BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Questions and Answers - Part 3

 
  

Page: 1 ... 7677787980(81)8283848586... 125

 
 
Spaniel
09:28 / 06.07.07
Ya link's fucked
 
 
This Sunday
09:36 / 06.07.07
Linkage had to be messed with to get the site/news. That's a helluva percussion section, though.
 
 
Princess
19:57 / 07.07.07
Are there any bars in the uk where men dance on poles for other men. I've found exotic male dance clubs, but they have enforced heteronormativity rules.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
10:10 / 11.07.07
Luck with that Ben. Now, in the same vein, where do people recommend in Brixton for all things to do with eats, drinks, arts and ents? Or indeed any interesting spot, shop, place or entity.. Just moved down there, 'preciate some local nous.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
10:44 / 11.07.07
When I'm out running and it's crazy humid, does it just seem harder to run because it's harder to breathe, or does the increased amount of moisture in the air actually create more resistance?
 
 
Ex
10:52 / 11.07.07
Could it also be that your body's cooling systems are not working as efficiently, as sweat is less likely to evaporate?
 
 
Spaniel
11:13 / 11.07.07
I've asked a question in the Gardenomicon thread. Heyupl.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
12:45 / 11.07.07
Nolte, what is it you're looking for?

On Brixton Hill, there's the Brixton Arts Space which gives arts and dance classes. For scratch and theatre performances, there's the Battersea Arts Centre, not too far away by bus - loads of good stuff there.

The Brixton Ritzy is a surprisingly good cinema and again, you're only a bus ride from the Clapham Picture House.

There's a few good watering holes, a few grimy ones and for clubbing, The Fridge, Jamm and Plan B, depending on your tastes. Restaurants are a bit thinner on the ground, mind...

Brockwell Park is lovely in the summer and Streatham has the Lido and there used to be dance and martial arts classes at the Streatham town hall, I think.

There's 5-a-side football, tennis and netball on Ferndale Road and I often see what I think must be a capoeira class hanging around there - yoga, too.

That part of south London has been my stamping ground for a good while and although, as everywhere, you have to keep your wits about you, I don't think the place deserves it's poor reputation. There's much that is great about the area and I'm sorry to be moving away soon. That said, London's just a collection of small villages very close together and I'm sure every manor has lots to recommend it.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
12:53 / 11.07.07
*slaps forehead*

oh, and The Dog Star and Living on Atlantic Road, of course.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
13:04 / 11.07.07
*head meets desk"

and the Academy, naturally. Best large venue in the country IMHO.

And Mass and The Bug Bar.

In fact: this might help
 
 
Closed for Business Time
14:21 / 11.07.07
Thanks a ton Ron! In fact, I totally forgot that I had the ace Urban75 site in my bookmarks folder which lists all of the places you do and more. Still, 'preciate the effort, and mybrixton can't hurt. Lastly, I'm totally with you on undeserved reps etc. Wasnit Apophenia who said that the devil lives in Clapham? I must concur..
 
 
Ron Stoppable
14:34 / 11.07.07
No worries - Urban75 kicks the arse out of mybrixton by the look of it.

Enjoy your time in SW9!
 
 
Closed for Business Time
15:18 / 11.07.07
Cheers, Ron. Akshlee it's in SW2 where I live, but I'm not about to let that stop me..
 
 
jamesPD
10:34 / 12.07.07
What's the name used for statements which can be used to argue for or against a point, which seam to conflict but infact are not incompatible?

Examples include: "The majority of cannabis users do not progress to harder drugs" -- "The majority of heroin users began as cannabis users", or alternatively "The people that committed the terrorist act were all Muslims" -- "Not all Muslims are involved in terrorist attacks".

Is there a technical name for these kind of statements or statistics?
 
 
Ron Stoppable
10:49 / 12.07.07
it's been the longest time since I studied this but is it bivalence?

1. Germans drive BMWs
2. Kant was a German
3. Kant drove a BMW

is, I think, wrong because of the bivalent qualities of 1.

Maybe.
 
 
Jack Fear
11:09 / 12.07.07
There's post hoc ergo propter hoc, literally meaning "After this, therefore because of this"—assigning a spurious causal relationship to phenomena that are coincidental, or that are related by a third underlying phenomenon whose influence goes unmentioned.

The classic example:

(A) Sales of ice-cream hit their peak in the months of July and August.

(B) Violent crime and homicides hit their peak in the months and July and August.


Now, obviously these facts are related; the same hot, sticky weather that makes people crave ice-cream can also make people short-tempered and irritable, for instance.

But the post hoc ergo propter hoc construction takes those two facts, without considering the context, and draws a cause-and-effect link:

Therefore (C): Increased consumption of ice-cream leads to a rise in violent and homicidal tendencies in the population.

Does that help?
 
 
Ron Stoppable
11:14 / 12.07.07
what he said...
 
 
Spaniel
11:23 / 12.07.07
Germans drive BMWs doesn't mean all Germans drive BMWs. That's yer error. Not sure if it has a proper name.
 
 
jamesPD
13:24 / 12.07.07
Thanks for the info guys, but I don't think thats quite what I'm looking for. In my above examples, the two events might appear to be mutually exclusive to the casual reader (If most heroin addicts started on cannabis then weed must lead to harder drug use, right?) It's only when you examine the two statements that it becomes clear that they're not mutually exclusive and it's perfectly possible for both statements to be true.

With the icecream example I don't think the casual reader would see both statements and jump to the conclusion that they are mutually exclusive events. In other words, it's unlikely the reader would see both sentences and presume that one of them was false because it negated the other.

I think I'm looking for a statistics framing term rather than one of logic.
 
 
Quantum
13:34 / 12.07.07
"The majority of cannabis users do not progress to harder drugs" -- "The majority of heroin users began as cannabis users"

The group A of cannabis users has a small percentage of those who buck the trend and DO progress to heroin. Of the smaller group B, heroin users, most of those were the ones from group A who bucked the trend.
The second group is smaller, so the same number of people becomes a majority instead of a minority.

I'm not sure what you want, there's not a stats term for that AFAIK.
 
 
Quantum
13:38 / 12.07.07
AAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAA CBBB
AAAAAAAA CBBB
BBBBBBBB CCBB

A= stoners, B= stoner junkies, C= junkies.

See? The overlap, B, is the same stoner junkies, who dominate the smaller group.
 
 
jamesPD
13:47 / 12.07.07
I was simply hoping that someone might know of the technical term for such statistics. It seams like an obivous way to mislead the public and I was trying to find more examples using Google, but that's a little difficult to do without knowing what the statistical term is called.
 
 
jamesPD
13:49 / 12.07.07
Yes, I entirely understand how the statistics relate to one another and are not mutually exclusive. It's just I was hoping there might be a discrete, concrete term for it.
 
 
grant
14:03 / 12.07.07
There is, and it comes from symbolic logic, and I can't for the life of me remember it. Something class, maybe?
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
14:49 / 12.07.07
This seems maybe to be the Prosecutor's Fallacy?

or similar, anyway...
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
14:52 / 12.07.07
I'm figuring that now I'm in NYC there ought to be cool local radio stations but I'm so far not blown away. The internet site radio-locator.com seems to show the same big stations that my little mp3 player can pick up, but there's nothing too amazing there.

I dream, perhaps foolishly, of some guy in a van somewhere broadcasting pirate radio with weird music I've never heard of and muttering conspiracy theories and local neighborhood news. Does this kind of thing actually exist? How do I find it? Do I need a cooler radio? Is it all done over podcasts these days? If so, how do I find a good one of those?
 
 
Quantum
16:18 / 12.07.07
It's just I was hoping there might be a discrete, concrete term for it.

For what? The error of those who believe it, the practice of framing things that way, the relation between the two groups?
 
 
Alex's Grandma
21:12 / 12.07.07
Haus batsignal, I think ...
 
 
Whisky Priestess
21:16 / 12.07.07
It's a syllogism - some examples (from Yes Minister) below:

We must do something
This is something.
Therefore we must do this


Of course this is about as good, the character notes, as saying the following -

My dog has four legs.
My cat has four legs.
Therefore, my dog is a cat


(Full disclosure - I got this from Googling "therefore my dog is a cat" - the perils/advantages of reading Lynn & Jay as a pubescent.)
 
 
All Acting Regiment
01:22 / 15.07.07
Is there anywhere on the web an English crib for Horace's Odes?
 
 
electric monk
14:11 / 17.07.07
Can someone show me how to do the HTML hidey thing with the pluses and the minuses for the SPOI-LERS?

[/Jerry Lewis]
 
 
Quantum
14:27 / 17.07.07
Regina, this any good?

e-monk, this post explains it best I think.
 
 
Quantum
14:48 / 17.07.07
My question- what's the correct Latin if I want to frame a title as 'principles of magic' instead of 'principles of mathematics'. Instead of Principia Mathematica what is it, Principia Magus?
 
 
electric monk
15:11 / 17.07.07
[+] [-] By Jove, I think I've got it.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
16:08 / 19.07.07
Erm, anyone have any suggestions for where to go (in London) and what to get if one is in the market for herbal smokes? And I don't mean weed.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 7677787980(81)8283848586... 125

 
  
Add Your Reply