BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Dilemma dilemma OMFG dilemma!

 
  

Page: 1234(5)6

 
 
Dead Megatron
17:33 / 10.01.06
You know, if we simply abandon the concept of "monogamy", this whole thread becomes a non-issue...
 
 
alas
17:46 / 10.01.06
DM: I'm pointing out that in FWP's own language, he keeps sneakily trying to make himself into a victim of her (she keeps doing stuff to turn me on!). And that's not fair to her: he's actually responding to the immensity of his emotions, not to her physical or other mystical powers as some MWQ from PT. In other words, shockingly perhaps: You and I actually agree on this point: the terms victim and victimizer are unlikely to apply to this situation, and only serve to confuse the point.

Second, I think I've made it clear that, like you, I'm no fan of monogamy.

Where we do NOT agree is your naive assumption that, apparently "all's fair in love and war," cf. your earlier posts, and if we just dump monogamy all our problems are magically solved.

I know from personal experience that, absent the clear rules enforced by patriarchal tradition, life isn't simpler on the human relations front: it's more complex and requires ethical negotiations and deep self-awareness. Both of which I've, frankly, seen little evidence of in your posts.
 
 
Char Aina
17:58 / 10.01.06
It seems as if we`re trying to find out who`s the victim and who`s the victimizer.

i dont agree. nothing i have written has been to suggest that either party is a bad guy, and i have gone to pains to explain that i feel that there is unlikely to be any malice involved.

if anything, your assesment that it is phobia who is the mythical baddy is casting victimhood and blame unnecessarily. creating conditions condusive to confusion is not the same as being a baddy, in my opinion, especially done unwittingly.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
18:11 / 10.01.06
Silly alas, all our problems can be gotten rid of if we just stop believing in things! Monogamy, war, teh government! 23!!!
 
 
Suedey! SHOT FOR MEAT!
18:23 / 10.01.06
I don't believe in the number 23.

I'm really shit at maths.
 
 
Dead Megatron
18:23 / 10.01.06
I'm not saying phobia i the baddy, I'm saying anyone can be the baddy, depend on the point of view.

and, alas, I didn't mean to say "all is fair in love and war". I disagree eith that: we should all be, at least, loyal and honest in such affairs. On the contrary, I'm saying they both should drop all acts, all "strategies", and express their feeling honestly and undoubtfully, for better or worse (regardless of her moving in or not). Or, if we want to keep the analogy: Retreat is a valid strategy in the battlefield; hesitation is not. Or, simply put, phobia, go for it already, or drop it all together, don't keep hanging in the middle like you are now
 
 
P. Horus Rhacoid
18:40 / 10.01.06
FWP, despite all the caveats, your response still indicates a desire, to me, to make her into a kind of evil temptress against whom you have no powers of refusal. I accept that we all, men and women alike, may want to absolve ourselves in this way for situations that are causing us pain and where we find ourselves, against our better judgment, doing that which we want not to do. To wit:

I understand that it's not her fault if people keep falling for her but in my case at least she was doing things which encouraged it; my roommates at the time were astonished when I told them she had a boyfriend. I don't think she was cynically manipulating me for attention but unless she is incredibly bad at reading people (she's not, she's actually quite good) then she had at least some idea of how I felt and continued to do things to encourage it.

Your roommates were "astonished" that she had a boyfriend, but you knew, right? And you were apparently bothered by the fact at the time, but said nothing? You did not, say, try to open a conversation about precisely what kind of relationship she has with that other guy, to see if having other 'friendships with benefits' is a norm for her and him? You didn't seem to directly and unambiguously sit her down and let her know where you were, how you were feeling?

She's a "good reader"--"intuitive female"?--and should have just "known"?


I don't think I'm stereotyping with that last- it's just based on observation and conversations I've had with other people who know her. She seems pretty good at sussing out people's motivations, and for my part I felt like I was being pretty damned obvious about it. Of course, it's obvious to me because it's me, which doesn't translate necessarily to obvious to her.

On the other hand, the eXtreme spooning- by the way, it only happened a few times- was in each case followed by a period of awkwardness and talking only in the vaguest terms about what had happened ('last weekend was really weird...' 'yeah...') without actually going into why it happened. A few times I almost brought it up with her, but I was always too afraid of scaring her off. Which, admittedly, doesn't jive with my feeling that she absolutely must have known what was going on- my only explanation is that I'm horribly awkward in these situations (as is she, for that matter- our break-it-off conversation after the first period of togetherness was a truly wondrous mishmash of awkward pauses, 'um'ing and garbled sentences) and that I'm inexperienced, also very paranoid and second-guess myself a lot. By a lot, I mean all the time. I also felt at the time that there was some element of 'don't ask, don't tell' to it all- like, it was okay as long as we didn't mention it, but once we did things would go completely to hell.

Are you sure you're not expecting her, as a 'good' woman to be more attentive to your "needs" than to her own desires and interests?

Well, no, I don't think so. I would expect someone to be attentive to whether their desires and interests are causing emotional distress for someone else, though. Which isn't relevant if she was not, in fact, aware of it, but our behavior in the aftermath of the various eXtreme platonic physicality incidents seemed to imply that she was, and that it was bothering her too. Am I reading your point right?

I realize I'm also assuming you did not feel physically threatened by her, as would be true in a potential rape case--or at least you have not suggested that was true, here. (If you do feel physically threatened by her in some way I can understand that it might be difficult to admit, given gender norms.)

Ha. No. She's half my size. She did try to kick me once but she fell over.

So, with the caveat that of course you may not be giving us the whole picture even of your own actions, from what I am reading here, you apparently continued to deliberately take part in the infamous aggressive spooning and sinister hand holding, and other actions that to you are unambiguously "come hither" signals, because you feel powerless in your attraction to her, not because you are fearful of her ability to physically overwhelm you, to blackmail you, or to directly harm you in some way. Is that fair?

Fair.

I hate to say it, but, despite all your caveats, it sounds like you still want to see her as a "cock tease," so that you don't have to face the fact that you are feeling powerless around her because of the immensity of your physical attraction to her, the immensity of your emotions. That immensity is scary, but it's not the same as being threatened by someone as in rape cases.

Possibly, it scared the shit out of me at the time and I hate not being in control of my mental state. I don't think the two are mutually exclusive, though.

I'll have to think about this some more, but I don't have the time to post more at the moment.
 
 
Loomis
18:49 / 10.01.06
i have been that person, being super loveable and sweet towards folks i dont love, inadvertently leading them on and fostering a love thing.

This is all too true. I have aggressively spooned toksik from a distance for many months now and all I have for my troubles are a lot of unusual marks that concern and confuse my GP.
 
 
Char Aina
19:09 / 10.01.06
s'what punk rock belts are for, loomis.
 
 
Totem Polish
19:22 / 10.01.06
Well in my social circle at least, the aggressive platonic contact that you have so far eluded to is relatively meaningless ie. you were drunk...at least you didn't break anything.

With regards to what alas and others have been saying, clearly it is FWP who is powerless here and as far as his actions have shown, he has said yes to her moving in after all, this should be relatively clear to the girl in question. It is only natural that she should use this 'free ride' for all it's worth. I don't think anyone here has suggested that all relationships work on one level, so as far as she may be concerned she needs somewhere to live and happens to be able to live with a friend.

When questions of accomodation come up, as long as you know the person and can trust them not to sell your stuff for crack for example then all other bets are off. At least as far as she is concerned.

Now FWP, do you know if her boyfriend is moving to your place with her? If so, then you shouldn't expect anything to come of the situation other than misery, guilt and perhaps a broken nose (yours) should you try to make the 'relationship' work. If not then by all means go for it, at least you'll get some quality time together to re-establish the perameters of your relationship.

Oh, yeah and there's that thing about area codes...it would only be crass of me to repeat it here.
 
 
Totem Polish
19:26 / 10.01.06
I would like to add as for the 'free rides' comment above, we all get them and exploit them and although it is not one of the more noble human traits it is certainly nothing unusual or condemnation worthy IMHO.
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
19:43 / 10.01.06
Yeah man. If FWP confronts her and she admits to exploitation, but covers with "shit that's how I roll muthafucka", she's in the clear. I mean, that's just how she rolls. Who among us can judge her?

you, toksik, whose inadvertant loving has led the stalwart Loomis to aggressive spooning oceans away?

you, Ibis, whose contributions to late-night talk radio have fostered more nerd crushes than Tina Fey?

you, Shaftoe, who routinely compliments hobos' ramshackle dwellings when you don't really mean it just for the free moonshine?

I say thee nay.
 
 
Totem Polish
19:46 / 10.01.06
My point perhaps is that FWP should be aware that he is being taken for said 'ride' but what's a man gotta do...
 
 
Mirror
19:56 / 10.01.06
Y'know, the whole "you were drunk, so it doesn't mean anything" attitude ticks me off. Being drunk may lower people's inhibitions, but it doesn't magically explain away events that happen while drunk. The correct response to "last weekend was really weird..." is "I really enjoyed it," so long as that's the truth.

As many others have now said in other words, quit playing games. Furthermore, while I can appreciate turning to Barbelith for advice on some level, in other ways all you're really doing is wallowing in your indecision.

Make your decision and get on with it. Being shot down isn't the horror that your internal monologue makes it out to be. Matter of fact, it's sort of liberating.
 
 
Dead Megatron
20:17 / 10.01.06
Hey, phobia, are you sure you`re not me a few years ago.'Cus I`ve been throught it all. It`s so hard to know what women think sometimes, ain`t it?

Anyway, this thread is becoming much like yout love-life, it semms: too much talk, which ends up hindering any action...
 
 
eddie thirteen
21:01 / 10.01.06
Okay, then. At the risk of sounding crass, I humbly submit that all the Gender Studies 101 stuff about whether Phobias is a closet/emerging rapist is not only a little harsh, but beside the point; it's all well and good for us to abstract the situation into total unrecognizability, but the fact remains that -- for reasons that have nothing to do with Phobias's secret pathology (secret even to himself!) -- this would be a fucking disaster. Strictly on the basis of what I have read here (and I accept that Phobias may be an unreliable narrator, but he is the only narrator that we have), I conclude that this woman knows very well that Phobias is attracted to her; and, if she is indeed a good judge of character, she probably also knows that he will allow this to sway his decision-making processes. Does that -- not Phobias's attraction, which is surely not her responsibility, but her willingness to exploit that attraction -- make her eeeeeevil? Far be it from me to say, and luckily, it's completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. The point is, Phobias is hoping for results to emerge that -- I assure you -- will never, ever transpire. Wholly outside the realm of idle abstraction, she will really be fucking her real boyfriend in the all-too-real very next room, and although she may try to keep it down at first, ultimately she will really be fucking him really, really loud. Even if she later dumped the boyfriend, and even if for some reason she chose to roll with the Phobes instead, this nightmarish memory would always, always, always persist. It would only have to happen once. It's a no-hope situation, and God help you for even contemplating it.
 
 
alas
21:12 / 10.01.06
Thanks for completely misreading my post, e13.
 
 
Char Aina
21:16 / 10.01.06
Yeah man. If FWP confronts her and she admits to exploitation, but covers with "shit that's how I roll muthafucka", she's in the clear. I mean, that's just how she rolls. Who among us can judge her?

that's not quite what i meant.
i'm talking about her not doing it maliciously, without full knowledge of what is going on for mr P.
 
 
matthew.
21:28 / 10.01.06
free rides, anyone?
 
 
eddie thirteen
21:41 / 10.01.06
I really don't think I did, Alas. How was I to misinterpret the idea that this woman was in jeopardy sharing an apartment with Phobias? He just doesn't sound like the physical attacker type. Passive-aggressive, maybe. In any event, I agree that this living situation could be as bad for her as it would be for him (as living with someone who mopes over you could indeed become very uncomfortable), and admit that perhaps my eyes were glazing over as I read the thread and didn't get the point of what you were saying. My apologies, if so.
 
 
eddie thirteen
21:48 / 10.01.06
And with that, I'm out of the conversation, as I realize the subject matter is shredding my levelheadedness to...um...shreds, and the whole thing is Just Not My Problem. Just a subject it's a little harder for me to objective about than I thought, I suppose. Good luck, Phobias. Don't be a 'tard.
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
06:49 / 11.01.06
Ok. Let's try this again.

FWP is having a hard time, about which he has posted here, seeking advice.

Many people have given sound advice of the 'this sounds like it's going to cause you alot of trouble, and sounds like a difficult and confusing situation, with the potential for hurt. So steer clear' school.

It is possible, as some have done, to also assess the terms in which FWP has described his situation and note that he's painted it in terms which invite us to say 'no, run away'.

FWP has, over the course of this thread, realised that he's probably still emotionally involved.

Regarding all of our sniping, I should say that it's always easier to see this stuff in someone else than when it's your own heart doing the tango. Try reading yr initial post as if it were about a friend and imagine what you'd say to him, or her.

Cos, y'know, all roles in this little drama could be played by anyone of any gender.

Herein lies the problem. As along with advice about the situation, there a bunch posts stuffed full of assumptions, as Nina, alas, toksik and I have noted above, made on the basis of this being a boy and a girl.

Assumptions which have no basis. Unless you subscribe to following notion:

a)men and women, or in this case, boys and girls are entirely different creatures and girls are therefore 'unknowable'.

b)women/girls are totally conscious omniscient beings, who always know why they are acting in a certain way in any given situation and what the consequences of that action are.

c)men/boys, on the other hand, have no control and are merely slaves to passion/crushes/love/whatever you want to call it.

d)therefore, the man/boy is the hapless innocent.

This is all misogynist BULLSHIT.

It's also extremely condescending and limiting to anyone of any gender.

FWP: The terms in which you've described this person do not make it seem a good idea that you live at close proximity to them. If they are being deliberately manipulative, why put yourself through that?

If, as seems far more likely, they're pretty messy themselves (and it takes two to create a messy situation, you're not innocent here, though I do sympathise), then you have to decide whether you can/want to be around that.

You've concieved of/described this person as having a high degree of influence over you, so again, you have to figure out whether the way you interact is one you can cope with. And one you want to stake your living arrangements on.

In fact, people are people, perhaps FWP has got himself mixed up with one who contributes to him finding himself a situation he's unhappy with. But it's up to him, if he doesn't want to participate in the game, to set boundaries and/or walk away.

A few people in this thread could do with thinking of female-identified folk as people, with the circumstances, drives and motivations that people have. People not too dissimilar from themselves.

Or would that be too scarily like Teh Future?
 
 
Lurid Archive
07:23 / 11.01.06
This is all misogynist BULLSHIT.

I more or less agree with you, GGM, and I was going to call bullshit on Totem Polish claim that FWP is powerless here (unless Totem Polish is joking. God, it is so hard to tell these days.) Having said that, I think the situation is more complex than that.

That is, although I'm no essentialist, one can argue that there are certain gender patterns in heterosexual relations. It is somewhat customary for the girl to be essentially passive and for the boy to be active and take the role of initiator. Personally, I think this is a really fucked up way to carry on, but it is surprising how many people effectively buy into it. (Evolutionary psychologists would say that there are good reasons for this pattern, but ev psych is always a bit dodgy. Nevertheless, as I understand it, there is reasonable evidence for *some* kind of gender difference in sexual behaviour, whatever the cause.)

The thing is that under this model, boys can easily feel powerless, since positive signals from the girl can constitute a strong offer of sexual relations, but are easily confused (this is part of the point, to an extent) with the sexual desire they invoke. Girls, on the other hand, can also feel powerless, unsurprisingly if they are limited to such indirect methods of communication. So, GGM, when you say

Cos, y'know, all roles in this little drama could be played by anyone of any gender.

I think you are right, of course, but I also think it isn't really an accident that these threads are almost always started by het boys.
 
 
Tuna Ghost: Pratt knot hero
07:37 / 11.01.06
that's not quite what i meant.
i'm talking about her not doing it maliciously, without full knowledge of what is going on for mr P.


My comment was aimed at Totem more than anyone else. I only used your names 'cause I had been drinking and wanted to make a funny involving the words "aggressive spooning", "Tina Fey", and "ramshackle dwellings". Despite my inebriation, I understand that these things can occur without anyone conciously deciding to make them happen. If that's happening now or not is anyone's guess, I suppose.

Being drunk may lower people's inhibitions, but it doesn't magically explain away events that happen while drunk.

SHUT UP SHUT UP IT DOES SO
 
 
Tryphena Absent
11:19 / 11.01.06
I also think it isn't really an accident that these threads are almost always started by het boys.

Can I tentatively suggest that maybe we just have more het boys?
 
 
grant
11:41 / 11.01.06
Oh, stop flirting!
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
12:02 / 11.01.06
It`s so hard to know what women think sometimes, ain`t it?

Yes, it's not like you can talk and listen to them or observe their behaviour or anything like that, you have to use one of these:

 
 
Totem Polish
12:03 / 11.01.06
Hmm...I guess a sorry is in order here, particularly since misogyny is the last thing I was aiming for here. I got the impression, as did GGM, that FWP's ex exerted a strong influence on him, although perhaps on reflection he may not know her that well. If I am wrong on the latter point then it seems to me that there's a certain obligation (as friends) on both sides to at least a bit of sensitivity to the other person's intentions and emotions.

Otherwise, since FWP has no idea if the girl likes him 'in that way' and all she appears to want is a bed to sleep in and some company then clearly there is a basis for frustration on FWP's part here. In my previous post I put too much of an emphasis on FWP's victimhood, perhaps what I wanted to express is that he is making himself a victim of his own expectations, letting the uncertainty of his romantic attachment to the girl infiltrate all areas of their relationship ie. the questions about rent and teh boyfriend.

I was also listening to the ODB, I guess things just got mixed up in my head.

It is FWP's decision in the end and his responsibility, I hope this at least clears up my part in the muddle somewhat.
 
 
Evil Scientist
12:36 / 11.01.06
Yes, it's not like you can talk and listen to them or observe their behaviour or anything like that, you have to use one of these:

Where did you get that picture! I can explain everything. I was uncertain of the young lady's intentions and, rather than ask her (because as a stereotyped het boy I am scared of women and believe them to be aliens) I thought it better to use the Mysogny-ometer on her.

She only scored 1.23 though. So she's obviously not good property.

(Tongue firmly in cheek, mein monkeys).
 
 
P. Horus Rhacoid
12:38 / 11.01.06
Ju-u-ust dropping by to say that I'm about to embark on an all-day busride which hamstrings my ability to reply to anything. Not ignoring anything which might come up, just out of action until tomorrow.
 
 
ibis the being
13:01 / 11.01.06
I also think it isn't really an accident that these threads are almost always started by het boys.

Maybe not an accident, but almost certainly a coincidence of some sort. This could have very easily been MY thread about four years ago, minus the cohabitation element. Probably the only reason I have never posted a thread like this is because the last time I was young, single, and lovelorn, I was just a lurker 'round these parts.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:26 / 11.01.06
Well, there are more men on Barbelith than women, I think, and so statistically more heterosexual (or at least attracted-to-women) men than any other group is a likely outcome.

I think Ibis demonstrates that this is not a gendered thang, necessarily. I mean, right now we have Fuckbaked's boyfriend aparently taking advantage of one of the issues that may look good to FWP's friend here - free rent with somebody who will do the washing up.

So, yes, the issue here is not gender, and I can see a lot of the assumptions GGM has identified - in particular, people appplying their own exculpatory narratives to this situation. The key issue here is not whether the hypnotic ladybreasts are dooming FWP to sacrifice himself on the rocks of doom, I don't think.

Basically, FWP is not sure how he feels about this person. He is also not sure what the aggressive spooning means - they may be an evil manipulator, she may be a flirt, she may have a non-exclusive relationship with her boyfriend of one kind or another, she might just have a different idea of what constitutes being friendly (I've shared a bed with peoople while in a relationship without thinking of it as sa step towards a relationship) she might be about to dump her boyfriend and declare her love for FWP. Likewise, she may be seeking to torture FWP for her own sick pleasure, or she may want to start a relationship, or she might just see an opportunity to live rent-free with somebody she likes/kind of knows/ is secretly in love with, unbeknownst to him/her/her boyfriend.

However, almost every single one of these possible permutations becomes more difficult to deal with sensibly, I think, if they are sharing a house and one or the other of them is not doing the washing up. Or not doing it right.
 
 
Mirror
21:05 / 11.01.06
Or not doing it right.

Damn straight. Those spoons had better be polished with a clockwise motion.
 
 
Ganesh
23:56 / 11.01.06
It's all getting terribly complicated.

Phobias: tell her no - because "I'm not over you and would find it difficult to be flatmates".
 
 
Triplets
00:29 / 12.01.06
dooming FWP to sacrifice himself on the rocks of doom

The doomingest doom in all of Doomington.
 
  

Page: 1234(5)6

 
  
Add Your Reply