BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Feminism 101

 
  

Page: 1 ... 34567(8)910111213... 34

 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
07:09 / 02.03.06
(off-topic)Yeah, I don't really know how to reply to that. I hope this is an ex you're talking about. That's someone you don't need.

We weren't actually going out with each other- she was going through a particularly bad and suicidal patch and the worst time it happened I was trying to stop her harming herself by hiding knives and painkillers. We're still friends- she's getting help now and seems to be a lot less dangerous.
(/off-topic)
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
07:16 / 02.03.06
Well, I could link to some more surveys--Amnesty International in particular has done some interesting research into this problem--but after reading some of the responses on the previous page I'm not really sure I can be bothered anymore.

Red Sonja?
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
07:45 / 02.03.06
To be fair, ze did ask if he was "off on this, and if so, how?", although I'm not sure if he was refering to I've gotten in trouble for my opinion on this before. I very much consider "men shouldn't hit women" to be a sexist notion as it implies something special about women that makes them unhittable. The position "human beings shouldn't ever hit other human beings" seems fair, though I don't agree with it. which doesn't really address positions of power or anything, or the Personally, though, I'm like Red Sonja bit.

Conan taught us all a lot of things, such what to do about dark wizards (cleave their skulls), but not much on feminism. I'm ready to admit that under oath.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
07:56 / 02.03.06
I don't think anyone was implying that "men shouldn't hit women, it's a big cozmic rule and stuff." If you go back and read my post you will see that in fact I was very careful to use a gender-neutral term, intimate partener abuse. I'm totally on board with the fact that men can be victims of domestic violence too, either male on male or female on male, and that it is equally traumatic. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen anyone seriously dispute that on Barbelith.

However, I hope people would be disgusted at the idea of one man beating up a smaller, weaker man, for reasons other than self-defense. Right? With me? Big guy beating up a little guy. I'd personally categorise male on female violence as just that tiny little bit nastier than male on male or female on female because it tends on average to involve a larger, stronger person beating up a smaller, weaker person. (And yes, the woman could be all like a ninja babe and the man could be one of those skinny guys, ect.) I also suspect that it's a more common pattern.
 
 
Quantum
08:30 / 02.03.06
"Conan taught us all a lot of things"

STRONG TRUTH!

Mordant, how about bullying at school as a parallel?
 
 
Quantum
09:03 / 02.03.06
I mean, it's because Men and Women's average height and weight differ it's wrong, not because of the X chromosome, so it's like 16 year olds beating up 14 year olds for example.
Having missed seven pages I hesitate to jump in, but Amnesty are concerned about domestic abuse for a reason. Especially in places where fundamentalist groups are in power and women aren't allowed to show their face and are treated as property (remember the Taliban? stoning women to death in Iran?).

There's a real danger that in avoiding Feminascism people forget that WOMEN ALL OVER THE WORLD are actually being beaten, killed, raped and tortured because of their sex. That for me outweighs the slight irritation Mr Limbaugh feels when feminists disagree with him, and the problems of misandry and manhating feminazis (which I think are myths).
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
09:19 / 02.03.06
the problems of misandry and manhating feminazis (which I think are myths).

Yeah- I'm pretty sure that after 34 years I'd probably have met at least one by now if they were actually out there.

It's interesting that misogyny is a "mis" and homophobia a "phobia"- how much misogyny and sexism does everyone think actually stems from gynophobia? I'm thinking of the primary school "ew! girls have fleas" attitude being something a lot of boys may not grow out of- perhaps because, society being as patriarchal as it is, they're not taught to?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
09:44 / 02.03.06
I'm pretty sure that after 34 years I'd probably have met at least one by now if they were actually out there.

Ah but if you had would you remember them? I recall a certain incident with a policeman...
 
 
Quantum
09:47 / 02.03.06
I yam teh Feminazy Watch but like my nemesis PC Thugg I never encounter them- they might only exist in people's imaginations.

What's that expression, 'Tool of the right wing media against the left' or something?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
09:51 / 02.03.06
Nina- ouch.
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
11:43 / 02.03.06
If you post a thread in conversation you ought to be half-expecting Red Sonja references.

Anyway - I haven't seen a lot of men-can't-hit-women on Barbelith, but there was at least one thread discussing the topic quite a long time ago - which I can't seem to find. Maybe my post was more of a "no one in real life seems to agree with me, tell me I'm not an asshole!" thing in which case I suppose it has little purpose in this thread and I apologize. I was also half expecting to be, as I said, way off and needing correction, and figured I'd get it here. And therefore become a better poster on Barbelith. So maybe it wasn't totally irrelevant.

The difference between Abuse (especially between partners) and A Good Fight with Your Wife, Elektra (this is really not as unlikely as everyone makes it sound - one of the dates I had in mind literally broke two of my bones, and she was "just" a rowdy farmgirl, not a space ninja) - is probably the key to the thing. Abuse is probably always going to be against the can't/won't fight back individual and I imagine always based on wanting to change the balance of power in an argument or a shitty day/life. I suppose I used to engage in that sort of thing when I was a little kid and won arguments by sitting on my kid sister but thankfully not since.

It must surely be worth noting that violence against women is arguably more likely to occur not just because of them generally being smaller (and socially trained to be less agressive?) but also because of historical and cultural context that it's *expected* of men to abuse women? I've been in countries where men would occasionally be ridiculed for *not* cheating on their wives (in countries with 30% HIV rates) or *not* beating their wives. Given this kind of thing going on now some places and in the past probably everywhere, IS it justifiable to say no hitting back against women ever? I'm still not sure about my position.

Seriously, did anyone, anywhere like that movie? I'm including myself in that, because I hated it too. I just like her rules for dating. (And Conan technically wasn't in Red Sonja.)
 
 
alas
11:48 / 02.03.06
I remember ibis's "work problem" thread linked above, and couldn't remember if I had responded--obviously, I didn't respond. I go in waves in my relation to Barbelith, sometimes I have more time than others (right now you all are being bombarded by me). I don't know if I just gave up on that because the initial responses were so horrendously dismissive, or I got to the few positive responses by Haus and Persephone and others and thought things would be better, or if I didn't feel I had time to respond properly or intended to respond but got interrupted... but, holy christ on a barrel, that was a real failure of a thread on Barbelith's part. I would note that the immediate responses to this thread were also just about as dismissive.

So, first step, guys: For Pete's Sake: Don't Do That. Stop before you say: Oh you can't possibly be right about that. Don't make a quick "all construction guys are equally jerky to everyone"; there's no sexism on Barbelith, we're just big thinkers who are equally hard on everyone.

Please don't assume that a woman with a claim that she's experiencing sexism is just being "over-sensitive" (where is the great sensitivity barometer that determines exactly what level of "sensitivity" is the correct amount? Oh, but it's feminists who are the PC ones. Right.)

Oh, but Alex's Grandma, re: Are you seriously buying the results of this survey..., by all means go ahead and assume that any survey suggesting that men have a tendency to think partner-violence is ok, is just a bunch of students (who you have decided are all of a lower class(?) than you because of their geography?) taking the piss. I mean, you know, it probably conducted by a bunch of women and what do they know about correct survey procedures anyway.

Ok, you didn't say that last, I realize. But you're certainly implying: "If it runs counter to what I think about this great big beautiful world, the survey must be flawed, because sexism is so over, or only confined to 'louche' places (US, have no idea what that means precisely), places where thank god good upright men like you don't live because this is Barbelith where there is no sexism." If you haven't read this thread, please read it. Also, read the F4J thread where it's also repeatedly asserted that high, predominantly male vs. female partner violence rates are a conspiracy created by feminists.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
12:15 / 02.03.06
UK. No idea what louche is doing in that sentence either.

But yeah, you're probably right, Alex's whatever. The survey was conducted by Goofy, silly old researchers got taken in, every single one of their 2000+ respondants was trying to get a rise, everything's fine. Problem? What problem?
 
 
Joy Division Oven Gloves
12:22 / 02.03.06
but after reading some of the responses on the previous page I'm not really sure I can be bothered anymore.

Am new and just annoyed rather than jaded, so

here
and
here


'academics' presumably from the university of Walt Disney, North London/West of Scotland branch,

Am not certain if these reports were conducted in conjunction with any of the Russell Group of universities and am therefore unable vouch for their unquestionable empiricism and impartiality.
 
 
Joy Division Oven Gloves
12:37 / 02.03.06
Apologies for the links that go nowhere, I seem to be experiencing technical difficulties. If you're interested go to Amnesty's website and search under 'violence against women', the intended links are both on the first page of results.

In the meantime, here's some music...
 
 
Evil Scientist
12:53 / 02.03.06
Please don't assume that a woman with a claim that she's experiencing sexism is just being "over-sensitive" (where is the great sensitivity barometer that determines exactly what level of "sensitivity" is the correct amount? Oh, but it's feminists who are the PC ones. Right.)

I don't know if this is directed at what I posted a few pages ago, but I'd like to clarify that I wasn't suggesting that female posters are being over-sensitive even in a minority of cases. I was asking if it was possible that, if someone is being a snippy and patronising moron, they may not necessarily be doing that because of gender bias but simply because they're snippy and patronising. They may not even be aware of the poster's gender.

This was about poster/poster interactions (as I noted you can't automatically identify gender on a message board, nor should people feel obliged to identify their gender). That said, if it looks like mysogyny and it smells like mysogyny, then it probably is mysogyny. If someone percieves me as being sexist then I'd much rather be called on it than not.

Last thing I want to do is set myself up as some kind of apologist for mysogyny on the forums.
 
 
Sekhmet
12:58 / 02.03.06
louche apparently means "of questionable taste or morality; decadent".

I must assume Grandma has spent a lot of time in these areas and talked to the vast majority of their denizens, in order to make such sweeping statements...
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:00 / 02.03.06
Joy Division Oven Gloves: I've put in a move to correct those links - normal service should be restored soon. You just forgot to put inverted commas around the URLs subject to the a tags.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
13:02 / 02.03.06
Evil Scientist, I think alas was referring to my dumb-ass responses to ibis in her "sexism at work" thread.
 
 
My Mom Thinks I'm Cool
13:06 / 02.03.06
Should we have a seperate thread here on classism, since it keeps coming up? And maybe seperate out the violence-against-women from the feminism/misongyny-on-barbelith thread?

And if so, should they go in Conversation like these, or over to the proper Headshop (where they probably already exist I suppose?)
 
 
Joy Division Oven Gloves
13:36 / 02.03.06
Ta Haus, that's very kind. Will engage brain next time. And apologies Mordant, I think we crossed . Didn't intend to repeat everything you just posted.
 
 
Quantum
13:45 / 02.03.06
How do we seperate the abuse of women from Barbelith abuse of women? Don't speech acts count? Verbal abuse is unnacceptable too, and while I'm not saying posting the word 'bitch' is equivalent to beating your wife, there seem to be parallels between the silencing of women's protests IRL and here.

From Mordant's link- ...when over 30% of us think that violence against women is OK, and when 50% of us think that domestic violence should be kept behind closed doors, and when more of us would report a dog being abused than a woman...
 
 
Quantum
13:55 / 02.03.06
Classism
 
 
alas
13:58 / 02.03.06
I was actually thinking of the initial responses to both ibis's thread and this one, and didn't have in mind who exactly had said things like: You are being far too sensitive as well as the people in the other threads who complained. Men and women are different - get over it. (Qwik, the second response on page 1), and, from the work thread, Qalyn's immediate: You're paranoid. Men treat each other like that, too..

I went to a restaurant for lunch a few weeks ago with a friend. We're both women; she's black, I'm white. Maybe it shouldn't matter, but as it happens we were both dressed professionally, for work--she always dresses for work and I'd had a meeting and this lunch date I wanted to look good for. I've rarely received such lousy service. The server actually went out of his way, more than once, to be rude. OF COURSE I KNOW that it's possible that this waiter was just an asshole or he was having a lousy day or had a hangover or ... But, really, he was so rude, so careless... The experience sticks with me because I can't be sure--was it sexism? racism? both? neither? Or a bad day combined with "it's just these two fucking women who probably won't tip so who gives a fuck." It's US so I did cut his tip to a mere 10% (normally I'll easily go 20% at a relatively nice place). But, fuck it. It's tiresome.

And if we had both looked like white male professionals* we'd have been able to be certain that it was just fucking bad service and it wasn't to do with who we were perceived as being.

Now, that was just the one experience. If the experience was repeated I would be more certain, but, of course, I don't know if she and I will ever go back to that restaurant, together. Whatever. Bad service happens, you get over it.

But in both these cases, an ongoing job situation and sexism here on Barbelith, someone's saying there's a problem with sexism, experienced over time, and the knee-jerk reaction from a few, quick-trigger male-identified posters (ones with great wives! even!) is: you're imagining this or you're being over-sensitive or everyone has it rough.... It's just so patronizing (Really? other people have problems? I had no idea, I better not talk about this one!).

And it's especially annoying that in these two cases they were in the very earliest responses, because it can set a tone for the whole discussion: feminist posters are placed in a reactive position of dealing with the asshole, which means it's easy for the problem to get slighted, or vise versa.

*Edited to add professionals, thinking about class as a vector. And then I thought, I suppose other factors could come into play--orientation, etc., of course. And I'm wondering about how I worded the whole thing. But my point is, because of how I look, I wouldn't normally have to think "was race a factor in this bad experience?"
 
 
Quantum
14:11 / 02.03.06
Good point alas- as a white man I rarely wonder what the reason was for bad service.
I also rarely get offended by people looking at my tits, people don't habitually underestimate me, I get listened to and think nothing of it, people don't accuse me of menstruating when I'm irritated, I have little fear of sexual attack alone at night etc. etc.

Men and women are different, so feminism is essential. Get over it.
 
 
pointless & uncalled for
14:28 / 02.03.06
Apologies for the rottage but reducing a tip to 10% isn't reducing in the eyes of the waiter, it's giving what a lot of other people are giving. Waiting staff don't know that you usually hand out 20%.

Under the described circumstances I'd have walked without tipping. I appreciate that the culture of tipping means that waiting staff and similar do live from their tips and therefore not tipping is considered very taboo. However, if I were to do my job as badly I would be fired, not paid a reasonable wage. Naturally I see a tipping thread in the spawning.
 
 
grant
14:36 / 02.03.06
On the "more men on the internet" thing, the vast majority of my contacts online are women, actually. I don't mean email correspondents, I mean message boards. Yahoogroups, specifically. They're all about adoption stuff, but they all overwhelmingly consists of women from 30 to 50. Quite a few of them know more about blogging (software, culture, etc) than I do, but I have noticed that they're not too keen, collectively, on message board software. For the most part, they prefer email interfaces or yahoogroups (which is tied to the email provider, even if it can be used as a messageboard). I'm hesitant to say this all gender-based, but I definitely think gender is a factor (especially in the blogging culture thing -- there seems to be a lot of control-of-voice, access-to-comments stuff I'm 90% sure I wouldn't see in a group of men).
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
14:38 / 02.03.06
Alex's post has been dealt with by others, so I'll content myself with a 'wtf'?

Ibis: thankyou for digging up a concrete example. The comparisions drawn between that thread and and this are extremely pertinent. They both suggest a culture in which suggestions of mysogyny and of unfair treatment are treated extremely critically. On that thread, with very little complaint.

To draw a comparison, look how generally welcoming and full of advice 'we' are on Barbeboy threads. Sure, there's some sarcasm, but a)someone usually protests it, and b)it's usually outweighed by sincere, sensible advice and offers of care.

Which would strongly suggest that we feel Barbe-boy threads are more important/deserving than the kind of situation that Ibis raised.

(And I want to apologise for Ibis for not seeing/being around for that, which obviously left you feeling minimised and unsuppoerted. But we're here to tryimg to affect the culture of barbelith so that there's no need for 'usual suspect' posters to take responsibility. Stil, I'm sorry, and pretty horrified by that.)
 
 
Persephone
14:56 / 02.03.06
It's US so I did cut his tip to a mere 10% (normally I'll easily go 20% at a relatively nice place). But, fuck it. It's tiresome.

I'm sorry, but my reaction to this is "you what?" The tipping system in the US basically amounts to an unfair labor practice, in my opinion. That whole exercise of power over the serving classes. I tip 20% across the board, regardless of the relative niceness of the restaurant. If you think about it, the checks are smaller at a less nice restaurant & the dollar amount of the tips is less, as it is. If I get bad service, I suck it up & if it's really bad, I will tip the same & have words with the server, if I'm pissed off enough.

I wasn't being positive in ibis's thread. I was saying essentially the same thing that Qalyn was saying, which is that class is an issue. Class is a feminist issue. And that is an issue that gets slighted all the time, and people applaud & say you go girl?
 
 
alas
15:05 / 02.03.06
10% isn't reducing in the eyes of the waiter, it's giving what a lot of other people are giving.

You know, I know that, and part of it is gender-related. I was a server, and the story was that women don't tip. This was the myth that even women servers believed, and I have no idea if it's true or not. I do know that that myth has cost me a lot of money, over the years....

Oppression often forces people into modes of over-compensation. I am aware in my bone marrow that women are perceived as making "emotional arguments," so I tend to come into arguments loaded-for-bear with concrete evidence and statistics. The problem being that the overcompensation is often futile, admittedly, because the myth overrides the evidence. Once someone's decided "women don't tip anyway" they're not likely to "see"/remember the big tippers, and voila, a self-fulfilling prophecy is born.
 
 
alas
15:16 / 02.03.06
Persephone: You're right. Class is totally a feminist issue and I also am getting a bit concerned by the impulse to separate these things out as if they are "rotting." You can't talk about sexism without bringing in all the other social vectors.

I do hate the whole institution of tipping, and completely agree that its immoral and reifies a quasi-master/servant relationship. And I am quite sure that my words played into that, and you're right to call me out on it. I probably should have had words with the waiter. I admit that all the vectors of the entire situation were so confusing at the time, I was taken aback and was raised in a Midwestern "nice" culture, so it often takes me awhile to think through the best response--and direct confrontation still takes me awhile to get to in real life. To top it off, my partner didn't want to tip at all. So we kind of said: ok, 10%.

["Nice" is the wrong word: for me, "nice" to me means=beyond counter service. If someone's coming to my table, I tip 20% in the US, regardless of menu prices. And more if it's just coffee, say--leave a $1 for a $1.50 coffee is not a problem for me.]
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
15:22 / 02.03.06
I can think of at least one other recent and very blatant example of [what I consider to be] misogynistic language, but can't point to it because I can't remember where it was (and I didn't see it until after the fact - was alerted to it by a RL conversation). But it involved Nina coming under attack from yawn, and was nasty enough that I don't know whether Nina would want to resurrect it.
 
 
pointless & uncalled for
15:24 / 02.03.06
You know, I know that, and part of it is gender-related. I was a server, and the story was that women don't tip. This was the myth that even women servers believed, and I have no idea if it's true or not. I do know that that myth has cost me a lot of money, over the years....

Keeping tipping on a gender related issue, from anecdotal experience related to me by waiting staff that I have known (detail on demand), it's possible to form a picture it's not so much that women don't tip is that women don't tip women.

But it goes a little deeper than that, because really the fault lies more with men. Waiting staff are, demographically speaking, more likely to be women. The successful ones are more likely to be the pretty ones. Men are sadly acting out their objectifying misogyny, whereas the women aren't thinking about sleeping with you when they reach for their wallets.

Tipping is one part of North American culture that not just condones misogyny, but actively encourages it. Thus it could be argued that the myth didn't cost you money so much as the objectifying made you money.
 
 
ibis the being
15:52 / 02.03.06
Ugh, I'm getting that thumping in my chest again.

I wasn't being positive in ibis's thread. I was saying essentially the same thing that Qalyn was saying, which is that class is an issue. Class is a feminist issue. And that is an issue that gets slighted all the time, and people applaud & say you go girl?

Persephone, Qalyn deciding was NOT saying "class is an issue" or anything like it. He was saying -

You're paranoid. Men treat each other like that, too.

Seriously, it has very little to do with your sex.

Ibis, I've worked as a painter, a welder, a carpenter, a finisher, a demolisher, a conservator, a lifter, a thrower, and a scraper. [...] It is not about your sex. It is self-defeating for you to believe that the reason you're being treated this way is because you're a woman. It's not.


He also admitted the reason he was arguing with me was gender-related:

I'm irked by this topic the way you might be if I came in here complaining about how needy, manipulative and irrational women are.

And if he made any mention of class at all, it must have been in this classist comment:

But I like doing the work and these guys are basically douchebags who suffer a miserable existence, so who gives a shit, really?

Later, you, Persephone came in and politely suggested that class may be a factor in the difficulties I was having at work. And in response I acknowledged that you had a point. Which, in retrospect, I must say was not the most pertinent point, since I am as working class as my former coworker and was doing the same kind of work he was doing for the vast majority of the project. But even you were right and it was mostly class problem, where was the Barbelith support that is afforded the boys-who-need-girls threads? I felt attacked in that thread, and I backed down, and frankly I am feeling a little attacked all over again on that topic, and once again feeling the need to back down. That alone indicates a possible problem, I think.
 
 
alas
15:57 / 02.03.06
Thus it could be argued that the myth didn't cost you money so much as the objectifying made you money.

Actually, Persephone's really right and I'd like to retract the statement entirely. The myth hasn't cost me money in the way I seemed to imply; the whole institution is really messed up and I'm aware of that. And, seriously, being a server was one of the hardest, most stressful, demanding jobs I have ever done.

Knowing that your livelihood is based more on perceived sexiness and not really one's ability to orchestrate the service of drinks food clearing billing, is well, sheesh, in the end, ...well it's the problem: it's not that it's "bad" to be perceived as sexy or funny or playful but but--this is where the "all feminists are just ugly, prudish, angry, humorless" issue comes in. Because in the situation of being the server, you can be punished for either or both or some messy combination: for not being "cute" enough or for not being "helpful" enough, or for not being "efficient" enough....It sucks.

And in the situation above I was so focused on race and gender that, despite my own experience and history, I was basically blind to class.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 34567(8)910111213... 34

 
  
Add Your Reply