BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Moderation requests & discussion thereof

 
  

Page: 1 ... 1213141516(17)1819202122... 95

 
 
Mourne Kransky
09:58 / 26.10.05
Me too. I don't find it offensive when the whole world fails to pronounce Scottish names and words correctly or makes jokes based on linguistic quirks. We do it ourselves, often cruelly. I use language and say things about the Sisterhood of Cissie Boyz that are very self-oppressive sometimes and if a straight man said the same thing, I'd want to lamp them.

Just because some word play can be offensive doesn't mean it all is. Just because some people claim something's offensive, doesn't mean it is. But it could be. I've had to look at this thread carefully to be sure I wasn't missing something as I wasn't seeing what was inspiring the fury.

But it's easy to use language in a way that is offensive and not be aware of it until someone makes you aware of it. And when they do, you either thank them for wising you up, or you disagree, respectfully. I've had cause to thank people on the Lith and irl for questioning the assumptions behind phrases I have used, without sufficient consideration.

I think intent is important in distinguishing offensive/non-offensive but less so than effect or impact. And this is a place where we can all learn. Every time I brindle at a phrase someone has used that I think should be examined, I have to remember that what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander too. Next time it'll be somebody else giving me pause for thought. Or just being a wise-arse.
 
 
Jack Fear
11:13 / 26.10.05
It's an open question. Which is why I took the approach I did; Fly In The Ointment, rather than Hammer Of Righteousness—because style does matter, right?

I wasn't shrieking OMG U R TEH RASCIST!!!1!, but rather trying to suggest in a sneaky, wise-arse kind of way, that maybe the assumptions behind the thread needed examination. Because while it is an open question, it is, I think, a question worth asking.

I guess that earns me a spot in the PC Brigade. Do I get a free toaster with my membership card?
 
 
Char Aina
14:15 / 26.10.05
you lost all toast priveliges when you revealed your jealousy for mike robot's position, dude.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
22:01 / 26.10.05
The PC brigade does not exist, repeat after me, then write 100 lines please.
 
 
Evil Scientist
13:43 / 27.10.05
Can someone delete my last post in the "Is Something Wrong With Barbelith?" thread please? It was a reply to another post which has apparently been deleted, and therefore makes no sense now.
 
 
Smoothly
13:57 / 27.10.05
If it's your post, Scientist, you can request the deletion yourself by hitting the 'Edit Post' tab next to it.
 
 
Evil Scientist
14:11 / 27.10.05
Alternatively I can request the deletion myself.

(blushes and pretends he'd planned it like that all along).
 
 
Loomis
12:06 / 01.11.05
Can someone please put a summary in Grant's Hanuman thread in the lab? It's a perfect opportunity for some rhyming action.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:49 / 01.11.05
Oh sorry, I did but it's pretty rubbisher. Write a rhyming summary and I'll replace it!
 
 
Loomis
13:05 / 01.11.05
How about a limerick?

There once was a bub with a tail,
Who as Hanuman people did hail,
With a bed time of seven
And a fast track to Heaven,
How could he possibly fail?
 
 
Bed Head
22:00 / 01.11.05
Could a kindly mod do something with this thread? One of the images on the first page prompts me for a password every time I open the thread - I think it’s one of the images Tom posted. Probably the second one.


(Actually, is anyone else getting that?)
 
 
Smoothly
22:52 / 01.11.05
Yeah, I'm getting that too. Similar problem with Manny's first link.

(By the way, Bed, whenever I open a Barbelith page you've linked to, I'm logged out. Is there a reason for that?)
 
 
Bed Head
23:24 / 01.11.05
Er.... am I doing that? I’m not meaning to log you out, anyway. Sorry about that.

(Actually, I sometimes have the same sort of thing happening to me. But only in the threads I’ve followed the link to; if I click back into the rest of barbelith, I’m recognised as logged in again. I was assuming it must be something to do with, er, cookies. Or something.)
 
 
w1rebaby
23:28 / 01.11.05
The protected image is coming from www.utm.edu; I'd guess it's either Olulabelle's or Tom's, but if the URL of the broken image doesn't begin with that it's not it. I would do something but I'm not a mod there.
 
 
Loomis
11:40 / 03.11.05
The summary for the Football Manager thread in G&G ("prepare to lose your girlfriend/wife") is bugging me. What do other mods think? Should I suggest a change, or just leave as is?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:04 / 03.11.05
thread in Books looks a little off to me.
 
 
Smoothly
12:05 / 03.11.05
Re. Football Manager summary - Flying figroll kinda deals with that at the beginning of the thread, doesn't ze? It's a good point well made and I almost think it would be more useful to let it stand.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
12:09 / 03.11.05
Although the abstract as it currently stands doesn't do what an abstract should. Half of me says leave it, for the same reason as Smoothly, half of me says change it, because it's kind of useless and doesn't present a particularly good immediate impression of the forum.

Your call. If you want to put a new one in, I won't disagree.
 
 
Loomis
12:14 / 03.11.05
mmm, it's tricky. I'm thinking more of the fact that lots of people will see it who might not even open the thread. Not good for the image of the forum really.
 
 
Mazarine
13:49 / 03.11.05
I reckon we should give the Pound haiku thread a day's worth of chance, and if nothing comes of it, out into convo.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
14:02 / 03.11.05
Oh sorry, I've just moved for it to go to the Creation. If it hasn't got the voted yet, feel free to disagree.

BTW, on the subject of Barbelith links logging you off, it's with people that link to http://barbelith.com... rather than http://www.barbelith.com... I don't know why but that's the way it is... some things will never change... oh but don't you believe them...
 
 
Loomis
14:11 / 03.11.05
Why on earth would you move a thread discussing literature out of the books forum?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:27 / 03.11.05
The author of the post doesn't say who the author of the poem is! I don't blame anyone for assuming they're one and the same...
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:27 / 03.11.05
Oh my god my brain's actually gone to mush hasn't it?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:29 / 03.11.05
Oh no wait, I just wanted a summary.
 
 
Mazarine
14:33 / 03.11.05
Theoretically there's one in the queue, but it'll need to be tweaked to mention the fact that it's a Pound haiku and not a Rosslyntemplar original.
 
 
Loomis
14:40 / 03.11.05
Pretty please can the summary be a haiku?
 
 
Mazarine
15:46 / 03.11.05
The one I proposed was.
 
 
Ariadne
19:45 / 03.11.05
Em - the Pound thread still has no summary. Did someone disagree it?
 
 
Bed Head
20:02 / 03.11.05
Did you vote on it, ariadne? - if not, and it’s not showing up for you as a pending job now, then I think somebody must have.

I’ve kept checking Books waiting for Sally’s haiku to appear, too.
 
 
Ariadne
20:26 / 03.11.05
No, but I've not been on the board much today so I wouldn't have seen it.
 
 
Mazarine
21:57 / 03.11.05
I guess someone vetoed or it just didn't go through. The last haiku was pretty crap anyway, so hopefully this one'll cut the mustard.
 
 
Mazarine
21:58 / 03.11.05
Or, I could've just done something screwy when trying to propose it. Known to occur. I proposed a second, better haiku summary, is the line that I forgot to include in the post above this one.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
15:23 / 04.11.05
Can a music mod tidy up the title to this thread please?
 
 
Shrug
15:30 / 06.11.05
Would anyone have any opposition to changing The Descent thread to a "with clearly marked spoilers" thread? Out on DVD release now as I would... err... like to post spoilers... in it.
Link
 
  

Page: 1 ... 1213141516(17)1819202122... 95

 
  
Add Your Reply