BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What exactly does get you banned on Barbelith?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 2223242526(27)2829303132... 42

 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:58 / 20.07.06
Not right now, no. It's not the issue at hand.
 
 
Char Aina
08:07 / 20.07.06
on sarcasm, it's depolyment there does more than suggest that you dont hold the belief espoused.
it suggests, at least to my mind, that you think someone else does.

if not, it seems you wouldnt have needed to say it at all.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
08:10 / 20.07.06
Flyboy Does Dirt If I sarcastically say that I believe we should all make a big effort to be nice to/about X, all it means is that I don't believe we should all make a big effort to be nice to/about X.

Then is it something particularly useful to say? I think this swings back to the issues of context and snark...
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:17 / 20.07.06
on sarcasm, it's depolyment there does more than suggest that you dont hold the belief espoused.
it suggests, at least to my mind, that you think someone else does.


One last time, because I don't know if I can make this anymore clear. If I say:

I think what's really important is that we bend over backwards to make the openly racist feel welcome and accepted, even if it means we don't challenge their views with any particular vigour.

Then it would be correct to take this to mean:

1) I actually think what's really important is that we challenge openly racist views with vigour, rather than worrying about making the openly racist feel welcome and accepted.

And:

2) I think that some people's priority seems to be that we bend over backwards to make the openly racist feel welcome and accepted, even if it means we don't challenge their views with any particular vigour.

It would be incorrect to also assume that I mean:

3) The people alluded to in 2) hold racist views themselfs.

Is this getting through?
 
 
Olulabelle
08:28 / 20.07.06
I hear you Flyboy, you do have a very valid point.

Our Lady, I think Flyboy's objection is that people are often 'too nice' to people who don't warrant that niceness and that we can appear to care more about being nice to people that we do about kicking the gittish racists up their backsides.

Or maybe he just thinks we're a bunch of hippies.
 
 
Ganesh
11:34 / 20.07.06
I think Flyboy's objection is that people are often 'too nice' to people who don't warrant that niceness and that we can appear to care more about being nice to people that we do about kicking the gittish racists up their backsides.

I don't think this point has escaped any of us, Olulabelle. What's being suggested (by some of those of us who have, in the past, been accused of being more concerned about the tender feelings of "gittish racists" who "don't warrant that niceness" than their 'victims') is that Flyboy's framing of the central point is reductive and tacitly brackets those who don't move directly to backside-kicking along with the "gittish racists" themselves - thus combatively polarising (or even closing down) subsequent discussion.

I think that happened in the case of the ShadowSax episode. I'm insufficiently up to speed on the current situation with Dragon to know whether it's the case here.
 
 
Quantum
14:59 / 20.07.06
Just to explain I was infuriated by dragon's question because it is easily answered by a simple search and is based on a perception of the world that seems very weird to me.
If you've ever looked at a spectrum of colours or looked up the word 'spectrum' in a dictionary* it's pretty obvious it's not a composite of coloured bands. Maybe I've been brainwashed by the Temple into believing that experience and observation are more important than theories that blatantly contradict obvious facts, and perhaps I'm wrong to try and bring such high expectations into the lab. Look at dragon's follow up question. To me, a rainbow does not appear to be coloured bands. So to ask why it does look like coloured bands, after seeing the wikipedia page on rainbows, implies to be that either a) my eyes are uniquely fucked up and my definition of the word 'spectrum' has been wrong for lo these many years, b) dragon and I live in similar but subtly different paralell universes or c) the ideas and beliefs in dragon's head are more real to him than the actual, real world.
That's not a reason for banning though. Maybe the unexamined racist behaviour might become enough of an issue, but it's probably best I refrain from that particular debate because dragon's posting style really gets my goat and I'm not able to distance myself from that. I'm generally cautious to ban, because it's a headache and a precedent, so unless and until someone goes over the line I think it's best to hang back. I don't think we have to be nice to posters we don't like though, as evidenced by my increasingly irate responses to D.

*"1. A seemingly infinite range of possiblities, paradoxically confined by two extremes."
 
 
Char Aina
18:30 / 20.07.06
Is this getting through?

i dont appreciate the tone, dude.
i aksed you if what you meant was option 2:

I think that some people's priority seems to be that we bend over backwards to make the openly racist feel welcome and accepted, even if it means we don't challenge their views with any particular vigour.

and you say it was.

perhaps i was unclear, and perhaps my way of phrasing contributed to your thinking i was suggestsing you were calling people racist?
i was not intending to suggest that.
(please note i am not asking you to bone up on your reading comprehension skills)

i also asked you to show me where.
care to tell me who is doing so, explicitly and with examples?

i'm not saying they arent, i would just like you to clarify your vague assertion. i think it is quite important to be sure, if indeed you are suggesting that barbelith is more tolerant of racism than it should be.
 
 
Char Aina
18:50 / 20.07.06
or rather, sorry, i saiid i thought you had said some one held view 2.
i didnt ask you at all.

sorry for the confusion, i'm rushing in and then out to george sqare tonight.
skippy fingers and skippier eyes.
 
 
Olulabelle
09:18 / 21.07.06
Ganesh I was being vaguely tongue-in-cheek about the'gittish racists' partly because of my past mistake in using a racist term (red indian) and partly because in the past I have also been accused of being too nice.
 
 
Char Aina
22:33 / 21.07.06
so what's the board-story so far with 33?

i wonder, because ze's still PMing me, showing no sign of having any idea why what ze said was annoying folks.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
22:37 / 21.07.06
Well it was explained quite clearly in the thread I thought. Perhaps you could reword it all for the poor lamb.
 
 
Char Aina
22:42 / 21.07.06
well, i have.
at least twice now.

anyone feel like taking a shot?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
23:01 / 21.07.06
Not me, I just think 33 should print it out and substitute word for word until it makes sense.

What? I was very careful with that post! If someone can't get that everyone in the fashion world isn't gay, a simple concept frankly, rather like every animal isn't a tiger or every type of squash isn't the colour purple or every saucepan isn't metal than what are you meant to say?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
23:02 / 21.07.06
And frankly I still have no idea what that comment meant if that wasn't the simple answer to it.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
17:59 / 30.07.06
Look, you know how if your infant son starts speaking Latin, you should just shoot him in the head right there and then, to save time and trouble later?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
18:17 / 30.07.06
Well, I can't help but feel that there's a lesson there, which may relate to how we deal with 33.
 
 
Ganesh
18:54 / 30.07.06
Biggest problem I'm having with 33's posts so far is difficulty working out which chunks of texts are his/hers. The tendency to quote, bold and italicise apparently at random is making my brane steam.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
18:56 / 30.07.06
Flyboy, when you say "lesson", do you mean we should ban immediately in future without giving people like 33 a chance to assess their prejudices and (hopefully) redeem themselves? (sincere question)

Personally, I was hoping he might have gone away and thought about his prejudices and assumptions, but from the look of that thread in Radio & Music, he appears to have ignored everything people have already said to him, and seems quite prepared to continue shitting his bigotry onto the board.

Still, I try my hardest to be an optimist and if there's a small chance Barbelith can help him, I'm prepared to wait a little while before banning. But then, I'm still relatively new around here and at this internet discussion business in general, so I'm probably being naive.
 
 
Jack Fear
19:18 / 30.07.06
I dunno. Do you think that 33 came to the Music looking for a fight? I'm really not sure, especially given that he's pulling out the "some of my favorite music is black" defense...

What, exactly, was the point of bringing the fight to him from the "Extinct Clothing" thread, Flyboy? Giving him more rope to hand himself? Hoping to provoke him into saying something stupid?

Well, you got your wish. Happy now?
 
 
Jack Fear
19:23 / 30.07.06
PW: I think the issue in the music thread is less to do with the use of language than with 33 admitting that he doesn't like or value black music. IS that a banning offense? Should it be?
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
19:37 / 30.07.06
I see what you mean, Jack. And taste is certainly not a banning offence (IMHO). However, I might be wrong, but his phrasing...

Have I missed something or am going to get into trouble for suggesting that last 6 or so plus years have been dominated by certain ethnic groups and their influence on culture

...seems poorly educated and thought out. I don't even want to start to deconstruct this text and point out possible the underlying racist assumptions (e.g. black people only make/like R&B, etc) inherent within it; and I'm aware that I might be projecting here based on 33's previous behaviour (and the fact he still hasn't acknowledged his mistake in the Extinct Clothing thread.)

For the record: I don't want a ban, and I don't think Flyboy's initial reply to 33 in the Radio & Music thread was right or helpful. However, I feel 33 needs to take a step back and think more about what he's typing, even if in response to a challenge (unfair or otherwise).
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
20:52 / 30.07.06
Well gee, Jack, m'boy, I don't know what to say. If you genuinely feel, son, that I'm in the wrong, and that 33 is more sinned against then sinning, who am I to argue? Maybe I forced 33 to make racist remarks using my telepathic powers? Or, okay, no, that's unlikely, maybe I somehow fooled or tricked him into saying something that might be wrongly interpreted as bigotted by wicked people?

Or, alternatively, maybe:

1) We've had any number of threads in the Music forum about the same subject before - "all new music is crap these days!" - and there's no need to put up with one from someone who has yet to show any sign of being anything other than an unapologetic homophobe, son.

2) Bringing up things like homophobic or racist comments which have not been retracted or apologised for or explained convincingly is something that some of us take it upon ourselves to do, sunshine, and I'm sorry if it doesn't fit with your own "hug a Klan member for liberal Christ!" strategy, but that's just the way it is, sunshine.

3) 33 already had the views he had about music and race, and while I might have been able to predict them, those views are his responsibility, not mine, kiddo.

4) What 33 thinks of "black music" is at times hard to tell through a mire of incoherence, shifting definitions and "just kidding!!!" pseudo-retractions, but it seems clear to me that he thinks a) that "rnb and rap" and music made by "certain ethnic groups" are synonymous, b) that in the past 6 years these "ethnic groups" have suddenly come to dominate music, and more widely culture (and maybe more widely still, given the ambiguous nature of the sentence quoted by paranoidwriter above), c) that this dominance has had a pernicious effect, d) that music made by black Americans prior to the past 6 years was also largely bad, as evidenced by Milli Vanilli. Add those views up, and we get a very confused, very wrong-headed and, yes, in my opinion, racist view of the history of popular music, sonny Jim. I'm sure 33 is capable of writing more "Oh aren't I allowed to like black music, I suppose that makes me a racist does it?!@?" posts without you doing it for him, young 'un.

As my (perhaps too cryptic) posts above were meant to indicate, arguably so far 33 has left himself enough wiggle room, largely through making his posts nigh-on unreadable, that neither the general consensus nor Tom Coates' view is that he should be banned. But I find it impossible to believe, given that he has also already started calling members of the board "wee-wees", that he will not end up getting himself banned in future.

I am prepared to start running a book as to field of culture 33 will say has been ruined by the recent dominance of women - television is at 11:1, the novel at 5:2.
 
 
Ganesh
21:12 / 30.07.06
Hmm. Personally (and I'm PMing him a link to here, so it's not just a third person discussion), I'm not sure as yet whether 33's being an "unapologetic homophobe" in the Extinct Clothing thread. I think he's expressing himself clumsily (I'm still unsure whether he's criticising homosexual male designers, gay men generally or certain 'looks' that he perceives as other-than-heterosexual - and I'm uncertain whether he's positioning 'homosexual' as antithetical to "male") and in a pretty unexamined manner, but I'm reluctant to write someone off as dyed-in-the-wool homophobic on that basis alone. I'd prefer to at least try to tease things out a little more first.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
22:25 / 30.07.06
I would prefer to tease things out for a little longer as well though I am dubious as to 33's naivete after the Milli Vanilli comment. Who the hell thinks of Milli Vanilli first?
 
 
Ganesh
22:35 / 30.07.06
There's arguably a whiff of pisstake there, but hey ho. I'm still in benefit-of-the-doubt mode.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:32 / 30.07.06
Well, 33 seems to be a bit unfamiliar with expressing himself online at the level ideally expected on Barbelith, which may or may not change over time. If not actually racist or homophobic, his posts suggest a lack of much life experience, in particular with people of different races or sexualities. He might be helped to think more about these issues, except that he appears to have real problems with being asked to look more critically at his generalisations, and becomes aggressive and incoherent - the ink-out-of-arse approach. He decides here, along with the eye-popping claim that there is nothing gay about cowboys, that he will not be listened to no matter how sweet his reason is - the logical conclusion presumably being that he may as well not bother engaging in anything resembling a sane or sensible fashion, since he has already been judged in the kangaroo court of Political Correctness Gone Mad. As an attitude, this is unlikely to commend itself to a bulletin board.
 
 
Ganesh
23:57 / 30.07.06
Heh yes, cowboys and denim: none more hetero.

 
 
Spatula Clarke
23:59 / 30.07.06
Jack: Do you think that 33 came to the Music looking for a fight?

33: Have I missed something or am going to get into trouble for suggesting that last 6 or so plus years have been dominated by certain ethnic groups and their influence on culture

I don't see how that's *not* an attempt to start (or continue) a fight, to be honest.
 
 
Jackie Susann
01:11 / 31.07.06
I'm not really as up on banning procedures and precedents as I probably should be, but if somebody has to say something like, 'I propose that we ban 33', than I would like to do that now. He's repeatedly said stupid and offensive things that he apparently doesn't realise are stupid or offensive. He shows no signs that he is reflective enough to realise if people explain it. He shows plenty of signs that he will probably turn a whole bunch of threads ostensibly about other topics into threads where a whole bunch of people try, and fail, to get him to realise why what he's saying is stupid or offensive.

He started a thread about how this is the worst decade in music ever, which he subsequently expanded on, explaining the problem with music is that black people make too much of it, and there are no bands like NIN or Smashing Pumpkins anymore. Every element of that sentence by itself is painfully stupid. Put together it makes me so angry I almost threw my cup of coffee across the room.

Can we please, like Fly suggested, ban him sooner rather than later?
 
 
Jack Fear
01:43 / 31.07.06
I think Haus pretty well nails it, actually. Although I'm wondering, with regards to this...

He decides ... that he will not be listened to no matter how sweet his reason is - the logical conclusion presumably being that he may as well not bother engaging in anything resembling a sane or sensible fashion, since he has already been judged in the kangaroo court of Political Correctness Gone Mad

...if 33 hasn't been proved correct.

Flyboy, sweet pea, I've got to question this...

Bringing up things like homophobic or racist comments which have not been retracted or apologised for or explained convincingly is something that some of us take it upon ourselves to do, sunshine...

Bringing up homophobic or racist comments in threads that ostensibly have nothing to do with sexuality or race?
 
 
matthew.
01:46 / 31.07.06
He's repeatedly said stupid and offensive things that he apparently doesn't realise are stupid or offensive

For once, I disagree with a ban at this point in time. We've certainly had posters say stupid shit (namely me), poke their nose into things they know nothing about (anonymous) and keep saying stupid shit (same anonymous) and yet they still remain.

First of all, 33 needs a lesson in how to write/post. Once he's cleared up his posting style a little, we'll see what the fuck he's saying without a goddamn map.

Secondly, how long has he been posting here? Let's give him time to shake his head and learn something. I vote that we give him time to grow.

I'm going to sound a little like toksik here, but I think we should give him the opportunity and the space for some growth and development. I understand that Barb's position in the web is not as teacher (we've had threads and threads about that), but we let others grow and learn. I was certainly a poster of less quality in the beginning.

If he can't shape up in a timely manner (as determined by consensus), then I vote out. Until then, we should try and engage with him. He is engaging. Sort of. Not at the level Barb expects, but... help him help himself.

Also, I don't think complaining about the lack of NIN or Pumpkins is blasphemous, in of itself. We should try and separate his taste from his prejudice. Some people only like NIN.
 
 
Jackie Susann
01:47 / 31.07.06
Ostensibly, right. I don't think it took a huge leap to see some subtext in his opening post, though.
 
 
Jackie Susann
01:53 / 31.07.06
That last post was a reply to Jack.

Okay the NIN thing is kind of a cheap shot. But if we're not going to boot him now, then I personally think 'lithers generally need to take more responsibilty for challenging him on his shit. It bothers me that after he took his own thread into outright racist bullshit, people continued to make helpful suggestions about his initial question. That, to me, is inappropriate behaviour.
 
 
Jack Fear
01:56 / 31.07.06
I'll cop to that: but for my part, it was a showing him the door process.

"Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day: teach him how to fish, and he'll piss off and never bother you again and with any luck fall out of his fucking boat and drown," as Liberal Christ famously didn't say.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 2223242526(27)2829303132... 42

 
  
Add Your Reply