There's a difference between sharing the same Aspect (if I may go a little Zelazny for a moment), and equating identity. Adam One, Supreme, Majestic, Hyperion, Samaritan, et al may share the Aspect & Attributes of Superman, but no one ever says that Superman IS these characters.
But that's just it: Some characters bear a greater significance, and have a more pure conflict. And one might see the stories that Grant is telling as giving these levels a sort of navigation and relationship to others.
Of course Samaritan isn't Superman, but culturally, they are the same.
For instance - Knight and Squire are members of the Ultramarines. When Knight is captured, he entreats the Squire to contact and acquire the assistance of Batman - his higher order (JLA) archetype. Once accomplished, Squire is thrust into a world faster and more strenous than the one she is natured to. Both Knight-and-Squire and Batman-and-Robin are culturally the same, but NOT interchangeable. Knight-and-Squire can be Batman-and-Robin, but the reverse is not true. A = B, but B ? A.
Adam One = Papa, Superman = Mama, Apollo? = Baby
Scott Free = Papa, Shiloh Norman = Mama, David Blaine? = Baby
So what I'm saying is Shiloh = Scott, but Scott ? Shiloh. It's more involved than just mantle-passing. I'm suggesting that Morrison is applying a sense of depth to the orientation of New God conflict and its DCU Earth variant. |