|
|
I think you were always putting new stuff up, Fly, aiming to start discussions in good faith, and pushing discussion forward with those controversial topics about racism in people's approach to hip hop and so on - if anything, any control you had over the place was quite good.
ILM was mentioned upthread as better place to talk about music than Barbelith, and was quite rightly reprimanded - because a whole lot of bullshit goes on over at ILM between decent posts that none of us need to see here. Yet they do have a massively higher volume - threads go on beyond the 1000s - and just by force of numbers that means that more people there are having good talk about music.
And yet they're a lot more tolerant of things like pointless threads, abuse, stupid internet jokes, 'shock' racism and so on (and an open membership). Is it perhaps true that you need that garbage-drift in order to bring in people who talk about music? I mean it shouldn't be, but a lot of people involved in whatever genre of music are far from being intellectuals and, as has been said before, a lot of the people we enjoy listening to, and the other people who enjoy listening to them, are probably complete arsehats.
If we could do a Venn diagram I think one sphere would have 'Most music people, promoters, DJs, band members, music bloggers, music critics', and the other would be 'Left-wing intellectuals interested in having proper discussions', and there might be some cross-over but not much.
Or I might be completely and utterly wrong. I am thinking from anecdote, here - the people whose bands I go to watch and the people who I go to the disco with often do not behave or think in a way I agree with - it's really only music that we have in common. Whereas there are people who, politically and philosophically, I get on with like a house on fire but who have the musical ear of an oven glove. |
|
|