|
|
the england top order fail and flintoff and pietersen steady the ship... a dangerous ploy; worked this time again, but...
absolutely agree, ws, england's 'world's best' team isn't as deep as australia's. that said, their team on the day/s beat ours and won the ashes, so depth is important but you need height too!
clarke is dropped for the third test against the windies but he'll be back hitting tons in short order, i suspect. his state team is on fire but he'll get in there anyway and have to perform - fantastic, i rekkun! with tait, hussey, hodge and watson all emerging as enduring, mature, decisive cricketers of the future, with the guidance of some senior players and other fringe players with some years on (i'm talking to you, magilla!) i think the australian cricket future is secure for a while and will take a bit of beating.
but england look most likely, with their own emerging crop. bell and freddie and pietersen will be around a while yet and win a few matches between them...
really interesting article, btw, thanks the link!
australia, of course, is very multicultural and, while an anglo, my cohort at school was yugoslav, persian, lebanese, lithuanian, brasilian, vietnamese, turkish, italian and maybe half anglo... i think i gained much from the exposure to the cultural passion from many varied homelands and traditions and am grateful for that youth. and i recall from then a variance of allegiance across the generations over football (in 1974 australia qualified for its first ever world cup soccer) my soccer mates all of course wanted autsralia to beat everybody but their families had stronger faiths. i don't recall any of them being chastised or even teased by their families for going for the aussies, now i think about it. isn't that nice?
what predictions for the two third tests almost upon us? i think the hosts will win both, comfortably. though pakistan will get more of a fight. |
|
|