|
|
Simple. Although there are zillions of characters in traditional calligraphy, each is made up of a number of brushstrokes. Asian-language keyboarding uses keys to represent particular types of brushstrokes, and each character is made up of several keystrokes.
Extend the analogy to the Roman alphabet, and C would be one keystroke, while G would be two. I is one, P is two, R is three--the two for P, plus an extra key for the downstroke.
It's surprisingly manageable--at least compared to the old days, when a Mandarin typewriter was constructed that was the size of a ping-pong table.
More interesting, though, is that there's no concept of alphabetical; order in a pictogram-based system like kana--so (at least until recently) filing systems would exist only in one person's head, and if that person died or quit the office would be thrown into chaos. I gather there's been some sort of general system adopted, albeit fairly recently.
This always bent my head--the notion that imperial powers, with huge bureacracies, could somehow get by without a universally-recognized file system--or, in the case of imperial Rome, simple columnar addition or multiplication: try doing MCM times XXXIV on paper, let alone in your head! How did they manage? |
|
|