BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Feminism 101

 
  

Page: 1 ... 2627282930(31)323334

 
 
Papess
21:56 / 21.06.07
I have. Countless times.
 
 
imaginary mice
12:20 / 22.06.07
The amount of times men have accused me of “playing hard to get”, “being a challenge” and “playing games” when I was just trying to be nice to them! But if I tell them more bluntly that I’m not interested I’m a rude bitch.

That “Nice Guy” theory is interesting; maybe it’s not all my fault after all.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
15:22 / 22.06.07
I was thinking about the way that "sucess" in this society - going to college, getting a job in the city, or whatever - might alter the way people relate to themselves, their bodies, etc. Although to be honest I can't remember what point I was trying to make. Id Entity summed it up, I think.
 
 
Mirror
03:24 / 23.06.07
In my experience, girls don't dig bad guys; they dig confident guys. Unfortunately, abusive egotism can be easy to mistake for self-confidence, and shyness or social awkwardness for a lack thereof. If one redefines "Nice Guy" as "Shy Socially Awkward Guy" then frequently such guys do finish last.

The horrhendously abusive tactics that how-to-get-the-girl guides promote seem to me to be the devil's stairway to self confidence: improve your own self-image by tearing others down enough, and you'll at least appear self-assured enough to attract a little attention.

Eurgh.
 
 
*
06:34 / 23.06.07
Hi, Mirror. If you've read the links and subsequent discussions, you know that by "Nice Guy" in this context we're explicitly not talking about guys who are just shy and socially awkward—"Nice Guys" are guys who self-define as "Nice" because they try to take advantage of women in ways that are less obvious (and may even be non-obvious to themselves) than raping or beating them, and think that they deserve sex as a reward for not behaving like an asshole. The aim is to point out that this behavior is still not treating women like people, and it's still not okay.

Of course there are people of all genders who are just good people and aren't very self-confident in social situations. I bet there's a greater than average concentration of them here on the board. But that's not what we're talking about when we say "Nice Guys" (with caps and/or quotes).

There are some few women who actually have trouble with the difference between self-confidence and arrogance, or with introversion and pathological Nice Guyism, but in my experience—not as limited as you might think—most women don't have any problem with these distinctions. And it's not really true that most women date assholes or that shy, sweet guys never get dates. That's one of the lies romantic comedies are partially to blame for in our society, I think.
 
 
Mirror
13:49 / 23.06.07
"Nice Guys" are guys who self-define as "Nice" because they try to take advantage of women in ways that are less obvious (and may even be non-obvious to themselves) than raping or beating them, and think that they deserve sex as a reward for not behaving like an asshole. The aim is to point out that this behavior is still not treating women like people, and it's still not okay.

I understand and agree completely; sorry for going off on a bit of a tangent. After reading the previous pages I was thinking mostly about the exploitation of the other "nice guy" subtype by self-help authers, so my post was mostly in response to Talks to Strangers' post a ways upthread on the previous page.

That being said, I think that by restricting your definition to those "Nice Guy" types who actually think that they deserve sex as a reward for not being physically abusive and instead use niceness as a manipulative tactic, you're creating a bit of a strawman. I think that in doing so you avoid the harder issue of the plight of the socially awkward (of either sex)n but that's probably a different thread entirely. What is on-topic, however, is whether or not the viscious feedback loop that Talks to Strangers was talking about here:

Yeah, I can certainly see a self-proclaimed Nice Guy reaching for The Game out of desperation, dammit, because he's sick of being left on the shelf...

exists (except without the "self-proclaimed" bit) and how to avoid it, if so. One way that the rejection of amorous advances can be made less injurious to the ego is for the suitor to be less emotionally invested in the outcome of an advance in the first place, but I have a niggling fear that for some, repeatedly needing to do so can predispose them to misogyny. I had a college roommate who was a bit like that.

Is there a gender-neutral term for misogyny? Something that simply means "the hatred of the opposite sex?"
 
 
alas
16:48 / 23.06.07
In my experience, girls don't dig bad guys; they dig confident guys.

Mirror, this response kind of reeks of what a responder to Little Light, linked above described as Woman [or, more likely, "Girl" as you choose to call us] As Vending Machine / Arcade Game. People who respect adult females, i.e., women, understand that women are not a strange species who have a single set of attractions, e.g., to "confident guys." An idea such as yours, that "girls [all] dig confident guys" leads pretty readily to the feeling: That asshole over there is pushing buttons and lighting the whole system up! Damnit, this Woman is broken! They tried up-down-up-down-left-right-left-right-B-A-stat, too, did someone give them the wrong cheat code? The last woman said that she liked this, why doesn't this woman respond to it?. So, I guess I'm kind of bothered by the tone of this.

Is there a gender-neutral term for misogyny? Something that simply means "the hatred of the opposite sex?"

This question has come up a few times before on Barbelith. Here's how I once explained my discomfort with a direct parallel between misandry and misogyny, in the context of suspicion of men/masculinity within feminism as being exactly the same as the degradation of women/femininity by men, in the context of a discussion of transphobia in feminism.

Now, in this context, I'd also add that the term "opposite sex" is an understandable term, but it has a whiff of the old "battle of the sexes" cliche and the normalization of heterosexuality, as does the earlier comment that "girls dig confident guys." It's not that it's wrong in some PC scolding sense of the term to say "opposite sex," it's that it implies a framework of thinking about these things that may have had some uses, but has also created huge blindspots and made us stupider rather than smarter about sex. So becoming a little more thoughtful, allowing it to be a kind of red flag, can actually help us come up with better terms, terms that help us to think more carefully, more accurately about these things. There are not simple "opposite sexes" on barbelith or in the world, many people on barbelith and in the world are not primarily engaged romantically by the "opposite sex" and things are just more complex than that.

There's a link in an earlier comment of mine to Marilyn Frye's essay "Oppression" that compares oppression to a "birdcage". I think if you read that short essay and think more carefully about the way oppression works, by creating double binds for an oppressed group, while sometimes still "harming" members of the group that largely benefits from oppression, you'll start to see why simple equations between misogyny and "misandry" are not appropriate. The structure is not there supporting misandry.

And I also want to make it clear that while I'm typing this, I'm working very hard to not explode angrily: "Jesus, we've had this discussion 12 times in this thread alone, already, haven't we?!!!" I'm making the assumption that you are teachable and that you care. If you could take some time to respond to this, and indicate that you are reflecting on what women have said here, that would be appreciated.
 
 
Claris Dancers
18:49 / 23.06.07
Hi all. I have a few things to say:

First of all, i recognize the changes in society between today and decades past for women and their various roles. I also recognize that feminism has played a large role in facilitating this change, and that the changes are a good thing for everyone. Even as a white male, I have no desire to see women paid less for doing the same job or given less social respect due solely to their gender. Dworkin was a part of the feminism movement that helped cause these changes, and while I cannot agree with the small amount Ive read of her work (or the attitudes of people ive met in real life who claim to be grand admirers of her specifically), i cannot argue with the results of the movement she was a part of. I know I am not alone in my disapproval, however if it was "milquetoast feminism" instead of "radical feminism," less attention would have been drawn to it and im sure less would have been accomplished.

Secondly, my initial post in this thread was out of line. It had no bearing on the thread itself and was meant to point out my disapproval of her methods in a very brash way. I apologize. In fact, i had only brought it up because i had recently been reading about her death and she was fresh in my mind. I realize that her radical form of feminism is not even really relevant to society as a whole today, but as i said it was fresh in my mind and it had been gnawing at me.

Lastly, as I have said elsewhere recently, i have no desire to cause anyone grief. I wholeheartedly apologize for the unpleasantness my clumsy and half thought-out remarks have caused in this and other threads.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:47 / 06.07.07
OH MY GOD: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6277306.stm

Please lay into the BBC. I will love you forever. I am actually to angry to even make that a link.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
12:49 / 06.07.07
I'll get my shotgun.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:50 / 06.07.07
DON'T FUCKING SHOW ME THINGS LIKE THAT YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU SHOW ME THINGS LIKE THAT
 
 
Ticker
12:56 / 06.07.07
*groan*
 
 
All Acting Regiment
12:59 / 06.07.07
# Feminism: If even veteran feminists can't agree on what this means then it's probably best avoided by men

# Afghanistan:
A place where the debate is rather starker

# Agony aunt:
When men seek answers to life-changing problems in magazines, it tends to be under the headline "plasma or LCD?"

# Airbrushing:
The process by which magazine picture editors oppress women in an underhand way


BBC = Bloody Bollocks and Cock
 
 
All Acting Regiment
13:00 / 06.07.07
I mean, wtf with that Afghanistan thing? Are they saying feminists are stupid because, look, at least you don't live in Afghanistan? What the fuck?
 
 
Ticker
13:04 / 06.07.07
I am shocked to find the BBC actively reinforcing gender assumptions to this degree. As a woman in the US I am appalled at being represented in this manner and to being reduced to a sterotype based on 'tongue-in-cheek' suggestions tacked on to a scientific study. I find the intent of the article offensive and the impact harmful as it further misrepresents actual human beings and promotes sexism. It is not funny nor productive when too often women's voices and their words are dismissed as invalid to have a responsible media site participate in this manner.
 
 
Ex
13:15 / 06.07.07
What a weird combination of feminist digs and third-rate stand-up (Blokes are like this! Birds are like this! It's allegedly hilarious!)

I've just sent in a comment as Barbara from Liff. I think it may have been too shirty to use.

On the plus side, I bet some of the responses end up on ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere
 
 
Ex
13:17 / 06.07.07
Thanks, xk. That was much more thorough than my response and didn't include the word 'porridge'.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
13:25 / 06.07.07
I admit I used the word "fucking" a little more than usual when I commented at the bottom of the article.
 
 
Ex
13:31 / 06.07.07
Do you think that's one of the words that women (hilariously) use and men (hilariously) don't?
 
 
All Acting Regiment
13:40 / 06.07.07
Come away, Ex, for this be a "discussion" board, and that not be man good thing! You must be man as on net - so go to Nuts website talk of CAR

CAR

CAR

WANT CAR
 
 
Ticker
13:44 / 06.07.07
damn. porridge would have really summed it all up though...

I find it terrible that a scientific study exploding a sexist myth is being used to shore up popular misconceptions with craptastic 'suggestions'.

Someone needs a kick in the bits and I happen to be wearing boots today.
 
 
Ex
14:10 / 06.07.07
Ooh, boots! With kitten heels?
Language Log gives a quick kick to the more simplistic forms of 'women talk more than men' whenever they crop up and also nudges readers to some interestign studies about actual potential gender differences in speech - there's a list of the posts at the bottom of this entry.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:57 / 06.07.07
I just sent them an email informing them that if the article had referred to an individual I would have contacted the press complaints commission.
 
 
Shiny: Well Over Thirty
15:34 / 06.07.07
Complaint duly registered. It's particularly horrible seeing the BBC coming out with this sort of rubbish. While it would obviously still be just as damaging and horrible, I don't suppose I'd be surprised to see idiocy like this from the Sun for instance, but until reading that horror I kind of liked to think that the BBC was at least a little bit better than that......
 
 
Liger Null
16:50 / 06.07.07
Thanks for the Language Log link, Ex. I remember hearing about a similar study on NPR yesterday. I've always viewed the statement, "Women are such great communicators" as being on a par with "Black people are so athletic and musical" and "Jews are so good with money."

So where do we go to read the comments on the BBC article? They don't seem to have them on the page, and I wanted to see where you all ripped the BBC a new one for that chunk of steaming crap.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
18:26 / 06.07.07
Well, I suppose we'll get to see whether the BBC consider complaints of anti-women articles to be serious, like complaints of racial intolerence, or frivolous, like complaints about homophobia. Who will win?
 
 
*
19:43 / 06.07.07
Does the BBC take complaints about racist language that seriously? I'm pleasantly surprised; that's good to know.
 
 
alas
20:07 / 08.07.07
Couple of things:

1) The Language log covered this specific new study, and the pathetic reporting on it in the NY (Sexist) Times, here, as "NY Times Slyly Abets a Lie" and then again here.

2) I've really been enjoying the "I Blame The Patriarchy" Site! Woot! And particularly enjoyed a link to Anti-Feminist Bingo!... which can lead one to White Liberal Bingo and Sexual Assault Bingo.

We could have fun with these on the 'lith-o.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:17 / 09.07.07
Well the form's not there anymore!
 
 
HCE
16:02 / 09.07.07
Meep. Language Log links back to this thread:

http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004701.html#more

Quick! Somebody say something witty!
 
 
Ticker
16:16 / 09.07.07
Woman wins settlement in breast-feeding case

Fear of the boob, if only it worked strongly enough to repel would be attackers.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:20 / 09.07.07
"You've got to ask yourself a question: Do I feel lactaty? Well, do ya, punk?"
 
 
Ticker
16:23 / 09.07.07
alas, thanks for the anti-feminisim bingo card.

I still need a compact response to the victim mentality box...I keep hitting my head on it like, 'well sure if you've been a victim why not view the world that way'...but yeah not working so much in debates. Helps? what is a better response?
 
 
Mysterious Transfer Student
17:43 / 09.07.07
Alas, further thanks for those links; some of the responses from angry entitled male posters are particularly choice/shuddersome. For those who haven't read through them yet, one of the comment-leavers on the AFB blog thread provides a further link to something particularly dear to the hearts of 'Lithers this summer, Anti-Feminist Comics Bingo. The associated blog, Girls Read Comics (And They're Pissed) is a positive goldmine that I'm mildly ashamed I didn't discover sooner.
 
 
nixwilliams
21:36 / 09.07.07
ooh! one of my friends is a girlwonder site founder, and i'm extremely gleeful to see it linked here!

/offtopic
 
  

Page: 1 ... 2627282930(31)323334

 
  
Add Your Reply