BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


PETITION TO CLOSE DOWN BARBELITH AND HAVE IT REMAIN AN ARCHIVE, A TESTAMENT, A MUSEUM

 
  

Page: 123(4)56789

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
06:35 / 10.03.09
Cloud moderation? Yeah, I see what you mean.
 
 
Ticker
18:30 / 10.03.09
see all the weird "Latina bitch" stuff in the Lost thread.

FAWK!**

*headdesk*

I know this isn't the correct place for posting this BUT... I've often considered lending a hand. If grant's cloud mod idea seems viable I would help if it was you know...helpful.






** My Upstate NY accent becomes audible when I really swear.
 
 
Ticker
18:32 / 10.03.09
..as I posted I accidentally threw water all over myself. I'm looking at you Closing Time.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:27 / 10.03.09
You could flood the place with moderators without changing the basic structure - it wouldn't take long. You'd probably also have to stop single disagreements from vetoing, though, or statistically you would get inconsistent deletion, especially given how many reasonably competent people are left. Then you'd get the opposite problem - inconsistent and indeed bloody stupid moderation being waved through. In essence, you'd be trying to stack the deck to create the impression of a single inconsistent and capricious moderator.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:34 / 10.03.09
When you could just MAKE ME A GOD. Well, one could. A GOD. Like Bruce Willis, assuming a) that Bruce Willis is playing Kratos in the film of the game "God of War", and that b) Kratos is at some point a god, and not just a very hard bloke. I haven't played it.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:50 / 10.03.09
BRUCE WILLIS WILL BE INCONSISTENT AND CAPRICIOUS AND DEAD! AND A GOD!
 
 
grant
21:10 / 10.03.09
In essence, you'd be trying to stack the deck to create the impression of a single inconsistent and capricious moderator.

Precisely.


I think you'd look cute with a halo above your jar, though.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:11 / 10.03.09
BRUCE WILLIS HAS A HALO OF THINNING HAIR!
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:19 / 11.03.09
Stoatie runs around sounding like a moron, for reasons known only to him.

Erm...

...I know I've not really been paying too much attention in the last couple of seasons of Barbelith, and I don't want to derail this serious discussion into yet another irrelevant fight, but is it okay for me to ask for some clarity here?

Or, y'know, maybe I sound like a moron because I actually AM one. It's a possibility I've considered at length, but I'd like some evidence either way, just for my own peace of mind.
 
 
grant
01:29 / 11.03.09
HCE does not speak chan, I think.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:40 / 11.03.09
I gather that much. But as far as I'm aware, I've been fulfilling my mod duties, and only chucking chanspeak into stupid Convo threads anyway, or places where, ironically enough, serious discussion (or, indeed, SRS BSNS) has become ludicrous through the prevalence of personal vendettas. Does that make me a moron? I'm no longer sure. Maybe it does.

If so, I'm very sorry. I would turn in my badge, but I'm not sure there'd be enough people here who give a shit to make it work OK if we all start leaving just because we've been called a "moron" by other posters.
 
 
This Sunday
02:17 / 11.03.09
I think we still have enough posters here trying to have a decent board that the personal insults and petty feuds could all go away without so much as a goodbye "Fuck you all!" without leaving the board vacant of discussion though.

Cohen and Stoatie dissed on the 'lith in one week? What is the world coming to!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
06:08 / 11.03.09
BRUCE WILLIS IS NOT WHOLLY SURE THAT TEN PEOPLE IS ENOUGH TO HAVE A DECENT BOARD, BUT IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT HE SHOULD SHAVE HIS SCALP CLOSELY. WOULD THAT BE A MASCULINE LOOK? OR WOULD IT LOOK AS IF BRUCE WILLIS IS CONCERNED ABOUT LOSING BRUCE WILLIS' HAIR?
 
 
Speedy
08:05 / 11.03.09
Has some kind of line been crossed or is this just another Jenna Elfman thing?
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
09:51 / 11.03.09
Is it me or does BRUCE WILLIS sound like Cerebus?
 
 
Anna de Logardiere
16:59 / 11.03.09
Wait is that Bruce Willis the famous movie actor or a different Bruce Willis?
 
 
This Sunday
17:37 / 11.03.09
I never believed that myth about a brain in a jar. Haus is actually all celebrities at once, working from a higher dimension as he does. Sometimes Jenna, sometimes Bruce. Hollywood is comprised of sectioned 4D bits of Haus.

No?
 
 
Ticker
19:41 / 11.03.09
When you could just MAKE ME A GOD. Well, one could. A GOD. Like Bruce Willis, assuming a) that Bruce Willis is playing Kratos in the film of the game "God of War", and that b) Kratos is at some point a god, and not just a very hard bloke. I haven't played it.

Crap. I guessed entirely wrong. Should have gone with the Orange Box one. Which I'm going to go watch now because I hearts it.
 
 
el d.
21:01 / 11.03.09
ALL HAIL HAUS! SACRIFICE YOUR VIRGIN GOATS!

And so on and so forth. Back to topic. How many people are actually still here?
 
 
Proinsias
21:54 / 11.03.09
23!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:39 / 11.03.09
THAT IS PROBABLY ABOUT RIGHT.

I AM THE BRUCE WILLIS FROM NEW JERSEY. I HAVE A SON.
 
 
iamus
23:00 / 11.03.09
Sorry. Meant to get back to this sooner.

On the plus side, I think the damage here would be to the integrity of the content on Barbelith rather than to anyone's profile - I'm not sure where you're getting that it by [its] very existence continue[s] to compromise the IT security of both current and past members - it doesn't, really.

Okay, I may have to back up a bit because I was learning on the hop, but that seemed to me to be the big bone of contention as laid out by Mordant and XK. Mordant's post was redacted, both here and where it was made, so I can't point to it. But XK's should still be there in the create new accounts thread. If it's not a problem with what Mordant laid out, then I can't think of any other reason why that information would have been taken out of the public domain.

If the problem with flagging the security hole isn't that it would attract trolls to those with access to those holes and compromise their security, then I might be missing what the problem is then. How would it compromise the integrity of Barbelith's content? If the hole is simply a way of registering new users, then revealing it could only do one of two things, as far as I see.

1. Allow the addition of new members through some fair and easily accessible way.

2. Allow new members through sneaky ways of subterfuge, which would be either through current members in possession of the link passing it about, or through trolls targeting those members to get to it.

As far as I can see, there isn't much that can be done to target the integrity of Barbelith's content at this point seeing as Barbelith barely even exists. It only has a memory of values and standards at the moment, it doesn't have a practice of them because there's nothing to practice them on. Similarly, we have no moderators because there is nothing to moderate.

I'm of the opinion that the only way to get Barbelith up and running again (and fill the moderator list up again by giving moderators something to engage with) is to start exercising it. The means to do that are here. It's plainly obvious, because he's proved over and over again, that Tom is not going to make a decision on this unless something is happening that forces his hand out of necessity.

I think grant is totally on point. I think that a critical mass of moderators could moderate trolls into submission. I think if that proved not to be the case, it's also been proven that the issue of troll abuse is about the only one that gets any sort of action from Tom.

Opening the doors, which we can do, could be the death of the place. The way things are just now is the death of the place. I'm not sure what there is to lose. I'm not sure what we are protecting against at the moment. If it's not the security of the members, what is it?

Is it the Barbelith archives? Nobody is posting to them or reading them, and at any rate, they can't really be compromised without a much deeper breach of security. Is it the standard of discussion? We don't have any.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:07 / 11.03.09
THANK FUCK! JUST AS THE BRUCE WILLIS ROUTINE STARTS TO LOSE IMPETUS AFTER AN ARGUABLY ILL-ADVISED COMEDY NAME CHANGE, IT IS GLORIOUSLY VALIDATED BY A TOTAL FAILURE TO HAVE READ ANYTHING IN THE LAST TWO YEARS!
 
 
iamus
23:08 / 11.03.09
I've read it. I just don't agree with it.
 
 
iamus
23:10 / 11.03.09
I was also kind of waiting for the Bruce Willis thing to lose impetus.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:12 / 11.03.09
BUT YOU HAVE SAVED BRUCE WILLIS, SINGLE-HANDED! IF YOU DISAGREE WITH IT, DISAGREE WITH IT! DON'T ASK FOR IT ALL TO BE REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN SO YOU CAN ASK FOR IT ALL TO BE REPEATED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
 
 
iamus
23:18 / 11.03.09
I've read lots and lots and lots of the shoulds and why shouldn'ts. Including a theoretical answer as to why grant's cloud moderation wouldn't work. It remains untested.

I've still to hear a proper, definitive answer as to why opening barbelith is impossible. One that's not based on a fear of stuff that might happen but hasn't actually.

I've been told that my starting of the previous thread was deeply unwise. I can't see it. Potentially unwise, yes. Deeply, not so much.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:30 / 11.03.09
I MEAN, DUDE! YOU WANT AN ANSWER NOT BASED ON THINGS THAT MIGHT HAPPEN BUT HAVEN'T TO A CONDITIONAL QUESTION. IS DOCTOR MANHATTAN EVEN POSTING TO BARBELITH ANY MORE?
 
 
iamus
23:34 / 11.03.09
I think it's been shown that when the standards of Barbelith begin to slip, members past and present, and even those who protest loudly about how much they hate the place, show themselves to have more of a vested interest than at any other time.

What are we expecting? A flood of shite as soon as we open the door that'll bury us? I really don't think Barbelith's that special any more, to be honest. I think that, at best the most we could hope for is a slow-building trickle that could easily fit alongside the current active mods. Tom's stated that he can just about manage the amount of work that sporadically updating the mods list would require. Fuck, I'd even put my name forward.

I don't think the process of opening Barbelith's doors would be anywhere near as dramatic as the closing was. Fair enough, my rash little action in the previous thread shook the structure of Barbelith to its very core, but I'm sure that was a one off.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
23:40 / 11.03.09
What needs protecting against is the certainty - and it *is* a certainty - that the place would, were membership to be opened up to absolutely everybody, with no vetting procedure in place and absolutely no way to effect bans (because, for the record, Tom hasn't even been responding to recent ban requests), become a house for the kind of racist, homophobic, sexist and generally just not particularly pleasant people who we've had to boot off in the past.

There are still people active on this board who don't want that to happen. There are people who are no longer active on this board who don't want it to happen because it would demonstrate a complete failure of board principles, while also stinking up even the decent bits of the archive as the returning trolls inevitably ransacked them in order to get in the last word that they were denied previously.

And, like it or not, it's still Tom's board, regardless of a lack of adminstrative activity on his part in the last, what, four years? Five? Ultimately, it has to be his say, not anybody else's, because he's the one who'd have to face any potential fallout that could arise from certain behaviours.

Plus, y'know, stalker.

If you want to turn it into a stinking cesspit, opening it up in its current state is the way to go. There's clear evidence elsewhere that people who've been banned from here for good reason - disturbing and genuinely frightening obsessive behaviour included - are still looking in on a regular basis.

There are only two semi-decent outcomes for Barbelith at this point. The first is that it carries on much as it has been for the last three years and gets no worse. The second is that posting activity in general declines even further as people drift away from the site.

Also: forget about new moderators. It won't happen. Tom hasn't even removed moderators who left the board half a decade ago, despite that being requested a number of times in the past. As far as structure goes, what you've got here now is what you've got for the foreseeable future and quite possibly for the remainder of Barbelith's life.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:45 / 11.03.09
iamus, I think I get why you want to do this and why you want to do this now (and why, e.g., you are ready to credit Tom with having enough time to make new moderators but not enough time to formulate and express a desire for admissions policy). I don't think you've really thought through the consequences, despite them having been explained repeatedly, and are clearly resistant to doing so. That's fine - it's only a message board, after all. I'd just suggest you be a bit more clear with yourself about why you want to mess around with it.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:45 / 11.03.09
IN CAPS
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:57 / 11.03.09
I THINK I SOUND MORE PATRICIAN IN CAPS. AND NOBODY CAN HEAR ME ANYWAY, BECAUSE I AM A GHOST. YOU KNOW WHAT I'M DOING RIGHT NOW? POTTERY. WITH DEMI MOORE.
 
 
iamus
00:01 / 12.03.09
I'm not sure why.

I see people very frustrated with the way things are, and I see people with obvious emotional investments in the place. I see the valid problems, particularly the ones you and Randy have explained, but I also see a lot of inconsistencies and contradictions that back them up, and I also see potential solutions that are not watertight but would require a deep breath and a bit of a leap of faith. It's not specifically a Barbelith thing, it's just a general me thing to poke a little and see what it turns up. To try and see why people are doing the things they are, not just through explanation but through action. You could explain something to me a million times and I wouldn't quite understand it. I could push my luck a little, watch how everything works together in reaction, and get it all first time.

I'm still a little stumped as to why you continue to bother, Haus, despite getting shit from one end and absolutely nothing in return from the other. If this is Tom's place and he gets to decide what happens at his own leisure, why do you continue to keep it warm for him until he's decided he's ready for it again? It's obviously a source of much more stress to you than it is to him. I would have rescinded responsibility a long time before now.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:15 / 12.03.09
Highly developed sense of duty. Having said which, I am not doing very much for it at the moment, except trying to make you aware of the underlying effects and motivations of your desires, which is more for you than for Barbelith.

It's not all about me, though, and it's not all about you. I get how your self-image works, but, honestly, if you don't understand things after they have been explained repeatedly and at length, maybe that means you shouldn't be seeking out decision-making roles, whether that is moderator or liberator of those trapped outside Barbelith. Your desire to poke things is not necessarily something people here need to deal with the consequences of.
 
  

Page: 123(4)56789

 
  
Add Your Reply