BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


DC Universe Surgery

 
  

Page: 1 ... 3233343536(37)3839404142... 44

 
 
Mario
18:44 / 04.04.07
That's tricky, because both AM & V's powers have changed over time:

Animal Man
----------

Initially, any animal within range, no transformation.
Later, any animal in the morphogenetic field/Red. Occasional transformations.
Occasionally, he can also talk to animals or read their thoughts.
Recently, his range improved, so he can tap into alien animals as well.

Vixen
-----
Originally, she gained powers similar to Buddy's second set, but needed the Tantu totem. Now, her powers are basically the same as Buddy's, although she lacks his control and range.

She also has claws.
 
 
Simplist
20:44 / 04.04.07
I've seen that panel over and over over the years, but I've never actually read the exploits of the hard-travelling heroes.

Does it hold up as the comic with a conscience that history has declared it?


So long as you restrict yourself to reading about the comic rather than actually reading the comic itself, it holds up just fine. Otherwise, well...

I say let it retain its (conferred) status in your mind as groundbreaking social commentary and a Great Leap Forward for the relevance of the medium, and save yourself the price of the trade paperback to boot.
 
 
grant
02:44 / 05.04.07
But but but... man! The relevance!

Actually, I will say that reading that story in a TPB did make me understand why people were excited by Neal Adams and his frames.
 
 
Jack Fear
11:16 / 05.04.07
Okay, new topic. The missus asked me this last night and I genuinely did not have an answer:

Can Superman see the Invisible Man?
 
 
murphy
11:34 / 05.04.07
Can Superman see the Invisible Man?

He can use his super-ventriloquism to make the Invisible Man "talk," and then use his super-vision to make out the rebounded soundwaves, and see him that way.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
12:04 / 05.04.07
Plus he still has infrared and X-ray vision, right?
 
 
Mario
12:05 / 05.04.07
That depends on the form of invisiblity. Given that Superman can see into the infrared spectrum (as well as UV and X-ray) if the invisibility is only to visible light, then said Man is easily spotted.

If it's all the EM spectrum, it becomes trickier, unless Supes is allowed to use his Birthright-era "aura-vision", which is not EM in nature.

Either way, he can still hear and smell him.
 
 
Benny the Ball
12:18 / 05.04.07
Jack - is this something to do with that joke about superman swooping down onto wonderwoman?
 
 
Jack Fear
12:23 / 05.04.07
See, I wasn't sure if Superman's vision extended into the infrared. When/where was this established?
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
12:40 / 05.04.07
I believe Birthright confirmed that he has access to the whole electromagnetic spectrum, even including broadcast frequencies.
 
 
Jack Fear
14:44 / 05.04.07
Ah. So post-Crisis, then, and can be safely ignored.

If Superman couldn't see infrared in 1966, then Superman can't see infrared. Thanks, all.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
14:48 / 05.04.07
Asking "Could Superman see the Invisible Man in 1966?" might have saved a bit of time there, Jack.
 
 
Jack Fear
14:57 / 05.04.07
Boo fucking hoo. What, did you have a hot date? Don't make me laugh, fanboy.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
15:05 / 05.04.07
Given that you're apparently having discussions with "the missus" about whether or not Superman (Hint: 1966 Pre-Crisis Superman, mind, not some other Superman) can see the Invisible Man, I think I can live with that scathing rejoinder.

On the subject of Supes, though -- has it been firmly established that the "1,000,000 Superman" is current DC Kal-El and that we can safely expect him to live, well, forever? And doesn't that kill some of the drama?
 
 
FinderWolf
15:17 / 05.04.07
well, it's not like we *really* thought Supes would actually die at some point, did we? (although in Alan Moore's 'final story', isn't he de-powered via gold kryptonite to enjoy a normal life with Lois, but his super-child turns coal into diamonds or some such...?)
 
 
John Octave
15:25 / 05.04.07
No, because the point of Hypertime was that Superman can live in the sun in the 853rd century, but also die maybe thirty years from now in the post-Kingdom Come "Gog" one-shot. The future is not yet written, as Phantom Stranger-types would say.

Also no because the drama is not killed by knowing Superman will live. By and large, the prime conflict in Superman stories oughtn't be "Will Superman survive?" (if his three-plus comic books are still being published next month, probably so) but rather "Will Superman save the day?" (or, "Will everybody ELSE survive?") As Superman is more focused on helping others than self-preservation, this is the more satisfying conflict, and it doesn't require you to tone down Superman's powers because waah, he's just too strong and can't be killed.
 
 
murphy
15:32 / 05.04.07
Wait. Were you asking about Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man?

I have a better question: Would Superman want to see "Hollow Man"?

Here's another: Who would win in a fight: Kevin Bacon's Hollow Man, or Chevy Chase's Invisble Man (the one who wrote the memoir), or Batman?
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
16:13 / 05.04.07
There's also the question of, will Superman die and then be reborn, or will the Superman in the sun turn out to be a clone, or, or, or...

And I like the idea of self-preservation not being the meaningful conflict and tension; it's something to be reflected in the comics more and is a reason to disparage lazy writing.
 
 
Feverfew
16:34 / 05.04.07
Here's another: Who would win in a fight: Kevin Bacon's Hollow Man, or Chevy Chase's Invisble Man (the one who wrote the memoir), or Batman?

Not forgetting Darian Fawkes.

Well, ok, mostly everyone's forgotten him. But still.
 
 
murphy
19:14 / 05.04.07
Which makes for the better "final Superman story", Alan Moore's (from Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, (wherein Superman intentionally exposes himself to Gold K, thereby removing his powers permanently), or Grant Morrison's DC 1,000,000 (wherein we find out that Supes lives forever and is the sire to a whole family of Supers).

Each story represents the sort of final chapter that Moore alludes to in his pitch for Twilight of the Superheroes. In the TotS intro, he refers to Dark Knight Returns as being the best capstone to a hero's story (acknowledging that Bruce Wayne didn't stop being Batman, but suggests an end, as opposed to the ever-unfolding, and potentially eternal monthly stories being published in comics).

So which is more satisfying? Which makes more sense? Which did you just plain enjoy more?

I think that, in a totally tempocentrist way, DC 1,000,000 is better because it doesn't (yet, if ever) have to measure up to the test of time. WHTTMOT has the drawback of taking place in, like, 1997, IIRC. Well, here we are in 2007 and we have yet to see the insect-like cars, or the floofy-sleeved shirts, or odd looking coffee pots that decorated Moore's story. The diversion between Moore's envisioned 1997 and the actual 1997 highlights the fictionality of his story, whereas we haven't yet seen what the world will look like 1,000,000 months from now, so that yardstick isn't available for DC 1,000,000.

Plus, despite being a "final chapter" kind of story, Grant's opens up a whole lot of opportunity for fun as we proceed to the end.
 
 
Spaniel
19:28 / 05.04.07
Moore was playing with sci-fi elements that have become invisible through their ubiquity. The very idea that they could be in any way dissonant is a new one on me. Add to that the fact that he was clearly attempting and *obviously referencing* classic silver age storytelling - storytelling rooted in a very particular 50's sci-fi aethestic that has been reproduced absolutey everywhere as shorthand for "the future" - and I'm left scratching my head at your criticism, Murph.

For the record I don't imagine the yooniverse circa one bazillion to look anything like Graung Morrison's, and that might have something to do with the obvious fictionality of Graung's own, rather in your face, reference points.

Of course, I love DC 1000,000
 
 
This Sunday
19:52 / 05.04.07
I'm gonna go with Morrison's, just because I hate hate hate the notion of de-powering to live a normal life. A real life. As if his life as Superman is somehow unreal. In that case, the fast shouldn't run, the strong should never lift things, the talkers should shut the hell up. And we'd all live real. More real than this.

It's like giving up the microwave oven or running water, modern medicine and your right arm... to make your life more real.
 
 
Triplets
23:06 / 05.04.07
Some people do do that, though, Daytripper. This person, for instance.

Then there's deliberate amputees and so on.

But I do agree with you in spirit and I could never see Clark-El, in my mind, giving up his birthright. The fact that he's a top dude with a cheeky wink (without listening to the Kaiser Chiefs, say) makes him hoo-man the most.
 
 
Triplets
23:07 / 05.04.07
Perhaps it was some kind of memewarfare by Moore?
 
 
Benny the Ball
06:48 / 06.04.07
Doesn't he feel a certain amount of responsibility to represent Krypton as it's last son?
 
 
Jackie Susann
07:19 / 06.04.07
Yeah but isn't the whole de-powering him thing part of the fake-out to make everyone think he's dead? If the kryptonite chamber really de-powered him he would have died in the snow. Right?
 
 
Evil Scientist
08:19 / 06.04.07
That was my interpretation certainly. Supe's still has his powers but has simply retired and taken on a new secret identity. He'll be training up his son to use his powers responsibly and in the meantime...

Crooks found tied up in front of police station, no idea what happened.
 
 
Mario
09:35 / 06.04.07
I always assumed it was a work.

After all, what evidence do we have that he exposed himself to gold K? One person... who is proven a liar a couple of pages later.

That being said, while WHttMOT is a paen to the Silver Age, I think DC1M is better science-fiction. The society Grant created, while sketchy, is quite interesting.

Kingdom Come was a pretty good "last story" too, especially with the epilogue. Then they went and did the sequel... *sigh*
 
 
murphy
12:21 / 06.04.07
and I'm left scratching my head at your criticism, Murph.

It wasn't an attack on the story itself (which I thought was great; Moore is able to tap into Kryptonian mythology better than any other writer, as seen in his Superman annual and his Swamp Thing/Superman story in DC Comics Presents as well as WHttMoT). I just think when a writer attaches a specific date to a tale set in the future, it acts as a kind of expiration date for that story. If we get to the date noted in the story, and actual society (technology, dress, religion, etc.) doesn't mesh with that pictured in the story, the story itself is lessened. Obviously there will always be discrepancies between our reality and the reality pictured in comics, but as long as the two are close, our suspension of disbelief can be continued.
 
 
doctorbeck
14:50 / 10.04.07
it's got to be the moore one for me, i think because it is a loving and affectionate tribute to the silver age superman with all the wonky bits you know and love from that time, and still a half decent, and a sleek well written story to boot.

sort of appropriate that moore wrote the last superman story too given that miracleman and watchmen were a big part of the cultural shift in comics that would make a silver age superman like that seem a bit redundant.

dc one million was a hoot, i admit, but a messy sprawling one with half cocked ideas and sometimes dissapinting artwork.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
14:58 / 10.04.07
Kingdom Come was a pretty good "last story" too, especially with the epilogue. Then they went and did the sequel... *sigh*

I actually thought that the sequel's "Offspring" installment was a pretty good end-of-the-world story, all told. Super-heroes descending into decadence, the meaninglessness of virtually every character's behaviour, the nihilism inherent in legacy heroes...
 
 
matsya
03:37 / 11.04.07
let's geek it up a bit again:

"Could Superman see the Invisible Man in 1966?"

Not sure exactly how 66 Supes differs from glorious 50s Supes, if at all, but if not, then yes of course Superman could see ANY Invisible Man by travelling into the Phantom Zone to make his super-vision PHANTOM super-vision that works on ALL invisible spectra.

Problem is, now Superman's in the Phantom Zone playing Super-Pinochle with Zod and the evil cats of the criminals imprisoned there, ol' Invissy has snuck into the Fortress of Solitude and accessed the Hall of Super-Costumes to dress himself up like Superman and invite Lois on a date. And he's planning to propose!! And you just know Lois is going to say, "Why, *choke* Superman - of course I do!"

Can the Superman of 1966 (or the 1950s, I don't care) free himself from the Phantom Zone in time to prevent Lois Lane from Marrying this Invisible Impostor in THE HOAX WEDDING OF THE DECADE?

and:

has anyone ever referred to J'onn having said Sublime prototype in his own body (keeping it prisoner) ever since?

Not 100% on this one, but methinks the spore was burned out of J'onn's body in the 4-issue miniseries written by DeMatteis and Drawn by Mark Badger. 'Twas the spore that triggered his vision quest for H'Ronmeer, the Martian God of Fire, which revealed his TRUE origin as a poet/philosopher/father with false memories of a life as a warrior prince.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
04:06 / 11.04.07
Aha! It seemed throwaway but too good an opportunity to miss, that spore.

As well, the Invisible Imposter would quell Lois's concerns about being invisible (only the stolen supersuit giving away his presence) by claiming exposure to red kryptonite. "It'll wear off...after the wedding night!"

What's a girl to do?
 
 
matsya
04:38 / 11.04.07
Red Kryptonite? Pish.

"You see, Lois, I was conducting one of my Super-Experiments in my Super-Laboratory, examining a strange kind of radiation that I noticed when I was returning to Earth after helping the Bubble-Headed people of Raxilon 9 to celebrate their annual Superman Festival. I was examining the radiation's response to my Super-Cool breath when a sound from my Interplanetary Zoo broke my concentration and I knocked over a flask of rare Transparo-gas from the swamps of Uxilon Minor. The two substances, combined with the relatively low background levels of Kryptonite radiation that permeate the Fortress of Solitude* made me temporarily vulnerable to the irradiated gases, rendering me invisible for a period of up to seventy-two hours."

* Ed's note: Kryptonite Background radiation is the aftershock of Krypton's explosion amplified through the atmosphere's molecules. Though not deadly to Superman, it does have some unpredictable side-effects!
 
 
Benny the Ball
08:10 / 11.04.07
Not 100% on this one, but methinks the spore was burned out of J'onn's body in the 4-issue miniseries written by DeMatteis and Drawn by Mark Badger. 'Twas the spore that triggered his vision quest for H'Ronmeer, the Martian God of Fire, which revealed his TRUE origin as a poet/philosopher/father with false memories of a life as a warrior prince.

Good work! I've been racking my brain since this question was asked, trying to remember what happened - but, yeah, this sounds spot on.

Who was the artist on the annual from which the Fate/Manhunter/spore storyline came? - he was quite good, I remember - in fact that annual is one of my favourite league annuals of all time.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 3233343536(37)3839404142... 44

 
  
Add Your Reply