BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Adventures in Christian fundamentalism

 
  

Page: 1(2)34567

 
 
paw
00:30 / 20.09.02
by the way exp. do you mind telling us about your religious background? are you part of a prayer group etc.? I'm a catholic, well sort of, and somehow, though my mum is in my room alot, she always seems to miss the pete carroll and phil hine books i throw to the floor at 5.30 am exhausted before going to sleep. if they discovered all that stuff though they'd have the catholic priest down to our house and the whole thing would go instant angela's ashes ireland. i'm in a house where my generally fairly liberal catholic parents go harcore christian when told that i missed mass. was once thrown out of the house for it too. my da's very stubborn. she's even asked me what the little servitor man i made out of cardboard is doing on my shelf and i've told her its a visual reference i need to 'help write comic books'
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:30 / 20.09.02
exp> are the confilicts unavoidable? Does your own unorthodoxy - and this sounds very playground, I realise - really have anything to do with anyone else? Surely you're free to take your own interpretations of whatever religion you chose and shape them as you see fit, without it impinging on anyone else's take. Unless you're planning a takeover or something...
 
 
Ganesh
00:31 / 20.09.02
I think I expected a wider range of opinions. Given the level of ignorance on bizarre, abstract concepts like "homosexual act" and "homosexual lifestyle", I guess I'd hoped I might explode the odd myth or two. They didn't really give me the chance.
 
 
paw
00:34 / 20.09.02
those borg never do ganesh
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:34 / 20.09.02
I've not really explored it that much, but do they have much experience of people presenting opposing views? I'd consider posting in a few discussions simply to see how possible arguments panned out, but almost expect to come away feeling wound up.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:35 / 20.09.02
Opposing views on issues other than homosexuality, that is.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
00:37 / 20.09.02
Or sexuality of any nature, for that matter. That's obviously one area where the big voice won't allow dissent.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
00:42 / 20.09.02
[Ganesh - who's reached his posting limit - borrowing ZoCher's suit. In this context, one Sodomite slipping inside another seems particularly naughty...]

Yeah, E Randy, I know what you mean - and I'm not entirely sure why I did it. Partly just to see what would happen, partly because I'm a compromise junkie/martyr and partly because my experience of individual Christians (mad Baptist aunt aside) has been benign. Also, I'm extremely bad at leaving obviously ignorant sweeping generalisations well alone - and there were plenty of those over on ChristianBBS.

Intellectually, I knew I'd come in for some flaming. I didn't think it would bother me, emotionally, at all. It bothered me more than I thought it would, and I'm not sure why. That's why I think it was a useful experience.
 
 
Seth
00:52 / 20.09.02
My background in a nutshell:

Born into a Charismatic Christian family. My Dad was one of the only people in the country at the time practising Christian prophecy, and he became extremely well known for teaching and training people in it. He had a dramatic conversion experience while on the run for manslaughter, and became a Christian in prison (the story is much more complex than that, and involves several miraculous events that I cannot be explained). These are his books and this is his website. The Church I am involved with encourages and teaches the use of the spiritual gifts (also known as the Charismata) that are detailed in Corinthians, but without the usual attendant weirdness that surrounds a lot of the Charismatic Renewal Movement. We're a lot more balanced and sober in our views than a lot of Charisfundies. I've never had faith forced on me by my parents apart from in some hamfisted motherly moments that she'd probably take back if she could. My parents are incredibly chilled, wise and wonderful people, and I'm dead proud of both of them. They would understand no matter what, as long as I explain everything thoroughly. However, no church is a monolith, and many other Christians would not understand. There will be conflict in places, because I'm an active member of my church. I may not be required to play drums in services any more, which'd make me sad.

I'm happy to answer more questions, but bedtime beckons for now.
 
 
Seth
01:06 / 20.09.02
Brief aside: this is the first time I've read the reviews of Dad's work on the Amazon link. Rock'n'roll.
 
 
aus
02:42 / 20.09.02
Has anyone found a Christian board that is more tolerant or perhaps encourages a broader range of views?
 
 
Hieronymus
03:45 / 20.09.02
An Episcopalian board perhaps? I wonder if any Spong-ish Christians post somewhere. I'd Google it but I'm too tired.
 
 
aus
03:59 / 20.09.02
"Episcopalian" is a very broad group.

I could google it for myself - in fact, I have - but there are probably a thousand or more Christian discussion boards out there. I was asking for a recommendation from personal experience.

I already post on one that is reasonably tolerant, but it is also fairly quiet. I posted some lyrics on CBBS and was immediately banned without notice of any kind and my post quickly deleted without comment. I posted the same lyrics at this other board and, although the lyrics were not whole-heartedly approved, they were discussed and I was encouraged to keep writing Christian songs!
 
 
Shortfatdyke
05:19 / 20.09.02
Ganesh - just checked the board out. You were asking intelligent questions, not being abusive at all. That's not trollish behaviour in my book. Interesting to see the reply that stated that men are not anatomically made to have sex with other men, and it occured to me to ask if it followed that heterosexual couples who have anal sex are just as 'bad' as gay men, but I think that would have been a bit trollish and windey-uppey. So I went instead to the women's section and smugly checked out a thread on feminism, knowing before I even read it how the question would be formed, and there it was: if feminists don't like men, how come they act like them?

And then I realised it read almost word for word like the numerous threads on lesbian message boards that use the same question to bash butch dykes. How depressing is that?
 
 
illmatic
07:57 / 20.09.02
Exp: Thanks for posting info on yr. dad. I think your self-exploration through Christianity is cool. Are there many more christians out there like yourself? There's got to be some Christian qabalists out there surely? I remember a group in London called "Holy Joes" who used to hang out with the people from the Talking Stick meetings (now "Secret Chiefs")who I thought were quite cool - Christian Pagans, I guess. I remember when someone "came out" as a Christian Thelemite on the Beast Bay bulletin board - to judge from the reactions this is the closest thing Thelema has heresey. I see if I can find the thread and some other more positive stuff as well.
 
 
illmatic
08:15 / 20.09.02
Can't find it. Will try and start a thread on positive manifestation of organised religon soon ie when I'm not at work and have more time to think and back it with web searches. I tried to get a discussion going on this article a couple of days ago in Da Magick but no one bit. The author lists a few positive, more inclusive relgious currents. I find it interesting we can see this spirit of inclusiveness across a lot of religous boundaries and I hope it's something that continues to grow. As we appear to be slipping back to the time of the Crusades, I think we need it more than ever.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
08:20 / 20.09.02
I remember once a few years back going to a Bible study group with my sister (I'd come up to London to visit her for the weekend- my entire family are Christians, with the "possible" exception of myself- my Dad was a vicar) and the subject of why the Old Testament was so numerically-obsessed came up- I inadvertently derailed the discussion by bringing up gematria, and a surprising amount of people picked the ball up and ran with it, so to speak...

Shame I never got to go to their next meeting.
 
 
illmatic
10:15 / 20.09.02
Sorry. Perhaps I should have just included the relevant section, like this:

"Let's use the example of Tibetan Buddhism, which probably has the best public image of any religious tradition in the world right now, and rightly so. I think it's going to take centuries for the rest of the world to be able to assimilate what they have to teach us. But: there's a strong authoritarian element in their institution. Historically, they weren't looking at Liberty, but now that they've been forced to interact with the world, the value of Liberty (as at least preached in the Western democracies) has become apparent.

I understand that the Dalai Lama's draft constitution for the future autonomous Tibet is, in a complete break with the political tradition of their culture, democratic. We can expect other Tibetan Buddhist institutions to follow suit, as they develop less authoritarian methods that work effectively with their system. We can only hope the Vatican might eventually catch a clue! .....

We're seeing the beginnings of this, with Liberation Theology and Creation Spirituality in Christianity, Tikkun magazine in Judaism, even Islam has moderately progressive spokespeople like President Khatami of Iran. In these cases, we have reformers speaking out for Liberty in historically authoritarian traditions.

There are other traditions that have always promoted Liberty, such as the Quakers, most manifestations of paganism, and Wicca..... "
 
 
The Strobe
10:21 / 20.09.02
I'm not so keen on the idea of specific trolling; for instance, I find the idea (harmony) of someone specifically going to an event purely to disagree with it leaves a little bit of a sour taste in my mouth. My own position with my moderate amount of faith is most confused and troublesome; I don't think any Christian needs rampant non-believers lobbing broad, undermining questions at them. Why the sour taste? Well, I appreciate what you're saying about body language, but the fact is, he/she is not entering into discussion with an open mind. He/she is entering into argument, and with an agenda. If he/she went along to a homosexual group, say, and (from an entirely non-religious perspective) told them they were wrong/bad/whatever, we'd call it gay-bashing. No matter what the body language was. But it's OK to do it to belief groups? Because you're only attacking someone's philosophy, not their body? Please. Most good members of a faith don't go along to other faiths meetings to cry them down. The most obvious targets are the atheists... simply because in so many of them, there's no thought. Just denial. I'm not aruging that that's the case in everyone, and your housemate seems to have enough strongly-formed ideas that he feels confident enough to try and sway people, but he/she's an exception, not a rule. A question: does he/she enjoy it? It's most likely that neither side is going to change their opinion at all, and the Christians are going to get more heated than your housemate. And so at the end of it, he's spent an hour or two more-likely provoking confusion and anger than intruiging questions and maybe rocking people's spiritual foundations. What does he come out of it with? He knew what he knew when he went in; he doesn't sound like he's going to shift. So I can only assume he/she gets off on it. That's what I find distasteful, and I don't care how pleasantly he puts it, or what his body language is.

"If you have an omnipotent God, why argue with him?" What, so discussion isn't allowed? What's prayer? It certainly isn't just asking God for favours, or telling God how much you like him. It's a means of interaction. Arguing with God is as essential as arguing with your own beliefs; you have to have questioned to come to an answer.

Am I christian? I'd guess so. I believe something rather than nothing, and that something is something of Christianity, coming from a relatively-Christian upbringing and ten years of singing in Anglican church choirs, most Sundays of the year. There are some fundamental aspects of the faith I have severe problems with, and that's where my belief falls apart. But there's a lot of good advice in its belief, there's a lot of inspiration, and for me, the artwork Christianity inspired is good enough reason to believe. The sung liturgy is wonderful; I find it loses some impact spoken. I find it interesting as a philosophy and approach to life; I often find worship less inspirational than I guess I should. The same with other faiths, I guess; but my upbringing has brought me into contact with it most.

I have a problem with people getting me into religious arguments because I know I'm not entirely well read on the subject, I know I'm probably hypocritical at times, and I know I have holes in my armour. That's why I get worked up about it - because my answer isn't 100% sure. But it was never going to be; it's not trivia, or general knowledge; it's big questions you're asking here. Christians have been dealing with "if your God is a loving God, why does he let Good People die?" for hundreds of years now. Faith was never meant to be easy; to my mind, if you don't have any questions, or things that trouble you, or just little bits you don't believe in - then you're clearly not doing it right and just being led by others. I don't need someone else to point it out to me. In fact, the most offensive people I've ever met WRT whatever you believe in are my University Christian Union people. They mug you outside lecture halls with leaflets. A lot of the time, they confront people and ask them about God and the say they don't believe or care, so go away. If they confront me, I also tell them to go away. My faith is my own business. I don't believe the way they do, and I don't have a desire to share. And I definitely don't want to convert anybody. That's just foolish, to think you can brainwash people. But nor do I want anyone to question what I believe: partly, as harmony says, because I'm weak I guess. But also because they seem to think that I've never asked those questions myself. I have to ask them all the time.

So yes. I'm a semi-Christian mish-mash. I like the music. I love the writing. The scriptures are variable - haven't read enough, but there's some great stuff in there. I have severe difficulties with the Eucharist though. Which is why I'm not confirmed, and never really can be. I've read the christianity.com thread in relative detail now, and I have no problem with Ganesh's so-called trolling; it's not really trolling because he's not seeking (in the end, however long it takes) to cause offence; he's seeking (in the end, however long it takes) to get an answer or at least a sensible discussion. His persistence has a genuinely worthy goal. With hindsight, maybe he didn't pick the right place to do it, but that thread makes for interesting reading. This thread... makes me tense and shaky. Perhaps even 'sad', as exp rightly put it. I'm all for sensible discussion; I'm all for learning about this - I don't think I'm ever going to come to terms with my faith, and I don't think I'll ever explain my halfway-house position to anyone without losing the fucking argument - but I just find that negativity directed specifically towards religion, any religion, but usually Christianity, makes me disappointed. Disappointed that one aspect of life gets so much stick. I have never investigated this, but I think that far more time is devoted to bashing/intimidating/being rude/supposedly being "clever" towards Christians than is towards any other faith. That's a general observation - I've stemmed way off from this thread. So in general, I just keep my mouth shut on the topic. Every now and then... I have a chance to get something out. And if I'm asked to pick sides, I'll side with the religious, even if half the christians I've met piss me off hugely at times. I'm christian. Small c. I may not be firm in it, but that's in many ways, the point.

(Apologies for huge rambling answer. It just came out, and I guess I needed it out. I hope no-one takes offence; none was intended. But it's a subject that does get me fired up, when the right people to discuss it are around. Calm now.)
 
 
Tryphena Absent
10:26 / 20.09.02
I stayed in hot topics on the Christian Bulletin Board and found it all very depressing - capital punishment defended and attacked for all the wrong reasons - there were a few other things I checked out. I didn't even consider joining because I find that kind of faith a disease.

The only sensible thing I ever heard Oprah Winfrey say was that she changed churches when her old one began to stop her from questioning her faith. Of course she probably meant that in a totally different context but hey, the words work, why not use them. I think you can apply that to this board and the verdict would be that all of these people need to change their churches.
 
 
angel
11:54 / 20.09.02
Paleface - I have never investigated this, but I think that far more time is devoted to bashing/intimidating/being rude/supposedly being "clever" towards Christians than is towards any other faith.


I agree with you that it can be "all too easy" to christian bash, but to be honest for pagans or witches the casual dismissals and insults without thought fly constantly. [I only mention this religious grouping because it's the one I have personal experience of - I am a non-wiccan pagan witch - and people of other religions may well have similar stories] For the most part the people making those statements are not actively attacking my beliefs [or even conscious of the offense they might be giving], but they are repeating shite that just isn't true. The whole sacrificial goat/virgin/drinking blood/[instert steroetypical object of choice] bullshite is trotted out time and time again and it is very rare to find someone in mainstream society who will point out that for most pagans this just isn't representative - now if you are a vampire, the story is of course somewhat different!

I have some very lovely christian friends and at times find it very difficult to reconcile my concept of them versus my experience/concept of the sometimes arsehole behaviour of some christians or the "religion". Yeah, I'm guilty of blindly bashing the christian religion at times and am not proud of those moments, but trust me when I say that it's not just the christians who get casually villified!
 
 
deja_vroom
12:24 / 20.09.02
If there ever was needed proof on how mentally handicapped one can become because of religion...
 
 
grant
13:59 / 20.09.02
auszilla: I could google it for myself - in fact, I have - but there are probably a thousand or more Christian discussion boards out there. I was asking for a recommendation from personal experience.


There WAS one I remember posting about on a prior incarnation of Barbelith... it was dedicated more to "the spiritual quest" through religion than anything specific to a hardline Christian ideology. People interested in asking questions in non-orthodox (if not unorthodox) ways. Unfortunately, I can't recall the URL, but I seem to recall it was attached to an online magazine and it *may* have had "lamb" or "sheep" in the title. If I was on the fast connection at work, I'd do a quick search, but I'm not, so I can't.

You might well find something along the lines of what you're looking for at The Door's website - The Door being, as they say, "the world's pretty much only religious satire magazine."


-=========-

Paleface: don't you think people asking tough questions would help you find some specific answers? Even if they are occasionally contradictory?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
14:11 / 20.09.02
Paleface: I get where you're coming from. I also think any decent ideology/faith should be strengthened by questioning, rather than offended. Hence- in my more Christian moments, I tend to feel that the Christian heretics were the "most Christian" of all- they were prepared to die for their interpretation of the faith, rather than to kill others.

And regarding trolling: I'm doing the anti-Countryside Alliance demno this weekend. If that isn't turning up to an event just to disagree, then I don't know what is. (Same goes for all my ANL/AFA protests...)

However- I do think respect (which it seems was given) is necessary. There's a difference between questioning someone's beliefs and just piling in and yelling "You're shit- AAAAA!"
 
 
The Strobe
15:00 / 20.09.02
Maominstoat: yes, exactly. But I feel that respect isn't just putting "AAAH, YOU'RE SHIT!" into nice polite language. Even in nice, polite language, it's still "AAH, YOU'RE SHIT!".

grant: I do try and answer their questions, and make progress through that. I tend not to think about questions like this too much. It's just it's come up, and I'm further on one side of the fence than the other, and I guessed I needed to state my position. I appear to have come across as some religious lunatic, which is incredibly far from my position in reality. I've asked myself the tough ones, and come to something like an understanding, if not a total solid answer. But there are many people who aren't asking the questions any more - they're just saying them, trotting them out on rote because they like hitting soft spots. As I said earlier, I really don't put up with that.

angel: I get your point. I personally don't pagan-bash. I'm very sceptical, but hell, so are lots of people. And lots more are sceptical of Christianity. That all shouldn't matter; it's a free country. And I see exactly where you're coming from on "casual insults". But casual insults never get to me - they're casual, thrown away. I let the CU hacks get peeved at them. It's the reasoned, calculating shit-throwing that gets me. In the same way, like, Jack Chick offends pretty much anyone.

Hell. I really do appear to have come across as some idiot. Jade seemed to insinuate that already. I'm not mad, I'm pretty tolerant, and I'm a pretty normal guy. And I'm not hardline anything. I just seemed... to have demonstrated my own stupidity and ignorance quite quickly, and am being rounded on. So I'm going to shut up. Shit. I get the feeling Barbelith are all going to think I'm a nutjob now.
 
 
The Natural Way
15:20 / 20.09.02
Face: I think Jade was just referring to Ganesh's christian cyber-pals. Don't think he's read the whole thread.... So relax.
 
 
Someone Else
15:23 / 20.09.02
Nutbar, perhaps, but never Nutjob.

Has anyone seen the 'alt.atheism newsgroup', which functions as an incentive for Christians to come a'trollin'? Give them a dose of their own medicine, I say...

Also try astrology newsgroups; tackle them with the simple question 'what if I read TWO newspapers, and the results don't add up?' and you'll be deluged in vitriol.

Well done The Nesh.
 
 
deja_vroom
15:24 / 20.09.02
Hell. I really do appear to have come across as some idiot. Jade seemed to insinuate that already

Not really. What I meant was that religion most often than not has this effect of putting restraints on people's propensity to question and learn. That people who are otherwise very intelligent can *become* intelectually handicapped by dogmatic views which aren't even their owns. Sorry, Paleface, if it sounded differently. No offense intended.
 
 
grant
16:19 / 20.09.02
OK, I just went to the board, and Ganesh, this might never have occurred to you, but you do realize you're posting under the name of a Hindu god, don't you?

As in, you know, one of those demons worshipped by the unsaved.

Hoo, boy.
 
 
grant
16:39 / 20.09.02
That "boston" fellow seems fascinating.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
17:06 / 20.09.02
Paleface I think you're mad.
 
 
Sleeperservice
17:29 / 20.09.02
and I quote from their 'policy' statement...

"Furthermore our policy on Homosexuality states:

The bottom line:
There isn’t much wiggle room on the base issues of this discussion.

"

The bottom line? Not much room to wiggle? Maybe someone there has a sense of humour? Looking at the rest of the site I would guess not...
 
 
paw
21:57 / 20.09.02
yeah they're archonishly restrictive, but you have to admit they're damn cute. These are the replies between two posters on a thread i read:

- Why are you down on yourself?

- Must have neglected to read my bible today!

- The Bible sure picks me up!! From there I find out how much I'm worth! Even though I've done some pretty scummy things! God's cool!



made me smile.
 
 
paw
21:59 / 20.09.02
'God's cool!' is the best i think
 
 
Seth
22:17 / 20.09.02
Paleface: you don't come across as a nutjob at all. You come across as very honest, and I have a great deal of respect for people who defend Christianity. And yes, I've lost track of the amount of times people have looked at me as though I'm stupid when I mention that I'm a Christian. It's insulting, judgemental and wrong. Sometimes it's understandable, but that doesn't mean it's not wrong. It often seems to be "The Prejudice It's OK To Have." Fuck that shit.

Jade: I het your point about the restrictions religions place in the way of knowledge. I actually spent most of today thinking about how this has effected me in the past, and identified with your point (once you qualified it). However, I know plenty of people who aren't involved in any kind of organised religion who have exactly the same problem, so it kinda falls down there.
 
  

Page: 1(2)34567

 
  
Add Your Reply