BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Invited possession/horsing and channeling/divine inspiration.

 
  

Page: 1234(5)6789

 
 
rosie x
19:39 / 05.09.06
Ember…just to answer your question briefly, so much is dependent upon context: the setting, the ritual, the attendants, the Powers being served and the purpose of the work, if any. My point about control was made to stress the importance of surrender, of matter to spirit, of devotee to deity. The particular Mysteries who are close to my heart would find it offensive if I were to assume a position of superiority by mentally dictating the dynamics of possession to them or holding them to contractual obligations of any sort. There are times when my Lwa Met Tet expects me to yield, and yield I do, without resistance. But sometimes I take a step back to focus on a particular piece of work for someone, or the practicalities of ritual. Possession, for me, is a sort of dance between my Lwa Met Tet and myself, with the intensity peaking at times, and then dropping off. The love between us is so intense that the desire for union is overwhelming at times. In a ritual context, I let it ebb and flow. She herself is a fairly gentle and delicate Lwa, and it was actually Her who taught me the breathing techniques (accompanied by a cold glass of water!) that proved to be useful during those times when a moment of self reclamation was needed. This was very helpful when I was first learning to share my body with Her, and helped me to better understand the dynamics of being ridden. So not really “control” over the interaction, but gentle moderation of intensity, if adjustment is needed, which is not always the case. Such moderation is more like a polite request, rather than a demanding order.
 
 
EmberLeo
19:53 / 05.09.06
*nods* That makes a fair amount of sense. If you don't mind my asking, how does your house deal with it if such a polite request is not met? That is, if a Lwa takes the intensity up a notch when the medium had prompted (however politely) for the intensity to decrease? Or if a Lwa behaves in a way that's somehow out of bounds?

I'm asking because this dance of control is something I've been struggling with - not just learning the dance itself, but trying to accommodate an external standard for what constitutes success when that standard is not clear to me.

I'm supposed to let go and let my Papa through as completely as possible, but I'm not supposed to let my body misbehave. The difference is, in theory, that I'm supposed to have a long conversation ahead of time wherin I explain what's expected of me, so that He knows. But it seems to me that this assumes that what the humans want is being placed about what the spirits think is fit, and I can't figure out how to correlate that with the idea that I'm completely subordinate to them.

I guess it sounds like... I'm subordinate to them, but we're not?

--Ember--
 
 
trouser the trouserian
08:52 / 06.09.06
xk
I do find it essential that each person's relationship with their Deities be a healthy one of mutual communication, yet I find the approach of coming to that relationship with a shopping list of calculated 'services to be rendered' sort of well, fucked up.

I think that's a fair enough point, but I do wonder to what extent this notion of approaching deites on a purely utilitarian basis is adhered to by people who relate to their deities via possession. The rather simplistic notion that deities are there merely to grant people's wishes without much in the way of reciprocacy seems to be more located within the post-Golden Dawn ceremonial magic traditions wherein the 'psychologizing' of deities is rooted.

The Roman view of the efficacy of appealing to the gods is quite interesting in this respect. Although there are some suggestions that Roman prayer was a form of bargaining - particularly in respect to the practice of "public vows" - wherein citizens would request specific help from the gods in and in return they would do something for the god in turn. For example, in 396BCE the Romans asked Juno to abandon the Etruscan city-state of Veii (to which she was a patron) and if she did this, offered to continue her cult in Rome and build her a temple:

Thee too, Queen Juno, who now dwellest in Veii, I beseech, that thou wouldst follow us, after our victory, to the City which is ours and which will soon be thine, where a temple worthy of thy majesty will receive thee. (Livy)

But Roman prayer did not bind the gods or oblige them to do something - they could simply decline the offering. However, if they did accept a petition, the individual was obliged to fulfill their vow.

You can see a similar process of mutual negotiation going on in South Asian local goddess traditions. In Sri Lanka for example, since the civil war, there's been something of a rise in popularity of Kali worship which is very much centred around possessed ritual specialists (usually women) being approached by Sri Lankans who've lost relatives (massacres, persecution, "disappearences") who want to know what's happened to their loved ones. It's not unusual for devotees to vow to perform a firewalk (either by themselves or another member of the family) if Kali will intervene. For a heart-rending ethnographical account, see Patricia Lawrence's contribution to Encountering Kali: In the Margins, at the Center, in the West (UCP 2003).

Ember
Thanks for that clarification re: Eris. I didn't think you were necesarily making a "judgement" but this point regarding the difference between say Hellenistic conceptions of Eris and contemporary Discordia/Chaos magic-derived ones does seem to get flagged up on Barbelith quite frequently, but much less so for other deities. There does seem, IMO, to be an opinion that deities have an "essential nature" that does not change over time and that Eris is something of an anomaly from this perspective.

Also, this notion that we are "subordinate" to the gods needs more exploration - I'd guess its a strong value in practices influenced by Christianity (in which I'd include modern western paganisms). I'm minded here of the fact that the ancient Greeks 'punished' their gods sometimes, by whipping their statues - and there's a lovely invocation to Pan where the poet basically says that if Pan does not bring to him the boy he's enamoured of (or another, just as good) he hopes that Pan will suffer discomforts.
 
 
Ticker
12:25 / 06.09.06
The rather simplistic notion that deities are there merely to grant people's wishes without much in the way of reciprocacy seems to be more located within the post-Golden Dawn ceremonial magic traditions wherein the 'psychologizing' of deities is rooted.

Yes I believe you've sorted out the thing that bugs me very eloquently. Thank you. It's not the exchange or the idea of mutual benefit in complimentary tasks (let me take the city and I'll build you a new temple) but the lack of respectful reciprocacy.

Also, this notion that we are "subordinate" to the gods needs more exploration - I'd guess its a strong value in practices influenced by Christianity (in which I'd include modern western paganisms).

I agree it needs to be deconstructed to tease out all of the elements. I for one would not frame it as always "subordinate" in a value system of worth or goals but rather one of partnership with distinct (if sometimes fluid) roles.
By way of analogy, my cat is in no way submissive to me or of lesser value just because I control the functions of the door. The cat is capable of getting me to open the door though my judgement of when he should be outside is informed from a different POV than his own. While I possess abilities he does not in controlling our shared environment we still negotiate the level of pressing need. He in turn must accept that sometimes I am not going to open the door for valid reasons and other times I will open the door just to show him my reasons are in fact valid (he doesn't like the rain).
I too can make a run for it and wiggle passed the God of the Threshold if need be but I have found that yes their perspective is better informed than my own. They are not obeyed blindly out of fear but out of respect.

As a technical professional I can state one of the most foolish things you can do is hire an expert and then not listen to them.
 
 
Quantum
14:52 / 06.09.06
So we're more cat than horse, cool! Pets of the Gods!
 
 
Unconditional Love
16:48 / 06.09.06
Some forms of eastern mysticism that have become rooted in western culture have also in my opinion been christainized, putting themselves over as playing on christain moralism with an eastern flavour, some of what i have read of buddhism comes to mind and some hinduism, i also know of two chinese based martial art institutes that operate through churches in my area, I can see why some institutions may think this adds social acceptability to them, wether it does or not is debateable, not one i intend to have at present.

The whole christain backbone to many forms of western paganism is little discussed from what i can see, even those paganisms that react against christianity are doing so because of it, and in some instances creating a caricature of adversity, crowley comes to mind in places, so does what some authors call dark paganism and satanism. Although it may well be a useful reaction to have to somebody who is trying to break away from christianity for what ever reason, but perhaps remaining there in conflict is not so desirable, the rebellion is still defined by a christain position, that of adversity, so is in effect, christian.

Then i would say almost everything processed by western cultures contains some form christain relationship in its cultural history, perhaps better to recognise that process without letting it become a point of identity, unless of course you are an identifying christian.
 
 
EmberLeo
18:53 / 06.09.06
Trou: difference between ... conceptions of Eris ... does seem to get flagged up on Barbelith quite frequently

Oh! I haven't been here long enough to see that. I'm sorry, I didn't know I was stepping in a pre-existing ... thing...

this notion that we are "subordinate" to the gods needs more exploration - I'd guess its a strong value in practices influenced by Christianity (in which I'd include modern western paganisms).

Even in the highly Christianized context of Umbanda (which is, of course, syncretized to Catholic Christianity) it's an attitude I see in humans far more than in the gods. I've occasionally had an Orixa or god poke at me to not underestimate Them, or to be mindful and polite, but I've never had Them go off on the kind of rants I've gotten out of humans on the topic.

We have this joke that you can tell what kind of Christian someone was raised by what kind of Pagan they are now.

I'm minded here of the fact that the ancient Greeks 'punished' their gods sometimes

That's what's odd, actually. Between my Umbanda house and my Heathen community, I see a lot more sense of subordination in the Afro-Diasporic context, and yet I see a much stronger tradition of bargaining, and of at least the Mama delivering consequences if the humans don't like what they're getting. Covering an altar with cloth, destroying trance regalia, refusing to call, or placing restrictions on when, how, and for how long a power is called, etc. Umbanda seems to treat the powers as a specific other, with rules and such unique to Them.

Heathenism treats the gods more like people, friends and family, who happen to be older and more powerful in some ways. As with my own friends and family, I don't usually go for punishment so much as simple consequence, you know? I won't work for a boss who treats me poorly, I won't be friends with a person who treats me poorly, why would Their lack of a physical body change my disposition in this area?

So far almost treats me well and when They need/want/expect something, They let me know. If I don't think I can do what They ask, I'm honest, and we discuss it. (They usually assure me They wouldn't have asked if They didn't know I could do it.)

If I need something, I let Them know how important it is to me by telling Them what offerring seems of comparable value to me.

The rest of the time we just ... hang out? commune? live together?

In general, I don't ask for much, and I try to make sure I've already done everything I can on a mundane level first when I do.

xk: As a technical professional I can state one of the most foolish things you can do is hire an expert and then not listen to them.

YES. That I agree with.

Quantum: So we're more cat than horse, cool! Pets of the Gods!

Not having raised a horse, I can't say how much power they have in their partnership, but I'd think at the very least the sheer scale makes a difference.

--Ember--
 
 
trouser the trouserian
08:55 / 07.09.06
Ember
What you've been writing about the mimesis between your Heathen & Umbanda practice is fascinating - particularly the way in which the latter accepts the Norse deities and reinterprets the relationships between them within its own terms - although it's understandable that negotiating between two distinct 'spaces' (which have both similarities and differences in both practices & understandings) can be difficult at times. I wonder, to what extent you get shared understandings between the two spaces? So, to what degree does the exchange of perspectives between the two spaces inform the practices? Is the "conversation" regarding possession within your Heathen space shaped by the Umbanda practice - and vice versa?

For me, one of the interesting features of possession is that its' generally a "public" or shared practice - as others have noted on this thread. By which I mean that, unlike the majority of western magical practices, it's located within social spaces and it's not generally compartmentalised from other aspects of one's life. Also, and I'd suggested that this is where one of the difficulties lie - what constitutes "correct" practice or perspective may well be managed by ritual specialists (experts). This, I'd suggest, is very different from the majority of western magical practice, which, since the Englightenment, has become increasingly secular, private, and text-based. It's entirely possible to learn particular western magical practices - such as the invocation of god-forms - out of a book and on your own, without having to have much to do with other practitioners - and as the "content" of one's experiences are intextricably bound up the notion of spiritual experience as essentially private - it's easy to see why so many magical practitioners (myself included) get "prickly" when their understandings get questioned in public forums such as this one.

Further, western secularisation has effectively "compartmentalised" spirituality from other aspects of life - hence the possibility of "choice" both in terms of choosing one's religion or path, and how far one accepts the consequences of related experiences into other areas of life.

Indeed, the notion that there is a seperation at all between personal spirituality and other life goals is characteristic of secularisation. This relates to another issue raised on the thread - that of "trusting", "listening to" or heeding the advice of powers or deities. xk used the analogy of bringing in experts and then not taking their advice. But of course if we don't like what an expert is telling us, we can always talk to another one, ad infinitum. I do think it's nonetheless a useful analogy because the experts I listen to are the people I've built up working relationships with over time, rather than the ones who ring me up and try and sell me server & print deals over the phone. So I'm wondering how far this allowance of influence, let's say, extends to our relationships with deities? On the Omens thread, I noted how omens in ancient Rome, the taking of omens was very much a part of social & political decision-making. A bad omen had, at least the potentiality to stop a marriage, an economic partnership, or even a war, taking place. In some cultures where possession features, the "advice" of the deities seems to carry a similar weight and pervades all aspects of public life. How do we 'handle it' when what our deities say to us moves beyond the realm of the immediately "spiritual" and towards our jobs, partnerships, etc? And what happens when this conflicts with what we see as our own desires and goals?
 
 
EmberLeo
17:38 / 07.09.06
the mimesis between your Heathen & Umbanda practice is fascinating

I'm not familiar with the word "mimesis". I tried looking it up, and it didn't quite follow. I assume you mean "similarity"?

I wonder, to what extent you get shared understandings between the two spaces?

Quite a bit, in this case, because the overlap between my particular Heathen community and my Umbanda house consists of several people. As I understand it, the connection between the Heathen community locally, and this Umbanda house came as a result of Odin dropping in unexpectedly when nobody in the Heathen community yet had any experience with Posession. I don't know how others handled it, but my Gythia handled it by getting in touch with this Umbanda house to ask for their help in understanding the process.

It's been quite a while since that learning relationship was established, and a lot of adjustments to make things work better in the Heathen context have been made since then, long before I got involved. So by the time I got there, approaching first from the Heathen side, the Aesir and Vanir had Their own methods within our community that are, in some ways, quite different from the Umbanda methods.

The main reason I, personally, got into the Umbanda house had nothing to do with the Aesir or Vanir, or even the Orixa. A friend of mine who was an initiated Vodouisant introduced me, for his own reasons, to Le Baron Samedi, at which point I was startled to discover that the mysterious Man I used to see in my window when I was a small child was Ghede - a connection pre-dating my personal link with the Vanir by a good 10 years at least. When I started looking around for a way to understand that connection better, I was looking for a Vodou house that might be willing to teach me, but had no idea where to begin. The woman who is now the Mama of the Umbanda house invited me to work with the Loa through Umbanda, so here I am. It doesn't feel ideal, but it's better than nothing, and the Orixa seem quite happy to have me for a singer and craftsperson.

It's entirely possible to learn particular western magical practices ... out of a book and on your own

Not for me! I'm not much of a book-learner. It's not the reading, so much as the lack of interactive exploration. I do great in discussions like this, but all my best learning is hands-on with other people there to compare, contrast, experience with me. I do have quite a lot of books for reference, but I don't generally use them to grok new concepts, only to look up the details of things I already pretty much understand.

it's easy to see why so many magical practitioners (myself included) get "prickly" when their understandings get questioned in public forums such as this one

*nods* The flip side of that is Traditions, where many people have worked out what they agree on, and have the validation of that agreement. Poly-trad people are usually more easygoing because they, themselves, have multiple answers to any given question, but folks who have followed one Tradition for a long time, or especially who were raised with a particular Tradition may be uncomfortable with somebody who seems to discount what to them is a very strong foundation.

Indeed, the notion that there is a seperation at all between personal spirituality and other life goals is characteristic of secularisation.

*nods* I remember the first time it occurred to me that the Orixa might take an interest in my extended family. I was horrified, because I knew my family had little to no interest in the Orixa (those that acknowledge They might matter are actually kind of afraid of them). I felt very much that it would not be fair to my family, who did not choose to work with Orixa, for my own work to bleed out into their lives without their invitation.

the taking of omens was very much a part of social & political decision-making ... the "advice" of the deities seems to carry a similar weight and pervades all aspects of public life.

That makes sense to me. Messages are messages. Method of delivery does affect my perception of it's accuracy, but ultimately it's confirmation that matters - the same message delivered multiple ways.

And what happens when this conflicts with what we see as our own desires and goals?

I don't remember who was, but one of the Orixa (or maybe it was Ghede, so Loa) started to tell me it wasn't my path to have children. When I dissagreed vehemently, the Power in question explained that I could go ahead and have kids if I wanted them, but it meant I would have to give up other things. I explained that since bearing and raising children has always been my greatest life goal, anything I supposedly had to give up is, in my mind, something I was never meant to have anyway. They accepted that.

I got the impression at the time that I had an opportunity to be a Major Influence in the pagan community outside my immediate area, or something, and would have to choose between devoting my time to that, or to children. *shrugs* I don't know, though - I know the horse to be somebody who has serious reservations about the topic in question, and I've never heard it through any other medium, so I'm not entirely sure there's a general consensus amongst the Powers That Be that I'm not actually supposed to have kids.

--Ember--
 
 
Ticker
18:53 / 07.09.06
But of course if we don't like what an expert is telling us, we can always talk to another one, ad infinitum.

heh. We joke about those people too.
'lookin' for a mirror'


I do think it's nonetheless a useful analogy because the experts I listen to are the people I've built up working relationships with over time, rather than the ones who ring me up and try and sell me server & print deals over the phone.


Well from my POV one is an expert you have come to respect from experience and the other is just a stranger claiming to be an expert. Problem is often even the best credentials can be forged or you're talking to a plumber when you need an electrician and you just don't understand the problem well enough to know that. I suspect that's why many folks get refered to someone else even outside of a pantheon.

"What you got here is a leaky subconscious manifestation of Death. Now I could maybe patch it up for you but you'll be wanting to talk to June, she's the Jungian Archetypist I was telling you about, for a full overhaul. Me, I'm a simple thanatologist and you're not ready to kick off just yet. You can give me another call when you are though, you seem like nice people. Real Nice People."
 
 
EmberLeo
21:50 / 07.09.06
This is a non-sequiture to the discussion we're already having, but it's on-topic for the thread.

My question for you folks is about time:

In my experience, my best posessory trancework is done slowly, focused on one power, over the course of several hours at least. To get a really deep trance I need at least half an hour to focus on establishing the trance state and connection with the deity I'm invoking, and once the connection is made, I can coast for hours floating from shared conciousness to deep posession (though I rarely forget more than a few minutes conversation at a time).

But one of the problems I run into in Umbanda especially, but to a lesser degree in Heathen trance rituals is a need to drop in and out of trance quickly, and rituals of limited length. Practice helps, certainly, but I often feel like I'm only just getting to the beginnings of an understanding of something when I'm pulled out of trance, and it's very frustrating.

Does anybody else find themselves challenged in this way, where their training doesn't seem to match their natural talents, and/or where there's a timing issue?

--Ember--
 
 
trouser the trouserian
10:31 / 08.09.06
Ember
"Mimesis" probably wasn't the right term in this context (but I might come back to it in due course) - what I was thinking about when I posed that question was the ways in which - out of a dialogue - a new mutual understanding of a process can emerge which in turn, can modify both groups' practices or at least their conversations about the practice - and I wondered if you thought this occurred at all between the Umanda house and the Heathen group.

the connection between the Heathen community locally, and this Umbanda house came as a result of Odin dropping in unexpectedly when nobody in the Heathen community yet had any experience with Posession ... my Gythia handled it by getting in touch with this Umbanda house to ask for their help in understanding the process.

So the contact between yr Gythia and the Umbanda practitioners helped yr Heathen community get a handle on possession - and presumably helped framed yr possession-practice. I guess what I was trying to ask was if this interchange has influenced the ways in which the Umbanda practitioners view their possession practice as well as the Umandas influencing the Heathens.
One of the communities in which I've been involved in possession practice is the UK's Queer Pagan Camp (QPC -) which is an annual event (with smaller, subsidiary camps & associated events around it) which attracts people from a wide variety of magical backgrounds & ranges of experiences. A fair number of the people who met at QPC work with each other outside of camp, so it's not just the kind of space where people turn up and go away and don't see each other the rest of the year. What's happening at QPC in regard to aspecting/possession (& trance-dance) is that there's not so much a new "tradition" evolving out of the melting-pot of divergent perspectives, but I would say that there's a mutually-shared set of "good practices" and perspectives around apecting/possession that's shared between the more experienced practitioners, regardless of their background affiliations to particular 'traditions'.So for example, until I went to QPC, I hadn't really come across safekeeping in a formal ritual-possession context - at least not in the way it is prioritised at QPC - but it immediately made sense to me insofar as from previous experiences, I know that if there's someone present that I trust enough to "bring me back" as it were, then this tends to have the effect of enabling me to "let go" quicker - if that makes sense. (Lou Hart, one of the "founders" of QPC, discusses some of the magical perspectives growing there in her article Magic is a many-gendered thing.)
 
 
grant
13:42 / 08.09.06
More book larnin' here, but:
But one of the problems I run into in Umbanda especially, but to a lesser degree in Heathen trance rituals is a need to drop in and out of trance quickly, and rituals of limited length. Practice helps, certainly, but I often feel like I'm only just getting to the beginnings of an understanding of something when I'm pulled out of trance, and it's very frustrating.

There's a bit in Mama Lola in the middle where Brown describes a ritual that just doesn't come together. They spend hours singing and the lwa just don't show up. Eventually, in the wee hours of the morning, I think it's Ghede who makes an appearance and saves the day -- but the point here is that she's an experienced practitioner within a (more or less) traditional context who takes whatever time is necessary to get where she (and the rest of the congregation) need to be. There's no time limit.

Along the same lines, the services are usually defined more as "parties" (as in, "I'm throwing a party for Kouzin Azaka next week!") than as services. It's not "turn up for the sermon, possession at 10, coffee and danish in the social hall at 11:30." It's "turn up for dinner, we'll do our thing downstairs after, it'll be a fun night."

I was once at a religious festival in Sri Lanka that involved people dropping into trance, walking on fires, all that business, and it was pretty obviously an all-night affair with a festival atmosphere -- folks selling peanuts on the fringes, people leaving to get beers and coming back. The Buddhist monks never left that I could see, just sat in the middle leaning on umbrellas looking authoritative, and the tranced folks were kind of busy dancing. It was like they had jobs, but the rest of the scene was a carnival -- still, clearly a significant religious event, but one without an obvious schedule.
 
 
Ticker
15:23 / 08.09.06
I have a couple of biggish events to go to later this month. I'm looking forward to the entire weekend approach and really being able to relax into it. I've had to work some office deals to get unhooked from my electric leash (on call) for three weekends in a row which is a fairly big deal for me.

Each event is fairly different but there will be horsing at each (by other folks) so I'm curious to to see how the same community handles three very different sub groups. Well maybe the groups aren't so vastly different but the focus of each event is.

This will be the first time I've attend a large scale group doing possesion work. Close proximity to small workings often make me feel slippery and being a new attendee I feel some compulsion to maintain a support role until my host signals it is appropriate to get into personal work. I suspect my uptight New England etiquette makes me a respectful house guest but also some what overly cautious.
 
 
EmberLeo
18:10 / 08.09.06
I guess what I was trying to ask was if this interchange has influenced the ways in which the Umbanda practitioners view their possession practice as well as the Umandas influencing the Heathens.

Oh! Hmm, I don't know - probably.

xk: Are you going to Keepers Crossing?

--Ember--
 
 
EmberLeo
18:13 / 08.09.06
Sorry for the double post - I forgot to reply to Grant!

Yeah, I'd gotten the impression that traditional ceremonies like that don't have scheduled endings. I'm not sure why the Umbanda House does it that way - maybe it's a Neopagan influence, I don't know.

But it definitely isn't the way I'd prefer to do it.

--Ember--
 
 
Ticker
19:20 / 08.09.06
Yup, Dark Moon Rising + Mabon Circle, Keeper's Crossing, then the Healer's Weekend.
All in one pair of overalls.

Are you planning on attending?
 
 
EmberLeo
21:52 / 08.09.06
No, but the Teacher I mentioned to you before before is going again and she's quite happy about it.

--Ember--
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:27 / 16.09.06
I'd have to agree that Helenism views Eris completely differently than Discordianism.--Princess

yes but so what? You could probably say that about any deity.--t the t

For me, the answer to that "so what" is that I'm interested to know how much Greek!Eris "feeds into" Dischordia!Eris, and how this affects interactions with Her. I find the whole phenomenon of deities changing and evolving over time fascinating, and it has a very direct bearing on the stuff that I've been getting up to recently. It seems especially relevant when the deity might be popping round for tea and crumpets.
 
 
Ticker
15:35 / 16.09.06
Funny, I've been asking about the same thing
 
 
Princess
21:52 / 16.09.06
I want to input on that but it's probably better in the thread XK just mentioned. So there it shall be.
 
 
Ticker
12:42 / 18.09.06
Come talk to me about why your Gods are coming through in possession work rather than in corporeal form in the Gods thread

I would like to talk about it over there so we can examine the evolution of various Deities' manifestations rather than specificly in terms of possesion.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
19:41 / 12.10.06
Two new articles are up on the Cauldron Farms website which might be of interest:

Open To The Divine: The Path of the Horse
Horsing the Gods of the Northern Tradition

(BTW--The articles' author, Raven Kaldera, is puting together a book on the subject and is soliciting responses to a questionniare which interested people can find here.)
 
 
EmberLeo
22:05 / 12.10.06
Oh, that article about Horsing the Gods of the Northern Tradition is fabulous! I wonder how much material is drawn from the experiences of people connected with Diana Paxson...

--Ember--
 
 
EmberLeo
22:21 / 12.10.06
I have written up a rather long reply to the article, which I have emailed to the author. If it interests you folks, I can post it here.

--Ember--
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
22:34 / 12.10.06
I for one'd love to read it.
 
 
EmberLeo
22:43 / 12.10.06
I just read your fabulous article about Horsing the Aesir, Vanir, and Rokkr. My experience seems to have a fair amount in common with yours. That is to be expected since I'm Hrafnar trained, but as the group I run, called the Vanic Conspiracy, has a somewhat different focus, and somewhat different experiences, I thought you might be interested in my input on the subject of the Vanir. This is, initially, just my own notes in response to your article. Your descriptions overall seem to be in a somewhat more formal context than we normally have set up - not that we're per se *informal*, but we don't designate attendants, for example.

Freya: "If she comes in her warrior aspect, she will be cooler and not do those behaviors, although she will still want the attractive attendants around."

I have also experienced that Her Seidhkona aspect is VERY blunt, usually pretty serious, and the thoughts that pass through the Horse's head may be vicious or frightening. I have felt Her actively prepared to rip out another Horse's heart through their ribcage as a potentially necessary last resort to banishing an unwelcome posessor.

It's not that She's bad, but She's totally unphased by the prospect of doing what is necessary, magically or physically, to solve a problem in front of Her. Usually Her viciously practical solutions prove unecessary simply because it is clear that She's NOT bluffing.

We have noticed a tendancy for the name "Mardoll" to signify Freya as Njordh's daughter, a younger, maiden path, or the aspect of Freya who has searched the seas for Od. It is this path that Njordh particularly dotes on, and gently guards.

Nerthus: "She is always veiled, because anyone besides a Vanir priest/ess who sees her face must be killed."

This has not been my experience, though I can see why it might make for a deeper trance, and I'm actually wondering to myself why it is that this ISN'T our experience, considering the reasons for it... Huh....

Anyway, Nerthus as the Vanic Conspiracy tends to encounter Her seems to be very much a Vanaheim Farm Wife - practical, and blunt, cheerful, mothering, capable of being primal, but tends to consider that private, and not terribly fond of clothing that gets in Her way, except veils that aid in the trance itself.

Njordh: I had no idea He so liked Rum, but that makes sense - it wouldn't be a good idea for me as the horse, since I also work in Umbanda with Ghede and other Lwa and Orixa.

We find He likes wines from all along the European coast, including Champagne and Port. He likes to give Freya pearls, I've noticed. I'm not His favorite horse, but I'll do in a pinch (it's kind of my job for all the Vanir, as far as I can tell). I haven't noticed Him caring about the gender of His horse more than He cares about the strength of His connection to the horse. Perhaps if we had more mediums with strong connections with Him, that could be weighed more objectively.

Freyr: "Frey will horse men or women, so long as the latter are masculine, willing to shapeshift to male astrally before he arrives, and willing to wear an enormous ritual phallus under their tunic. "

While I have definitely felt the shift into masulinity when I have tranced Freyr, and I am told it's quite obvious that I'm male at those times, and straight women and gay men both find themselves VERY attracted to me, I have never found a need to shift to masculine *before* His arrival, and He has never prompted me to wear a physical phallus for Him.

"He will never hit on anyone who isn't willing and enthusiastic; he has no wish to make people feel uncomfortable in that way."

That is my personal experience with Him, and yet I have seen Him overstep His bounds in this area with another horse. However, the subject of His attention seems to have a history of issues with Him, so I think there's more to it.

"Yes, [Freyr and Freya] do have a sexual relationship, although it is a ritual thing, done for fertility purposes to make the crops grow rather than his romantic relationship with Gerda or his share-the-wealth sexual attitude..."

Hrm, I've never looked at it quite that way... In my experience Freyr and Freya have a very deep love and intensely sexual connection with eachother, but I suppose it's true that the connection is not, per se, *romantic*. I wouldn't say it's *purely* ritual, however. To me they feel like non-romantic Soul Mates, and I have repeatedly experienced Freya's pain at the knowledge that Freyr will die at Ragnarok, and Od is unlikely to ever return. (Note for Barbelith: I have a LOT more to say on this particular subject.)

Heide: "Heid, when riding a human body, comes across as a little old witchy woman, the sort who lives in the gingerbread house out in the forest."

Pretty much. Rarely, and I suppose for a very specific reason, I have had Her come across as in Her 40s or so - early menopausal. I'm too young to be a preferred horse, but again, one of my jobs for the Vanir seems to be that if there is no other horse available, I am obliged to fill in.

"She prefers black and gold for her colors"

She also prefers a greyish-purple in my experience along with black, and I don't get so much of the gold, but when it's there, it's a darker, antiqued gold, rather than the bright shining gold Freya gets. (Note for Barbelith: I had a dream where Heide appeared as invisible, but draped in layers of gauzy cloth. The under layer was black, the middle layer was purple, and the top layer was pale grey. The overall effect averaged to the greyish-purple She seems to prefer, at least from me.)

Gullveig: I notice you've left Her out. Some percieve Her as an aspect of Freya. I treat Her sepparately (as instructed), but I percieve Her as Heide when She was younger, very powerful, and less in control of those powers.

In my experience Gullveig is quite wary of the Aesir in general, Odin specifically, and of Men in general who do not specifically belong to the Vanir. I've seen Her behave through a particular horse as though She has a rather severe case of Post Tramatic Stress Disorder from Her experiences being used as a weapon in the Aesir/Vanir war. Most of the reast of the time She seems to have an interest in the empowerment of female magic-workers - especially Seidhkonas. I have no idea how She responds to those of fluid gender who approach Her, or those who are biologically male but identify as female, but I have seen Her ride a particularly ergi, effeminite male horse without difficulty.

Hnoss and Gersemi: I haven't seen Gersemi horsed, but I have accidentally horsed Hnoss, and She seems to be about 7-8 years old or so. She expected to see Gersemi nearby, identifying the adolescent female who was near as looking very much like Her. She seemed to feel very nervous and afraid to be at this party without Her older sister to watch after Her.

I brought away from that unexpected experience the sense that Freya's Daughters wear white - one with Gold (Hnoss, I believe), and one with sparkling jewels (Gersemi, I believe). I don't think horsing them is ever likely to be a common thing, and if we ever deliberately invoke them, we will be sure to invoke Gersemi first.

--Ember--
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:40 / 15.01.07
I'm not sure if this ought to go here or over in the sexism in magic thread, since it's a sort of continuation of some of the discussion over there. I've decided to plonk it here because it seems more relevant, although I think the sex and gender angles are important.

The gendering of spirit possession, with the horse being regarded as a passive, "feminine" recipient and the spirit being regarded as active and penetrative seems to me to be a pretty widespread mode of thought. I have come to believe that it is not just unhelpful but genuinely damaging.

First off, I'm not going to try and insist that possession is NOTHING LIKE SEX EVEREVEREVER!1!!, because there are obviously parallels between some aspects of some experiences of possession, and some experiences of sex. A lot of us don't really have a possession toolkit, the concepts and language that we need to talk about the process, so it's sometimes handy to be able to dip into the sex toolkit for a widget or two that seem to fit the bill just as we might dip into the computing/internet toolkit or the BDSM toolkit.

What I have a problem with is the very rigid and absolutist way in which spirit-possession is gendered by some. When you insist flat out that a person being entered by a spirit is precisely and exactly the same as a lady's mimsy being entered by a gentleman's tummy-snake, you're no longer offering the opportunity just to dip into the sex toolkit for a useful item. You're insisting that the same set of rules and responsibilities that one might reasonably apply to a sex act be transferred across wholesale to a situation where those rules don't really apply, creating unnecessary tension and friction when such artifical boundaries are inevitably transgressed. You are also insisting that instead of a few useful terms and concepts, a person engaging in possession must drag all their sexual and gender baggage over into what is possibly already a rather twitchy area.

As I have mentioned previously, during my first serious working it seems that I underwent full amnesiac possession. In discussions afterwards, I found that some of my interlocutors were so heavily invested in the concept of possession = penetrative sex that they couldn't let go of it. One or two people got pretty indignant when I wouldn't--couldn't--parse the experience as some kind of criminal assault. Essentially I felt I was being cast as an willing and stupid victim rather than a competent adult making a potentially risky but reasonable choice in continuing the work.

If it had just been a couple of stroppy online exchanges that would have been nothing to write home about, but I found that without wishing to, I'd taken on board a lot of what had been said to me. This kind of thinking had a real negative impact on my work and my relationships with my Guys, because all the time I was trying to do my damn job I had this kind of running commentary going on. There was personal stuff, gender stuff, political stuff--was I colluding in something reprehensible? Being a Bad Feminist? Instead of being able to engage happily in what I regard as a healthy, natural form of interaction I was having to spend increasing amounts of energy dealing with the ick. I think I've finally arrived at the point where I can stop it affecting my work anymore, but it took a long time and a lot of effort to scrape all the gunk out of my brane.

I can't help wondering if the people I spoke to would have seen matters differently were I a male witch, or if I was working with a female entity.
 
 
Ticker
17:27 / 15.01.07
I'm glad you're talking about it and here in this context.

I've run into internal gender baggage related magical issues on a few occassions and what I needed to work through them was making sense of the internal context, and how it had been informed/changed by external gender values. What was utterly useless to me was this internal examination being lifted and used by other people to say anything about external gender issues or magical systems. It just made shit more confusing.

My circumstance is very different than yours on a number of levels however I think I can say with some conviction it is important to define what you want input on. In the context of my work I needed to access some things that culturally are not in the gender kit I perceive myself having permission to get into. So I worked with Someone who had access. Our interaction is not sexual (though it involves sexuality) and to define it as a cliche female/passive male/active sexual exchange is useless. For me gender is an core factor in this particular work, but external judgments on how I should view the interactions are usually counterproductive.

I don't do the same kind of possession work as most people in this thread and I'd hesitate to use that term at all to define it. However packaging my role as passive is as useless as saying those with the internal port are passive to those with the external plug sexually everytime they interact. As someone with built in internal ports and retrofitted external plugs when need be, I find those definations to be worse than useless in creating productive dialogue around issues of consent and personal power.

To be very clear I personally view there to be no inherent power role assigned to possession work or sex acts except what the participants bring to them. To assume there is is to be trapped by the eons of dogma and oppression we're trying to crawl out from under.
 
 
Unconditional Love
16:51 / 16.01.07
Perhaps people aren't assigning these roles based on gender, but on biological sensation or simple anatomical sympathy.
It makes a quick and convenient way to explain the giving up of personality to be inhabited by a spirit. I wonder what language mediums use?

Both predominant sexes can be penetrated in a number of ways, the act of assigning gender roles to the sensation is wrong, thou i would assume some people find it an easy description to provide a map of the experience, it basically seems to me that people are using a convenient method of describing the sensation of opening up and being filled, which is also charged by the use of sexual metaphor. The idea of sexually charged spirituality moves two usually taboo subjects when considered together and anchors them. Another way of expressing the intimacy of this kind of contact and the kind of receptivity required by the possessed.
 
 
Unconditional Love
20:19 / 16.01.07
Something else just occurred to me, the sensation is very similar to orgasm, the loss of self, an opening to what is considered by repressive cultures an alien energy, sexuality.

There is also a kind of swooning dream to sexual fantasy that fits the bill as well, in sexual fantasy that relates to another being/beings you open yourself out to interact with these parts of your sexual dreaming, you allow things created/belonging to your sexual energy, a semi controllable force to interact with you, the character of these sexual encounters is not entirely under your own control, in my experience, these parts of the sexuality have an inherent life of there own, its a way to engage with those areas of consciousness that seem to have a life of there own. sexuality being one of the most difficult areas to control, yet considerably easier to transform.

I am in no way saying that sexual fantastic encounter is the same as a possession experience, just pointing out a few similarities.

So perhaps its not the gender descriptors themselves that are of importance put the comparisons with a sexual interaction, i think the feeling of a loss of self and disassociation are large contributing factors to why the terminology may be employed, the masculine feminine labels are perhaps acting as a misused way to maintain a sense of male dominance within certain community's.
 
 
EmberLeo
21:42 / 16.01.07
I would tend to agree that the sexual characteristics are more the reason than the gendered ones on a mechanical level. However, the cultural context of the language use, and in which posession occurs traditionally make that distinction a little fuzzy.

So I guess... yes there are cultural gender paralells that may hurt more than they help and tell us more about perspective than mechanism, yes there are useful metaphors in using sex to describe posession in experience, perspective and mechanism, and yes to have that as the only, all-encompassing metaphor creates additional, unecessary problems.

That said, I noticed in the last Trance Class that we discussed the challenges in this area: Learning Posessory work often does (whether it should or not) open up the emotional can-of-worms that is personal issues with sexuality. Folks who have been abused in the past, or don't deal well with sexuality often find the "invasion" of posession to be traumatic all over again because it does push those buttons, even if it hadn't occurred to them ahead of time that it should.

I find it interesting that there is a documented correlation between recieving sexual abuse and dissociation. I'm sure that also plays into this picture, but it's potentially quite convoluted, eh?

--Ember--
 
 
Unconditional Love
23:51 / 16.01.07
Very much convoluted,, Sexual abuse especially at an early age can also create effects such as hearing voices, hallucinations related to abuse and often these are not characterized by the initial abuse but have evolved over time through interaction.

Through therapy myself i have come to realise that some of the elements i used to call guides were infact adult comprehensions of toys i used to relate to as a child. This is not to say that peoples guides are rooted in this kind of experience, but it has helped me disentangle a huge amount of the childhood baggage i was bringing into my spiritual practice.

Also the powerlessness associated with abuse becomes prominent, the lack of self control as one is taken against ones will into a place of pain. This is an overpowering feeling that stays with me as an adult often leading to depression, self harm and anger. The experience itself though is not to be disregarded, as i believe it can be transformed into something more useful, but i do wonder if keeping the experience open is tantamount to constant psychological and emotional self harm.(Since my own abuse took place in a semi religous setting i wonder if my interactions with all things spiritual are self harming at some level, but spirituality was used as a comfort blanket by my abuser directly after the abuse, doing something i perceive as spiritual for me brings me an immediate sense of relief and calm, another quality i believe i can and have transformed for my own betterment.)

I have moved my own practice away from possession work to what i have seen being called godforming in these regards, aspirations to exhibit qualities and characteristics of deity rather than total self loss.

I am though thinking of seeing what is involved in spiritualism, as the community setting appeals as do the spiritual safety measures when it comes to spirits being worked with, i have also noted a greater tolerance from some people i have met that were spiritualists, especially towards alternate faiths.
 
 
EmberLeo
00:06 / 17.01.07
Sed: I've read through what you wrote a couple times and realize already that I need to read it a couple more times before commenting on the meat of it. What I know on this topic is stuff I'm still correlating.

The one thing I do have: Through therapy myself i have come to realise that some of the elements i used to call guides were infact adult comprehensions of toys i used to relate to as a child

I have a related experience, I think, but not in a manner directly pertinent to Posession.

--Ember--
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
00:49 / 17.01.07
XK: I've run into internal gender baggage related magical issues on a few occassions and what I needed to work through them was making sense of the internal context, and how it had been informed/changed by external gender values.

I think this is one of the things that's really bound to come up in a person's magical career. Nobody is 100% 'masculine' or 'feminine' (however your particular culture defines those things) and sooner or later you're going to have to deal with that. Fairly or unfairly I suspect that the insistance on rigid gender roles in magic may have evolved and endured in part as a reaction against this, a way to shore up the masculine or feminine identity against the scratchy awareness that one is not all man or all woman.

packaging my role as passive is as useless as saying those with the internal port are passive to those with the external plug sexually everytime they interact. As someone with built in internal ports and retrofitted external plugs when need be, I find those definations to be worse than useless in creating productive dialogue around issues of consent and personal power.

I could not agree more.


Sed: Both predominant sexes can be penetrated in a number of ways, the act of assigning gender roles to the sensation is wrong, thou i would assume some people find it an easy description to provide a map of the experience, it basically seems to me that people are using a convenient method of describing the sensation of opening up and being filled, which is also charged by the use of sexual metaphor. The idea of sexually charged spirituality moves two usually taboo subjects when considered together and anchors them. Another way of expressing the intimacy of this kind of contact and the kind of receptivity required by the possessed...
[snip]
...perhaps its not the gender descriptors themselves that are of importance put the comparisons with a sexual interaction, i think the feeling of a loss of self and disassociation are large contributing factors to why the terminology may be employed, the masculine feminine labels are perhaps acting as a misused way to maintain a sense of male dominance within certain community's.


And I'm perfectly happy for people who find that there is an area of overlap between the way they experience sexual fantasy or activity and the way they experience spiritual activity, positive or negative, to use the language of one to describe the other. It can as you seem to suggest be a powerful and healthy act to bring spirituality and sexuality together, if not in practice then in the way one talks about these two areas. Not a problem. What I'm protesting is, to quote my own earlier post: the very rigid and absolutist way in which spirit-possession is gendered by some... [the insistance] that the same set of rules and responsibilities that one might reasonably apply to a sex act be transferred across wholesale to a situation where those rules don't really apply, creating unnecessary tension and friction when such artifical boundaries are inevitably transgressed. You are also insisting that instead of a few useful terms and concepts, a person engaging in possession must drag all their sexual and gender baggage over into what is possibly already a rather twitchy area.


Emberleo: Learning Posessory work often does (whether it should or not) open up the emotional can-of-worms that is personal issues with sexuality. Folks who have been abused in the past, or don't deal well with sexuality often find the "invasion" of posession to be traumatic all over again because it does push those buttons, even if it hadn't occurred to them ahead of time that it should.

I think that's because possession and other forms of intense spirit contact involve working with the permeability of one's personal boundaries. If those boundaries have been messed about with then related issues can certainly crop up during the course of the work. Sexual abuse will almost certainly create serious issues that the spirit-worker will have to deal with, but then so can other forms of abuse: emotional cruelty, physical assault, etc.

I reckon, though, that having to work within a model in which possessory work is treated as mapping closely or exactly onto penetrative sex is very likely to cause unnecessary grief and trouble for the n00b spirit-worker who has such abuse in hir past. Imagine saying to someone "to do this work you have to become completely powerless again, you have to be invaded again, and you're just going to have to deal with it." Nice.

I'd say this kind of thing does damage not only by suggesting that the experience of possession will likely resemble painful experiences from thier past, but also by potentially distracting from, undervaluing, or just completely ignoring other ways of experiencing the permeability of the body and the Self which are less immediately sexual and therefore perhaps more appropriate.

F'rexample, one of the main tricks I've used to get a handle on the whole thing is breathwork. Lots and lots of breathwork. Breathwork is fantastic for breaking down rigidity and allowing the Self to be experienced as fluid and permeable. It can be very emotionally challenging at times, but I'd venture to suggest that it's far less so than trying to achieve the same thing with a less subtle penetrative technique. I use a kind of bastardised Reichian technique for the most part, although that inevitably ties into sexuality as well and might not be the best or easiest place for a survivor to start. I also use perfumes, incenses and smoke to explore permeability. (This incidentally is one of the reasons for Loki's insistance on the horrible cigarettes I've complained about elsewhere, although I strongly recommend that people find something else to inhale. I prefer to break the things open and burn them over charcoal, but sometimes only a proper smoke will do.) Then there's the ritual ingestion of food or drink libations, which works in the sense of a shared meal but can also be used to break down Self/Other barriers--I often find I'm called upon to eat and drink things I wouldn't normally have and don't enjoy, like very strong bitter coffee. Then again you have things like piercing and bloodletting, which can also help to blur the boundaries.

But mostly it's all about the breath with me. I even noticed, at the times when I was seriously angsting about all this, that when I was resisting contact with a spirit my breathing would go wonky. I'd find that when Someone began to come through during my devotions I started to breath differently: more shallowly, using just the top of my chest, as if I was in a dusty or smoky environment or as if the air was too cold to breath comfortably. On a couple of occasions I actually began to have an asthma attack brought on by spirit-contact (and I never get instant stress induced attacks like that). Once I became aware that I was doing it, it was like a light went on in my head and I started breathworking like it was going out of fashion.

As well as disappearing useful techniques, then, there's also another issue here, that of disappearing a whole section of experience relating to spirit contact and spirit possession because it does not conform to the horse=lady=passive/spirit=tummysnake=active model, or in fact consciously draw on sexuality very much at all. I think this is unbalanced and unhealthy.
 
  

Page: 1234(5)6789

 
  
Add Your Reply