BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Hip-pop 2: Misogyny, politics, the 'underground' and the bling bling

 
  

Page: 12345(6)789

 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
13:48 / 17.08.05
Robert...Anton...Wilson...

Nope, never heard of him. Does he write for the Guardian?
 
 
Seth
03:09 / 18.08.05
No. He's just the occult equivalent of This is Spinal Tap.
 
 
Bruno
20:21 / 29.08.05
(Bruno says:

Apologies for the late reply but I am not using the computer that often.

I now disagree with the following statements from my old posts.:

(1) 14:42 / 03.06.05 [the Wu Tang]They have fallen off, their last decent release was the japanese ghost dog OST.
-I changed my position on 01:14 / 16.06.05 when I said (referring to their releases in the past 5 years) Wu almost always have at least one or two good tracks per album, but most of their output is watered down.

(2) 13:33 / 14.06.05 I hate the way hip-hop has become like fashion; it used to be everyone was trying hard to create a new style, now it seems like most producers and MCs are trying to catch up with some imaginary in-thing.
-After Flyboy's 14:11 / 14.06.05 post (incidentally, it would be helpful if you could nail down the period when everyone was trying hard to create a new style and fashion didn't play a part (let's leave aside the "why is fashion bad?" argument for now). Rough ballpark of five to ten years will do.) I changed my position to Thought about it and what I had said is not true. Say 90-95 when you have the craziest rawest shit coming out, there is still Hammer and Kriss Kross and Rump shaker and all of this commercial [so-called R&B] crap at the same time. It was always there. on 01:14 / 16.06.05.

(3) 01:14 / 16.06.05 The golden age is objectively historical.
-This was meant to be half-serious.
I still think that, in US hip-hop, there has been a decline in the quality of certain things like a. the originality and inspiration in the flows, b. the consciousness of the lyrics, c. the inventiveness and 'time-travel' quality of the beats, etc, since approximately 95, although there have been a few good releases every year since then that have reached my ears. In this post I tried to explain some of the factors that I think influenced this change.

(4) 01:14 / 16.06.05 from here on called SFP (Sex For Profit) out of respect for rhythm and blues singers
-I took this back on 00:21 / 12.08.05 because [toxic & Flyboy] You are right that the Sex For Profit is not a fitting term and it has generated too much confusion; I used it on the spur of the moment because it seemed fitting at the time. It was a mistake to label it this way. I still do not like so-called R&B and almost all so-called R&B I have heard sounds to me very much like a corporate and commodified form of music very much inferiot to the R&B of the 60s and 70s. I am open to recomendations to so-called R&B songs which people think are good.

Now up to here, these beliefs can be backed up by a "consensus" of many fans and critics, toksik. Illmatic, these claims can be "reinforced by any critical community/group of music consumers".

OK. Now on to more problematic things I have said:
(5) 15:13 / 18.06.05 I said Now I have to admit I agree with Chuck D to a large extent! From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.
-"I agree with Chuck D" was a reference to Flyboy's post 17:10 / 15.08.02 see the commonplace dismissal of a pop artist’s music via the accusation that they are only liked by “little girls”. This kind of snobbery, so insidious that even Chuck D basically said it, is "if girls like it, it sucks".
First of all, Flyboy, please find me a reference to the Chuck D quote, because I dont think it is fair to misrepresent him.
Secondly, saying "I agree with Chuck D" was deliberately provocative for no good reason. It was wrong and the only way I can explain it is by a subconscious anger towards women at the moment of writing.
But I still stand by the statement From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music. To remind you all, I also said
(a) I don’t think the absence of females from hip-hop (especially scratching and producing) is due to any reason other than that of socialization; how women are not encouraged to do these things, they are not allowed to experience music in the same way.
(b)And I condemn very strongly the misogyny in hip-hop lyrics, both underground and non. There is a lot of ignorance still being perpetuated in that department!
(c) And the whole post on 15:34 / 30.07.05 http://www.barbelith.com/topic/8216/from/105#post474701
(d) Let me yet again make clear that I did not say "women have shit taste in music" as both Illmatic and Flyboy have used in quotation marks, but that I said "From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music."
And I expanded upon this on 23:21 / 20.06.05: I have known women who do not fall into the shitty music category. I am confident that there are social circles where most if not all of the girls have a profoud feeling for good music. In London I have been to dub parties where there were lots of women dancing and enjoying what I also consider to be very good music.

My point was: that women are not encouraged to appreciate certain aspects of music. Subsequently, fewer of them like [what I consider] good music, and this is very evident in certain genres, especially 'black' genres, where their role is 99% of the time only the singer, and not a musician or behind the mixing boards. This applies especially to more militant or battle-oriented forms of music. Now you can agree or disagree but I do not think this falls into the category of misogyny.


And because I have been labeled a misogynist several times I will make certain things clearer. I have been a misogynist at times in my life, also a misanthrope too. All this is, is projecting a self-hate onto other people. I wonder if there is anyone who has not gone through similar feelings? In my opinion there is nothing intrinsic to women to make them 'worse' than men or than me, and nothing intrinsic to women to make them deserving of hate.
At the time I was writing all of these posts I have been quoting right now, I was very sick and had little contact with women. I was quite angry with the way some girls stopped contact with me because they couldnt deal with sickness, death etc. But now I am much better! I am a DJ and I have been playing out this summer and socializing. I also hang out with some women and some of them have good taste in music too. I even had a girlfriend again after 4 years. :-) (Goodness Gracious Meme, My sister by the way has good taste too, although of course I do not agree with everything. I am getting along with her well now. Isn't that nice.)


Right now I have to go. Next time I post, I will re-read the thread from page (3) onward (beginning 01:55 / 16.06.05) and will
1. retract any more statements I no longer agree with,
and 2. reply to any criticisms which I have not done so until now. If I have failed to reply to any posts before 16.06.05, please let me know - all it takes is a simple copy paste.

Peace.)
 
 
Haus of Mystery
20:29 / 29.08.05
I have known women who do not fall into the shitty music category

Hmm. Some of my best friends are black/gay.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
21:51 / 29.08.05
Right now I have to go. Next time I post, I will re-read the thread from page (3) onward ....and will...
1. retract any more statements I no longer agree with,
2. reply to any criticisms which I have not done so until now.


Dude, you are so in my Outlook reminders. I just can't wait / (can't wait)...another minute!!

After, we'll recommend some books and stuff. It'll be like Oprah.

Only not black.

Or a woman.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
21:54 / 29.08.05
And where, I have to know, do you DJ?

I gots to hear me that blend, baby. Wee doggie! DJ Redneck on the Wheels o' Steel!! Is there line dancin'?
 
 
illmatic
07:39 / 30.08.05
I did not say "women have shit taste in music" as both Illmatic and Flyboy have used in quotation marks, but that I said "From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.

Well, I think that's kind of splitting hairs. really. Hedging a offensive remark with a few qualifiers doesn't make it less offensive. But I appreciate the retraction anyway.

I think you actually ought to start investing in some music for your honey personally, for the next time you get her back to your crib. She'll probably want something like some Marvin Gaye, perhaps some Luther Vandross and a little Anita will probably set the party off right. You might also want to consider some Ready for the World, some New Edition, perhaps some Minnie Ripperton.

Let us know how you get on.
 
 
tickspeak
22:11 / 30.08.05
So wait, how does that part in the Tweet song where Fabolous raps about coming on your face fit in?
 
 
Jackie Susann
00:20 / 31.08.05
Colour us rebutted, then.
 
 
Char Aina
06:38 / 13.04.06
So wait, how does that part in the Tweet song where Fabolous raps about coming on your face fit in?

tickspeak;
reading threads with hir eyes closed since august '05!
 
 
Jack Denfeld
10:01 / 23.04.06
"So wait, how does that part in the Tweet song where Fabolous raps about coming on your face fit in?"

tickspeak;
reading threads with hir eyes closed since august '05!


Because Fablous kept coming on his face since august '05?
I kid, I kid.
 
 
Harrison Ford, in a battle suit, wheels for feet, knives and guns
21:19 / 23.04.06
I did not say "women have shit taste in music" as both Illmatic and Flyboy have used in quotation marks, but that I said "From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.

Are you a 45 year old man that still lives/sleeps with his mum in the middle of the sea by any chance? Are you a huge fan of Robot Wars?

It's just that in my 'limited' experince of giant pricks, most of them seem to make retarded use of their fingers/mouths.
 
 
Bruno
22:21 / 25.06.06
I thought that this thread needs some kind of closure since it was formative for the bruno persona and it still effects relations with other posters.

A lot of what I wrote was needlessly aggressive (especially "Haus your posts are stupid" was very uncalled for, I apologize for that). It was written at a time when I was going a bit mad and not particularly good at communicating. I discounted a lot of very strong arguments by a lot of posters.

The range of topics covered are very very big. Too much to discuss all at once, all are interesting topics and I would contribute to other threads on them.
I just want to address some of the issues about feminism, music and the exploitation of women, and to defend myself against charges of being a misogynist.

First of all the alleged Chuck D quote, where did he say it?
I mean the man made a song with Janet Jackson of all people. (if the link doesnt work go here and scroll down to "New Agenda".)

I never said "women have shitty taste in music" as has been attributed to me. What I was trying to get across is that from my real life experience, there is a very disproportionate amount of men as compared to women who are a) musicians/performers/producers, or b) hardcore fans, people who really know their shit within their genres. And I think this is much more strongly pronounced within some genres than others, indeed in some it might be non-existent.
Its my impression that this tendency exists generally, just as the tendency for example for more men than women to study engineering or to play football. This is just my impression of course and I cant prove it.
And I should add that in my opinion most music circulating right now is very shitty, so in my opinion most people, whether men or women, listen to shitty music and claim they like it.

However what I can point to with more objectivity is the disproportionate amount of performers who are men within certain genres. If you look at the jazz greats, or rock guitarists and drummers, the funk and reggae musicians, the dub & hip-hop producers, all these people who really innovated the music. Most of them are men. Why?

My argument was simply that this is a part of the socialization process by which gender is defined. There is some social mechanism going in during formative years which encourages boys/men and discourages girls/women from dedicating themselves to playing music. It's even more prominent for more militant and rough music, and generally in black genres of music. The exceptions I can think of are singing, the piano, the harp and the violin.

As for how a singer should treat hir sexuality, I can't tell people what to do. I definitely don't have a problem with nudity in itself. I dont like it when sex is used for marketting purposes, I think music should be judged as music. I also consider it quite inhuman when a singer uses hir sexuality aggressively to demean or disrespect others, or when sexuality is used as a tool for material gains. And it makes me pretty angry when songwriters write fake love songs just to sell records. And generally a lot of the 'expression of sexuality' I see, both within music and outside it, does not strike me as particularly authentic.

I find it highly problematic that for a woman to become a succesful singer, one of the main criteria is to conform to a fairly specific way of presenting herself, and most so-called "R&B" female singers look like models.

As for the question "who is the pimp?" Well, the entire culture industry, from the CEOs to the DJs and VJs to the producers to the A&Rs and the marketting people, the distributors, the exploitation involved comes from a huge range of people. And it is not really the conscious agency of one or another person which is to blame, but an institutionalized ideology which is not questioned by its agents. It's a way of thinking that has been internalized by many people (including of course many artists and listeners) and replicates itself in a vicious circle because the masses buy what is being sold, while the companies produce what will sell.

My impression still stands that so-called "R&B" as a genre is formulaic and unimaginative; also most hip-hop of the last 5 years; if someone has songs to recommend please do so, I will listen to them.

Also I'm willing to respond to any question about previous posts on this thread, including questions that have already been asked.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:10 / 25.06.06
I never said "women have shitty taste in music" as has been attributed to me. What I was trying to get across is that from my real life experience, there is a very disproportionate amount of men as compared to women who are a) musicians/performers/producers, or b) hardcore fans, people who really know their shit within their genres

Yeah. Well, what you actually said was:

From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.
 
 
Bruno
00:03 / 26.06.06
Your point being?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:18 / 26.06.06
My point being that that's an awful lot closer to "women have shitty taste in music" than what you now say that you meant to say, and I don't think you can really get round that - that is, you are trying to disclaim your statement, but by saying "I never said that, I said this, and it's your fault as readers for not understanding this". That's poor practice, and I think you'd probably do better to accept that you expressed an opinion that you have subsequently abandoned, rather than claiming that you never expressed it in the first place.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
00:46 / 26.06.06
To be honest, Bruno, I think we'd sort of learnt our lessons from this and moved on- you don't need to drag up old threads to clear your name. You'd do better to talk about something new. If the board worked otherwise, I'd still be "Legba who thinks only people north of watford gap should be allowed to listen to Joy Division" and all that.
 
 
Bruno
01:04 / 26.06.06
Haus, I don't think it is "an awful lot closer" to "women have shit taste in music" like you say. But lets not get stuck on details shall we, we're not lawyers, 'how do you define an awful lot' etc etc. I accept that it was not phrased well and the fault was in my writing as well as in some readers. I think as a statement it's true for certain types of music for sure, but I was wrong to generalize about all music.

Legba if a fresh dialogue can be formed than why not.
For me clearing this name is important anyway.

-bruno
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:31 / 26.06.06
If it's that important, Bruno, it might be worth exploring some strategies around it. For example, by explaining how on Earth:

From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.

is more like

There is a very disproportionate amount of men as compared to women who are a) musicians/performers/producers, or b) hardcore fans, people who really know their shit within their genres

Than it is like

Women have shitty taste in music

Answer? It isn't. "Tim likes mostly shitty music" is not the same as "Tim is not a musician, a performer, a producer or a hardcore fan".

I'd go further and say that the subsequent assumption, that the only protection against liking shit music is to be a "hardcore fan" and to "really know the shit within the genre" is a beard-stroking fanboy cliché, and may well be exactly why many women might avoid talking to "hardcore fans" about music.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:55 / 26.06.06
Haus, don't you know that just thinking of dissing Bruno is worse than disobeying Oracle (out of Birds Of Prey)?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
08:17 / 26.06.06
More generally, we seem actually to have come full circle in this thread, to the extent that one can plug much of this continuation into the first post. Thus:


I find it highly problematic that for a woman to become a succesful singer, one of the main criteria is to conform to a fairly specific way of presenting herself, and most so-called "R&B" female singers look like models.


Meets:

Women are allowed to have a wide variety of body types and still be sexy. It's the only area of pop where you can be fat, or really short, or kinda weird looking. It's the only area of pop where men are allowed to be overweight and not be ridiculed, and women are allowed to be sexually aggressive and assertive without necessarily doing it for the sake of sales, or being coy. Women are allowed to own their sexuality.

Can you imagine the kind of open scorn that the white music press would pour on a white female rock singer of Missy’s build, let alone one who dared sing about their need to find a man with enough staying power to sacrifice their sexual appetite? (Remember the things that were said about pre-skinny Courtney Love, come to think of it?) It’s interesting to think of some comparable female artists in indie today, or the bands that contain them – The Gossip, Bis, Le Tigre – and then to consider how little coverage these people get and how marginalized they are within the wider culture. Now compare and contrast with the relative standing of Missy Elliott in the hip-hop/r&b/pop world. Ta da.

***

As for the question "who is the pimp?" Well, the entire culture industry, from the CEOs to the DJs and VJs to the producers to the A&Rs and the marketting people, the distributors, the exploitation involved comes from a huge range of people.

Meets

Of course, the idea that women have a strong voice in pop music, r&b and rap music, and are almost entirely silenced within indie/alternative rock, is one that the (mostly white, male and middle class) indie rock press cannot allow to be considered, as realatively self-evident as it might be. So various doctrinal camouflages are invented, some of them more openly patriarchal than others. One favourite technique is for the critic to assume that he can speak for the female artist, usually in a way that devalues her: she’s stupid; she’s ‘fake’; she’s being manipulated (by men) and doesn’t realise it; her sexuality and creativity are not her own… Often these assumptions are presented without comment, as self-evident. “How do you know she’s not making her own decisions about how she presents herself?” “Well just look at what she’s WEARING!” I’d say this falls pretty squarely into the category of “misogynist feminism”, or more accurately misogyny wearing the doctrinal disguise of feminism.

***

My argument was simply that this is a part of the socialization process by which gender is defined. There is some social mechanism going in during formative years which encourages boys/men and discourages girls/women from dedicating themselves to playing music. It's even more prominent for more militant and rough music, and generally in black genres of music.

Meets

The beardy backpack scene is much more of a boy’s own/only club these days than ‘hip-pop’ – look for example at the way that it’s widely disparaged to have women (or “r&b bitches” as celebrated underground rapper Edan calls them) sing on your records if you’re ‘underground’. Or look at the way ‘underground’ rappers often berate ‘mainstream’ ones for allegedly using their looks to sell records (to women or, worse, gay men – the underground is * definitely * no less homophobic than hip-pop, arguably more so) – cf the then-widely-acclaimed and ‘underground’ Canibus on pop idol LL Cool J – “mad at me cos I kick that shit real niggas feel, while 99% of your fans wear high-heels”. And we're back to my earlier point.

***


After six pages, we seem to be pretty much back where we started, with the trad antipositions of real/fake, underground/overground, wombling/free.

On the plus side, there seems to be some messages of hope written in the stars for hip-hop. Back in 2004, the lament came:

cee-lo has had some really good stuff but no one cares


Unfortunately, I'm not sure whether "Crazy" is a real love song or a fake love song written to sell records. I'm not actually even sure how one would tell the two apart. Certainly, though, more people care about Cee-Lo Green.
 
 
Bruno
09:42 / 26.06.06
Haus I think the way you're using those quotations is out of context.

But I see the point about the 'hardcore fan' you are making, you are very right.
What I meant to get across is the difference between appreciating and loving music (which I foolishly equated with being a hardcore fan) rather than just consuming it without much sensitivity or respect for it. And I think the latter is much more common among both sexes.

Flyboy, I don't get your joke.

Haus I will answer the other post later.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:52 / 26.06.06
What I meant to get across is the difference between appreciating and loving music (which I foolishly equated with being a hardcore fan) rather than just consuming it without much sensitivity or respect for it. And I think the latter is much more common among both sexes.

What has led you to the conclusion that the latter is more common?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:18 / 26.06.06
What I meant to get across is the difference between appreciating and loving music (which I foolishly equated with being a hardcore fan) rather than just consuming it without much sensitivity or respect for it.

This is the part I don't get, though. I mean, I don't really like Randy Newman, for example. However, I know that other people do, and I don't immediately assume that they do because they are just consuming music without sensitivity or respect. In fact, I have no real idea how one shows sensitivity or respect for the music of Randy Newman. Now, as it happens, Randy Newman is an award-winning songwriter and, crucially, broadsheets tell me that he is good. As such I might be more inclined to assume that people who _do_ like Randy Newman just have different but equal tastes, whereas people who like ... oh, I don't know... Ashley Simpson are just uncritical consumers. However, the way to be respectful and sensitive to an Ashley Simpson song may simply not be one that I can immediately recognise, possibly involving rumpshaking.

As for quoting out of context - could you explain how the context makes:

From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.

more like

There is a very disproportionate amount of men as compared to women who are a) musicians/performers/producers, or b) hardcore fans, people who really know their shit within their genres

Than it is like

Women have shitty taste in music

I'm looking at the context, and I just don't see it. I really think you should own your words here, dude. I think what you're now saying that you said was that women mostly like shit music, as do men, and furthermore that they like it in a shit way - that they are insufficiently sensitive and respectful to it. The implication, I think, being that you can only be sensitive and respectful to good music, so that if you are properly sensitive and respectful, you only like good music.

Unfortunately, the fact remains that you singled out women, and that you continue to make generalisations about women, such as:

From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music.
How many DJs I know who play some SFP in their hip-hop sets ‘to get the girls dancing’. And believe me it is difficult to get girls dancing without playing commercial music. How many guys I know who go to the shitty clubs because there aren’t enough women at the underground events! Women are socialized into this, they are not made to feel at home in many forms of music in any role except that of the groupie. Especially in hip-hop!


Now, we could talk about why women are mis- and underrepresented in popular music in general and hip-hop in particular, but to do so we might want a) a new thread and b) to have talked with women in and about popular music in general and hip-hop in particular.
 
 
Jackie Susann
22:02 / 26.06.06
However, the way to be respectful and sensitive to an Ashley Simpson song may simply not be one that I can immediately recognise

It wouldn't hurt to spell her name right - it's Ashlee. Also, I think she's a legitimately interesting lyricist (and am willing to argue the case if anyone cares/it doesn't derail this thread).
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:06 / 27.06.06
mea culpa. My point, however, stands - the way to be "respectful and sensitive" about Ashlee Simpson's music may be rather different from the way one would be respectufl and sensitive to a song by Talib Kweli. Honestly, and hopefully obviously, I think this "respectful/sensitive" and "unconsidered/consumerist" dichotomy is basically silly. People listen to Ashlee Simpson not because they have not thought hard enough about Talib Kweli, but because they like listening to Ashlee Simpson. They may express that by lyrical analysis, or rumpshaking, or both.
 
 
Jackie Susann
02:20 / 27.06.06
Surely people listen to Ashlee rather than Talib because Talib is one of the worst rappers on the planet?

(I know I am being totally unhelpful now.)
 
 
Char Aina
08:12 / 27.06.06
it's more a case of , well, wrong.
talib has more skill than many.
take for example this dude.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:21 / 27.06.06
In recent years Talib Kweli's strengths have faded and his ear-hurting ticks have become exaggerated - check out his guest verse on the new Coup album for an example. I've said this already but, much like some of Common's recent misdemeanours, his current problems sound like they owe a lot to being too influenced by spoken word and forgetting that a rapper is supposed to make rhymes flow.
 
 
Bruno
09:33 / 27.06.06
Haus for the time being I am going to postpone answering the big post of yours which copypastes flyboy's first post.

You have suggested making another thread, it's up to you.

Firstly, the context.
From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music. was preceded by a large paragraph giving props to female MCs I like, (including What What aka Jean Grae who BTW is one of the most original MCs I have heard in the last 10 years.) It was followed a day later by this clarification: From my (obviously limited) experience of women, women tend to like mostly shitty music. And by obviously limited I mean as obviously limited as about anyone here, we know max a few hundred women each? and there are a few billion (or so I have heard). (That is, I was aware I cannot generalize and say [all] "women like shitty music") I have known women who do not fall into the shitty music category. I am confident that there are social circles where most if not all of the girls have a profoud feeling for good music. In London I have been to dub parties where there were lots of women dancing and enjoying what I also consider to be very good music. (so I acknowledged clearly that I both know and have observed women who do not have shitty taste in music, and therefore it's pretty clear that I don't believe [all] "women have shitty taste in music".)My point was: that women are not encouraged to appreciate certain aspects of music. Subsequently, fewer of them like [what I consider] good music, and this is very evident in certain genres, especially 'black' genres, where their role is 99% of the time only the singer, and not a musician or behind the mixing boards. This applies especially to more militant or battle-oriented forms of music. Now you can agree or disagree but I do not think this falls into the category of misogyny.

I will agree that it was phrased quite badly.

Let's leave it at that, because anyway right now I am unsatisfied with both positions, thanks in part to your criticism of the implications of 'hardcore fan' (which I acknowledge) and second to something else I have been thinking about.

It is problematic for me to draw a divide between 'those who love and appreciate music' and 'those who consume it without respect or sensitivity' (i.e. what I previously called 'shitty taste').
The reality is much more dynamic.
Thinking introspectively, at times I have also consumed music without respect or sensitivity.
An example: I like to dance. Sometimes when I danced, I was kind of pushing myself into dancing without 'really wanting to', without 'really feeling it', but for various reasons I did. Other times I danced and it was very special, even life-changing. I could say that the latter was a celebration of life and of unity with other dancers. But the former wasn't, it was alienated, and in fact a few times even made me feel physically ill afterwards.
I can apply this same rough model to simply listening to music. Music has uplifted me, given me energy, given me epiphanies, relaxed me, made the hairs on my back and arms all stand up, it has made me cry or laugh, brought a big smile to my face. Sometimes though it has been like a numbing opiate, joyless and escapist, tapping my foot mechanically.
This same applies to the actual creation of music, some musicians express vitality, honest expressions of the human condition, others are formulaic, unimaginative, inhuman and mechanical. And I also know this from practical experience when playing an instrument, because I have felt both states.
And I have played with other musicians and 'felt' them, sometimes the room is full of energy, you can physically feel it. Sometimes they are unimaginative posers and hence boring musicians and the atmosphere is dull.

So "The implication, I think, being that you can only be sensitive and respectful to good music, so that if you are properly sensitive and respectful, you only like good music" is pretty accurate. Personally I can only dance or listen in that 'special way' if the music is also that 'special'.
As to what constitutes that 'special' 'good music' I can only hint, not point, it seems beyond words for me right now. I think it has a lot to do with energy, but thats not a very useful word at the end of the day. It is up to a point subjective, but not totally.
And I think it is tied intrinsically to social conditions, including the effects of ideology on the artist, listener and music industry.

"I think this "respectful/sensitive" and "unconsidered/consumerist" dichotomy is basically silly"
I think the dichotomy exists and I can base this on my own experience. More accurately, it is a continuum, and the dichotomy just makes it easier to discuss about.
You are also correct that it is possible that I simply 'just don't get' HOW to respect or be sensitive to a certain song or genre (your example with Randy Newman). Constant self-critique is important, listening to new sounds, changing. But some songs are objectively terrible I will stand by that, and I apologize if anyone is offended because they enjoy artists who I consider objectively terrible...

Flyboy: What has led you to the conclusion that the latter is more common?

God told me.

-bruno
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:53 / 27.06.06
Good-o. Incidentally:

My impression still stands that so-called "R&B" as a genre is formulaic and unimaginative; also most hip-hop of the last 5 years; if someone has songs to recommend please do so, I will listen to them.

Dude, do you browse this forum with your eyes closed (except your THIRD EYE, natch), or something? There are threads in which people enthuase about recent hip-hop and r&b all the time. Off the top of my "dome-piece":

What you know about that?
What you know about that?
What you know about that?
I know all about that...
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:04 / 27.06.06
But some songs are objectively terrible I will stand by that, and I apologize if anyone is offended because they enjoy artists who I consider objectively terrible...

Not whom you consider objectively terrible, Bruno. Who are obejctively terrible. Otherwise you're just expressing a subjective opinion about what you think is objectively terrible. However, I don't think we have any objective criteria for what makes a song terrible - you have established some subjective criteria, which were analysed some pages ago by Fred. You have now said:

And I also know this from practical experience when playing an instrument, because I have felt both states.
And I have played with other musicians and 'felt' them, sometimes the room is full of energy, you can physically feel it. Sometimes they are unimaginative posers and hence boring musicians and the atmosphere is dull.


So, your criterion is a "feeling", as perceived by you, based on whether or not you like the people playing the music. This is another subjective judgement. Objective judgements require substantiable and measurable qualia, which is what we're lacking at this point.
 
 
Bruno
10:29 / 27.06.06
Haus your point is understood,
I realize my arguments are too close to mystification for comfort, and while I writing I really felt I was against the limits of language (dancing about architecture etc).

Maybe we should agree to disagree,
because this is not the place for discussing epistemology and the nature of knowledge anyway.

Maybe the most fruitful line to follow would be the points made by flyboy's first post and some of the stuff I have said about both the music industry and sexuality.
Later though.

Flyboy I'm d/ling some Kelis songs.
 
 
illmatic
10:45 / 27.06.06
I can only hint, not point, it seems beyond words for me right now

Possibly meaning you can no longer construct a consistent argument?

I think it is tied intrinsically to social conditions, including the effects of ideology on the artist, listener and music industry

… and here we go again, Bruno attempts to shoehorn Marxism and false fucking consciousness into every category of analysis.

I think the problem here isn’t that Bruno has been moved by music, that’s something he shares with most of us. The problem lies in the fact that Bruno has also been moved by Marxism, and can’t let go of this attachment.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
10:51 / 27.06.06
An attachment to Marxism need not an impediment to an appreciation of pop music! Paging Jackie Susann (who may or may not have an attachment to Marxism but can probably knock this one of the park better than I could)!
 
  

Page: 12345(6)789

 
  
Add Your Reply