BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


INTERVENTION (PICS, NSFW depending on your workplace's attitude to fully-clad pictures either of Grant Morrison or of Ron Mael, depending on whether that moderation action goes through)

 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:51 / 08.01.09
On top of which, is this really relevant? There must be more to this thread than the ease with which godstallon can co-opt it, surely?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
22:58 / 08.01.09
I thought it was both obvious AND incredibly annoying, to be honest.
 
 
Liger Null
23:21 / 08.01.09
Gosh, reading through the wiki has given me more reasons to miss this place when it's gone.

DS is a jokesuit. I wasn't sure at first, but something about his posts scream "parody" to me, and (for what it's worth) Alex has stated in another thread that he's actually Flyboy in disguise.

I really don't want this place to shut down. But most of the moderators are gone, and the ones that are left clearly want out. I suppose the best thing to do now would be to take a page from the Temple's book and start a new site, where there is better functionality and the quality of moderation is comparable to Barbelith in better days.

I can't do it by myself, as my own resources and knowledge of code is extremely limited. But should anyone else have a similar idea, I would be willing to help out where I could.
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
23:46 / 08.01.09
I'm gonna sleep on this.
A part of me thinks that this is funny like hell.
A part of me is pissed off and partialy disgusted.
A part of me is going "NyahNyah I knew it!!!"...
But, I'm still new to the message board game and Barbelith is the first I've ever joined...
Good night.






Wait... Let me guess... Flyboy is really Tom Coates. Right? Right? I'm right, aren't I...
 
 
iamus
01:16 / 09.01.09
On the plus side, iamus, you've given me an idea. Maybe GM could buy Barbelith.com from Tom? In these times of heightened etc, a decent offer would I'm sure be considered. Having secured it, he could no doubt find some fans who wold be delighted to build a new site that would give fans of his work the kind of forum they deserve.

Why?
 
 
iamus
01:39 / 09.01.09
You know the bit where we don't post funny pictures in the Policy, because we are trying to at least give the impression that it's where the grown-ups have grown-up talk?

Who is trying to give the impression that it's where the grown-ups are?

Who are the grown-ups and how do they act?

How is it that grown-ups solve issues of board policy?
 
 
Tsuga
02:26 / 09.01.09
I don't intend to be insulting, old chap, but isn't it wildly obvious? Possibly I've been doing this for too long, but really?

On top of which, is this really relevant? There must be more to this thread than the ease with which godstallon can co-opt it, surely?


stallion, whatever it is, is as relevant as iamus' speculative poster, surely.

But I'm sorry, I suppose it wasn't clear from what I said. It is not wildly obvious. Believably possible? Absolutely. I'm not at all alone in being uncertain.
Look. If you know who it is, and that it's a joke, that would color your perception of "obvious".
 
 
ghadis
02:31 / 09.01.09
And, of course, Haus would pull up a Joke suit that he knew about posting in Policy as soon as he would a few lame picture jokes.
 
 
ghadis
02:34 / 09.01.09
I really don't think it is Flyboy.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
05:21 / 09.01.09
Personally, ghadis, I find godstallion's contributions less irksome than big pictures saying "fuck off". I find the amount of anomie directed towards the suit, joke or no (hint: joke) a bit disconcerting, given the behaviour of other users of Barbelith who don't get the same level of ire. Clearly others do too, since they are agreeing with his core beliefs.

Speaking of which: iamus - steady on, old chap. You're turning into Paranoidwriter a bit, or possibly classic Life Critic. What exactly are you asking "why" to? Why would some fans be happy to build a forum? Well, because they're fans, although I suppose one could always get professionals in if no fans were forthcoming. Why is this an idea? Because I... thought of it just then in my head. I really don't know what you're asking about.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
05:50 / 09.01.09
OH, and MMTIC: You're absolutely right. I think those two can be confidently called disgusted. My feelings about the unfairness and inutility of comparing even just those two with someone like Hawksmoor (... from the bleed), though, stand.
 
 
Neon Snake
07:47 / 09.01.09
I don't intend to be insulting, old chap, but isn't it wildly obvious? Possibly I've been doing this for too long, but really?

Honestly, I think it's equally likely that he's simply one of the guys who got here by googling Grant+Invisibles, had a quick look around, discovered that there were also threads on Dr. Who, Battlestar Galactica, and video games, and thought that this would be a nice place to post with people of similar interests.

Having come in all eager, and a little naive, he's made some posts which have been inappropriate (although free of malice), generally bounded around like a happy little puppy...and then been smacked on the snout with a rolled-up newspaper for making comments that seem obviously wrong to everyone except for him, for reasons that seem similarly obscure.

And now people are saying that his personality is so obviously the antithesis of good posting etiquette, that he is clearly a joke.

Maybe he is. It's clearly within the realms of possibility. As Tsuga says, the fact that he falls squarely within the parameters of the sort of people I see on, say, the DC Boards, may well be the whole point of the joke.

But if he's not, then it's a pretty awful thing to be saying about him, his comment and posts notwithstanding.


It's relevant because it's highlighting the problems that people have here.

His posts are inappropriate, yet there is no effective method of applying corrective behaviour. Whatever corrective methods people have so far applied have been ineffective, and yet you don't have the option of saying "Right, enough's enough. We've tried, failed, so off you go elsewhere - you'd be happier on the DC Boards." because the ban function apparently doesn't work either.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:54 / 09.01.09
Just to clarify - the banning function has never worked. There is a banning process, which is in process and may or may not work. I have yet to reply to randy's email.
 
 
Quantum
10:37 / 09.01.09
You know the bit where we don't post funny pictures in the Policy Haus

Isn't that 2003 Barbelith though? Perhaps you've missed my change in attitude whereby I now just post whatever I like for a laugh? It seems to be in keeping with the new barbelith ethos, why don't we just chan it up? As ermintrude and el directo have pointed out in the petition thread, if it's irksome you can always just leave, why pretend the place is what it used to be?
Let's examine your options when faced with offensive trolling;
1. You could move to delete the posts
2. You could put me on ignore, hiding the offensive images.
3. You could start a new board.
4. You could ban me
5. You could attempt to engage with me and persuade me to stop trolling with rational argument

If you can find enough mods to agree 1 or 4 you'd be lucky, 2 tends to disrupt reading pleasure and mashes up threads, 3 is only applicable for particular fora really as the effort involved requires determination and a common cause or interest, a standalone policy board isn't going to attract much traffic. So you're left with 5, attempting to persuade me to post properly with reasonable appeals to my better nature.
That does mean that from my perspective I have all the power here, all I have to do is refuse to change my posting style and you're stuck with the eyebleed. In fact, it's rather like holding court where anyone who doesn't like my posts has to approach me cap in hand and beg for me to stop- aha! Now I see the appeal of trolling, the heady power of forcing people to pay attention to you and ask for things you have the power to give or withhold i.e. putting eyestabbing content on the pages you read.

I'm sure you can see the comparison I'm drawing here with other posters. Of the options available to you when faced with trollish behaviour here in Barbelith 2009, leaving rapidly becomes the most attractive- it's easy to do and instantly rewarding, no more brain pain and no irksome process difficulties.

Now excuse me for teaching you to suck eggs (I'm sure there's an Alex's Grandma joke about trolls to be had there) but this is the slippery slope we've been on for a few years now where the good posters are driven out by the bad. Like the prisoners dilemma where one of the prisoners is a troll, or the tragedy of the commons/car pool lane syndrome, it's an inevitable result that by the aggregate of reasonable individual responses the board ends up expelling the people that make it what it was and retains the people posting rubbish. Individual posters get to the end of their tether and leave, but the infinite supply of trolls just keeps sending reinforcements.

In my humble, most of the posters here are still great, it's only a few troublesome noisemakers that pollute the board- but it only takes one turd in the punchbowl to make it unpalatable if it's impossible to remove.

The Headshop is really the canary in the coal mine for me, it was one of the reasons I joined up but for years now it's just been a diseased appendix (the refrain 'scrub it, boil it, smells like toilet' has stuck with me since you used it) that is not worth posting in. That seems to me to be an indicator of the declining intellectual quality of the discussions to be had, and I am as guilty as anyone of perpetuating the situation- I used to contribute to discussions on the nature of unconscious bias, and the pertinence of epistemology etc. and now I'm posting pics that say 'fuck off', so really I'm an excellent example of the declining standards here. Although I feel I am the same person as five years ago my interaction with the place has certainly changed, and I attribute that to the sea change in the nature of the behaviour of the community rather than my impending mid life crisis.

After a long time attempting to raise the bar and maintain aggressive positivity, I've lost the will to improve or maintain the place like an elastic band that snaps after getting stretched too many times. I still feel a lingering responsibility to the people who still want to use the board so I'm staying on to mod in a sensible manner, but my posting style is no longer that of a concerned and diligent member of a community trying to keep a high standard of debate going, now I'm posting in a convo style as that is more fun.
My decision to post pics here was partly due to my predilection to post pics (I love cat macros) and partly as an escalation response to stallion. I know fighting fire with fire leads to flame wars etc. but after the many, many times I've responded reasonably to trolls (like almost everyone here, attempting to reason with them and raising their game by example etc.) it was just so satisfying to shout textual abuse at one, all the more so because I feel guiltless as it's almost certainly a joke suit so nobody is getting hurt feelings.

Come on Haus, I'm certain that you've shouted swear words at the screen occasionally (maybe right now?) and the urge to flame has gripped you. Can you blame me for succumbing to the sweet taste of responding in kind, replying to shit with shit? Like a social contract- is my responsibility to behave politely to people annulled by their refusal to behave politely to me? Do I have to be nice to people who are nasty?
So to the virtual equivalent, do I have a responsibility to behave appropriately to trolls?

The only reason I can think of is the collateral damage. Since my offence is directed, it's unfair of me to inflict it on innocent bystanders (e.g. you) so maybe I should send some offensive PMs.

Ooh, a thousand words!
 
 
Quantum
10:41 / 09.01.09
Anyway, I've now requested a delete and edit, let's see if there's enough Policy mods to agree it. We may be at the stage where you can't even voluntarily moderate your own posts, never mind other people's.

Dang. I just can't get the hang of this trolling.
 
 
Evil Scientist
11:10 / 09.01.09
Dang. I just can't get the hang of this trolling.

Then call it satire, that seems to work for others.
 
 
iamus
13:08 / 09.01.09
Speaking of which: iamus - steady on, old chap. You're turning into Paranoidwriter a bit, or possibly classic Life Critic.

I'd really rather you didn't try to frame me in such a fashion when all I did was ask a series of simple questions based on things that you have said. You ask people questions based on what they have said all the time. Paranoidwriter and Life Critic really have nothing to do with it, do they?


I'm asking why to your buy-out idea, because my impression is that it was a non-sequiter made specifically to undercut something that happened to me upthread, that for whatever reason, you are uncomfortable with. I want to know why it is that you would choose that way to do it. Why that idea? Why it is you think that it might be a viable alternative? What do you think Grant's opinions on the site are? What is the image in your head of who he is and who his fans are that make that either likely or possible or relevant or even funny in any way?

The other questions are because, well, I am geniunely curious as to why you would construct such a statement in such a way, and what those words you used actually mean to you, because I'm fairly certain they would mean something else to me or anybody else reading. It's a simple sentence, but there's a lot there taken on assumption, and since it's about how board Policy is conceptualised and discussed (which we are in the process of now), I would like clarification on exactly what it means.


To be completely straight-up, the reason I'm asking is that I geniunely don't feel you'd be able to provide me with answers that would be satisfactory either to me or to you, and I would like to be proved wrong.
 
 
Evil Scientist
13:19 / 09.01.09
So pictures of naked guys are cool, right?
 
 
grant
13:19 / 09.01.09
if it is a joke, it's not that funny.

I'm positive that's entirely the point.

Not laughing, drowning.

Anyway, I've now requested a delete and edit,

You might want to try again with the first one you proposed (big honking black one with the swirling clockwork arrow text), because for some reason there wasn't a change in the way the pic was being displayed in the "Proposed Change" pane, so I disagreed it.
 
 
iamus
13:26 / 09.01.09
I think leaving the pictures in, and keeping the relevance of the resultant discussion, would do far more to illustrate the current standards and attitudes to board Policy than taking them out and plastering over the cracks ever could.

The pictures aren't really seperate to what we are discussing just because they are pictures.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:29 / 09.01.09
What funny things go on in those heads of yours. Will respond when at a keyboard, but bloody hell. Funny, funny things.
 
 
iamus
13:32 / 09.01.09
Yeah and don't do that, please.

People are being nothing but courteous. Needing to belittle in such a way is perhaps more telling than you would like.
 
 
iamus
13:34 / 09.01.09
In fact, that may be one of the oddest things I have ever seen you write.
 
 
Evil Scientist
13:42 / 09.01.09
Don't worry, it's satire.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:48 / 09.01.09
You are being nothing like courteous. You have embarked on a lengthy fantasy about my personal inadequacies and how they have been exposed by you having (as I understand it) spoken to someone. And, as you have already stated and demonstrated, you are comfortable with Making these random statements because people can never successfully communicate their meaning and people can never interpret meaning, so you can just sort of make up what you think should be the case. I am remembering past cases of how long it took you to get on board with really simple, factual statements about what had happened half a hand's span further up the page, and feeling rather daunted. When not reliant on my thumb, though, i will try.
 
 
iamus
14:04 / 09.01.09
That's not really what's happening, you know. You're making a straw man of me by saying that's what I'm doing to you. You can't bruise my ego to get me to respond in that way.

This is not personal.

I'll happily wait until you can give my questions some time and thought.
 
 
iamus
14:10 / 09.01.09
For instance, I haven't embarked on any lengthy fantasy. What I did do was ask you a question about that specific thing to try and cut to the core of the issue and reconcile what I think you are doing with what you think you are doing.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:11 / 09.01.09
I cannot imagine what would bruise your ego, old chum. But I would like you to acknowledge the possibility that your own straw man, above, may be not only wrong but offensively wrong. Start on that now and we can see where we are later.
 
 
iamus
14:14 / 09.01.09
I reckon you were maybe in the process of writing that when I posted the above.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:20 / 09.01.09
Half a handspan above. Beginning "my impression". Lengthy fantasy. Already it begins.
 
 
iamus
14:29 / 09.01.09
My impression.

My impression.


Hence asking the questions I did. I am aware that my impressions are not immutable and they will shift with whatever new information comes to me. I asked questions to bring in new information that would help revise that impression into something nearer the truth.

When engaging with a situation, is it even possible to go on anything other than our impressions of it? The important part is how you handle those impressions and allow them to react to the changing situation.

Would you agree?
 
 
Eek! A Freek!
14:44 / 09.01.09
You know the bit where we don't post funny pictures in the Policy, because we are trying to at least give the impression that it's where the grown-ups have grown-up talk?

Sorry, btw: If I had known pics in policy were frowned upon, I had forgotten. I knew I was being flip as I posted and I should have posted elsewhere. Again, I apologize, won't happen again. (In policy)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:50 / 09.01.09
So, I can make up some offensive speculation about how uncomfortable my effortless superiority makes you, and how as a result you are asking empty questions to try to frustrate me into giving up on this conversation, and that would be ok because, no matter how baseless and unevidenced, I had said it was my impression and then asked a load of questions (why does my effortless superiority upset you? Is it the effort bit?)? Come on, dude. You are operating a double standard, here, and it limits my confidence.
 
 
iamus
14:51 / 09.01.09
Who is it that you are apologising to, freektemple?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:07 / 09.01.09
No need to apologise, old bean. Q. has rather rearranged my thinking on this, and nobody else was much bothered.
 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
  
Add Your Reply