BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Questions and Answers - Part 3

 
  

Page: 1 ... 8182838485(86)8788899091... 125

 
 
Ticker
17:29 / 17.08.07
in fact I've just this very instant placed a call to those who deal in green slavery to fetch me a new potted prisoner. My standards are high so this may take a few days to come to pass.
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
17:40 / 17.08.07
fuck's a mudkip?
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
17:42 / 17.08.07
Oh! Cute!
 
 
epona
21:26 / 17.08.07
cute! and dangerous! i want to become strong enough to crush rocks bigger than myself, too!
 
 
Saint Keggers
21:33 / 17.08.07
Whats' the best way to go about selling my old comics? I've got Punisher #1-50+ that Im sadly going to exchange for cash.
 
 
Saint Keggers
21:44 / 17.08.07
What did Donovan mean by
"you've got to pick up every stitch"
in the song Season of the Witch?
 
 
Tsuga
21:46 / 17.08.07
If you want a tree or tree-ish houseplant, there's always Ficus, a really neat one is Ficus x reanna, I think it is? It's a bit contorted, but not crazy-like. There's ming aralia, Polyscias, nice foliage and shade-tolerant, but maybe a bit more touchy. Schefflera can be really nice, and my mother abused and neglected a huge Philodendron bipinnatifidum for about 20 years before accidentally leaving it out one winter night. It was gorgeous. The Philodendron vines are incredibly easy to grow, also. They are poisonous, though, and you've got a kid, so that's probably out. Scindapus are much like the Philodendron vines, super easy to grow, a cascading vine, but I don't think poisonous at all.
 
 
Tsuga
21:48 / 17.08.07
What did Donovan mean by
"you've got to pick up every stitch"
in the song Season of the Witch?

The same thing he meant when he said "electrical banana".
 
 
Jack Fear
21:50 / 17.08.07
...a vibrator?
 
 
Saint Keggers
21:55 / 17.08.07
If I were rich, "...a vibrator? " would be my answer to everything Alex asked me on Jeopardy.
 
 
Jack Fear
22:05 / 17.08.07
No, seriously.
 
 
Saint Keggers
22:15 / 17.08.07
WHy when I click on Jack's link do I get nothing but HTML code?
 
 
De Selby
22:23 / 17.08.07
You're getting XML, because its an RSS feed.
 
 
Saint Keggers
22:25 / 17.08.07
AH... ofcourse.

(whut?)
 
 
Jack Fear
22:29 / 17.08.07
Because you're using Internet Explorer, instead of a proper browser.
 
 
Tsuga
23:35 / 17.08.07
I get a request to create a live bookmark in firefox, dude.
 
 
Spaniel
09:13 / 18.08.07
Scindapus looks nice. Do they get big? I need at least one plant that gets big.
 
 
Tsuga
11:51 / 18.08.07
Sorry, it's scindapsus, the common name I couldn't remember was pothos. They do get large, but in the way of a big mounding cascade out of a pot, or you can make a climbing trellis in a pot and they will climb it. And. Looks like I was wrong about the poisonous part as well. Apparently most people's houses are full of toxic greenery. Here's a list I pulled off this site.
* Amaryllis sp.
* Dumbcane, Dieffenbachia sp.
* English Ivy, Hedera helix
* Oleander, Nerium oleander
* Philodendron, Philodendron sp. (Listed as the most frequently ingested plant by the American Association of Poison Control Centers.)
* Pothos, Scindapsus aureus
* Schefflera sp.
* Snake plant, Sanseviera trifasciata

Jesus. Be careful out there, people. Really, the chances are small, but with a baby, you never know what they'll stick in their mouth-hole. Here is another plant list. It does appear that spider plants are...whew, safe. But looking around, there's one site that says Dracaena is safe, another says poisonous. There are a number of sites with lists, I'm finding, a few contradicting each other. I've found no warnings against ficus or jade, they both get pretty large(the jade very slowly), or begonias. Some of the angel wing begonias, which are super easy and shade tolerant, get pretty good sized, but not over about 2 feet tall.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
12:35 / 18.08.07
"Pick up ever stitch" is a sewing analogy, yeah? I mean, probably.

Can I get a bit of advice really quickly, please? Is this a load of shit:

Chaos is an illusion, most of the time. It’s ultimately the result of an infinite number of patterned possibilities colliding

and, if it's *not* a load of shit, does it even make sense to read?
 
 
Tsuga
13:14 / 18.08.07
For what my opinion is worth, I think it makes sense, but you have to have some faith in the "patterned" part for it to be load of shitty or not, and that's going to be a personal judgment call.
 
 
This Sunday
13:18 / 18.08.07
Reads like a case of 'What if hats were ants?' or 'smiles in the boiler room' to me. I mean, it doesn't really mean anything, does it? Chaos vs infinite likelihoods?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
13:25 / 18.08.07
Bum.
 
 
Tsuga
13:26 / 18.08.07
Sorry. Is it being totally misinterpreted here? Reads to me more "chaos as infinite possibilities". Actually one thing kind of confuses me: "most of the time". When is it not an illusion, in this scenario?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
13:32 / 18.08.07
Sorry, that wasn't a bum aimed at either of you, but myself. Actually, Tsuga, you've pretty much confirmed exactly what I was already thinking - that it means nothing unless it's something you already agree with.

"Most of the time" was me covering my bases, which is as good a demonstration as any of how uncertain I was about it. But yeah, chaos as infinite possibilities was what I was trying to get at.
 
 
This Sunday
13:39 / 18.08.07
It's agreeable if you agree, yeah. I just wasn't (and am not, now) seeing what was gained in either direction, hence 'as' and 'vs' being pretty much the same to me in that situation.

It's that sense of order, pattern thing, isn't it? Which, still doesn't help me get it, unfortunately, but as a faith thing it holds together better than, y'know, the golden plates of Mormonism or phlogiston. Not self-invalidating.
 
 
Tsuga
13:54 / 18.08.07
Well, I agree with it for the most part. Not to get too deep and philosophical in the Q&A thread here, but I'm of the belief that chaos, like coincidence, is just the inevitable result of infinite possibilities. I don't believe that there are patterns in the possibilities beyond the patterns in many functions; the passage of time, division of cells, action and reaction. But really, what the fuck do I know?
 
 
Mysterious Transfer Student
20:43 / 19.08.07
(Posted here to avoid rotting any threads in Books)

If a man were interested in reading some of this Harry Potter stuff now that it's at least in theory all over, and had a vague idea of the mythology, characters etc. and so could reasonably say he was more interested in an enjoyable read than in consolidating his knowledge of a modern pop-culture mythos that all the smart people on the rainbow-coloured pages dig, which of the HP books would that man be recommended to try for a kick off?
 
 
Triplets
20:44 / 19.08.07
WHAT'S THE BEST BOOK
 
 
Mysterious Transfer Student
20:53 / 19.08.07
YeZ!
 
 
Princess
20:54 / 19.08.07
Well this first four are all quite good. I suppose it makes sense to read them in order.

After that it tries to be a bit clever and then fails. But you will find yourself reading. An addict, a victim, a fly caught in Rowling's spider-spell of inanity.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:07 / 19.08.07
Perhaps read the first two, then watch the films from then on, which have so far been better, or in the case of Goblet of Fire less bad. Even better, read some Diana Wynne Jones, or Phillp Pullman, or Phillp Reeves, or the Sabriel trilogy by Garth Nix, any and all of which are better.
 
 
Mistoffelees
21:22 / 19.08.07
After having seen the fifth movie, a friend also wanted to start reading, and I gave her the third novel (which I like best), because the first and second movie don´t differ that much from the novels.
 
 
Triplets
21:34 / 19.08.07
Your name could also be Rowling's Absent Editor, Princess.
 
 
sorenson
22:41 / 19.08.07
Haus (and anyone else with an opinion) - very much agreed that Pullman and Nix are far better than Rowling. I have always heard that Diana Wynn Jones is great too, but haven't read anything - what would you recommend to begin with? And who is this Philip Reeve fellow? We could really do with some engaging, young adult type reading in this household...
 
 
Triplets
23:23 / 19.08.07
You could do worse than getting "The Third Dragon" by Garry Kilworth. Set in Hong Kong in 1989 it follows the intertwined stories of British-Hong Kong native Daniel and Chinese political refugee Xu (both of whom are about 14). If the year rings a bell think "Tiananmen Square", the fallout of which Xu is fleeing from. Riveting book involving mountain hideaways, Chinese mainland spies, fibbing to the parents and a hurricane. It also, if memory serves, strikes a decent, if ham-handed, balance between "kids can handle a lot more than you think" and "sometimes they need help from adults, if only they'd ask". You should be able to pick it up for pennies.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 8182838485(86)8788899091... 125

 
  
Add Your Reply