|
|
I got the feeling the aussies rely too much on that Cahill guy who got in in the second half. And to rely on (any) one player is not a good idea.
Well, as astro at some point will likely confirm, Mark Viduka is the man through whom most of their play will go through (I only saw bits of the 2nd half today, so I can't confirm this to always be the case, but it certainly is with Middlesbrough.) He's also, generally, their main goalscorer.
Anyway, those underdogs no one expects to win (like Angola, Trinidad & Tobago, even Australia and Japan) are the ones I fear the most - The Gods of Football tend to like them.
I don't think this is true, really, in any way, or we'd be talking about Cameroon's famous 1990 World Cup win, likewise Senegal in 98 and Bulgaria in 94. Is there any evidence you'd like to present to support this? One of those four teams you've quoted has won against another quoted thus far.
Teams not expected to win tend not to, otherwise no-one would be a bookkeeper. I can't really believe I have to lecture a Brazilian about what happens in football.
Anyway, Ghana tonight, same story really as with Cote d'Ivoire and, to a lesser extent, Angola (who I thought were on for a hiding after ten minutes and after thirty looked like a solid, difficult to break down, unit with a chance of sneaking a draw from a long-ranger; ) the story goes - cracking game, in possession for the majority of the time/hard to dispossess, smooth passing, exciting going forward, no end product. Smashing game, again, but I just wish they'd make good on their promises.
Oh, Czechs looked very useful indeed, and Rosicky like another genius signing by Wenger. |
|
|