|
|
The mirror scene at the Fortress can be read several ways. Bear with me, most of them are sort of the same point from a different angle, but what the emphasis is could change.
One: Kal is the proper personality, Clark is a construct -- a fiction suit he constructed when he moved away from Smallville; moving is a way of changing self sometimes. An opportunity.
Two: as much as Clark tries to hide himself behind mild-manneredness, he's still essentially one person, and the values that he holds dear and espouses are the same regardless of whether or not he has a cape on. Basically: sure, he comes off as timid most of the time, but look at his response to Luthor in the end of #5, the genuine anger at the wasted potential. The mirror scene emphasizes that the mannerisms are the illusion, not the person; Clark = Kal.
Three: well, obviously for all his playacting at Clark, Kal is super-powerful and the slouched posture and the fake fat to make him appear as Clark doesn't change the powers and strength inherent in his body.
Four: given the context of the issue and his feelings for Lois, essentially Clark and Superman are the same person and both in love with Lois for the same reasons and any split between them is utterly superficial. If you think about it, this series has rendered Kal immune to most types of kryptonite - possibly that includes Red K, one of the more famous effects being that it once in comics and once in the movies split him into Evil Clark and Good Kal. Black kryptonite has no splitting effect, it doesn't relate to its Smallville incarnation, it just releases the anger, despair, atrophied anxieties and death-fear inside Kal. He's as mortal as anyone else, merely long-lived. It reminded me of a scene late in the Justice League Unlimited cartoon where Kal's in the middle of fighting Darkseid and thanking him for the opportunity to stop holding back, because he lives in a world of cardboard.
Basically, all of that is two readings: either Clark is an illusion and Kal is actually Superman, or there's no esssential difference between the two of them and they're more integrated than, say, Batman and Bruce Wayne.
I have absolutely no idea if that made any sense. |
|
|