BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


PETITION TO CLOSE DOWN BARBELITH AND HAVE IT REMAIN AN ARCHIVE, A TESTAMENT, A MUSEUM

 
  

Page: 12(3)45678... 9

 
 
Closed for Business Time
16:09 / 23.01.09
Thanks, R.
 
 
HCE
00:36 / 29.01.09
c) it won't NOT be made of fail in the foreseeable future, unless
d) he's suddenly back, carrying a new technical infrastructure in his virtual pocketses, that empowers the community and allows for a reincarnation/-animation and the return to halcyon days


That's not the problem anymore, though, is it. That used to be the problem. Now the problem is that nobody good is left.
 
 
jentacular dreams
18:42 / 29.01.09
Thanks. And while that statement may be true when applied to myself, on behalf of all the active posters who I respect and admire, fuck you.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
19:05 / 29.01.09
Hey GG:
According to your profile, that post was #666 for you. Nice one!

Hey HCE:
See GG's #666.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:04 / 29.01.09
That used to be the problem. Now the problem is that nobody good is left.

Thanks a fucking bunch.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:05 / 29.01.09
Please calm down, princesses. HCE is left, and I am left, and I bet HCE thinks I am awesome. I think we can take it to be a general statement rather than a universal assault.
 
 
jentacular dreams
21:51 / 29.01.09
That used to be the problem. Now the problem is that nobody good is left

Cough. Brain. Jar. Cough.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:09 / 29.01.09
Awesome jar.
 
 
Closed for Business Time
14:00 / 30.01.09
A vessel is a vessel, no need to fight THE POWAH children.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
17:43 / 30.01.09
ROW ROW.
 
 
Keith, like a scientist
20:33 / 16.02.09
Nay. I enjoy the television/movies and comics discussion too much. I would miss the contributors from there.
 
 
trouble at bill
09:53 / 17.02.09
Perhaps ze means Now the problem is that nobody good is left. Maybe ze means we are wicked people, bad seeds, rotten apples, and to paraphrase Iron Maiden, only the good die young while the evil seem to post forever?
 
 
Quantum
09:24 / 19.02.09
Maybe HCE meant nobody good is left because all the good people are right wing?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:46 / 19.02.09
Your contributions are valid.
 
 
HCE
19:31 / 08.03.09
Go fuck your own mother, GG. I meant what I said, nobody good is left. Stoatie runs around sounding like a moron, for reasons known only to him. Possibly some of my own old pals are around, but there hasn't been a decent conversation in ages, so whatever brilliant deep thoughts people are having elsewhere, on here, we're all just a bunch of assholes.

Oh by the way, this is all said in my new persona, that of an old drunk. Just in case you thought you had some kind of right not to find me hilarious.
 
 
Char Aina
20:07 / 08.03.09
HCE, why don't you just fuck off?
Honestly, if it isn't any good for you, fuck off and go elsewhere. Fuck off where you are wanted and where you want to be, and stop hanging out here and being aggresive.

Said in the persona of a bouncer dealing with a pathetic old drunk who just won't leave, in case you thought you had some right to not find me hilarious.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:40 / 08.03.09
Jesus Christ. I am going to resist, manfully, the temptation to continue the use of "fuck off", here, but, really.

Life Critic, I have no idea why, in the face of all the evidence, you are still behaving like the UN representative from Heaven to Barbelith. It's sort of insane, especially in light of your recent hot streak of supporting and speaking up for the integrity of an attack on the security of Barbelith. Your faith in the value you add is impressive, but misguided.

HCE is entitled to be regretful. HCE was not the person who started shouting "fuck off!", and of course you were silent when s/he was being abused. Gamma Globulins should know better. Freektemple is very young, IIRC, and easily influenced, and Lord knows what's going on with you. It probably won't end, however, because you are apparently bent on a campaign of attrition, expressed by hanging around in the Policy like it was the nineteenth hole.

It's easier to make things shit than to make things not shit, so I imagine your cause will ultimately be carried. However, it is not incumbent on anyone here to feel happy about that. I am not happy, and as it turns out nor is HCE.
 
 
iamus
23:18 / 08.03.09
Just for the record, while I have no problems with the locking and redacting of the other thread, if that is what is deemed needed, I'd rather you didn't frame it as an attack on the security of Barbelith, as much as I've been blunt in other areas, I've been fairly upfront about that. It's much more like a very old and worn bucket springing a leak than it is like taking to a shiny one with a screwdriver.

Though I accept responsibility for upsetting some members through my actions, I think the heft of the blame here is on Barbelith's state of disrepair, the lack of information surrounding it, and Tom's continued willingness to allow these holes, which by their very existence continue to compromise the IT security of both current and past members, to remain open. There's an ethical issue here that doesn't stop with me I'm afraid, but I'm willing to draw some flak if it helps bring it to light.

Though I always thought I was going the other way, if Tom really isn't going to do anything with the place until a number of years down the line, I feel it would be best of him to close it down. It's not a problem that is going to improve with time.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:26 / 09.03.09
Gabriel Princip might with some justice have argued that the socioeconomic and diplomatic issues afflicting Europe would have led at some point to a great shaking out of the historical alliances. He might have had a good point. Nonetheless, he still shot a dude.

Seriously, old chap "I'm sorry people were upset" is second only in the cop-out stakes to "I'm sorry you have no sense of humour". It's not a terrible thing to take responsibility once in a while.

I feel like Tobias Funke. Who does White Power Bill hate? White Power Bill hates... White Power Bill. The funny thing is, all the people I seem to be feeling like at the moment are a bit sparse up top. Is this foreshadowing?
 
 
iamus
01:30 / 09.03.09
I don't know who Gabriel Princip is. I kind of get the jist, but it's a wee bit lost on me.

Look, I understand, and if this does indeed turn into a Great Troll Outbreak then I'll shoulder that and do my best to help amend it, but at this point in time all that's happened is that some people have been upset. That upset doesn't come from the fact that I've maliciously targeted anybody or anything or cleverly engineered a brand new exploit in Barbelith's code, but from the fact that it's been very easy to bumble into this situation and quickly discover some very large and potentially dangerous flaws in Barbelith's security simply by watching some people's knee-jerk nervous reactions and listening to the concerns of others.

I think I deserve a bit of credit for trying at every turn to outlay my reasons, be as clear as possible about my feelings on it, and not rip into the thing with gleeful abandon like I easily could have if I was a bit more of a dick. That doesn't mean that I think I'd necessarily be making things any better for people in the long run by pretending the case isn't the case. If this was mostly my fault, and it didn't stem from a larger complex about the board itself, then I wouldn't have just learned how to pull down a house of cards in a thread of less than two pages.

That's a security risk and a half. Anyone who knows how to play people could have this place in a second, and I don't think that Tom saying he can't make the time is a good enough excuse to not do something about that. I also don't honestly think being fobbed off like that for so long is at all fair on you either and I'm not sure why you put up with it. I feel I'm getting on with you well here, and I'm really pleased at how we're handling this, but I'm just not going to agree that what I've done was a universally bad thing. There's blame at both sides of this. Primarily putting it on me may be easier for the time being but it's not going to fix anything about the situation. It's only going to defer it for a bit so it can turn up again somewhere else down the line to piss you off and stress you out.
 
 
Char Aina
04:36 / 09.03.09
speaking up for the integrity of an attack on the security of Barbelith.

Please, point to where I did that.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
06:32 / 09.03.09
If you actually read etc, you'd see that iamus is already fighting that corner for you, Lify Criticy. But fine. Let's go with:

Jesus Christ. I am going to resist, manfully, the temptation to continue the use of "fuck off", here, but, really.

Life Critic, I have no idea why, in the face of all the evidence, you are still behaving like the UN representative from Heaven to Barbelith. It's sort of insane. Your faith in the value you add is impressive, but misguided.

HCE is entitled to be regretful. HCE was not the person who started shouting "fuck off!", and of course you were silent when s/he was being abused. Gamma Globulins should know better. Freektemple is about 13, IIRC, and easily influenced, and Lord knows what's going on with you. It probably won't end, however, because you are apparently bent on a campaign of attrition, expressed by hanging around in the Policy like it was the nineteenth hole.

It's easier to make things shit than to make things not shit, so I imagine your cause will ultimately be carried. However, it is not incumbent on anyone here to feel happy about that. I am not happy, and as it turns out nor is HCE.


Congrats! I look forward to you taking one line of that out of context in order to avoid confronting or improving your behaviour.

iamus: I think it's generally dangerous to request credit for not having been more of a dick, but I see your argument, as far as it goes. The point here isn't that a couple of people were upset (although I'm not sure anyone was upset, so much as cognisant of security etiquette) but that you might have sought better information before doing something deeply unwise. People who work with the elderly and infirm can only blame the unexpected fragility of their bones and muscles so far, you know?

On the plus side, I think the damage here would be to the integrity of the content on Barbelith rather than to anyone's profile - I'm not sure where you're getting that it by [its] very existence continue[s] to compromise the IT security of both current and past members - it doesn't, really. The Hotmail hole was closed, and it required a kind of dedication that had simply not been anticipated to exploit it in the first place. I guess this one might encourage people to redouble their social engineering efforts, and eventually possibly with success, but I'd be more worried about a technical exploit for people's personal data being found and no patch being made, or indeed the exploit not being discovered.

However, this situation would, as you say, not have arisen if Barbelith worked. It doesn't and it won't, which is an argument to shut it down, but apparently it's not going to be shut down either, so if you are concerned about security I would, e.g., change your email in your profile to a non-primary one and delete your private messages regularly.

All a bit messy, really.
 
 
Char Aina
08:34 / 09.03.09
improving your behaviour

I think you misrepresent my behaviour.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:15 / 09.03.09
Not even a sentence. We may be approaching some sort of event horizon.
 
 
Jack Fear
12:08 / 09.03.09
may

So, by your own admission, the possibility for change and revival exists!
 
 
Jack Fear
12:09 / 09.03.09
(Sorry.)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:27 / 09.03.09
Well, change. Renewal is an awkward one- without moderators it would be a bit of a cockroach pit, but new people, sure. The difficulty is that without banning or moderation it would basically be it - the question is whether it is better for the place to die off or to become a mass of irreparable icky. Possibly the security failings make this not a question, really, but although it would be tempting to proceed on that basis it would not be wholly honest. A puzzle I can't solve. Unusual. And ulcerating.
 
 
grant
16:27 / 09.03.09
"Someday all of this will be beautiful ruins"?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:22 / 09.03.09
I give this thread DRAMA/Internets.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
18:00 / 09.03.09
Welllllll...

Actually, I'm almost 1, in BBLith years specifically, and internet post-boards in general: before last April the internets was more of a thing to look at and read and shop and send emails over than contribute to.

13 is giving me way too much credit, Haus.

I would have never said that I'm easilly influenced, but one rarely recognizes, let alone admits, to one's faults. Yeah, I guess I can see it, though.

I guess I can try excuse myself due to my lack of internet-smarts, or savvy, but the fact is that I tend to take one post at a time and react, rather than stand back and look at the larger picture/history.

"Oooh. This person is friendly to me - better be on their side..."

Ignorance? Innocence? Kind-hearted/weak-willed? Easily influenced: a result of all the above, I suppose. I can get swept up in the moment before I anaylze a situation properly sometimes.

Not to say that I haven't learned a lot in the short time I've been here: it's been a hell of a place to cut one's teeth, even in it's decline, given the standards the place has held. I can honestly say that interacting here has challenged my thinking and made me question my long-held views and assumptions more than any other community I've associated with, and things I've learned here have carried over into meat-space, much to my benefit.

A part of me wants to get all defensive and lash out and whine: "Well, I'm sorry I'm just not as enlightened as all of you" and go on and on about cliques and elitism and general snobbery. I can guarantee that a few short months back I would have done, but I'd had my knuckles rapped for similar and can stand back a bit now and have that tiny bit of clarity to know I'm wrong. I've had Kind and patient people take me to the side to explain to me the rules and I've had impatient, frustrated, suffer-no-fools types jump down my throat.

But I've tried, and learned. And sometimes, when I get the chance, I browse the archives. I've learned from there, as well, but the reading becomes a bit more dry, less dynamic, for me since I wasn't a part of it (for better or worse) and cannot really sympathize with the whole "God, it sucks here now; nobody good is left" line.

HCE, if it really sucks for you, imagine how it is for newbies like myself who joined all bright-eyed and eager only to find myself in a mass exodus; catching only little scraps of what I came here for and recieving shovelfuls of how this place has become shit and all new people have ruined the vibe and we're all ignorant and stupid... (OK, you didn't say all that, but it's what I inferred)

I'm pretty sure that not all my posts are stupid and/or irrelevant, and the many that were were picked apart. Those that weren't were left to stand because they were read and ignored or passed over altogether. I'm sure that you had the benefit of being similarily ripped apart when you were stupid/irrelevant. You just had a broader, more dynamic community doing so, and less was ignored because people had a greater vested interest in the community, I imagine. We don't have that now. So please understand, when you post that "Now the problem is that nobody good is left." it's a slap. Not a constructive "better yourself" slap, but a spiteful one.

If nobody good is left, it seems that more a failure of the "good" people than the remaining and the new. If the standards aren't up to your liking why aren't you doing your best to correct the situation? I'm relatively certain that the 'lith wasn't fully born wonderful, that there were growing pains and lessons to be learned and a community to support and correct each other. I'm pretty certain you had all that. What do we have now?

I find myself ignoring posts that bother me because history has shown me that many times I'd spoken up, I'd misunderstood what I'd read or I was outright wrong. I always figured if something was wrong, someone with more experience would point it out. Guess not. I suppose that it's because those who cared left...

Haus tries. Randy tries. Flyboy tried. Speaking for myself, sometimes the clever brand of Barbelith sarcasm goes straight over my head. Often, but not always. I chalk it up to the fact that it's a thing learned: you don't go to a foreign country and pick up all the nuance of the culture.

The Darkstallion suit pissed me off alot, but for quite a while I actually thought it was some eager kid, kind of on the dumb side; but earnest nonetheless. When I said something stupid and reactionary, or did not express myself well and the DS suit agreed with me, it was like a punch to the stomach: I knew I was either wearing my ignorance on my sleeve at that moment or I had some 'splaining to do and would try distance myself from him. I'm sure I came off as flip-floppy: sometimes because I failed an attempt at sarcasm or didn't express my thoughts properly and sometimes because I did flip-flop when I realised I was wrong and/or being a jerk. It took a while to catch on and when I did it was to mixed feelings of shame, anger, amusement and illumination.

When the DS suit wrote something incredibly stupid or offensive in a thread I had nothing to do with, I kept quiet because I felt that it wasn't my place to say anything, that other, more experienced people would do so; "I mean, I'm still new here, right? What right do I have calling someone out when I'm still looked upon as a "newbie". Besides, there's mods for all that, right?"

When nobody else ripped on DS, I wasn't sure if it was a sign of the lax state of things or because maybe I was wrong or misreading things. My intuition isn't 100%, but not following it is usually one of my biggest mistakes.

But then again, except for the first couple of months after I joined, that's been the case for alot of my experience here: people don't really seem to care. I guess attrition works. And my confidence as a board virgin is shaky at best, so I keep quiet when I shouldn't and spout nonsense when I should shut up. I keep telling myself it's all a learning process.

I have read some of the Trolled archives, and I can see why some people may want to leave rather than stay and fight for what they worked for, but did all the "Good People" leave because they were worn down and frustrated, or because they had nothing left to say? It's not all that clear: People always rave about how sage and noble Ganesh was in the glory days, but over in LN, s/he's made 4 posts in one year. Maybe s/he's really busy, or only writes when s/he has something s/he want's to say? I don't know. Maybe in the six or seven years barbelith was "good", all the "good" people exhausted all the good and interesting things that they had to say...?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
18:12 / 09.03.09
It was more that we had functional board software.
 
 
grant
20:02 / 09.03.09
Well - I do think the software here can function, it just needs a big crowd of invested users who have moderator powers. Once you pass a critical mass (wrong metaphor, but can't think of the right one) of "turned off" moderators, then nothing works.

On the ideological/paradigmatic level, Barbelith has more in common with Wikipedia than I think most people realize. The problem is that the wisdom of the crowds is bottlenecked by moderator privileges.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:57 / 09.03.09
I think you're wrong, grant, in the sense that without functional admissions and functional banning it can't work work, but it can work better than it does at the moment. The wikipedia thing I don't think I follow. Moderator privilege is hardly a bottleneck here, or indeed a privilege. You have a more defined and more powerful bureacracy in wikipedia, who have powers far beyond the rather anaemic ones on Barbelith.

freektemple, you're right, to an extent - the older guard simply had many of the conversations. In a normal, viable board they would be replaced by new people, who would bring possibly interesting new things to light, which might have then reengaged people. Problem being that the stakes for allowing new people onto Barbelith are now so high, because there is no banning and limited moderation, and also because the name tends to attract people with some problems. So, at the moment, entry is closed, because of this problem, but theoretically this is a temporary state, until Tom expresses a reality-based opinion. At this point, I'm not sure that can happen, and I am, personally, not going to be the person who facilitates Barbelith becoming a Protocols of the Elders of Zion book club unless specifically told that I can walk away and let that happen. However, no new members is its own kind of death, and no moderation means that the people on the inside of the bug trap can be weird and creepy and there really isn't any payback - see all the weird "Latina bitch" stuff in the Lost thread.

So, yes. All rather unfortunate, and steady state - slow decay - might be the best available option. But it's not the only option, which is a problem.
 
 
grant
01:22 / 10.03.09
I was thinking in terms of this potential that distributed moderation had (has?) for allowing the things that moderators do to be done by a large, diffuse group - that's what wikipedia does. There are admins and folks who can lock pages, but for the most part, there are edit wars and brawls and all that on talk pages, but generally, the articles turn out OK. Not always, but generally.

My feeling always was with a large enough contingent of distributed mods, trolls could be deleted & edited into submission - de facto banning. I don't think this place ever had that contingent, and if it did, maybe it would be some other place altogether. I was speaking not of what is, but more of the general principle of distributed power.
 
 
grant
01:23 / 10.03.09
And I think I'm finally glad I've never watched Lost yet never wanted to be spoiled just in case.....
 
  

Page: 12(3)45678... 9

 
  
Add Your Reply