|
|
you suggested that saying you were once like someone would be a good way to get them to listen.
i said it wouldnt convince many people and told you why i felt that way.
Well, yes, but maybe you used some inflammatory language? Maybe a little sarcasm? Maybe when YOU see a dirty, smelly, crazed-look-in-the-eyes desert hermit giving warnings (the image I presented in a spirit of fun) you think he's being patronizing and insulting and liken him to an evangelical preacher. I wouldn't; I'd give him a lot more credit, but hell, that's just the way I am with the homeless insane. Maybe I'm crazy too.
Certainly I'm as guilty of using inflammatory language and sarcasm to start a more-often-than-not messy argument/discussion as anyone else, which means we've got something in common, so let's be friends.
i fail to see how that is completely missing the point.
See? My own use of inflammatory language.
I noted that some people will refuse any advice, even from someone who has "been there", so to speak, and will have to learn things the hard way. I didn't specifically say "they won't listen because they feel they are being patronized" but, y'know, I thought it was implicit. You basically restated this idea with some fun words thrown in and accused me of failing to realize this.
And re: evidence, just look at this thread. I would say that the idea of "Smart People Didn't Vote For Bush, Only Fools Did" (suggesting the linear progression you spoke of) is already present. Like a fat man in a small phone booth. |
|
|