| |
|
Heteropanic: the concern to specifiy that one is straight and that therefore one likes girls (if one is male) and so on.
To explain further: as Haus eloquently argued, GGM originally asked about non-obvious characteristics: things that are not about a person's "bits" -- by which I assumed she meant body parts, including genitalia if we want to get literal. I don't really give a toss if someone only likes one gender. I was simply struck by how really, really unreflective and revealing some of the responses were: liking the "hair lying on the pillow"? Um, that's a body part. A woman who says 'cunt' and drinks pints? Great, someone who doesn't make you feel bad about your masculinist misogyny but supports and participates in it. Why does one need to mention gender, in this context? What would happen if you didn't?
And dudes, maybe I shouldn't be making assumptions about gender here, but given the response, I feel it was a safe assumption to make. Apologies if my assumption was wrong.
To rephrase my point into a question, because I did ask a question, even if it was hidden in snideness: do people who are 'only attracted to one gender' ever find themselves turned on by a particular thing in persons of the 'wrong' gender? |
|
|
