|
|
You know gyus, in retrospect I can see that my joke about not provoking haus can be seen as a provocation, specially in view of our past "interactions". For that I apologise, but I assure all that it was just a joke and I did not mean it to be taken seriously, as I'm confident Haus understood. Anyway, sorry.
And yes, Favreau was the only flawless thing on Daredevil by far(not even Bullseye was 100% perfect), and his lines "as your attorney on that matter" were the funiest in a movie that failed deeply in its attempts to be fun. Some say the director's cut was much better, but for me, this is urban legend until proven otherwise.
back on topic, Flyboy said he is afraid the most entertaining part of the filme would be the begining, with "evil tony" being better to watch than "good tony". But Tony Stark is a potential addict no matter waht: he only shifts his addiction on alcohol, sex and the spotlight for a new addiction on the adrenaline of wearing a heavily armed battle armor. RDJr is also an actor capable of such a subtle performance as to convey that without shouting it to your face. me, I'm more afraid that the improvised tincan suit may be more fun to watch than the golden-red one.
And I think, that to have Stark turned into a hostage by afghani rebels, though politically iffy, is the most realistic way to go. Where else, after all, would a weapons supplier for the US Army would be having his business nowadays,right? Though I don't expect the movie to give a deep and fair view if the region and its people, I still hope it will skip the bulging-eye, drooling, shouting fanatic maniac characterization usually reserved for "arab terrorists" in American movies.
Favreau, the ball is in your freaking court. |
|
|