|
|
You do realise your name is currently Glenn: douchegate veteran, yes?
However, this is not productive. Either you are aware of the reaction you occasion, and roughly why, or you aren't. If the latter, at this point it would be foolish for me to do more than I have already done - to suggest that you consider what might explain why not one person thought to agree with, or even to find credible or indeed worth considering, the possibility that you might in fact have been representing your motivations honestly? I would find that, approaching it in good faith and sincerity, a bit of a shocker, personally.
Sad thing is, I thought you were doing quite well with the prejudiced humour thread, after the magical poo pile-up, but of course one should test even the most firm ice before essaying a soft-shoe shuffle thereupon. |
|
|