BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Is something wrong with Barbelith?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 1213141516(17)1819202122... 24

 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
23:52 / 25.02.06
Or instead, we can agree that Haus and Flyboy are actually one and the same. Flyboy is Haus's repressed urge to give up and call someone a retarded racist fuckwit. Like Onslaught but without the psychic powers. The more I think about it the more it makes sense...
 
 
matthew.
23:54 / 25.02.06
I thought Haus was Robert Stack.
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
00:31 / 26.02.06
Nah, he's been dead for a few years now. Serisously: they're the same person. The only thing that stops me from running through the board telling everyone is the fact that this "Mysterious Person Q" (as I call hir) would have over 20,000 posts. Who has that much free time?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
00:57 / 26.02.06
Can we all just agree that sometimes Flyboy gets a little grumpy and posts off-the-cuff sometimes? He does not mean personal attacks; he just needs a nap and some juice.

Oh you sweet thing. Fly doesn't need a nap and some juice. He needs a gun and a nice big bucket full to the brim with ammunition.
 
 
matthew.
01:01 / 26.02.06
And yet another addition to the loooooong list of reasons why we need an Armoury thread.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:03 / 26.02.06
Nah, TG. Q's someone entirely different. He's kind of Flyhaus' conscience. (And he's- get this- SCARED OF LEMONS!!!)
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
01:09 / 26.02.06
My mind is swimming with the implications of all this. Barbelith has once again torn down my assumptions of what the world is and what the rules are.

MADNESS I TELL YOU
 
 
Ganesh
01:10 / 26.02.06
It's a faintly tiresome Hamlet-typing-monkeys factette that any Barbelith long-timer persistently expressing PC POLICE!1 criticisms will, in time, be accused of being a sub-suit of Haus's - because, like, the chances of MORE THAN ONE person finding perfectly normal JOKE!!1!!s like what one has with one's MATES objectionable are infinitesimal.

A few years back, I was Haus's left-brain.
 
 
matthew.
01:11 / 26.02.06
Wow. Okay, moving on.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:21 / 26.02.06
Oh 'nesh, you're just bitter cos you miss the melding.
 
 
Ganesh
01:26 / 26.02.06
It's not easy being a half-wit.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
02:09 / 26.02.06
Q's scared of lemons?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
02:18 / 26.02.06
So I hear.
 
 
Aertho
03:08 / 26.02.06


Did someone say lemons?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:29 / 26.02.06
In my parallel universe, Ultra Magnus is voiced by Richard Dean Anderson, and Starscream by John de Lancie. Think how much better both character arcs would work...
 
 
Disco is My Class War
01:50 / 27.02.06
I think this thread has been very productive, particularly the lemons bit, but something isn't coming to the surface, or if it is, it's not being highlighted enough. Comparions with witch hunts, Azande rituals, parent/child relations don't work for all sorts of fine reasons (Barbelites are no-one's parents! If one desires parental discipline for one's transgressions, one might consider paying a pro domme, or joining an ageplay messageboard.) At the same time, however, these comparisons rid the pertinent conflicts of their political content. The conflicts between the so-called 'pc police' and various others are not just about what is socially acceptable here in this space, or about avoiding conflict and keeping everyone happy. They are about the social and ideological currents that shape each poster's feelings, ideas of what's funny and what's not, 'intuitions', affective maps of all kinds. Many of those currents are based on the assumption that some people are better than others, and deserve more.

Conflict is inevitable -- both here and in the wider world. (Actually, separating Barbelith from the 'wider world' has its problems too.) The only way conflicts get resolved, generally, is by each party taking responsibility for hir actions and being open to such conflict transforming and changing one's assumptions, one's world. So being openly hostile or making snarky jokes is fine -- as long as people are prepared to talk about why they phrased their response in such a way.

John, the problem with your funny names post (and a few others, it seems) was not that you were being rude, or that such behaviour is not acceptable on Barbelith. That behaviour, and the assumptions it reveals, would be crap anywhere. As people have tried to point out to you, the fact that you consider such behaviours acceptable, and feel you have done nothing wrong, suggests you may want to look really hard at the unconscious assumptions you make about the world, your place in it, and how you think about people who are different from yourself. No-one can do that work for you. So when someone gets hostile with you, ask yourself why your words might have caused offence; think before you react defensively. If you don't know why you've caused offence, say so. Being a newbie is no excuse. Barbelith just happens to be a place where drawing attention to dodgy politics is acceptable and somewhat encouraged -- unlike many other social spaces, in which the same thing can result in ostracism, ridicule, and at the worst, physical violence. Next time you get shitty about someone telling not to call women bitches or slags, think of the woman who tells a guy not to call her a bitch or a slag and gets slapped (or worse, raped) for her trouble. Next time you chuckle at 'Anil Shithole' and his dumb, non-literate parents, imagine having that name, seriously. Think about how many times you'd get into fights for telling the racist joker ridiculing you to shut the fuck up. Is that name still amusing? Do you still feel comfortable calling women slags?
 
 
Sniv
06:50 / 27.02.06
Mister Disco - thanks for your advice. Believe me, it has been taken on board.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:39 / 28.02.06
It's good that you're taking advice on board, John. If your position has genuinely moved on from the idea that what is wrong with Barbelith is "an elite pushing their ideas of what makes correct discourse", that "some people could do with letting the unimportant shit slide" (where unimportant shit = "things John says that he doesn't think are in any way objectionable"), and that the site should be renamed Harmony House, then that's also good.

However, you have a history of claiming to have said one thing when in fact you said another. For example, within the "funny names" thread itself you claim "I've asked users to clarify their positions rather than making potshots", when in fact what you had said was "fuck off" and that Jack Fear was being "a cock". Were you planning to make it clear that you had taken advice such as Mister Disco's onboard, and possibly apologise to Jack, anytime soon?

If you feel I've misrepresented you, then represent yourself better, and more accurately. For example, at the time of the discussion of your comments about hip hop, I asked you repeatedly to clarify your request, and your response was to call this "pointless clarifications" [sic]. Oh, and we also got "my usuage of 'Bitches et al' was meant to be ironic" for our troubles.

Equally, what you've actually said about calling women (perhaps only working class women?) "slags" is that:

I'll save it for a place where it's easier to tell what I mean from the way that I say something.

I don't know about anyone else, but this is of little comfort to me, for the same reason I and others found it of little comfort when Dead Megatron recently said that he could think of many homophobic jokes to make about something, but would refrain from making most of them on Barbelith in order to, I dunno, spare our blushes or something.

Perhaps you really are in the process of reconsidering your ideas about women, sex, and class. As you say, further discussion of that could best be done in its own thread - why not start one in the Head Shop? I would, but to be honest I'd been hoping that the question "Should there be limits to women's sexual behaviour after which point you call them slags?" had already been comprehensively answered in the minds of most people here...

(It's not really strictly relevant to this thread, but of interest, is that your initial defence of your language and attitude towards women is precisely the same as the defence trotted out by the most misogynistic of hip hop artists - "I don't think all of them are slags, but I reserve the right to call the ones who are slags slags!")

To all those who think I'm just picking on one poster, and that this is not relevant to the question of 'Is something wrong with Barbelith?', I'd direct you to that thread, which has now picked up again, the ripples made by Jack Fear et al dying down, and posters such as Chief Boabab quite happy to post about hil-ARIOUS Thai names, ho ho!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:38 / 28.02.06
Yeah, well - this is a problem, although it may be a problem with people not reading threads before contributing to them. Chief Baobab has also recently appparently done this in a Head Shoop thread on trans identity, and thus not noticed that the discussion is a few headrooms over quoting from South Park.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:44 / 28.02.06
Oh.

Oh dear.
 
 
*
06:49 / 01.03.06
You know, actually, I didn't mind the South Park reference that much. I thought it was actually a reasonable example of the effect simplified versions of The Transsexual Empire argument have had on pop culture representations of trans people. I did take the piss a little, but I don't think there's any need for further snark about it.
 
 
Sax
07:55 / 01.03.06
All of a sudden, there seems to be something right with Barbelith. Perhaps it's the impending Spring.
 
 
Jack Denfeld
10:26 / 01.03.06
I'd like to send a shout out to Enrieb(a newer member) for setting a good example over in the Lab forum. Lula asked a question about bird flu, Enrieb gave a kind of jerky answer, and when called on it, not only did Enrieb apologize, but also provided several links with good information about Lula's initial question. Great job enrieb.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:03 / 01.03.06
That was very cool, wasn't it? Warms the cockles, sort of thing.
 
 
Dead Megatron
21:50 / 01.03.06
think before you react defensively

Although Mr Disco wasn't talking to me when ze posted this, I shall meditate really hard on it.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
09:39 / 02.03.06
Although at the moment it would require mods doing it manually I wonder if a 'lock thread for 24/48/72 hours' option might be handy. It would of course require mods not to lock right after deploying their best withering comment but I'm wondering if it would help the more vicious sniping or whether it would just move to another thread?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
18:09 / 05.03.06
Barbelith needs Ritalin. Buckets and buckets of the stuff. Even the most specific threads seem to have problems with their attention spans.
 
 
---
10:51 / 08.04.06
Something that I wrote in a pm to someone, and that I thought I'd add here aswell :

"Some people seem to spend a lot of time being as perfectly 'correct' as they can be when posting here, and as soon as something doesn't fit their standards, they seem go over the top pretty quickly. I don't think they realize that not everyone can be as correct as they're trying to be, probably because some of us can't check exactly the same thing in each of our posts, because we're all different people. They should allow more for people's errors without 'pouncing' and 'tearing apart', like Macready in the film thread was going on about.

I think that's a little self centered aswell when I think about it. We can't all examine our posts as well sometimes, and it's stupid that some people don't realize that."


The only thing I changed in that has been to replace 'that guy', with 'Macready', because I'm not sure if his/her sex.

So, thats the start of what I want to get at, and I understand that along with all my other posts, it's not worded perfectly, but none of my posts will ever be 'perfect', and that's something that I feel should be accepted instead of having people pouncing and tearing apart, etc, etc.

Self centered : I think it is in a way, and please don't think that that's just an attempt to get peoples backs up. In explaining it I'd say that some of you in your efforts in trying to make this site one of the best on the net for discussion, and standards of it, raise the bar too highly for others. Some of you are very good writers, and can craft posts that are way better than a lot of other can people can regularly manage to do. I know that I can't write posts aswell as some of you can, and I do aim to constantly write better, but many of us just aren't as good at writing, and instead of having selections of various words to use at any given instant, some of us are restricted, and that is probably just the same when it comes to explaining things aswell.

For a group of people to be good at writing and explaining things, and then not be prepared to deal with others who aren't as good without being harsh, angry, and over the top, it's pretty out of hand.

So onto the problem that's arisen with my post in the V for Vendetta thread, and that's spilled into the Barbannoy one too. I've already explained what I did wrong, and I think I explained it well enough. I was happy a few times after I'd written posts and thought that things would be cool because you'd understand, but I got some replies that weren't much help at all.

Ganesh, you said :

The old "but you know I'm not Xist therefore that can't have been a Xist comment therefore YOUR AL OVEREACTING!!1" argument.

But you haven't explained what you meant, and so how can this help me if I've done something wrong? Can you explain what you mean here? Also, what do you think of this whole thing, and where can you see the faults here? Are they only my problems, or can you also see how there's possibly a bigger problem that's also present aswell, that involves the site and the way people get labelled/judged with things without enough evidence?

What is Xist here and what type of comment was I making? Looking back at my first post again I can see how it could've offended, and apologize for that, and when thinking about it it was ignorant of me because I failed to have the awareness of what was wrong in the post, but does that mean that I'm whatever 'Xist' is?

Macready said :

Do you actually read Barbelith? Do you actually think this kind of comment ain't gonna be pounced on and torn apart for the offensive tripe it so clearly is?

Is this over the top, and how far could this have gone if the person who'd wrote it had just given a 'fuck you' and a pissed off reply? These are problems that I think the site has, and not being here as much as I used to be, and not being very well at wording things as some of you are, I've stayed out of these discussions for the most part, but if asked what was wrong with barbelith, I'd include the things that I've just written about here, and probably say that they're what I think the main problem is.

People being too fast to judge, too fast to collectively rip into someone without having any awareness that they might not be bad people, and that they should at least deserve a chance, because if you can't explain things to others without giving them abuse, then how much can you help them see their faults, and how can you expect that to be the right way of going about problems with other peoples posts and then dealing with them?

Damn, I've been here years now and even mod in the Games forum, but I sometimes still feel like a newbie here. I don't feel comfortable posting some of the time, and I don't really feel like I can post in some of the forums either because people set too high a standard on what's a good post and what isn't.

If that's a problem for me, then how much is it a problem for a lot of new people here?

I think I've written too much here and have come off as Macready's post has really offended me, but it's what usually comes after posts like that from other people that I don't like. Anyway, I have a hangover, and this about as good as I can do for now. So now I'm offended aswell after all this, and I feel stupid for feeling offended, like there's no point in worrying about it, but does it matter that I'm offended? So I started it by saying something that could've offended people, but I was trying to understand what I thought King Felix meant, and thought that where he'd said stereotypically gay, I saw V as being camp in the scene I described. Instead of speaking about how wrong he was, I was trying to understand where he was coming from, because I thought a load of crap was going to start off, but it's now me that's getting it.

The '.....' before I said 'gay or whatever', was where I didn't agree with his wording, but at the same time tried to relate to what he meant. Now I'm here and I've spent hours typing trying to defend what? Is it worth it when the people arguing with me don't seem to care as much? If they don't care as much, then why should I, and why should anyone else here?
 
 
matthew.
13:30 / 08.04.06
I've learned that when I say something incredibly stupid or juvenile or I link to something that somebody thinks is offensive, I shut up and apologize. There's very little point in arguing over anything that a majority of people find offensive or stupid. Ganesh will probably post something along the lines of "Erm, well, Matt, it would be better to try and defend your point." And I sort of agree with him. But in my experience, the veteran posters have heard all the same defenses and they know how to counter them. Unless the point I'm trying to make is logical and sensible, I'd rather just apologize, because I may have offended somebody, and if that has happened, I find I'm embarrassed. I don't want to offend anybody. These people are my friends. That's why when I stick my foot in my mouth, the second thing that comes out is an apology (the first thing is the foot, obviously)
 
 
Quantum
15:02 / 08.04.06
People being too fast to judge, too fast to collectively rip into someone without having any awareness that they might not be bad people, and that they should at least deserve a chance,

I'm hesitant to get involved, but about without having any awareness that they might not be bad people- be aware, most people will attack the post and not the poster. 'You are *being* -ist' rather than 'You are -ist'. I believe the traditional analogy is a bogey.

Often someone posts something unintentionally offensive, gets criticised, and takes it personally. I prefer Mattvara's approach.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
15:06 / 08.04.06
I can't believe two sensible posts arrived in response to Jack's already. I'd gone and made popcorn and everything.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
15:46 / 08.04.06
Look. If someone questions something you say it is not, automatically, threadrot. OK? Just deal with it and stop assuming your being called a homophobe.
I apologise if I was overly spiky in my first post, but seriously, your response was histrionic in the extreme.
I quote:

If you want to carry it on, then go to policy and help or something, make me out to be anti-gay, offensive, lucifer or whatever you want, imagine me standing in a pit of fire with big horns

Actually you took it to both Policy and Conversation, to loudly protest how you are DEFINITELY NOT ANTI-GAY, whilst steadfastly refusing to examine why your (and Felix's) posts might be problematic to some.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:43 / 08.04.06
Jack, could you tell me exactly where the top is? Right now I don't seem to be able to define exactly where over it is. Also, could you try not to use the verbs "pounce" or "tear down" for the next week? They are unnecessarily melodramatic and their repetition is making me want to spork myself. After that, we'll talk.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
17:09 / 08.04.06
Maybe you should read King Felix's explanation of his comments in the barbeannoy thread, as he managed to say exactly what you said without sounding like a hysterical child. Or my naughty little sister for anyone born in the fifties.

I'm not homophobic, I'm not homophobic, not not not!
 
 
matthew.
23:53 / 08.04.06
I'm not saying we should all simply throw up our arms and apologize to absolutely everyone. Sometimes we have to work and figure out what the fuck we're trying to say and what other people are trying to say. Barbelith is a learning environment, I find.

The trick is to avoid taking everything so personally, to avoid getting ridiculously defensive and abusive. Hateful or annoying language is not conducive to a productive and mutually beneficial discussion.

It's better to calm down and say to one's self, "Wait. Why is everybody getting upset? Is it something I said?" and then one should think, "Why is what I said being challenged?"
 
  

Page: 1 ... 1213141516(17)1819202122... 24

 
  
Add Your Reply