BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A transforming beam of magical rainbow energy!

 
  

Page: (1)2345

 
 
Tom Coates
22:49 / 05.08.09
Okay, so look - I know I've not been around so much for a long time, and I'm probably not going to be around again for a little while either, but I feel a bit like I'm coming to the end of one particular arc in my life, and will be at some point looking for a new arc to start over with. In between those arcs, I might have some space.

So here's the thing. If I have space in between, I might be able to spend a few weeks doing nothing but get Barbelith fixed and cleaned up. It'll probably not be for about a year, so don't get excited or anything, but I thought I should mention it.

That's option one - I come in here and fix the place so that people can come through the door and we recapture the glories of our youth. Option two is more interesting. Option two is that we go back to first principles - what are we about, what would we like to exist, what should barbelith be for in the NEXT decade of its life (you know Barbelith has been around in one form or another now for ten years, right?)

What could we do with it? Return it to Grant? Replace the Bomb with a high powered Morrison Fan Wikipedia and put that front and centre? Turn the place into a world-wide counter-cultural social network? Transform ourselves into the Long Now Foundation? Find a mission and a project in the real-world and use this place to organize it?

If you had access to this domain name, and the large—if slightly disconnected and maybe slightly disintegrating—community of people who have been here over the years, what would you want to do with it?

I mean, I'm going to be doing a project after Yahoo, and there's a small chance this project could be it. After all the BBC TV Programme Pages work I did, and the secret social media project at Yahoo that didn't get anywhere, and Fire Eagle, maybe it's Barbelith for 2010?
 
 
Evil Scientist
12:01 / 06.08.09
Find a mission and a project in the real-world and use this place to organize it?

I find myself really liking this idea. Barbelith has/had a lot of smart people from lots of different walks of life and I think that the results of us all coming together to work on something has the potential to be pretty amazing.

It all depends on what we want to get out of it of course but I am personally drawn to the idea of...well...helping people. Does that sound a bit trite? I mean, yes, I could just do volunteer work or something.

I dunno, real-world Global Frequency without the guns and body-horror?

Getting us, as a collective force, involved in actually trying to do something about those things in the world that most of us on-site seem to agree as being "not on".
 
 
luminocity
13:51 / 06.08.09
In a year it will be too late (if it isn't already).
 
 
Dead Megatron
14:32 / 06.08.09
Turn the place into a world-wide counter-cultural social network?

You know, that was the reason I orginally came here for. To get in touch with people in the, in the lack of a better term, "forefront"

(That, and the words "Chaos Magik" in the Temple...)
 
 
Evil Scientist
14:32 / 06.08.09
In a year it will be too late (if it isn't already).

?
 
 
netbanshee
00:11 / 07.08.09
I'm game. Glad to see you pop by, Tom.

Like Evil Scientist mentioned, we have a good group of folks here. Re-imagined, we might bring in some great new people and possibly reclaim some old ones as well.

I think that this is actually good timing for this sort of thing. We could come up with something worthwhile in a year's time. We've also, fairly indirectly, passed over the need to recreate a lot of functionality that's hosted by many excellent services over the years. Glad to see we've side-stepped this tendency. We can harness what is there in an interesting way. The net has matured to a point (along with many involved) to see what has passed and how it can be mashed up.

I'm not going to speak to the philosophy of the site (at least at this time) but here are a few things worth mentioning, feature-wise:

Feed integration - drawing in information around the nets that we can scour in one place. A site where we can encounter things automatically, mull over and respond to intelligently. Google reader / digg for the interesting.

Ranking / Sorting / etc. - allowing threads to distinguish themselves in ways that allows for more contribution. Boards often rely on fora, timeliness and replies to make them rise to the top. Would be good to keep "old" threads more actively engaged. Furthermore, ideas can be promoted to an article status where conversation can lead to a succinct item that can be shared with the net... an authoritative element springing from conversation.

Connecting Users - being able to tie our other accounts into this platform. Most everyone has groups, profiles, twitter accounts, etc. Would be nice to opt into something that offers some further background on users, enhances our presence, etc. This can be furthered upon with new capabilities on this site.

I'm pretty curious what thoughts Tom, personally, has in mind. Beyond that, what would be the type of resources behind the enhancement? Would this require technical ability from the group? I know that the originators (Tom, Cal, etc.) are well regarded outside of here in this day and age.
 
 
Tsuga
00:35 / 07.08.09
netbanshee, it sounds like you're describing something like digg (which you mentioned) or reddit.

don't get excited or anything
At this point, I don't know that there's much excitement to be had. After your last few feeble (if well-intentioned) attempts at tweaking the board, much of the wind has gone out of any remaining sails. There are few souls left here, adrift on flotsam in the Sargasso Sea. To extend the metaphor, I and some others keep floating around, but many have let go and started swimming. At least you've got some email addresses, and a small percentage of those will still be viable.

All I want is a functional version of this place, and maybe it can get a little traffic again. But, I'm old and unambitious at this point.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
10:47 / 07.08.09
I suspect that the deafening stampede of enthusiasm in this thread speaks for itself...
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
12:08 / 07.08.09
If you had access to this domain name, and the large—if slightly disconnected and maybe slightly disintegrating—community of people who have been here over the years, what would you want to do with it?

Shut it down. Maybe archive it. Build something new that is not called Barbelith and is not tied to the whole late 90s Invisibles thing, but which builds on all of the things that made this place really great back in the day. Look back at what used to make it work, what used to make it lively, and on all of the positive things about Barbelith, and make something totally new that accommodates that, but isn't tied into the Invisibles comic and stands on its own feet as it should.

I don't think this board is ever going to function as the vibrant nexus point for all sorts of different interesting stuff that it was for a time, just because The Invisibles is no longer a zeitgiesty driver of traffic in the way that it used to be back then. You may get a handful of people returning for a bit, and you may get a few comics fans who have just read the Invisibles trades and come across the site. But I think the circumstances that came together to make Barbelith what it was, were very much of a particular moment in time.

Which is not to say that there isn't scope for such a thing like that to erupt into existence today – of course there is, and I would sign-up and contribute right away. But I'd hazard a guess that you would be best off creating a new project - and one that your heart is in – rather than trying to revive the fortunes of this place.

Option two is that we go back to first principles - what are we about, what would we like to exist, what should barbelith be for in the NEXT decade of its life

That's sort of what I'm getting at, but freed from the connotations of the word Barbelith. Go back to first principles and work upwards from there – adapting the initial impulse that was behind Barbelith, and all the things that made it what it was during its heyday – to the 21st century and the current web environment.

That's basically what we did with Liminal Nation. Looked at all of the things that were good about the culture of the Temple forum (intelligent discussion of magic, spirituality and religion), and all of the things that were bad about it (drive-by lunatics). Then created a new space in which we could cultivate the former and exclude the latter, building on the positive aspects of Barbelith Temple forum but transplanted to a board that provided the functionality we required, as well as fresh branding and design so it can stand on its own two feet as something new. It's great. Most of the Temple regulars have migrated over there now, and its got a steady influx of new applicants from all over the place.

What I miss about Barbelith though is the collision of good writing that would take place across the switchboard, headshop and temple, and the cross-fertilisation of interesting perspectives that came together here. I also miss getting to read the perspectives of all of those interesting contributors on telly, film, comics and books. I miss the huge social aspect of Barbelith as well. I'd be surprised if you could make that energy and activity happen on Barbelith again, just by sorting out the functionality. If the place was suddenly fixed and functional again, I doubt it would be enough to lure me back unless there was loads of good writing up on here again and it felt like an informed, fascinating, switched-on, exciting environment – rather than the shell of one, like it has done for years now.

However, if I heard that Mr Coates was going to create a new social media project, building on the original spirit of Barbelith, but drawing on all of his experience to make something truly groundbreaking and exciting... I'd be there like a shot. I suspect other lapsed contributors might be as well. This place, at its most vibrant, was a fucking amazing thing to have conjured into being, and I would love to see you do something like that again. Not necessarily here though.

Ultimately I think the success or failure of you taking on an interim project like that – either a revamping of Barbelith or a new project based on its first principles – would depend on whether your heart is in it, and whether you are genuinely excited about it and getting something out of it. If that element isn't there, I'd say you're probably best off doing something different, as an interim project like that ought to be something personal that excites you, rather than a chore that you are doing for the benefit of the six people who still post here.
 
 
Tom Coates
15:39 / 07.08.09
Fair enough.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:44 / 07.08.09
Interesting question, Tom . Will respond ASAP. Incidentally, isn't the thread title a description of the Care Bear Stare?
 
 
grant
16:07 / 07.08.09
I like the first principles idea too, even if it's still tied with the Barbelith brand in some way - in days of yore, this place went through a few functionality revamps as well as redesigns, so that (new beginnings) seems like part of what it was, paradoxically enough.

Good writing across different subjects = YES.

I sometimes wonder if the board has a recognition level that's separate from the comics... if there are more people who know the domain first and are kind of dimly aware that there was a comic book involved with the name. Dunno.
 
 
grant
17:33 / 07.08.09
I'm also curious about what this would mean:

Turn the place into a world-wide counter-cultural social network?

Something Twine-y? Reddit-ish?
 
 
iconoplast
19:19 / 07.08.09
I would like to see some of the promise of this:
http://www.barbelith.com/faq/index.php/TriPolitica

I think a lot of Barbelith's functionality decisions (no signatures, no avatars, no quote button) should be preserved - they really seemed to help to serve as constant reminders that this place was about discourse.

I have to say that I've found myself really missing Barbelith lately - there are a lot of specialty fora for things I'm interested in, or blogs about them, or whatever - but there doesn't seem to be a place to find out what people who like the things I like also like. You know? A last.fm for everything that isn't music - "Hey, if you like early christian heresies and comic books about pop music, users like you also liked..."
 
 
Spaniel
21:04 / 07.08.09
What Gypsy Lantern said.

Shut this place down, and if those old impulses are still smoldering put the heat into something new. I'd come back.
 
 
This Sunday
00:14 / 08.08.09
Turn the place into a world-wide counter-cultural social network?

I can see ways this would be useful, ways this would be amusing, and a few that manage both.

Of course, a GrantyGrantWeLurvzGrantMorrison go has its pluses.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
00:14 / 08.08.09
OK. Bit more time. I think one reason why a number of people here are repeating the requests to close the place down that previously appeared in the "petition to close down Barbelith" thread is that what's being proposed here is not immediately appealing. Essentially, in a year or so you might have time to fix some stuff. At this stage I'm not sure what that would involve, although like others I suppose I have a list (opening admissions, but opening admissions needs banning to work and moderators to have authority and capability, and there aren't a meaningful number of moderators or trustworthy replacements left, so you'd need to change the moderation system, and so on...). However, given how the departures have accelerated in the last year, another year like this would probably mean that when the place was fixed you would be left with about three people on board. It's possible that others would return to the repaired spaceship, having been sheltering in escape pods, but it's not a certainty, and there would be little continuity (I'd probably say even less continuity) with the values that established the place as a place where the level of discussion was noticeably higher than the usual on the Internet in the first place.

So, that's one thing, on the fixing front - to that timescale, it's probably reasonable to say that almost nobody (or at least, nobody who doesn't need this place) will be left in a year's time.

That's a thing to bear in mind - that when you talk about a large community of people who have been associated with the site, that's exactly accurate. They have been associated, and might in some way be tempted back to the site, but it's by no means a given - and one would have to do it piecemeal, by LiveJournal invites, Facebook updates, Tweets and so on, since nobody signed up for unsolicited emails telling them how Barbelith is/will be back to functionality.

(Also, on a purely technical note, this kind of intermittence in technical support is surely something that we have pretty clearly established doesn't work brilliantly.)
 
 
Tsuga
01:02 / 08.08.09
(Also, on a purely technical note, this kind of intermittence in technical support is surely something that we have pretty clearly established doesn't work brilliantly.)
Absolutely. IF you could at least create the ability to moderate more effectively in your absence, things might at least be able to limp along until you might be able to revamp things. I hope you realize, the largest reason (I believe) that there has been such a precipitous dropoff in activity is that there is little-to-no control over the board. Much as I'd like some egalitarian, naturally-occurring equanimity of the board through discourse— especially when there is low traffic that's impossible, and you really have to have a bit of policing and janitorial faculties.
I came here utterly ignorant of Grant Morrison, the Invisibles, and comics in general. I'm sorry. For whatever reason, I was never introduced into that world, I never really had the pleasure. I only had books. But what I immediately loved to see, was what grant mentioned:
Good writing across different subjects = YES.

If this place continues, I would hope that that is at the core of whatever continues; besides the joking and frivolity of some things (which I love), if serious subject matter is being discussed, everyone really holds each other to a high standard. I think it's fair to allow that everyone's standards are different, but people give their best when they can, and that makes the difference. The format, appearance, or organization may change, but hopefully the expectations from each other can remain the same.

Tom, I'm very happy if you have the ability to devote a bit of energy here between "arcs" (though I'm sorry if it's not really by choice), but I hope that you actually still care enough to not be half-assed about it. I understand that you, like many of us, have a shit-ton (not to be confused with a fuckload) of things going on in your life. I don't know all of the other things that you've created and done, but I can't imagine that they're all that much better than what this place has been, at its best (admittedly, I'm speaking from a position of ignorance of your other work, which undoubtedly has been the focus of much of your personal energies, and I don't mean to insult). I'd love it if you directed energy back here in some way. I don't think I'm alone. I agree with GL (if it's the case):
But I'd hazard a guess that you would be best off creating a new project - and one that your heart is in – rather than trying to revive the fortunes of this place.
...
Ultimately I think the success or failure of you taking on an interim project like that – either a revamping of Barbelith or a new project based on its first principles – would depend on whether your heart is in it, and whether you are genuinely excited about it and getting something out of it. If that element isn't there, I'd say you're probably best off doing something different"


I'd love it if you had a determination to somehow resuscitate this place, but if you don't, really... well, maybe you'd best not? I think Haus is right, that a year would probably be too long.

(I apologize if this post is sloppy at all due to alcohol.)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
01:56 / 08.08.09
Bit more time...

Return it to Grant? Replace the Bomb with a high powered Morrison Fan Wikipedia and put that front and centre?

The first of these I have suggested before - clearly, there is a desire for a Grant Morrison fan forum, because people have at various points got very upset that this is not one. This could be as good a location as any, and it would create a clear break between Barbelith, the community where people maintained a high standard of discussion on many topics (up until, say, late 2007), and Barbelith, a Grant Morrison fan community using the same URL but run by people working for Grant Morrison, or by fans of Grant Morrison. That would resolve many of the problems this tension has created.

But let's talk about this tension, because I think that if you actually want people to be involved with Barbelith, or at least people who are redolent of the golden ages of Barbelith, then some sort of Morrison fan wikipedia is probably not the way to go - unless you actually want to run a Grant Morrison fan forum, in which case go for it. Not that GM isn't a marvellous writer and that the Invisibles wasn't a classic etc, but at this point.. well. You know the people who are still keeping the faith with Bros? That's what happens to fandom plus time.

Which is a problem with Barbelith as a whole. The funny thing about Barbelith is that the golden ages - and everyone has their own idea about what constitutes a golden age, but I think we can all agree that this is not one - didn't have a lot to do with the Invisibles. Many of the people who made for what I would call the good bits - Mordant, Deva, Persephone, Bengali in Platforms, Nightclub Dwight, alas, Flyboy, E Randy Dupre, Gypsy Lantern, Illmatic, Seth, Trouser the Trouserian, Ganesh, Saturn's Nod - weren't fans. They had often read the Invisibles, and enjoyed it, but they weren't by any stretch of the imagination fans. This led to some problems, not least because... well. Let's start from a hypothesis.

Hypothesis: Barbelith was intended to offer a higher standard of discussion and interation on the Internet. One part of that, it was decided, was that it would not be a place for racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-semitic etc language or attitudes. Now, relatively few people looking for a Grant Morrison fan site or an Invisibles-inspired chaos magic board specifically went out of their way to express these things - with a few notable exceptions - but the simple fact is that if your primary aim is to be a fan, avoiding these things is not likely to be such a big deal, except insofar as it damages the experience of the board to a fan. We came across this fairly recently, when some people who wanted this to be a fan community tried to use just a touch of racism to clear out the people who were getting in the way of what they wanted to be happening.

So, if you want to have a fan community, then go for it, and that fan community could be administered by you or the space just given to Grant Morrison or his Internet executors, but it's probably incompatible with any goal either to have a counter-cultural space (whatever one means by that) or having a high standard of discussion, because neither of those things are what fan communities are for.

Also, and by extension, the brand equity of Barbelith is a bit complex. I think the period when it was being identified as actually being the home of a higher standard of discussion - when it was a sort of "best of the web", at least in some areas - was when people were coming to it from all over, often from recommendations from friends or blog posts. However, I don't know if that brand equity persists, and what you tend to get, from my viewing of the applications emails, is people who are looking for a fan community, or a chaos magic discussion board usually based on experiences of chaos magic derived from the Invisibles. Not exclusively, but largely. Which a dedicated fan forum could serve very well, if it existed, but which leads to a pretty narrow membership.

So, a fan community based around Grant Morrison would no doubt be a fine thing and would probably be a thing that a fair few of the smallish number of people left around here would get a lot out of, but, ironically, it wouldn't be something that was anything like Barbelith.

(Which is why we should have changed the name way back, but milk, spilt, crying over, inutility of)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
01:58 / 08.08.09
I sometimes wonder if the board has a recognition level that's separate from the comics... if there are more people who know the domain first and are kind of dimly aware that there was a comic book involved with the name. Dunno.

My anecdotal response would be "not any more", for more on which see above, incidentally.
 
 
HCE
04:04 / 10.08.09
Why reanimate a corpse, that never ends well. If you have the time and inclination, a clean slate could theoretically give anybody who is still interested in talking a chance to do so without the weepy nostalgia for a semi-mythical golden age, without the anxiety of never having been a member of some kind of barbelite, and who knows, maybe also without bitterness or regret at old wounds of various sorts.

One thing it would be great to keep: a nice, uncluttered, text-oriented format that works well on phones and doesn't allow for enormous flashing signatures. Likewise, the 'typo' window, for quick edits. Maybe don't try to impose a mission on it, just seed it with a few questions and see who shows up, and what the group makes of itself. Oh! And an option to publicly or privately ignore others. If you see somebody is widely and publicly ignored, that tells you what the group thinks of questionable comments, without people having to stamp every instance of such commentary with a book-length mark of disapproval. If you just don't get along with somebody due to personal chemistry or whatever, you can choose to privately ignore their posts and fights don't have to escalate. We don't all have to be best friends.
 
 
Quantum
08:09 / 10.08.09
What I miss about Barbelith though is the collision of good writing that would take place across the switchboard, headshop and temple GL

Hear hear, I miss the switchboard, especially when something of note happens in the news. One of the many strengths of this place was that you were more likely to get accurate information than elsewhere when something hit the headlines and then get a coherent discussion of it that made sense.
In the same way, I miss the Headshop's authoritative tone on many issues that challenged my assumptions and opened my eyes to a lot of things I took for granted or had never heard of (esp. as a white middle class hetero male, lots of things I now take to heart were new to me when I came here- male gaze? PC as a weapon of the right? The invisible sexism implicit in our current patriarchal culture? etc etc.) and I like to think it made me a (slightly) better person to be around.

So to echo my compatriots, I would welcome a new site to go to and discuss all those things and join up straight away, and invite many others in a viral marketing stylee, but one thing I *wouldn't* want there is a Temple. LN fulfils that function nicely and despite the great writing that arose as a collision of those fora in times gone by, I've become a believer in segregation.

Make a new site Tom! That would be awesome! I'm all for it!
 
 
Quantum
08:12 / 10.08.09
(Oh, and here's the opening 11 seconds of Rainbow Brite for ref)
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
09:34 / 10.08.09
I miss the switchboard, especially when something of note happens in the news. One of the many strengths of this place was that you were more likely to get accurate information than elsewhere when something hit the headlines and then get a coherent discussion of it that made sense.

Yeah, I miss this. I remember the days whenever there would be a demo in London, and you could go to Barbelith and read insightful first hand accounts from people who had been there. I remember reading Barbelith on September 11, 2001, as my main news source when you couldn't get on any of the proper news websites. I thought the demise of Barbelith was quite telling when the G20 stuff happened in London this year, and it didn't even get a thread here.

one thing I *wouldn't* want there is a Temple. LN fulfils that function nicely and despite the great writing that arose as a collision of those fora in times gone by, I've become a believer in segregation.

I have mixed feelings about that, because one of the things that made the Temple forum interesting was that it existed in the same space as the Switchboard and Headshop. You wouldn't have Liminal Nation if it wasn't for Barbelith Temple. Whilst LN fulfills that function more effectively these days, I'm not sure I would want to see writing about these areas of human experience totally excluded from any new project based on the first principles of Barbelith. The cross-fertilisation of perspectives was one of the things that made Barbelith so diverse and interesting.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:43 / 10.08.09
True - although the idea that it was where you went for the Chaos Majicks also meant that we got a lot of unstable and unpleasant nutters. If we didn't have a functional means of banning people and excluding them permanently or semi-permanently, I wouldn't want to expose a new board to the people who aren't allowed into or are kicked out of Liminal Nation.

So, to recap - I don't see a lot of future for the Barbelith "brand", Tom - unless you want to turn it into a Grant Morrison fan forum, or turn the URL over to someone else to run as same. Either of those would at least provide a home for the people who are currently here who get nothing out of the things the place is actually meant to stand out for.

Also, from a simple image management point of view, Barbelith right now is not a great advert for social software development - it's functionally broken, and almost devoid of worthwhile interaction, or indeed any interaction at all. There's a seven-page thread over in Policy essentially about whether it should be closed down, with a majority generally in favour. Personally, if I were you, I'd roll with that, and start thinking now about how to manage that closure - I would suggest by inviting people to put themselves on a mailing list to be alerted when a new project launches, and trying to ensure that the people who join that project are not just the remainder of Barbelith (because there are almost none of them left), but interesting people with interesting things to say. I have no idea whether this would work at all, but to be honest Barbelith isn't working either, and has been failing progressively for some years.

I would also involve people with experience either of Barbelith or of managing communities at the planning stage, and try to involve them in the development, and then give them power to effect meaningful change to the finished product. Were I starting from scratch, that is.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
11:32 / 10.08.09
True - although the idea that it was where you went for the Chaos Majicks also meant that we got a lot of unstable and unpleasant nutters. If we didn't have a functional means of banning people and excluding them permanently or semi-permanently, I wouldn't want to expose a new board to the people who aren't allowed into or are kicked out of Liminal Nation.

Yeah, I agree with that. But I wouldn't want to exclude the potential of a Temple-type area from any hypothetical new board, just on the basis of LN already being around to serve that sort of purpose. I think any such new space would have to have the same sort of anti-unstable and unpleasant nutter safeguards in place that LN does, and not be open to the accusations that it functions as the mentalist catflap for the rest of the board. The two things don't have to go hand-in-hand, and not having the association of Barbelith/Invisibles/chaos magic inherent in the name of the place would probably earn you less nutters anyway.

What I've found from LN though, is that nutters are easy to manage if you have the right structures in place. With a robust applications policy you can filter out most of them before they even get a login, and with basic editorial guidelines in place for what is and is not considered acceptable content, you can remove contributors when they aren't contributing material to an acceptable standard without any fuss or ghastly 10-page hand-wringing policy threads.

I don't think I would personally want to write for a board now that didn't have that sort of structure and policy in place. LN knows what it wants to be, and what it needs to do to cultivate the sort of writing and discourse that it's aiming for. It's more like a publication looking for contributions of a certain standard, than a free-for-all message board where everyone is entitled to write whatever mad bollocks comes into their head. That format may get you slower traffic to begin with, but it's also a USP for people who actually want quality content and dialogue that's a cut above the rest of the web.

I'd say any new board based on the first principles that made Barbelith worthwhile, might benefit from being built on a (perhaps slightly looser) version of that model. It knows what it is, it knows what sort of contributors it wants, and it knows what it needs to do to create a space where that sort of dialogue can flourish.

I'd love to see a new project happen along the lines of what we seem to be discussing, and I'd be happy to get involved in the planning stages of it. There is a lot about Barbelith in its heyday that I miss.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
00:44 / 11.08.09
I wonder if the sort of experiment Barbelith originally represented hasn't just had it's day now, as raves had by the mid-to-late-Nineties? Everyone seems to be on F***book these days; it's as much of transition as when ... as when the love died in the heart of even the most arden optimist, and Norman Cook starting shifting units.

I don't know what you'd do really, to rekindle the original enthusiasm. Something spectacular ideally, but Tom, if you're not being paid for it, then screw it, you know? The last thing you'd want to be is a virtual Fatboy Slim
 
 
Evil Scientist
08:47 / 11.08.09
I suppose that Arbolith is pretty much what I want from a message board if all I want is "like Barbelith with functionality". Alright it's not a hive of activity either right now but still.

I do like the idea of being involved in some sort of project built from the ashes of Barbelith that has some effect on the real world. So if something like that turns up then count me in. But there doesn't appear to be much enthusiasm for that currently (and it's not like I have any real idea of what form that project could take anyway).
 
 
illmatic
09:02 / 11.08.09
Alex's post above, as always, reminds me of the need for a robust banning policy.

I completely agree with ditching the Barbelith brand but would be enthused by some kind of new project - one that built on the old board's strengths - thoughtful writing of a high standard, across a range of areas.

One point I'd add would be the need for some kind of continuity of technical support and tweaking - you give the impression above, Tom, that this would be something very much "squeezed in" while you're in transition. While I wish you all the best with whatever, changes you are ringing, what happens to a new board, when, inevitable, you become busy again? One of the main reasons everyone left is largely due to the inability of anyone to make any substantive changes to the board. Whatever ends up occurring make sure you have a plan for some sort of delegation in place. I think this is absolutely essential.

It's also probably worth making the point that this is true not just of you, Tom, but most of the original contributors, Most people are a bit older now, and less likely to have the time to contribute due to the demands of careers etc. I don't know how this affects the equation - but it's something worth bearing in mind.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:26 / 11.08.09
Remembering our pledge to say ONLY NICE THINGS - which I think everyone here has agreed to join me in just by staying on the board - let's not forget that Barbelith really was something special for a long time. Not just a place where really interesting discussion were held, or people got together to work on creative projects or activism, but also a great social space. Many of my best friends in the whole world I either met or kept in touch with by Barbelith, and the relationships I have formed here have been some of the happiest and most fulfilling of my life.

Sure, into every life a little lusophone must fall(see note 1), but Barbelith was a great achievement. Maybe something which combined the high level of discussion with the desire to make positive change in the world (see note 2) - maybe with local nodes for getting together and actually doing stuff, a way for people in different activist or interest groups to talk and interact, things of that nature (so, you know, a London pod for people in London to meet up to protest or discuss or have comic book reading groups or whatever), with some integration with other social software systems - so one could decide one's own level of involvement with the core site - would be fun, but even if we can just preserve the equity of the historical brand and keep it in the positive column of Tom's CV, that would be just marvellous.

Note 1: Obviously, I have ONLY NICE THINGS to say about Portuguese. It's a lovely language.
Note 2: Which I think might be why Arboretum hasn't grabbed me - most of the membership were recruited from Barbelith at a point when it had already become essentially derelict, and certainly after its political/activist elements had departed - although there were some great moves to talk about some elements of ethical consumption over there. It's just wonderful, what those guys have put together, though.
 
 
grant
13:46 / 11.08.09
In case Tom isn't aware of what these references to "Arborlith" or "Arboretum" are, I did this thing in a spare few minutes and tweaked (and allowed others to tweak) a few other things as it goes.

Thinking it over, I suppose it's probably significant that one of the first changes people decided on was to change the name.
 
 
iconoplast
22:47 / 11.08.09
A couple of blod face names from the Portland (Oregon) Tech community have recently founded Black Box Republic - which from what I can tell is going to be a glossy, for-pay barbelith with the goal of getting its members into relationships.

WSJ Article about Black Box Republic

I like the voucher system, granular privacy, anonymous gifting, and the emphasis on real relationships - 'friending' and befriending are very different things.

I want Tom to get a million dollars in VC funding and create a utopian community for engagement, relationships, and discussion. Since, apparently, that shit's possible. (The money, if not the utopia).

I wouldn't mind monetization of some kind (e.g., a cut of anonymous gifts given), or even some kind of membership fee - given the kind of people we once attracted, a suggested donation could work fine.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:00 / 11.08.09
It's always fascinating to see what other people think. I hadn't really thought before that Barbelith was meant to be a Craigslist for horny hippies, but now that you've _said_ it...
 
 
Spatula Clarke
23:02 / 11.08.09
Eww no.

Gypsy, Haus and Rex have all hit the nail bang on here. I especially want to second Rex's comment about any new board - and it would need to be a new board, for all the reasons mentioned above, including the basic fact that this place *is* effectively kaput already - coming with either a number of people in place who can perform any and all necessary administrative functions as required, or the ability (and willingness) to pass that admin torch on if and when you found yourself unable to maintain a regular presence, Tom. This absentee landlord thing doesn't work in the slightest, and has created quite a lot of ill feeling that I'm not sure you're aware of.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:16 / 11.08.09
Incidentally - Barbelith time tunnel! - there was a period where one could donate 3 or 5 dollars by Paypal a month. Anecdotally, very few people actually did this, but possibly not from a lack of will - a number of people asked for a way to contribute that didn't require a credit card, since they were not possessed of one. That might be less of an issue, these days, since I think credit card ownership is more common, or one could pay by debit card, possibly.

The question there would probably be what one is charging _for_. Metafilter can charge a one-off fee of $5 (which I suggested in the past as a troll-filter) because it offers for that a large user community with a record of interacting a fair bit and often coming up with fun discussions. Your Portland thing, if it works out, appears to be offering people sex, and possibly sex with multiple anonymous partners. That's a value proposition and a half, and something for which you can charge a monthly fee, because you can look for new hook-ups every month.

Such marvellous and ingenious people we share the world with! Very exciting.
 
  

Page: (1)2345

 
  
Add Your Reply