BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Moderating the Temple

 
  

Page: 1 ... 678910(11)1213141516... 35

 
 
Quantum
09:02 / 09.10.06
they get the impression that the Temple is anti-religious

I don't know how prevalent that is though. I've often thought of it as pro-magic rather than pro-religion, a legacy of it's roots, but there's only a couple of posters who attack the church/churches and they haven't been seen for a while. I don't think it would be too arduous to make the Temple seem pro-religion, let's start a few worship and theology and comparisons of dogma threads. Then the atheists can complain instead.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:13 / 09.10.06
I think the Temple, whilst being generally okay with faith, is not and never has been a place where organised religion could be discussed entirely uncritically. I don't think it should be, frankly. As I've said on several occasions I'm keen that we don't become yet another platform for the bashing of teh scured Xtianz, but I also don't want to see a Temple where--for example--homophobic statements could be made and then defended with a careless "well, that's what my trad teaches!" as I've seen happen elsewhere.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:05 / 09.10.06
Oh, I totally agree with Mordant re- the criticism thing.

And I don't think the Temple *is* anti-religious (in a knee-jerk sort of way)- in fact, I'd say it actually ISN'T- the respondents to the infamous God Is Imaginary thread should be a pretty damn good illustration of that. What I'm saying is how much does it *seem* that way, and thus put people off?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:07 / 09.10.06
(I realise the wording of my last post on the last pagve is pretty off, as well- I haven't said "the same", I've just worried about it a bit. But it's what I said so I'm not gonna change it, just acknowledge that I said it wrong).
 
 
Ticker
00:50 / 10.10.06
one of the things I dig about the Temple is that it's a pro-experience forum. If your experience was shitty or sublime or some where in between it's welcome if offered in a thoughtful productive manner for community exploration.

I suspect saying it's pro religion or pro critical doesn't quite shade it dead on. In terms of people saying unpleasant things we seem to be pretty okay about it if they are discussing their direct experiences rather than vapor accusations gleaned from a babblebox.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:57 / 10.10.06
Well, I've been waiting for that poster to come back and elaborate on what ze wrote and thus far I haven't seen anything. Until that poster elucidates exactly why ze feels that the Temple is so anti-religious that ze can't even discuss hir experiences of religion in a thread dedicated to so doing, to which several other posters had already contributed their own stories, I'm afraid I'm going to have to regard that comment as a cheap shot. It does not look like a genuine appeal for understanding (consisting as it does of one line which has not been expanded upon) it does nothing to help us look at what might need to change. Instead it seems designed merely to administer an unpleasant sting to anyone actively involved in the Temple.

The poster is free to prove me wrong here but until I see evidence of this terrible anti-religious bias I won't be losing any sleep.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
12:21 / 10.10.06
You do indeed have a point. Well, I pointed hir in this direction...
 
 
Mirror
17:44 / 10.10.06
Perhaps it is simply that the Temple, while not being anti-religious, *is* somewhat anti-dogma and anti-uncritical-acceptance. Since dogmatism and uncritical acceptance of said dogma are prominent features of numerous religious faiths, it may be that some posters are confusing the two.
 
 
Elettaria
18:21 / 11.10.06
Not everyone has the time, ability or inclination to be a regular on Barbelith. I'm dealing with chronic illness and at the moment it's worse and I'm having trouble reading at all.

Anyway, the environment I was referring to was that particular thread. I haven't noticed an anti-religious bias in the Temple elsewhere so much as a marked absence of discussion of religion (other than paganism and magic) in a forum where you'd expect it, which is a different matter. I haven't read every post in the Temple going back for months or years or whatever people seem to be expecting.

The thread was called "My Religious Backstory", but the first post focused most strongly on getting away from religion, and this seemed to be where the thread generally was going. Several commenters - and I'm sorry but I can't skim much, my eyes are fairly bad today and I don't find the Barbelith format the easiest to read, so you're only getting one - were very harsh about religion in general and those who believe in it. For instance, sn00p (whom I'm not trying to get at personally) said:

I just want to scream in their faces, ARE YOU STUPID, I GREW OUT OF THIS AT ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS SANTA, YOUR ABSTRACT IDEAS (as nice and interesting as they may be), MEAN NOTHING, NOTHING, THERE ARE FACTS IN THE WORLD, NON SUBJECTIVE, NON RELATIVE FACTS, LIKE THE MONITOR INFRONT OF YOUR FACE, WHAT YOU BELIEVE MEANS NOTHING, TRY AND BELIEVE THE MONITOR ISN'T THERE, IS IT STILL THERE?

and repeatedly referred to people with religious beliefs as "stupid". Overall, yes, this does not make for an environment which feels welcoming to those who actually follow a religion, rather than having decided that anyone with any intelligence should scrap it.

Nor am I particularly reassured by the suggestions that I am after "dogmatism and uncritical acceptance of said dogma" or "a place where organised religion could be discussed entirely uncritically" or "a Temple where--for example--homophobic statements could be made and then defended with a careless 'well, that's what my trad teaches!'" Since when did asking for religious tolerance imply any of that? I'm perfectly aware that religion is often far from a force for good in the world, that many people have been screwed over royally by religion and that their complaints are valid, but that doesn't mean people can't allow any respect for others who do follow religions. If the starting supposition is that religion is stupid and damaging, then it feels about as friendly as a thread would which was entitled "Your sexual orientation" and went on to star stories of people who were previously gay but journeyed successfully towards heterosexuality and called anyone who was still gay stupid and immoral.

I'm a member of a women's interfaith group in real life (and several interfaith groups online), which includes Jews, Muslims, Christians of various denominations, Buddhists, an occasional Catholic or Baha'i, Quakers, Brahma Kumaris, and I'm trying to recruit a pagan friend. Despite the very strong differences of opinion which are in the group - I am strongly against religious sexual repression or pressured conversion, there are people who think it's immoral that I'm queer and engage in premarital relationships, for instance - we manage to engage in critical dialogue on some pretty hot topics without name-calling, with full mutual respect and with some damn good food.
 
 
Ticker
19:09 / 11.10.06
I feel it is important how you are framing sn00p's post.

Elettaria:
and repeatedly referred to people with religious beliefs as "stupid". Overall, yes, this does not make for an environment which feels welcoming to those who actually follow a religion, rather than having decided that anyone with any intelligence should scrap it.

sn00p:
Every time I turn on the T.V there’s something about Muslims, "Europe is a cancer, Islam is the cure", or someone from the bible belt shot an abortion doctor, or some war over religion. I just want to scream in their faces, ARE YOU STUPID, I GREW OUT OF THIS AT ABOUT THE SAME TIME AS SANTA, YOUR ABSTRACT IDEAS (as nice and interesting as they may be), MEAN NOTHING, NOTHING, THERE ARE FACTS IN THE WORLD, NON SUBJECTIVE, NON RELATIVE FACTS, LIKE THE MONITOR INFRONT OF YOUR FACE, WHAT YOU BELIEVE MEANS NOTHING, TRY AND BELIEVE THE MONITOR ISN'T THERE, IS IT STILL THERE?
But that's hateful right?


For myself in the frame of the thread on religious back story sn00p's experience is as valid as any other. It has some harsh opinion floating in it but I believe the poster was expressing a specific frustration. In typical Barbelith fashion sn00p's post was engaged with by several posters including:

I would never actually scream things in peoples faces, that's just an expresion of my bewilderment.

well, then, I'd say you're not hateful at all. well done.


I also have to nudge you about :
(I got nudged about it too and it helps to read it)

If the starting supposition is that religion is stupid and damaging, then it feels about as friendly as a thread would which was entitled "Your sexual orientation" and went on to star stories of people who were previously gay but journeyed successfully towards heterosexuality and called anyone who was still gay stupid and immoral.

Please check out the thread on the comparison and use as analogous of different forms of bigotry
 
 
Char Aina
19:24 / 11.10.06
i can understand why you would feel unwilling to share your views, but i would urge you to try and do so at some point.

while some of the assumptions on display could lead to others being made about a lack of tolerance on the board, i think you would be surprised by the lack of attack if you did test the waters, especially now that you have raised the issue.

for one thing, sn00p has said he was venting rage at a specific type of religious person, and has further said that he wouldnt be so harsh to their faces.

i would asume you are not in the demographic he was railing against, and further would assume that he would therefore have no urge to shout at you.

i'd need to hear other examples to know exactly where you are coming from, but i can see the points about the 'journey away' commonality, and about the assumption that you might require the freedom to abuse homosexuals.

i'd probably feel pretty uncomfortable too in a similar situation, and point to the fact that no one said that this was what they expected you to want, but were instead describing limits that they were unwilling to remove for anyone.

i feel this was done because others have acted outside of those limits, but i can see how you might have felt it was a warning aimed directly at you.

all in all, i think you will find the temple mostly welcoming, if rigourous.
i'd definitley be interested in hearing your story if and when you decide to share it with us.
 
 
Elettaria
19:50 / 11.10.06
I'm sorry, but I've got a lot going on right now, and I'm afraid I don't have the time to read backstories and get into long discussions just to justify having mentioned not feeling comfortable somewhere. It does look like an interesting thread and I may look at it some time, thank you for pointing me at it, but not tonight and not over the next two weeks. I've quite possibly misread part of that post, which I apologise for: as I've said, the Barbelith format is difficult for those of us with visual or concentration problems.
 
 
grant
19:53 / 11.10.06
the first post focused most strongly on getting away from religion,

Well, I can see where someone would get that impression.

It's odd, actually, that some of my more, um, staid? (there's a better word) religious practices I started adhering to more strictly after I more or less stopped attending Mass. What I'm trying to say (and really didn't in that post, I guess), is that in some ways I think of myself as a more religious person today than I was then, what with the annual fasting and Bible reading and all.

Perhaps that's a flaw in the concept behind the thread itself, but I hope not. I really should have been a little clearer about myself. I do find it a little difficult to talk about, though.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:54 / 11.10.06
I'm afraid I don't have the time to read backstories and get into long discussions just to justify having mentioned not feeling comfortable somewhere. It does look like an interesting thread and I may look at it some time

but...but... you POSTED in the backstory thread, and said there that you didn't feel comfortable. Apart from anything else, that thread, afaict, was started largely to COUNTER impressions people may have had of the Temple being anti-religious.

Don't get me wrong- I think there's a valid conversation to be had over whether or not the Temple's anti-religion (I'd say not, but I can see how people would get that impression and am interested in why)... but...but...
 
 
Elettaria
21:28 / 11.10.06
The backstory I was referring to was the long thread someone suggested I read because of a phrase I used, not the original post. If you really have to know, I've been fighting off migraine for the last five days, the ME's suddenly got worse (and it's fairly severe to begin with), I'm frantically trying to finish embroidering a wedding present which has to be done over the next few days and have managed to give myself eyestrain to the point where I am having serious trouble reading and I cannot focus on the computer for very long, I'm going away on Tuesday for a week for said wedding and travelling generally makes me pretty ill, and I've just had my mother crying down the phone to me because my aunt is having her eye removed tomorrow (cancer). So if it's considered the norm on this board to insist that someone with all that on should spend hours reading extra threads and discussing them despite their saying that they do not currently have the time, then I really have no interest in hanging around further.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:35 / 11.10.06
The backstory I was referring to was the long thread someone suggested I read because of a phrase I used, not the original post

Apologies for the misunderstanding- the word "backstory" confused me a little.
 
 
Quantum
23:12 / 11.10.06
Elettaria- please do come back when you have less on your plate, you certainly shouldn't feel any obligation to read everything right now and post every ten minutes. I'd like to assure you though that the opinions expressed by the various characters in the Temple do not necessarily reflect the policy of the management...
Some people say religion is stupid (most atheists for example) but equally some people say rational materialism and a denial of the divine is not only closed minded but idiotic and perverse. We have to cater for all kinds here, my hope is that we foster debate and discourage prejudice.
 
 
EvskiG
14:40 / 12.10.06
I'd be pretty interested in hearing about what it's like to grow up Jewish in the U.K., and whether it seems different in Scotland (where I presume most people are Presbyterian rather than C of E) than in England.

As a nonobservant New York Jew who wants to move to London or Edinburgh, I'd also be interested in hearing about the prevalence (or lack) of casual or overt anti-Semitism in the U.K.

No pressure, though.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:01 / 12.10.06
Apologies for responding to your post the way I did, Elettaria. I hope you can understand why I interpreted it as a poke, and that when things are better for you, you will feel able to come back and contribute to the thread.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:54 / 12.10.06
(Also, I'd just like to reassure you that this comment: I think the Temple, whilst being generally okay with faith, is not and never has been a place where organised religion could be discussed entirely uncritically. I don't think it should be, frankly. As I've said on several occasions I'm keen that we don't become yet another platform for the bashing of teh scured Xtianz, but I also don't want to see a Temple where--for example--homophobic statements could be made and then defended with a careless "well, that's what my trad teaches!" as I've seen happen elsewhere was a general observation and was not in response to your post.)
 
 
Ticker
19:32 / 20.10.06
hey did you folks consider making monk a Temple mod? He threw his hat in the ring but I didn't see any response to it? (am I not looking in the correct place?)
Or do we not need more currently as Pegs came back online?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
19:58 / 20.10.06
I'd like monk for a mod...
 
 
electric monk
20:14 / 20.10.06
(am I not looking in the correct place?)

I think you are. I'm pretty sure that post was in this thread. I asked that it be deleted a while back.

I'd still like to mod the Temple if there's a need.
 
 
Quantum
01:56 / 21.10.06
I'm all for it too. It's a bit haphazard getting someone modified though, I'm not sure there's even a standard process. Emailing Tom seems to be the way to go.
 
 
electric monk
02:45 / 21.10.06
I've PM'd him with a link back to here. Couldn't find his email addy on his blog or in the wiki.

I know this might sound silly, but I feel as if I may dance around a bit and refresh my drink.
 
 
Ticker
20:26 / 22.10.06
I really like the way monk interacts with all the kids in the sandbox and is invested in the Temple as a quality place of equal sharing.
 
 
grant
01:23 / 23.10.06
It's the haircut, isn't it. That bald spot.
 
 
electric monk
11:38 / 23.10.06
STOP POINTING AT IT!
 
 
Quantum
14:32 / 23.10.06
Well, as we were talking about christian-bashing I'm a bit worried about the link in this post; here to a conspiracy theory book that 'debunks' christ. The post is alright but the book sounds euw.
 
 
electric monk
15:37 / 23.10.06
Given that it's two pages removed from the exchange that inspired it, would it be a good idea to ask Digital Horus to start a new thread for this? That post could easily be the opening post in a new thread (with some fleshing out, I would think) with a link to the relevant Q&A exchange. That'd give us a chance to discuss it without dragging the Q&A off the rails.
 
 
Quantum
01:02 / 31.10.06
Well, a week later I'm helping drag the Q&A off the rails because of some monkey business starting about here. It's leading to trouble of the appallingly familiar kind, anyone have any ideas?
digital horus eye seems amiable enough, just poorly phrased and unwilling to read, and entranced by Mrs RAW (without realising she was a she), could we ask him to take a break and read, or just take a break, or let him continue to post and generate half a dozen outraged responses to every ill-advised piece of crap he quotes?

I'm for the repeated advising not to post for a while, if enough people reasonably ask perhaps we can head off the kerfuffle before it develops. But if he keeps posting shit in the temple I'll ask for a ban. The temple will survive without another pookahcoyoteRAWclone, thanks, language barrier notwithstanding.
 
 
Hallo, Paper Spaceboy
05:24 / 31.10.06
This popped up in the Conversation, revelant-like. Probably didn't help by replying, but the rankles are up. Anyone have something articulate to say for, perhaps, bumping the Feminism 101 thread?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
08:43 / 31.10.06
Well at least this time it's confined to the Questions thread.

Although DHE does have form for this sort of thing, I'm reluctant to start calling for a ban anytime soon simply because I don't see DHE as malicious and he hasn't (yet) become enough of a presence in the Temple to really put a spanner in the works. I'm for trying to communicate with him why his contributions are problematic and helping him to structure them better, but I don't really know where to start.
 
 
Quantum
12:33 / 31.10.06
At least he's not in the Temple any more. I'll leave it to someone else to propose the almost-inevitable ban.
 
 
sn00p
17:05 / 17.11.06
Just so I’m not mis-quoted it's not certain religious people I’m against. It's any supernatural theism in any way. I'm not against things that us western folk often call religions, as in secular contemplative 'spiritual' processes.

I think you either have it one way or the other. You have total free speech where people are allowed to talk about anything no matter how offensive or dumb some may find it (racism, porn, whatever) or you have it moderated so it's more of an intellectual think tank. I think the big wigs at barbelith need to have a think about which camp they're in (both are fine with me) and then have a long think which category faith and religion fits into.

I think it's also misleading to have faith and magic(k) in the same forum. As they're not connected in any positive way. The situation is analogous to Intelligent Designs connection with science.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 678910(11)1213141516... 35

 
  
Add Your Reply