BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Moderation requests & discussion thereof

 
  

Page: 1 ... 6768697071(72)7374757677... 95

 
 
Spatula Clarke
11:59 / 07.07.07
Oh, and can somebody nkill my earlier request to delete my original post? It's pretty much pointless now.

Distributed moderation. Works so well.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
12:36 / 07.07.07
Me the offending comments

d'mandem How do you feel the comments transgress? Are there any in particular you would draw our attention to?

Calm down dear, it's only a web-board. 'The offending comments' as in 'those comments over there' to which Haus was referring. Now, can I interest you in some car insurance?
 
 
sleazenation
11:59 / 08.07.07
Can a mod take care of the extra OF in the title of this thread.

Cheers
 
 
Char Aina
15:15 / 11.07.07
'The offending comments' as in 'those comments over there' to which Haus was referring.

Oh, I got that.
As Haus was asking to have posts excised, I figured he felt that they transgressed. From your post I got the impression you agreed. I was hoping the pair of you(or even either of you) would explain why.
If you don't think it's necessary to remove them and don't really feel they transgress, then I don't imagine you'd have much to say as to why, and I suppose it's down to Haus.
Many of the words in question were mine, and I am curious what Imay have been doing that warranted deletion.

But calmness? Calm as calm can be, I am. Just curious.
 
 
Char Aina
15:34 / 11.07.07
Yeah, there is: the fact that it seems to be constant, and also seems to have been all that you've done since returning after your break from the board.

Well, I promise I'm not taking the piss.
Occasionally I may suspect I know the motives or intent of a poster, but it is often hard to be sure. I dislike when my own motives and intent are assumed, and so I endeavour to ask first.
Would you rather I assumed I knew?



I don't know if you're doing it because you honestly don't understand the contents of people's posts (seems highly unlikely, because you're not unintelligent)

Well, thanks for the vote of confidence at least. I do often think I know, but no, I don't always know for sure. Rather than go with a hunch or a best guess, I'm inlcined to ask first.

if it's because you think that your questioning is making others reflect upon their own behaviour (it isn't, it's just causing them to question your motives)

I would hope conversation does that generally, but it isn't my primary motive most days. I'll take your advice, though. What is it about my approach that you think is just causing them to question [my] motives?

or if you're getting a kick out of it.

I'll admit to being lost as to what kick there is to be had in the above conversation. I'm asking because I want an answer, not because I want a reaction or a buzz. Maybe you are projecting? I can't imagine what you felt accusing me of being three years old was going to do, beyond provoke an unfavourable reaction.



But right now, your stock on the board is dropping in value at an alarming rate as a direct result of this.

I know we're losing members at an alarming rate (hey, I was one), but is it really so depserate that your opinion is a solid indicator of board stock? Or is there more to it?


I was quite happy to see you back here, tbh, but if this is a new posting strategy to go along with the new name, the time away might not have been all that productive.

There is no strategy, nor is seeking to be sure new for me on this site. Clarification has long been a standard tool in my barbelith kit(everywhere, really, but it often seems important to be sure here), even becoming the subject of a friendly joke by that great mate of mine a few months ago, Flyboy.

I struggled then to see what was wrong with asking someone about their posts, and I still have trouble seeing why asking you about yours is so unacceptable and aggravating.
Perhaps you could help me understand?

I got into some trouble here before when I wasn't sure and went ahead and said what I thought, and now I seem to be losing board stock as aresult of increasing certainty before opining.
Colour me confused, like.

Maybe I'm just not barbelith people? Or maybe the difficulty I occasionally have here isn't entirely about me? I honestly don't know.
 
 
Char Aina
15:47 / 11.07.07
Apologies for the multi-post where one would have done had I my full faculties... but;
all that you've done since returning after your break from the board

That's just not true. Please, look a little harder. I started the stone-like thread about Lethal Bizzle for one.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:57 / 11.07.07
Well, my reasoning was they are offtopic and they drag the discussion off course. Beautiful though all words are, some are better placed in other gardens - a point that Mathlete finally got by moving what it turned out was a request for a discussion rather than an answer about his behaviour and the reactions it engendered to his banning thread. As it was, the discussion took a turn which I felt was not conducive to an atmosphere in which the original aim of the thread - for new starters to ask questions about Barbelith in a friendly environment (I distrust the term "low-snark").

Those words will not be destroyed, however. Generally when a post is deleted the content should be sent to the writer, except in cases of egregious trollery.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
15:59 / 11.07.07
I'll admit to being lost as to what kick there is to be had in the above conversation. I'm asking because I want an answer, not because I want a reaction or a buzz. Maybe you are projecting? I can't imagine what you felt accusing me of being three years old was going to do, beyond provoke an unfavourable reaction.

It was meant to be a reference to the "why" stuff. Like when kids realise that they're creating annoyance by responding to any given answer with that simple, one word question, and so continue to do it to raise hackles, for the attention.

I just don't see you not understanding or needing clarification all the time. I don't see how that's possible. It feels like needling. It seems now that it isn't, that you do actually feel the need to have everything made as explicit as possible, but yeah - the fact that it happens so much makes it look like you're taking the mick.

I've seen it called 'bearding' elsewhere, when done for a mutual laff. Person A makes a statement. Person B asks a question about that statement totally straight-faced, the answer to which they already know and is very obvious. Person A answers the question, missing the obviousness. Person B posts BEARD. Everybody falls about. It *is* funny in practice, when it's good-hearted. That's when it's bearding.

I'm still not completely sure that I'm not walking straight into an attempted bearding by trying to explain this.

I know we're losing members at an alarming rate(hey, I was one), but is it really so depserate that your opinion is a solid indicator of board stock?

Thinking more of how there's not anybody rushing to your defence on this one, or otherwise taking me to task for it. Generally, if Barbelith people don't agree, they say so. It's not like people are usually shy to post if they think somebody's getting a rough deal.
 
 
The Falcon
17:48 / 11.07.07
Well, I don't agree, Randy. I believe d'mandem (if you must, but I really don't understand the fixation on erasing previous personae when you are, as you say, acting and posting pretty much identically) is utterly sincere and will take on board the rationales he has asked for. He is not, I will stake my (perhaps rapidly plummeting?) reputation, donning the role of teh trixter because he is an earnest lad.

Given we're not all privy to the London pub conversations and pm's that generally at this point, and I say this with a minimum of rancour - honestly, decide board policy/outlook and that posters have different entry levels to the conversations that go on, (naturally in any case but also) therefore, it seems a little unfair that these should be expected to go unquestioned, that a request for some explanation of them should be regarded as, what, a contemptuous act?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
19:19 / 11.07.07
It's the frequency though. And I've got to say, quite honestly, that as somebody who isn't privy to any off-board conversations that may or may not take place, I don't think I'm having any trouble understanding which posts Flowers was refering to above, why Haus and grant feel that certain of them don't belong where they are, why Mathlete's... contribution to the Basic Questions thread was clearly attention-seeking, etc. The answers to these things are already quite explicit.

As I say, I'm coming around to the idea that he really does feel that this, to me, 1+1=2 clarification is necessary. But if what's needed is a reason as to why his recent posts have generated a certain amount of wariness, that'd be it. From my perspective, at least.

Still feel I'm being bearded. I forget the term for when you claim to have spotted a beard, but have been mistaken.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:29 / 11.07.07
Without rancour and of course without any evidence, Falke. The idea that there is a cabal of Londoners guiding the board with a secret hand may be comforting, but to be honest nobody is steering it at all.

Alternatively, there is such a cabal, and I'm not in it, which is also possible, if a bit depressing personally.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
21:49 / 11.07.07
Do you honestly think this place would be such a mess if a clique of Londoners were in charge?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
22:18 / 11.07.07
I guess it would depend which Londoners... if it was me we'd be fucked, put it that way.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
04:47 / 12.07.07
If there was a clique we'd be getting rid of trolls a lot quicker than we do.
 
 
Shiny: Well Over Thirty
06:30 / 12.07.07
Could FTV mods consider putting a spoiler warning in the abstract for the Dexter thread? I've just finished watching the whole series and wanted to post some comments, but I'm a bit uncomfortable bumping the thread at the moment as the show's just started showing on legit UK TV, and it's ripe with spoilage for the end of the season. Most of the spoily posts are already labelled but belt and braces seems more sensible to me.
 
 
The Falcon
21:45 / 12.07.07
I've just put in a totally parochial request for the British smoking ban to be changed to 'English' and then read the last page which is all about Scotland. It's a niggle, the percevied interchangeability of Britain and England as terms, but feel free to ignore it. I'm a bit under the weather.

On the clique/cabal/inner circle/seekrit order stuff; I don't really know why it'd be comforting me really, someone to blame I suppose, when things go wrong - but I don't think I'm suggesting anything outlandish or sinister. I also don't know what evidence over and above the fact there are a lot of posters live in london, they are chums, they are nearly all moderators would be sufficient or within my powers to gain. I suspect drawing from my own experiences talking with Barbeliths irl that occasionally the topic of the board which drew you together may come up and you may consider ways to improve it, which really you are better positioned to do having generally invested more time, effort and vision in making it what it is (still very good for my money, though I have phases where I think otherwise). It's hard to gauge power, of course, and the - whatever - the Flyboy/Haus bloc for all it's cachet may not have greater power than the power of intransigence, or lazy thinking but it does exert a quite considerable, and largely benign (for all the times I disagreed with Flyboy about banning someone, I'd just like to say: sorry. You were right, and they only made me look a cock for defending them) influence, I think.

Perhaps not a topic for here, howevs.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
21:47 / 12.07.07
I've agreed your request, but did Wales get the ban at the same time? Now I come to think of it I don't know.
 
 
The Falcon
22:23 / 12.07.07
Neither do I, but Richey James and SFA aside, I generally think little of Wales. I imagine it probably did, because its devolution is a lesser version of NI or Scotland's.

Anyway, I shan't be hurt if mod 3 disagrees, was seized by a fit of pissiness.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:01 / 13.07.07
It's hard to gauge power, of course, and the - whatever - the Flyboy/Haus bloc for all it's cachet may not have greater power than the power of intransigence, or lazy thinking but it does exert a quite considerable, and largely benign influence, I think.

I just think statements like the one above undermine so much of the work that everyone who isn't Flyboy or Haus has put into the board.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:10 / 13.07.07
I've put in a request to correct the typo above, from:


I just think statements like the one above undermine so much of the work that everyone who isn't Flyboy or Haus has put into the board.


To


I just think statements like the one above undermine so much of the work that everyone who isn't anyone has put into the board.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:18 / 13.07.07
Sorry, it's just been driving me moronic for years. We encourage critical analysis but apparently that doesn't stretch to people's perception of barbelith so everyone has this disproportionate response to you and Fly. What about Randy, Zippy, Talks to strangers? (None of them live in London incidentally) They're as important to this place as either of you. It just aint hott.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:24 / 13.07.07
Oddly enough, I am currently having quite an involved discussion by PM with somebody who is keen to discuss by PM, with me alone, something which involved over a dozen people at various points, and which I don't therefore really have much power to affect beyond my own borders..
 
 
Tryphena Absent
11:06 / 13.07.07
The absurdity of the situation works well for no one.
 
 
Char Aina
18:33 / 16.07.07
I'm still not completely sure that I'm not walking straight into an attempted bearding by trying to explain this.

I was not familiar with the 'bearding' game until now, so no, you are safe from the feared ridicule.

[+] [-] for randy

Apologies to anyone else reading that who thought it might be more exciting than it was.
 
 
Char Aina
18:44 / 16.07.07
how does one remove italicisation from within spoiler boxes like the one above?
 
 
Spatula Clarke
16:31 / 17.07.07
If the worried aren't prepared to speak up, then the hell with them. Sorry, but I'm losing patience with the board and the lack of effort that people are prepared to put in, and if that is the case here, then it's just another example of the same problem that I simply don't have any time for atm. I have to make presumptions based on the evidence before me.

But... look. I really don't have the energy for this, either, and would rather that we didn't drag it out into something that it doesn't need to become. I don't want to get into an extended argument with you over it and I've explained, I think, why I read your posts as I did. I kind of like you as a poster, actually, but your time away and return *straight into* this stuff made me wonder if it was the result of a reviewing of your position within the community. If it was simply a matter of unfortunate timing, I apologise.

Meanwhile, Mathlete's spudding of P&H threads continues unabated. Last time this happened we had the paranoidwriter situation. I think my eyeballs might implode if we have to go through a re-run of that.
 
 
Char Aina
12:42 / 19.07.07
your time away and return *straight into* this stuff

Except I went *straight* into it after doing other stuff. So not straight. Perhaps you don't read the rest of the board as much as policy?
 
 
Ron Stoppable
14:26 / 20.07.07
Quick mod question: as a guideline, how trivial does a mod request have to be to be a pain in the neck for mods?

In the last week or so, I've submitted requests to clean up an it's / its apostrophe catastrophe and a typo misspelling of a boardmember's name.

I know the simple answer is; "well if you preview your posts more rigorously, it won't be an issue" but for reference; do you guys tackle these with an eyeroll and harrumph or are these eyestabby (to me, at least) mistakes fair game for moderation?

Thanks!
 
 
Ron Stoppable
14:43 / 20.07.07
sorry - I should point out that that's not a passive-agressive demand for my mod requests to be actioned NOW DAMMIT! - just don't want to be a timewaster...
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:03 / 20.07.07
The thing to remember is that the more trivial they are (typos, apostrophes etc...) the less hassle they are. It's a couple of clicks for shit like that, so I really wouldn't worry.
 
 
Ron Stoppable
15:13 / 20.07.07
cool - cheers, Stoatie
 
 
Whisky Priestess
15:31 / 20.07.07
Editing changes are fine for me - as long as you point out where they are so we can check. (1st sentence, etc.).

I've moved to add (SBR) to Kali's new topic that heads the Convo, but it's either still in the queue or was disagreed - if there's a reason not to do it, can someone tell me why? Cos it sure as hell is bang on-topic for SBR.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:54 / 20.07.07
I disagreed it, because SBR is at best a quasi-official denotation, and since Kali did not make her thread SBR-searchable when she began it, it seemed best to me to ask her if she did before changing the content. Was going to suggest this by PM, but you anticipated me.
 
 
HCE
17:49 / 20.07.07
Just to check -- Kali wanted the SBR tag, which I see is there now? That hasn't become something that can be imposed?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
01:06 / 21.07.07
That's a bit weird... I agreed it, Haus disagreed it... I always thought a disagree was the winner.

I THINK Haus may have disagreed it before I saw it, in which case it may have been proposed AGAIN, but...

I have no idea.
 
  

Page: 1 ... 6768697071(72)7374757677... 95

 
  
Add Your Reply