Tell me about it...
I got the impression Lewis got picked because he had a reputation as being a solid 'death' bowler. Unlucky. I've no idea why Lee only bowled 8 overs and Lewis bowled 10 though. I guess even Kallis went for over 11 an over, so it seems there might have been more help for the bowlers off tarmac.
It might have been the greatest batting one-dayer, but for a start i reckon the England vs. Australia tie in the final of the last Natwest series, pre-Ashes, was probably a better all-round game. I mean, tying off the last ball? A more up and down game, whereas AUS-SA was just a (admittedly huge)run-chase. Depends whether you class great games as being boundary-fests or horrific pressure-cookers.
Not too sure on this quote from Steve Waugh
"Teams are starting to stack their sides with batsmen now, and I can see that becoming more frequent and games just becoming 'batathons'," he explained. "The crowds would love it and television would as well. Bowlers are going to be like accessories in the game.
Bollocks to crowds, and bollocks to TV, frankly. If you'd rather see bowlers getting flayed on flat pitches then you're missing out on what's great about cricket, and thats a fair fight between bat and ball, and I'm surprised to hear Waugh saying what he did. Though if a bowling attacks looking as ropey as Australia's is at the minute i could understand it.
Still, kinda looking forward to the England-India ODIs, though i wish we had Simon Jones back, Patel, that new India bowler that got 7 in the last test was reversing it all over the place, and i think we're missing variety. Though i reckon Panesar's looking pretty tasty, and that might be it for Giles. |