BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Random Q and A Thread

 
  

Page: 12345(6)7891011... 42

 
 
Wrecks City-Zen
22:09 / 04.10.02
Where could I find Celeblogs?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
23:14 / 04.10.02
"Celeblogs?"

Wass ist?
 
 
Baz Auckland
03:31 / 05.10.02
Celebrity Blogs?
 
 
William Sack
15:41 / 05.10.02
Anyone know where I can find the full text of Gwyneth Paltrow's 1999 Oscar Acceptance speech?
 
 
William Sack
15:52 / 05.10.02
The one where she blubs.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
17:05 / 05.10.02
Well, of course you're wrong. You big cuddly fluffy lump of man, you. Adjectives don;t have past tenses.

An engraving is something that is carved *into* something. "en" + "grave". The transitive verb "to grave" means to carve or sculpt. Thus, a graven image is an image that has been carved or sculpted, or in these modern times probably created as a result of the application of any of the plastic arts. The graven images that are generally slagged off by puritans were sculpted images, that is statues or idols.
 
 
grant
17:04 / 07.10.02
Halle Berry blubs here.

But Gwyneth is tougher.
Here: will a RealPlayer version of the speech do?
 
 
Papess
14:29 / 15.10.02
Three guys go to a hotel in California.
They tell the man behind the desk that
they want 3 rooms.
He says, '10 dollars per room
so that's 30 dollars.'

So they pay and go up to their rooms. Then, the
deskman remembers that there is a special for 3
rooms for $25. He gives the bellhop the $5 change
and tells him to take it up to them.

On the way, the bellhop realizes that he doesn't know how to
split it 3 ways so he keeps 2 and gives 1 to each man.


The question is:
If after the dollar refund each man
paid 9 dollars and $9 x 3 men equals $27 and the bellhop
only has $2 then what happened to the other dollar?


This has been bugging me for about a week. I am sure it is something very simple that I am just not logical enough to figure out but, I ask you all....please tell me where the other dollar is! My last few brain cells need some rest.

~May
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:39 / 15.10.02
What other dollar?

They paid $30.

They were subsequently given $3.

The bellhop was given $2.

The first transaction has no mathematical connection to the second.

Or, to look at it another way - If the rooms had been available for $9 each, then the bill would have been $27. As it is, they were available for $8 1/3, so the total bill was $25. They paid $30, and so were entitled, whether they knew it at the time or not, to $5 change, or $ 1 2/3 each. The bellhop gave each person one dollar of their change and kept the 2/3, leaving him with 6/3 of a dollar or 2 dollars at the end.
 
 
Papess
14:54 / 15.10.02
Yep, thanks Haus, I guessed it was something that simple. I also guessed that you wouldn't pass up an opportunity like this one.

I had no idea till today, that I could not count.

D'oh
 
 
Persephone
14:55 / 15.10.02
Yes, it has to do with mixing two different math problems. You have to either add up how much money everybody has been paid:

Hotel...... $25
Three men.. $3
Bellhop.... $2
TOTAL...... $30

or how much money everybody has paid:

Hotel...... $5
Three men.. $27
Bellhop.... -$2*
TOTAL...... $30

*because the bellhop has "paid" a negative amount--i.e., is $2 to his good

The riddle is a trick because it mixes the bellhop from the first problem with the men from the second problem.
 
 
Cloned Christ on a HoverDonkey
22:46 / 15.10.02
@ Kit-Kat Club :

I think maybe your kettle would be considered more dangerous than the fridge or the microwave due to its higher power rating. Your kettle is probably around 2kW, whereas your microwave probably only uses 800W and your fridge around 1kW.

Its fuse will be of a higher rating than that of the other appliances also, placing it into a higher risk category than the others. I may be wrong-diddly-wrong-wrong, but that seems to make sense to me.

Now for my question :

I've recently had my Ford Focus souped up to allow light-speed travel, which is very convenient for commuting. However, given that the speed of light is absolute, what will happen when I'm travelling home at the speed of light from work in the dark & switch my headlights on?

Will the light just pool in my headlamps, then burst forth when I apply the brakes? Will my headlamps just look dark? Or will they work normally?

My local Ford dealership were unable to answer this, so any help would be appreciated (preferably before the nights begin to set in before 6pm).
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
08:59 / 16.10.02
Let me guess you were asking one of the Rochester Ford dealerships?

Sorry, just a throw over irk from my Ford Customer Service days.

Now down to the question. Firstly on a historical note this question was first used as part of a comedy routine by an American comedian called Steve Wright IIRC. Very dead pan, more so than Jack Dee.

A few theories have been proposed in regards to this question. The first being that being a wave the speed of light is relative to the origin and that they would work as normal. This would be irrelevant as you would be going too fast to see where you were going.
The second would be that there would be a null effect generated and thus nothing would happen. This however doesn't take into consideration a few important affecting factors relating to light and vehicle design, which would ultimately result in light production due to direction and reflection of light.

One small consideration that you should take into consideration while driving at light speed is that the Ford Focus is known for it's spontaneous deployment of the airbags.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:10 / 16.10.02
Steven Wright. Steve Wright is a disc jockey.
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
09:14 / 16.10.02
Doh!

On a note about the above math problem. This is a classic example of "diversionary math" which is still one of the most widespread cons.
 
 
Smoothly
11:35 / 16.10.02
I think Potus is right on the speed of light thing when he says that they would work as normal. Although perhaps that rule (that the speed of light is constant regardless of the motion of the source or observer) breaks down once the speed of light is reached. If so it would have lots of other cool consequences. Like, what would you see when you looked in the rear-view mirror? In fact, that's another rule that would be broken if headlights failed to work at light speed - you could distinguish between moving at (that) constant speed and being stationary, without looking outside your vehicle (ie. by turning on a torch or looking into a mirror and not seeing your reflection).

You've got yourself a good car there though Atrange Attractor. The harmonica must sound amazing.

I've got a supplementary question. When I travel on the train and look out of the window as we draw to a standstill at a station, I get a strange sensation that once we've stopped going forwards we start moving ever so slowly backwards. Is this normal? Is there an explanation?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
11:44 / 16.10.02
Similar to how when you watch the end credits to a film scroll up the screen then, when the final, static copyright notice pops up you 'see' it scrolling down the screeen slightly, isn't this just your eyes/brain taking a couple of moments to readjust to the sudden lack of movement, after becoming accustomed to translating moving images?
 
 
Smoothly
12:05 / 16.10.02
Yeah, I thought it might be a persistance of vision thing, but I'd have thought that if it was a case of vision meeting expectation, the 'creep' would happen in the same direction as the previous motion.

Also, on the subject of trains, I've never heard a really explanation I can easily understand of how a fly getting hit by a train travelling in the opposite direction doesn't stop the train. In other words how something can change direction in contact with a moving object without, at some point, being stationary. Is this just a variation on Zeno's paradoxes or something?
 
 
Cloned Christ on a HoverDonkey
19:27 / 16.10.02
As for the feeling of going backwards when looking out of the window on a stopped train, I think it's more to do with expectation, rather than any persistance of vision.

I say this as I work on an industrial site with several production lines that continually move forwards at a few metres per minute. If these machines are ever stopped, they initially appear to be moving slowly backwards - even if I have only just arrived on the scene without seeing them for days.

I explained this phenomenon to some of my workmates, and they looked at me as though I was insane. It's a relief to know that there's other 'sufferers' out there. 8)
 
 
Bad Horse
22:07 / 16.10.02
Someone told me that if you turn off the conveyors in the manual sorting shed at the recycling centre every one falls over because the expectation of movement disorients you so much. They wouldn't let me near the switch so I can't vouch for this working, bugger.
 
 
Saveloy
23:06 / 17.10.02
A question about history:-
You know how all the stuff that you stick in your head - books, films, education etc - tends to clump together in lumps of significance, which you use to build mental models of various periods in the past? And how, as you're adding a new bit of information to your collection it will often cause previously stored nuggets, covering similar themes, to light up and go "remember us?" Well, I've just finished reading "The Secret Agent" by Joseph Conrad (first published in 1907), and all the time I was reading it I'd keep thinking: "hmmm, late 19th/early 20th Century: G K Chesterton's 'The Man Who Was Thursday', Oliver Reed and Diana Rig in 'The Assassination Bureau', anarchists, decadents, bombs (round ones with fizzing wicks), revolutionists, ferment, jumpers for goal posts, hmmm..." and it occured to me that I've clocked plenty of references to 'anarchy at the end of the 19th Century' in fiction and popular culture, but bugger all from any non-fiction sources. So, my question is: what went on back then to inspire Conrad, Chesterton et al? I'm interested in anything relating to the subject, really - links to info would be nice, book recommendations etc, as would brain dumps of Everything You Know About It. How seriously was anarchy and terrorism taken as a threat by the authorities, the media etc? Were there any dominant factions, leaders, beliefs etc. ? That sort of stuff.

In an author's note to the book (included in the Penguin Popular Classics edition), Conrad says that the plot to "The Secret Agent" was partly inspired by a brief conversation with a friend about an actual attempt to blow up the Greenwich observatory, and he mentions the "dynamite outrages in London, away back in the eighties." A bit of info on those particular events would be particularly lovely, ta.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
01:04 / 18.10.02
Here's something that's been bugging me a lot lately but that I felt rather silly starting a whole new thread on...

Okay. I know it's kind of a strange question, but: Does anyone here have problems w/overly teary eyes in cold weather? I don't know why it happens, but whenever moderately chilly breezes blow in my face, my eyes tear up something awful, to the point where I basically can't see anything. I've had surgery done on my tear ducts in the past, so I don't know if this is a common phenomenon or if it's specific to me. It's always been fairly annoying, but now that I've started to ride a bike everywhere, it's gotten a little dangerous, as well. I'll be riding at top speed down the road, a gust of wind will hit me head on, and then I'm suddenly for all intents and purposes blind, tears completely obscuring my vision, while careening down the road at 20-30 MPH. This is becoming a several times daily occurrence and I'm beginning to think I may have to quit riding altogether until it warms up...in another six months. Does anyone know if there's anything I can do about this? Am I a hopeless case?
 
 
Mazarine
01:15 / 18.10.02
You could wear nifty and fashionable goggles. Seriously, I have a pair of welding goggles that I have no excuse to wear now that I'm not playing with stage lights of powertools anymore.
 
 
Catjerome
02:02 / 18.10.02
Can anyone translate Italian? I have two South Park postcards from Italy that I can't translate (enough Italian under my belt to be conversational but not enough to get colloquial phrases and figures of speech):

"Che figata!" (picture: Kyle with "kick ass!" happy face)

"Mi diverto un casino!" (picture: Wendy in a bathing suit on a deck chair with a mixed drink)

arrrgh! What are they saying? This has been driving me bats for over a year.
 
 
Saint Keggers
02:14 / 18.10.02
Does anyone know of a homne-brew beer kit thats close to guinness? I've tried a few but none taste anywhere near it.
 
 
Baz Auckland
02:44 / 18.10.02
Che figata = What a figure(?) (I'm guessing from Spanish)

Mi diverto un casino = I amuse a casino(?) I have fun in a casino?

What is a saveloy? I always saw signs for them in chip shops but never did find out what one was.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
02:48 / 18.10.02
A saveloy is a highly spiced (well...) pork sausage that's smoked. They range from rock hard to watery with peeling skin. Remember those big red things? Saveloys. Though I think they and kranskys are pretty much the same thing...
 
 
Catjerome
04:14 / 18.10.02
!!! So is _that_ what a saveloy is in the song "i-tiddly-i-tie, eat brown bread"? Fantastic!
 
 
The Natural Way
08:04 / 18.10.02
Does anyone know the origins of the phrase "Burning the midnight oil"?

Jus' wunrin....
 
 
pointless and uncalled for
12:54 / 18.10.02
There are no home-brew kits that will taste like guiness as I think it may not be possible to brew it in the regular home conditions. This may also have something to do with the dead rats.

Must check snopes on that one.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
13:11 / 18.10.02
We all know the meaning of midnight oil as something late in the evening/night. However, what is the origin? The first reference I can find is in 1635 (Frances Quarles):

We spend our midday sweat, our midnight oil;
We tire the night in thought, the day in toil

That is indeed the first recorded occurrence of the term. The phrase, which we recognize today as burning the midnight oil, is simply a reference to the days when light was provided by oil burning lamps. If one was using a lamp - burning oil - at midnight, one was probably up late doing something that needed to be finished by the next morning. Midnight oil was being "consumed" in 1744, and a few years later we find it being burned.

One source claims that Quarles coined the phrase.


From here.
 
 
The Natural Way
13:15 / 18.10.02
Thanks, Roth!
 
 
grant
14:29 / 18.10.02
Deric: when I was at grad school, I experienced a similar thing (though less pronounced) and found wearing a pair of clear (non-prescription) glasses while biking helped.
Although goggles are cooler.

Saveloy: As I promises in the related Books thread:

The Anarchist Threat

On Friday afternoon, September 6, 1901, William McKinley, twenty-fifth president of the United States, greeted well-wishers filing by him at a reception at Buffalo’s Pan-American Exposition. Although three Secret Service agents, local police, and military guards were on duty, no one spotted a self-proclaimed anarchist who patiently stood in line, a revolver concealed in his handkerchief-wrapped hand.

At 4:07 p.m., McKinley turned to greet this man. Two shots rang out. The gunman, Leon Czolgosz (shole-gawz), was wrestled to the floor and taken into custody.


and (bear in mind the author of the page/book is a doctor)

Despite the use of every known therapeutic measure, William McKinley, aged 58, died on September 14, 1901.

One desperate man had stolen the glory owed not only to Buffalo, its surgeons, and its grandest public event, but also to McKinley and the American people. A hugely popular president, poised to lead the country to ever greater prosperity at home and prestige abroad, was dead. The nation was stunned! The president's surgical team, granted heroic stature immediately following surgery, was declared incompetent by laymen and professionals alike. Nearly every historical interpretation of the McKinley era concludes that "bungled surgery" cost the nation its leader.

A different explanation emerges when the medical evidence is re-examined in light of a more thorough understanding of surgical physiology. It is unlikely that Park or any other surgeon could have saved McKinley in 1901. Similar surgery today, however, would likely be successful. A reconsideration of the McKinley tragedy thus also provides the occasion for celebrating a century of medical progress.

McKinley’s assassination, believed to be the result of a vast conspiracy, fed popular fears of "foreign influence," despite the gunman having been a disillusioned native son. The story begins with the anarchists who mistrusted every form of ruling authority, even a democracy governed by elected leaders.


You can click around the site using the left-hand bar to find more snippets, like this:

Repudiating the teachings of his family faith, Roman Catholicism, he turned his attention to the newspapers and read about the socialists and, especially, about the exciting anarchists. Czolgosz was thoroughly captivated by the story of Gaetano Bresci, a common day laborer like himself, who had murdered the King of Italy with a tiny revolver. He clipped the article and folded it into his wallet. Periodically, he would remove and reread the story, savoring its details.

There's a much clearer version of the story (written from a non-surgeon's perspective) located here, at the marvelous Crime Library site.
 
 
Saveloy
14:51 / 18.10.02
grant, you rule not only with fists, but feet, knees, eyelids and ears of iron. Thanks.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
16:55 / 18.10.02
I actually already wear glasses and still have the "wind in my eyes" trouble. Although I may look into the goggles. Can you have prescription lenses done up for old aviator goggles? Because that really would be the most.
 
  

Page: 12345(6)7891011... 42

 
  
Add Your Reply