this one little hang-up where they've decided to be very 'don't talk to these types of men, and you don't want to have sex, you don't really have those kinds of thoughts...' and so on down the road.

Am I being overreactive or analyzing incorrectly?
 
 
Ticker
18:56 / 17.05.07
Projected infantilism is a tool of oppression when it removes the option of adult compentency and participation from any minority group. (Though warning: if you google it you'll get lot's of kinky adults in diapers)
 
 
This Sunday
20:51 / 17.05.07
I guess I'd been trying to put deliberate infantalising into a cultural/racial context a bit too much, and was hoping we weren't quite that bad off on a sex/gender front. Partly because we seem to've got past the 'gay as immature-phase' mentality ( even if anything not straight/gay is still seen as such), and there's at least lipservice paid to the capacities of women in male-dominant roles. Partly because recent news events were leading me to a virgin/whore concern, instead. Mainly because several people have been telling me lately I must be seeing it because I want to (and one direct accusation to a friend of mine that she's made it up because she wants deep down to feel protected) and I tend to second-guess myself at even a suggestion.

I think I want to feel we're as a species making some advancement somewhere, and I just shift one subsection of the differences to that dubious spot of 'progress' and then get kinda sad to admit it might not really deserve to be there.

The following may not belong here, and may need to go elsewhere, but I couldn't find a good thread, so:

I've just been asked for advice that I clearly cannot supply (and have said as much), has anyone got a suggestion for a woman, early-thirties, who's at the point where some male friends (as groups, as individuals) are actually tailing her on dates? I did suggest threatening/taking legal action, but she'd rather keep it 'friendly.'
 
 
Lugue
23:34 / 17.05.07
So, does feminism make anything at all of when Men Are Men With Men?

I'm talking about sexual objectification in particular, which it seems fair to say is largely enacted by men on women But how does feminism cope with this dynamic when the elements in it's relationship are switched around? Surely, gay men are programmed as men (though probably not as thoroughly, or if they are, it seems logical to say there is some "reprogramming" done in the act of coming to terms with one's identity). And if a gay man imports a Man's (read: a Straight Man's) code of, say, sexual conduct towards other men in a way that infringes on their comfort zone, how is that framed?

Or, in fact, in general, how does the questioning of gender constructions that feminism aims for apply to situations in which the basic dichotomy that defines those constructions are taken away, while their impact not neccessarily eliminated? Does feminism's concern with male priviledge and conduct apply to when those phenomena influence how men act towards other men? It seems obvious to me that as a movement for women's rights - legal and beyond - , this wouldn't be a concern, but if there are psychological and behavioural trends in gay men that are a legacy of the system that feminism concerns itself with, is it that simple to seperate things out? And if not feminism, who takes these issues on? Is this where Queer Theory, which I now zero about, kicks in? If so, is it fair to say it intersects with Feminism?

Though I guess a previous valid question would be "do these issues exist at all or am I interpreting my experiences in ways that don't make sense?".
 
 
Lugue
23:35 / 17.05.07
[I apologise if it's an interruption of the thread's flow.]
 
 
Seth
05:24 / 18.05.07
I've just been asked for advice that I clearly cannot supply (and have said as much), has anyone got a suggestion for a woman, early-thirties, who's at the point where some male friends (as groups, as individuals) are actually tailing her on dates? I did suggest threatening/taking legal action, but she'd rather keep it 'friendly.'

I think that's entirely her option… but I don't see how she can keep it friendly when these people need to be told that their behaviour is unacceptable. Even couching it in the terms "I appreciate you're trying to look out for me" would seem to endorse their actions too much. A calm but firm "Please stop following me" should be sufficient, if it's not then it might be worth questioning why these people are her friends.

If legal action were to be taken (harassment seems the most likely avenue) then coppers would want to know whether she's asked them to stop herself before they do anything, so it would be the first step whatever.

Hoping I've not misread the situation.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
05:29 / 18.05.07
As an experiment, I just had sex with a man. I haven't had time to check whether it remains in all cases, but a quick look round suggests to me that gender inequality still exists, however. If you give me a second to get my breath back, I'll try again.

Slightly more seriously, I think we have already warned about the dangers of saying or assuming that "feminism" is a single entity that can be said to think or feel in a single way about anything. Beyond that, I'm not really sure what you're asking. Do feminists generally oppose homophobia against gay men? Do feminists have a general view on male homosexuality? What I would say, with reasonable confidence, is that gay men tend not to be considered as outside a world in which gender exists simply because they may not seek the opposite sex for emotional or sexual relationships. Sex, as in the act of sex, is important, but it isn't _that_ important, whereas the variosu types fo feminism tend to be aiming to critique the operations of societies in which people of all genders and sexual orientation have to function.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 2223242526(27)2829303132... 34

 
  
Add Your Reply