BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Sex and Relationship forum

 
  

Page: 12(3)45678... 9

 
 
fuckbaked
11:56 / 13.08.05
I think I would like it if such a forum existed, although I'd hope it would be available to members only so that we wouldn't have a lot of people showing up here because they googled sex terms, and so that it would not be quite so public. I had the same concern as Stoatie about threads being moved out of the S&F forum, and I think that there could be scandal over this if we don't figure something out before the forum starts (if the forum starts, that is).

Something else I am worried about is the possibility that we will increase the amount of talk about sex on Barbelith if we have such a forum, which might make it more likely for filters to not allow people onto Barbelith. I recall, um....Stoatie (?) saying he has to use a computer with a filter on it at work, and it would really suck if people couldn't come onto Barbelith from work. I don't actually know how those filters work, but I know that they sometimes filter out sites that they shouldn't.

Oh, also, I think something ought to be added to the potential title of the forum that is a bit more inclusive of solo sexual activities than the words sex and foreplay. I know that masturbation is "having sex with yourself" but unless someone's saying it like that, people tend to think of sex as something you do with other people.

Oh, um, and if we did have this forum I think I might start a thread about anal sex, or if there's a q&a thread in the forum I might ask there.....
 
 
electric monk
12:35 / 13.08.05
And wouldn't it be a bit, y'know, better to be a member of an online community that was happy enough to discuss teh sex in an open, adult and frank way (so sometimes as a joke, and at other times not,) as opposed to say computer games, (also something I haven't really been involved with since the mid-to-late Nineties)?

Seconded.

Something else I am worried about is the possibility that we will increase the amount of talk about sex on Barbelith if we have such a forum, which might make it more likely for filters to not allow people onto Barbelith.

Aaaaand seconded. I've got pretty stringent controls on my surfing at work (the bastards). I can't even post from there, and I've been locked out of 'lith for 24 hours when I tried. So yeah, maybe selfish, but this could get me blocked at work and that would be teh suxx0r. Perhaps it'd only be a matter of staying away from that particular section of the street. Dunno. Definitely something to think about, but in the end I wouldn't say it should be make-or-break wrt starting this up.

And let's be honest: Who's not eating up the meta-textual, virtua-sex-tual vibe running thru this thread with a big soup spoon? We could have this all the time.
 
 
lekvar
20:53 / 13.08.05
I like the idea of a BodyShop forum, but I think there might be a collision between the Headshop-style discussions (Gender, Identity, Mechanics) and the Convo-style discussions (Anything Involving Steve, Whiskey Priestess'Rumors* forum). I could easily see a poster getting their feelings hurt because they posted what they considered to be a serious thread only to have it degenerate into piss-taking. There's a proud tradition of this happening, but it's usually confined to the Conversation.

Ahh, hell. Could we maybe give it a one moth trial period, see how it goes?

*Honestly not trying to sinle you out Whiskey, it sounds fun.
 
 
lekvar
20:57 / 13.08.05
With regards to site filters, would it be feasable to set the sex forum up as a sub-domain, http://sex.barbelith.com for example? If time and effort were not issues, I'd imagine that it would be easier for Tom to implement some of the other suggestions, like anonymity, blocking, etc.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
11:07 / 14.08.05
Lady: "Whisky Priestess can't seem to come up with more than a desire to start a load of joke threads"

Whoa there! That's both below the belt and inaccurate, Lady. If you check my post with the thread suggestions I think you'll find there are four serious topics suggested (albeit some with tabloid-style titles) and only one (the Pot Noodle one) that's a joke. It's even flagged up as such for your convenience:

- What makes a bear? (an info thread)
- The bearded lady: what do you call blokes who go/hang out with girls who are in denial about their lesbianism? (an info/terminology/discussion thread)
- Alex and Flyboy Up A Tree: the weirdest place you've ever had sex (a sex/gossip thread)
- Moving out and moving on - the social and technical problems of breaking up with your live-in lover and how to survive them (a help/relationships thread)
- Pot Noodle as sex aid: how hot is too hot? (a joke thread)


And, frankly, if you think using Pot Noodles as a sex aid is a joke, you've clearly never tried it.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
11:10 / 14.08.05
PS - I think there are enough Convo threads containing forbidden words (sex, swearing) to get Barbelith banned anyway (certainly it has been in a few overzealous companies I've worked at) and a dedicated forum would probably not make a difference.

Also, heeding suggestions above, can mods please change the thread title to Sex and Relationships Forum? Sorry, I am probably being thick but I can't work out how.
 
 
Aertho
20:33 / 20.08.05
I vote yes. Regardless of what could possibly happen, S+R on Barbelith is an opportunity for intelligent discourse on sex practices, sex history, and sex problems. Whether we get people popping in is only to their benefit anyway, right?
 
 
Aertho
20:34 / 20.08.05
And I'd moderate, too.
 
 
Whisky Priestess
22:29 / 20.08.05
Me too. I would like to keep an eye on it, if I am judged suitable.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
09:11 / 21.08.05
I can see only two possibly useful threads in there Whisky, a thread for explanations of definitions and terminology, a discussion on how to deal with messy breakups (with a hope nobody discusses messy breakups involving two or more Barbepersons). These would be dealt with quite happily in Conversation, or possibly in the Headshop depending how the discussion went. The other three are joke threads of a type that I'm almost surprised someone hasn't started already in the Conversation.

Can anyone suggest any more discussions they'd want to have, and why they feel they can't have them at the moment?
 
 
Smoothly
12:54 / 21.08.05
With all due respect, Flowers, I think you're missing the point. Asking for thread ideas that couldn't be started in the Conversation is a bit unfair, I think. Name some comics discussions that couldn't happen in the Convo, or some current affairs discussions, or...

The point is that the culture of the Conversation isn't always *conducive* to certain kinds of discussions. Take the Whatever 'In Love' Means thread. Now, in the end that turned out pretty well, but it got off to a pretty depressing start. The first response was 'You think too much' which set the tone for a slew of offtopic, one-line posts which no Convo mod would think to delete because it's the Convo and derailing threads into asides, snarks and throwaway postoids is par for the course.

Also, the churn rate of Convo threads means that discussions quickly fall off the front page if people dither about posting. That thread is now well below the fold, and I fancy that the posters who said they would come back to it once they'd mulled it over a bit might well have forgotten about it. Look at the gaps between posts in some Head Shop threads. If they were expected to sink or swim in the Conversation I expect that the majority of them would disappear pretty quickly for all but those who specifically searched for them.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
13:16 / 21.08.05
I know it's a very different board, but would any TMOers like to elaborate on how having such a forum has worked out over there?

Seems like quite a lot of people would like it- and, more importantly, would both get something from and put something into it, and (with my earlier-stated worries about losing stuff from Convo having been at least partially assuaged) those of us who probably wouldn't use it so much would be unlikely to be harmed by its existence.

It WOULD require some fairly sensitive modding, though, but I don't really see that that should be too hard to achieve.
 
 
Jack Fear
14:34 / 21.08.05
Something about the idea rubs me the wrong way, frankly—and I think it's the notion that sex and relationships should be compartmentalized away from/separated out of the rest of our lives, instead of being central to & enlivening our overall discourse.

I find that depressing—and frankly kind of bourgeois; the personal is political, innit?
 
 
Smoothly
16:33 / 21.08.05
I just don't get this. Politics, philosophy, art and culture should all be central to our overall discourse, and I don't see how dedicated forums work against this. I also don't see it making Barbelith any more bourgeois (heaven forfend) than it is already.

I agree with your sentiment, Jack, and I'd like to see *more* discussions of sex and relationships happen here for the reasons you give. I'm supporting the idea of this forum because I believe that by constructing the right environment, more and better discussions will grow out of it. I might be wrong about that, but I see no harm in giving it a go; there seem to be quite a few of us here who would be happy to moderate it.
 
 
w1rebaby
19:08 / 21.08.05
U75 (I seem to mention that bloody board a lot, I apologise, but it is something that's relevant here) grew a "health, relationships, sexuality" forum a few years ago, and I have to say that it was a success, certainly if you count the nicknames (my favourite so far being "knobbing and sobbing", though "pooves, perves and poxes" is good as well). It's very busy with a mix of threads about specific illnesses - several chronically ill posters there - general health advice, relationship whinging, issues regarding orientation and straightforward "have you ever put X up Y and was it any good" threads.

I'm not entirely sure that would work on Barbelith though. It seems to me that there's a different constituency here. Before the forum started, the "general" forum was full of the above sorts of threads, which is not something I see here.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
19:54 / 21.08.05
Could we just try out having a new forum for a bit and see if it works? I mean the general impression I get is "undecided". We could run it for a trial period of about a month, and if it doesn't work, it doesn't work (and vice versa).
 
 
Bed Head
21:11 / 21.08.05
Barbelith’s a much *smaller* community that U75, isn’t it, fridge? I thought that was kinda the point with your ‘forumitis’ thing - that another forum might spread barbelith too thinly. I do think that there’s an argument that a successful forum here won’t look the same as a successful forum there, but I dunno that it can’t work because of the make-up of the constituency here.

Hm, I think U75 also keeps google out so non-members can’t read it. It’s been said before, but mmmaybe easier to talk about certain, private-type aspects of life if something in your post isn’t potentially going to come up as part of some weird dude’s search string, and from which an entire history of everything you’ve ever written on the site can be googled up. So, I dunno, is there anything that can be done about anonymity? Tom’s said it would be a shame to make the *content* of any such forum invisible to google, because it might be a useful read for someone, somewhere. But, really, what about Money$hot’s idea of anonymous suits?

Still, wow, I *really* like the idea of adding ‘health’ into a ‘relationships, sexuality’ forum. Interesting, useful, lots to be said.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:25 / 21.08.05
The addition of health would be fascinating- fuck it, even I might participate then. Kind of like the Body Shop idea proposed upthread... a forum for physicality? Only that would exclude all the emotional relationships stuff, so maybe not...
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
11:00 / 22.08.05
Smoothly Weaving With all due respect, Flowers, I think you're missing the point. Asking for thread ideas that couldn't be started in the Conversation is a bit unfair, I think.

I'm sorry, but I don't think it is. This thread has got to three pages and yet the pro's haven't really put much by way of argument about why there should be this forum (with the exception of Deva wanting somewhere to talk about strap-ons and female ejaculation) or answers to the concerns of those who don't (such as Nina at the top of page two).

I think what this really calls for is a discussion about what The Conversation is for. As a moderator I've never been entirely comfortable with seeing it as just a playground where absolutely anything goes and it was that that caused my arguments with Flux and Fly over the whole Joycore/Borecore thing, picture threads for pictures of meat and those 'Flux is dying!'-Steve/Dave things which I ignored completely.

At the moment we have a slightly uneven balance between utter nonsense and more serious personal stuff which requires a modicum of thought in replying to but which sometimes gets thoughtless replies 'because it's in the Conversation'.

Now, maybe the 'slightly more serious' side of Conversation needs a seperate area away from the idiocy (though looking at the first page of the Conversation at the mo it's looking mostly serious stuff at the moment, the 'silliest' things are Morgues hell thread and Anna's 'Have we met' thread), but I don't think it's in a forum about Sex.
 
 
Smoothly
13:07 / 22.08.05
Fair enough.

So Nina says at the top of page two:
A lot of long term members aren't going to post threads in a sex and relationships/personal lives forum because frankly a lot of them are together … So, basing this on my own experience of the board, presuming that half of the London crowd don't want me to know anything about their specific relationship with [insert name here] or their masturbation fantasies, roleplay, BDSM acts etc that's 20 prolific posters who aren't contributing specific personal information to the proposed forum just off the top of my head.

Which seem related to your objection here:
The limits I feel comfortable at in disclosing my sex life are quite comfortably bound by the Head Shop thanks.

Which seem to be variations on the ‘this forum holds no interest for me or my friends’ gambit that we’ve had elsewhere. As I’ve said, I think that’s a shame, but I don’t think it blows the project out of the water. I was never going to post much in Games & Gameplay, but I supported the introduction of that.

There also concerns that having an S&R forum would bring about content that would raise our google-traffic from unsavoury elements. I find this impossible to reconcile with the parallel objection that an S&R forum wouldn’t contain anything that we don’t have already, but either way, we might find ways around that. Tom, Bed Head, Money $hot and others have made some suggestions, although personally I’m not convinced of the need. The Temple seems to attract the full gamut of internet whack-jobs, but I think that’s a price worth paying. Saying that, I do get a hint that I might have less to hide than others. I don’t really care if A. N Googler learns that some character called ‘Smoothly Weaving’ likes a thumb up his arse when he’s getting a blow-job, but others might have different, specific concerns. It’s hard to know though.

This thread has got to three pages and yet the pro's haven't really put much by way of argument about why there should be this forum

Personally I’m a bit gutted that the thread reads like that for you, because as well as Deva, I have made several stabs at supporting it, as have Whisky, Tom, Laughing, gridley, Alex, sentimentity, Chad, and several others with various qualifications. I’d like it if a few more people would weigh in (on either side), but I don’t see the thread so far as largely oppositional.

I have stacks of sympathy with your appraisal of the Conversation’s short-comings, but I really think that’s a whole other battle.

Maybe this is a good time to summarise.
I think an S&R forum would be a good thing because I think sex and relationships are interesting, important and as valuable a part of the overall discourse as politics, philosophy, science, and culture. I think that there are serious discussions to be had that aren’t a good fit with the existing forums, and I think it’s possible to create an environment that would nurture them.

What are the major outstanding objections, do you think?
 
 
Bed Head
13:47 / 22.08.05
Just to clarify, it isn't so much the google traffic itself as the ‘search on: username’ functionality we have that I think might *possibly* inhibit discussions. Search on username is a newish thing that will bring up things you might have let slip years ago. It’s not really such a problem in itself, but.... jeez, it is a rather stalkertastic piece of functionality. There are some things you just don’t want your stalker to know.

I’m just trying to anticipate something that might stop a new forum from working as well as it could, man. I like the idea.
 
 
w1rebaby
20:39 / 22.08.05
Barbelith’s a much *smaller* community that U75, isn’t it, fridge? I thought that was kinda the point with your ‘forumitis’ thing - that another forum might spread barbelith too thinly. I do think that there’s an argument that a successful forum here won’t look the same as a successful forum there, but I dunno that it can’t work because of the make-up of the constituency here.

Yes, it is, much smaller. I don't think that's the issue though; I think it's more to do with the fact that Barbelith posters don't seem to be crying out (with a few exceptions) for a specific place that they can talk about sex techniques on. There's not just a size difference, there's a constituency difference. That doesn't necessarily mean that it shouldn't be there, but if there are also downsides it becomes more important.

Hm, I think U75 also keeps google out so non-members can’t read it.

Nope - the archives are googlable, even if the actual board pages aren't (to conserve bandwidth and data transfer).

It’s been said before, but mmmaybe easier to talk about certain, private-type aspects of life if something in your post isn’t potentially going to come up as part of some weird dude’s search string, and from which an entire history of everything you’ve ever written on the site can be googled up. So, I dunno, is there anything that can be done about anonymity? Tom’s said it would be a shame to make the *content* of any such forum invisible to google, because it might be a useful read for someone, somewhere. But, really, what about Money$hot’s idea of anonymous suits?

If you post anything on the internet it can be linked to you. A lot of people don't seem to fully appreciate this. But really, any dedicated stalker can track you down if you've posted any sort of personal detail. You can make this easier or harder depending on what you post and how careful you are, but there's a limit. Anonymous suits might help a bit but if you're talking about anything to do with your life outside of the net, you have to accept that somebody may link that to you. I'm sure any long term Livejournaller will know that even keeping posts to friends only doesn't stop it happening.

Anonymous suits certainly wouldn't stop people from being recognised within Barbelith. It's not that hard to identify people if they're not just taking on joke suits that only post in certain defined ways, which wouldn't be the case here. Particularly if you already know/have slept with that person.

I don't think any such forum should be ungooglable; I agree with Tom that if the content is going to be worthwhile at all people should be able to find it and read it. A forum that's just for Barbelith people to talk about their problems with each other seems... I dunno, self-indulgent, masturbatory (possibly quite literally). If you're not prepared to give something else out, even if it's just anonymous advice to somebody in the same position, you're being very selfish to my mind.

Basically what I'm saying here is that the issue of complete anonymity isn't one that I see being solvable. If it's something that would put a lot of people off then that's going to happen - better they know about it beforehand rather than get into stickiness afterwards by accident.

---

Oh, and my main objection is still that a forum involving "relationships" would lead to a lot of very whiny threads with no real content and the expectation that there's going to be acceptance and tolerance (read: no nasty challenges to preconceptions or attitudes, lots of hugs and "awww"s). That's not a given but I think 'lithers go too far in that direction at the moment to be honest and I don't see a relationship-related forum helping that in the slightest. Of course, if it turns out that Barbelith grows the hardest-edged, most no-nonsense agony aunt appendage to be found on the net, I'll claim that I thought that would happen all along.

I'm perfectly happy with a "Body" forum. I think that's a good idea. It could have all sorts of stuff to do with sex, health, exercise, the physical aspects of the martial arts, debates about the mind/body dichotomy in modern medicine.... There are a lot of possibilities and I don't think we should just concentrate on what is traditionally considered "intellectual" here.
 
 
Smoothly
22:20 / 22.08.05
You know, I'm coming round to Flowers's point. The anonymity thing doesn't worry me so much (I think it's a bit of a red herring really - people can make a decision about what they disclose. At any rate, the forum that most threatens anonymity is The Gathering, and I'm not worried about that), but what is making me doubt it all is that there's going to have to be a decent number of potential posters. If it's just me and Whisky exchanging Pot Noodle tips, then it's going to be unbelievably rubbish.

Let's face it, there is going to be an element of I'll show you mine if you show me yours, and without a tacit pledge bank of willing participants, the forum's going to be under stimulated, dry and painful to enter. I think Our Lady has a valid concern in that three weeks since it was suggested, there don't seem to be very many people expressing an interest in this.

Perhaps the Body Shop is a better approach.
 
 
Loomis
07:43 / 23.08.05
I think the Body Shop is a great idea, but I was wondering if it would take threads away from the Lab, which struggles a bit already. In which forum should threads on health, exercise, medicine and nutrition be placed?
 
 
Aertho
12:30 / 23.08.05
What if we just open Laboratory to Sexual Experimentation and consider the "Body" something worth working with?
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:42 / 23.08.05
That would work for me. Really there's no reason why a thread about mental, non-tangible things shouldn't go in either the Head Shop or the Conversation, and physical body stuff either the Lab or Conversation. This thread of Whisky's has made me become aware that we're possibly not using current fora to their maximum possiblity, not that we necessarily need more of them.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:52 / 23.08.05
we're possibly not using current fora to their maximum possiblity, not that we necessarily need more of them

When you put it like that, I guess you have a point!
 
 
sibyline, beating Qalyn to a Q
02:04 / 20.04.06
I want to revive this thread just to say that I endorse some version of a Sex and Relationship Forum, and I want to bring up a couple of points that haven't been discussed.

1. I'm new, I'm female, I don't live in London and, as far as I know, I've only met one Barbelith person, along with a few others who are on my LJ friends list. I came here because one person in particular recommended the board and, after a rough start, I'm sorta getting the hang of it, except that:

2. Since people have been discussing the possibility that Barbelith culture is woman-unfriendly, it strikes me that the existing forums tend to cater to a historically male demographic, given that it has highly specialized forums dedicated to comic books and gaming, but no forum devoted to relationships, which would cater to a historically female demographic.

3. Even the existing forum names strike me as male-centric. "Laboratory" doesn't inspire me to post about eating disorders for instance (and yes, i know i know, men have eating disorders too), nor does "Head Shop" inspire me to ask for anecdotal advice about monogamous v. polyamorous relationships. And yes, I was able to ask my questions in Convo but I think it would have been better-addressed in a Relationshps forum.

Barbelith appeals to the abstract, analytical side of my personality but not to the side that likes listening to people tell stories about their lives, if they choose to share it. I mean, it would be great if I lived in London and can do that with you all over a pint, but I can't. From the sound of the discussions on this thread, it sounds like y'all are having such a good time talking about your lives at the pub. But what about the rest of us? Does Barbelith give preferential treatment to Londoners v. non-Londoners?

Just a few of the topics that I would be more likely to post about if there was a Sex and Relationship Forum:

* Are women in 2006 still finding it hard to achieve orgasm?

* Formalizing a relationship by changing your Friendster or MySpace profile

* Are boxer briefs the best of both worlds?

* Online dating disasters

* Do you think your partner's astrological sign really makes a difference?

&c., &c.

In conclusion, I'm still slightly on the fence about Barbelith because I feel like the culture is indeed male-centric and that it doesn't give me the best opportunity to post about a significant amount of the things I care about, while I observe whole forums dedicated to activities that I've historically (and with good reason, imho) associated with men.

I feel like I'm in a play room where there are significantly more robots than dolls. And I'm not saying that girls should only play with dolls, but that dolls and robots should be equally represented so that girls (and boys) who do want to play with dolls can do so if they choose.

Rambly rambly. I hope *somebody* sees my point.
 
 
Shrug
02:40 / 20.04.06
Just popping in to say "aye".

And I don't exactly see the side where sex and relationship as a forum would necessarily appeal more to a female demographic than a male one but I do think it would be a welcome addition to Barbelith.
 
 
Disco is My Class War
05:00 / 20.04.06
Hmmm. I was really into the idea of having a 'Sex and Relationships forum until it was framed as a space where all the women could talk about women's issues. I'm not sure it would work and it seems to assume a certain rock-solid division between what counts as 'men's stuff' and 'women's stuff'. Sybiline, in my experience, the personal threads that happen in non-Conversation forums tend to be about the way that forums work in the sense of 'affinity', rather than gender. Maybe I'm wrong about this. For instance, I came out as trans in the Head Shop, because at that stage, the Head Shop was my stalking ground. And personal threads in the Head Shop work surprisingly well: people bring a certain care and thoughtfulness to those discussions, and 'theory' doesn't have to mean 'academic' there. Don't be afraid to start personal threads in non-Conversation forums, is what I'm trying to say. But don't assume that all the robots are boys, either.

Health stuff is one thing that could be in a 'Body Shop', easily, and would be really useful. Doesn't have to be sexual health stuff, just any kind of body issues. I kinda think that a 'Body Shop' might be a place where emotional stuff could be talked about: surely we don't have to be limited by Cartesian mind/body splits here?

I also think that the only way a Sex and Relationships forum would really work is if it could host anonymous posts, or if there was a ficton suit everyone could log into to post anonymously. I know this would open the board to trolling, but still. I often think I'd like to talk about difficult relationship stuff here, and I don't have intimate histories with many posters. But there's something about being that vulnerable that makes it hard. This might open up complex and potentially messy situations, but I seem to remember a few good threads being started by anonymous suits about, BDSM and other stuff back when we could have more than one suit.

Lastly -- I would put my hand up to be a moderator of a forum like this. I did get the can last time I was a mod But now I have home internet access and am here much more often.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
08:09 / 20.04.06
I don't really see how creating a S&R forum would make the board more female friendly. I guess I'd be concerned it would make it less so, but I suppose that I'm assuming that a load of dick-waving morons would suddenly find Barbelith and would join.

However (and apologies if this has come up in this thread, I was reading it at the time but haven't gone back through it yet before posting now), it may need stricter rules about moderation than the rest of the board, what with triggers and people posting sensitive information.
 
 
Smoothly
08:44 / 20.04.06
I guess I'd be concerned it would make it less so, but I suppose that I'm assuming that a load of dick-waving morons would suddenly find Barbelith and would join.

The fact that it’s nigh on impossible for *anyone* to join at the moment aside, I’m not convinced that a forum devoted to carnal matters is going to be the tallest lightning rod for morons on Barbelith. The vast majority of new applicants seem to be drawn to the Temple, and if people are attracted to sex and relationships as discussed on Barbelith (in preference to the multitudinous competition on the web), then I’d probably see that as a good thing. If dick-waving is you thing, then I struggle to believe that Barbelith is going to your venue of choice. And anyway, we already have that thread.

I agree about moderation though. I don’t think it would necessarily have to be stricter, per se (what kind of triggers are you thinking of, Flowers?), but I think it would have to be a bit different from the existing forums. But that’s not prohibitive, I don’t think. The other forums have different flavours of moderation, which is one of the great strengths of Barbelith, IMO.

My main concern is still the level of commitment. Are there really enough people who’d be interested in actually engaging in these kinds of discussions?
 
 
*
08:46 / 20.04.06
*raises hand* Yo.

(Are you srsly wondering if there are a number of people on barb who like to talk about the sex?)
 
 
Smoothly
08:53 / 20.04.06
I’m just going by this thread really, (id). It just didn’t ultimately rally a great deal of support when originally discussed. Also, people might be interested to read such a forum, but whether they would contribute is another matter.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
09:08 / 20.04.06
I know it's a very different board, but would any TMOers like to elaborate on how having such a forum has worked out over there?


Not that well in my opinion, but it is, and was (way back when the question was asked) a very different board. TMO being much smaller, almost everyone on there has met many other contributors in real life, and in several cases have slept with or dated other contributors in real life. Which puts a different complexion on posting about your romantic and bedroom activities; it would be like putting a sign up on the village green, and likely to annoy, upset or squick out at least one other person.
 
  

Page: 12(3)45678... 9

 
  
Add Your Reply