| |
|
Well, I suppose we'll do it as and when possible. I'm seeing this as a way to clear the backlog, in order to stop people from being kept waiting who applied a while ago.
The way this one works, whoever wants to be a part of this process signifies their willingness in the next week, let's say, during which time they also have to create a list of who they think should be given an ID, and who they think shouln't be given an ID. By the end of the week, the lists are sent in - I'd suggest to me, by Private Message. I comb the lists and see which names have been approved by a simple majority of those involved, and have not been specifically vetoed by anyone. Those who satisfy both of those conditions go to Tom to get userIDs. The others we put back in the pond and think about further, using a process yet to be determined.
So, if nobody else submits a list, it would come down to me going through, putting a list together and sending it to Tom. I'm happy to do that, but others who might want there to be more views in the mix - so anyone with access to the yahoo group can run down the last 259 applicants.
This is a lot of work, yes, but for want of a better way of doing it it seems to be a way forward, at least until and while the discussion about the power to ban can be had. |
|
|
