BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The place for new members to ask basic questions about Barbelith

 
  

Page: 12345(6)789

 
 
Benny the Ball
15:51 / 11.12.06
tech and theoretical question - I've always wondered why, with a lot of people seeming to start threads with the line "I'm not sure if this should be here or in..." why there isn't a cross reference posting system. is it the technical issue or simply a practical issue?
 
 
Ganesh
17:00 / 11.12.06
Surely they're ova?

It's all ova.

Now.
 
 
Saturn's nod
03:23 / 04.01.07
What does it mean to aim that the "standard of conversation, discussion and debate is higher than anywhere else online"? (From the wiki; the stated aim of Barbelith.) How do you measure it?
 
 
■
06:30 / 04.01.07
We've applied for ISO certification but they are having problems processing the gender-neutral pronouns on the forms.

I think saying it's an aim is just that. The constant striving for the upholding of non-racist/non-sexist/what have you discourse is very important, and is something which elsewhere might come off as "thought police PC", but it's so ingrained in the culture here that it means we do all start off on the same footing, even if some are much better and more verbose when expressing themselves.
There is the potential for smugness which, I think, is generally avoided, and the shared understanding that trolling, OMG!"£23!!isms and other memes common elsewhere do no-one any favours helps, too.
As for measuring? Show me somewhere better. (Sorry, TMOers)
 
 
alas
13:25 / 04.01.07
Damn I missed the egg-puns! Isn't there any way that we could have a direct link to "recent threads that have devolved into mindless punning" at the top of the screen, too? How else will we maintain our standards? We have become a shell ovaur former ...shelves?

(It's not ova til the fat chicken broods, bub.)
 
 
Smoothly
14:49 / 04.01.07
God, yeah. Pun alert! That'd be a real coop.
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
17:52 / 09.01.07
Is there any way to send a PM to multiple members at once?
 
 
Char Aina
17:54 / 09.01.07
send, hit back, change name, send, etc.
no way to do it all at once, but that way is still relatively quick.
your browser should hold the message when you go back to it, and so all you need is the name change. you can do the same thing to save your sent messages by adding my own name, if necessary.
 
 
Princess
18:01 / 09.01.07
How does one change the content of the first post in a thread? I have made a woopsie.
 
 
Char Aina
18:51 / 09.01.07
there should be a button to edit topic and one to edit post.
where's the error?
 
 
MattShepherd: I WEDDED KALI!
10:53 / 28.01.07
What does it mean when a suit is no longer clickable? This thread has no thread-starter in the abstract, and the name isn't a link to a profile. Banned? Other banninated people seem to still have clickable profile links.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:34 / 28.01.07
With one set of old board software, if a suit died for some reason there was no longer a profile and hence no link. Sometimes this happened because the suit got burned deliberately, but suits used to die randomly sometimes as well. Mine did, as well as a few others.
 
 
Jack Fear
12:53 / 28.01.07
The starter of that particular thread now posts as Matthew Fluxington. The "Ronald Thomas Clontle" suit was an extra that he was using for some fairly benign purpose which I can't recall at the moment; when board policy was changed to allow only one suit per user, the Clontle suit was deleted.
 
 
LykeX
20:05 / 07.02.07
tech and theoretical question - I've always wondered why, with a lot of people seeming to start threads with the line "I'm not sure if this should be here or in..." why there isn't a cross reference posting system. is it the technical issue or simply a practical issue?

A problem with such a crossposting system could be that not all forums have similar requirements. That is, the emphasis differs between, e.g. Conversation, Temple and Headshop. A post which is appropriate in one forum might not be so in another.
 
 
saintmae
12:17 / 09.02.07
A question on old threads:

I just signed up here a few days ago, and I've been enjoying reading through a number of older threads. Being the talkative person that I am, I find myself in some cases wanting to reply to threads that haven't seen a response in a year or more. On many other online fora that I've participated in, once a thread sinks off the first or second page, it's essentially dead and to respond to it just means that yet again no one will respond and it will sink rather than engaging new responses (and you'll look like an idiot, too). Conversely, I've noticed that a number of Barbelith threads span several years (like this thread, for example). I understand not wanting to start Yet Another Introduction Thread, but I wonder about other topics.

What do you think? If I'm interested in a thread that hasn't seen any action in a while, is it still worthwhile to reply? If not, if it's something I'm really interested in, is it seen as bad etiquette to start a second thread on the topic if an old one already exists?
 
 
Jack Fear
12:31 / 09.02.07
It's a personal call. For myself, I try to gauge whether reviving an old thread will be of benefit to the board as a whole, or just to me.

In other words, if my response to the dormant thread is essentially reactive—that is, if I'm riffing on/analyzing what's already been seen in-thread, or requesting more information on the topic, or simply trying to make myself look clever—then I'd have a hard time justifying dredging up that particular shipwreck.

On the other hand, if there's been a new development related to the subject, or if I have a question or perspective that could potentially move the topic in anew direction, or broaden it, or give people a window for re-engaging with it...

...or if it's the sort of thread that seeks to build an archive, either by

-inviting personal narratives (e.g., "Your Life In Ten Songs")

-soliciting additions to a canon (e.g., "The Lamest Superhero Costumes")

...or one that serves a function, where starting a new thread would be a duplication of effort (e.g., "Identify That Tune")...

...then I have no compunctions about clamping on the electrodes and bringing Boris Karloff back for one more round.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
20:46 / 04.03.07
This ain't no biggie, but, when I click on the "page 2" link on the Recently updated page it takes me to page 2 of the Policy... Has this always been the case, and will it remain so? As I say, just curious...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
21:12 / 04.03.07
It's a glitch. Has it always been like that? Yes. Will it remain so? Probably.
 
 
jentacular dreams
09:23 / 05.03.07
The link should be

http://www.barbelith.com/forum_all.php/from/30

and pages 3, 4, 5, should be from/60, from/90, from/120 etc.

I presume mods can't change this?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:19 / 05.03.07
Nope.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
15:43 / 07.03.07
Another quick q: I'm thinking of starting a thread on epistemology in either Head Shop or the Temple, possibly both, arising from a short exchange with the mighty Q:Trollslayer over on the "Something from nothing" thread, starting here and continuing via a coupla PMs. However, and this has come up for me before, for certain very broad topics, I'd love a kind of thread vetting place, a pre-thread if you wish, to discuss stuff like possible limitations on the scope, nature and tone of the thread. Naturally, these topics come up quite a lot in-thread, often proving hugely useful to the exchanges, but every now and then they seem to derail and kill what otherwise could be a very worthwhile endeavour.

Barbelith, what sayest thee?
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
10:28 / 11.03.07
Have I done something bad? Or merely stupid?

I posted a terribly clever thing about words being missing from the English language in the random thoughts thread and my post has vanished. Was it removed? Was it offensive?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
10:40 / 11.03.07
Oh dear. Are you sure it went through?

Another thing that sometimes happens is that a double post will occur, and both versions of it will accidently be flagged for deletion by two different mods. It shouldn't happen if we're all being careful, but sometimes it still does.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
10:55 / 11.03.07
Are you sure it went through?

Well, I thought it had... Merely stupid, then? I suppose I was assuming mods would PM or leave a mark of some kind when deleting, not so, I guess. Ah weel.

I do hope I haven't been dim and put it somewhere else by accident, I was *convinced* I'd pressed "post".

Oops.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:13 / 11.03.07
Well, sometimes you hit "post" and the page doesn't load, or whatever. Have another go.
 
 
Blake Head
14:24 / 08.04.07
Why does the Sociobiology thread come up with The Sinister Haiku Bureau as thread starter, when the first post is from Bill Posters? Glitch, first post deleted, or what? I don't get it.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
11:13 / 09.04.07

Guys...

Several questions. Enjoying this lots so far and want to do more.

Are my threads / posts too fluffy? I'm guessing folk would say at the time but am unsure.

Do I post *too much*? I've got loads of (what I think are) good ideas for threads but they're all pretty fluffy. Thus far I've been trying to limit myself to a maximum of 2 Sibelian threads on the front page of Conversation at any 1 time to avoid stuffing it with word games.

*I* would have no problem with this as I like to pursue most things in life in the spirit of play but that's just *me*. I'm suppose people could get sick of the sight of me in short order if I just let rip. Thing is, there's very much a theme of dialogue superceding monologue on this board and it's WAY more fun, for me at least, to play in such a headspace than on the (mostly) monologue based boards that I usually frequent.

I am a habit forming creature and have developed a Barbelith habit. Am I allowed to indulge myself? A lot of it would be pure ego-boosting for *me* because I like to go into social spaces and introduce games for people to play and enjoy and give myself pats on the back if it works. Is this site really supposed to be a bit more serious than that?

Should there be a forum called the Playground?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
11:21 / 09.04.07
Dude, chill. You're doing fine.
 
 
*
15:30 / 09.04.07
Please approach Barbelith in the spirit of play. Please. It so desperately needs it right now. Just not, you know, in the spirit of the kind of play that throws a bloody screaming fit and flings all the toys out of the sandbox and breaks them over the other children's heads.
 
 
Papess
15:35 / 09.04.07
So, dodgeball is out then?
 
 
*
16:19 / 09.04.07
Off to conversation with us this minute.
 
 
Papess
16:24 / 09.04.07
Sorry, id. I was just trying to be playful.
 
 
*
16:46 / 09.04.07
Me too, Justrix. Go see conversation for what I mean.
 
 
Sibelian 2.0
20:09 / 09.04.07

It so desperately needs it right now.

Off we go, then...

 
 
jentacular dreams
14:15 / 12.04.07
Whatever happened to forum number 3?
 
  

Page: 12345(6)789

 
  
Add Your Reply