BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Operation Coincidence Driver

 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
 
trouser the trouserian
09:40 / 16.03.06
Horsley follows through with Matrix Sorcerer

How long before he comes up with the "V for Vendetta Warrior Guide to, er, blowing things up"?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:56 / 16.03.06
It’s exactly a year since I wrote Matrix Warrior, and a lot has changed since then. For one thing, I have made contact with the “real world"... What concerns me more, however, is that particular portion of readers who enjoyed the book without feeling any need to take it seriously...

This promises to be a stimulating read. Thanks, trouser.
 
 
Quantum
10:09 / 16.03.06
I must now risk the wrath of such readers by bearing some disturbing news. Matrix Warrior was not intended as a gag. (I hear you laugh all the louder.) Its hucksterism was in itself—a hoax!

M'sieur Horsley, with this guff you are really spoiling us...

Sorry, weatherworkings, Texas, back on track.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
10:16 / 16.03.06
Presenting reason number 135 why our friend Jake should be soundly beaten with a shoe:

A woman, especially a magikal one (by which I mean one whose link to Spirit is clear), cannot ever take shelter under the illusion of meaning or purpose as a man can. This is both why and because women are not “rational” beings. They are physical, and the payback for this, at times oppressive, capacity to be “down-to-earth,” to be real, is that, as already stated, the body does not need a reason to live, only an opportunity.
 
 
illmatic
10:16 / 16.03.06
If we want to rip the piss of of Matrix Warrior Part 2 (and I feel we might have to), shall we do in an alternative thread? I'll start one in a bit. We can always move it to Convo.
 
 
Evil Scientist
10:18 / 16.03.06
Implementing now.
 
 
Sam T.
10:48 / 16.03.06
Weird, because I just read it and thought it was some of the trashiest cod-philosophy I've ever read.

Then again, you should be aware of my dubious tastes by now.

(It is slowly dawning on me that my left brain must have switched off near completely at some point in the last few years, and that, somehow, I didn't notice.

I think I'll just dig a hole somewhere in the ground, bury myself with some calculus book, and do differential equations for the next few months, in a vain attempt to switch it back on. If someone has a better plan, please let me know while I'm shoveling.

Thanks for the eye opener, people.)
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
11:48 / 16.03.06
This may be unrelated, but I was really, really sick yesterday. I'm almost never sick. I wondered if it may have been due to our little working.

Well I'm feeling physically sick just from reading this thread, and I don't think the two phenomena are at all unrelated.

We were all slow movers, Wombat. Kylark picked a target, nobody had time to agree to it, and a few hours later, it was raining ans snowing without anyone doing anything (I think).

This is an interesting aspect of the discussion that seems to have been glossed over amid rampant fnording.* Can we just backtrack a moment and ask whether anybody involved in this project actually did any magic to make it rain? Or are you claiming that you are such great adepts that you can manipulate the weather merely by talking about it on the internet. Did anyone actually do any magic? If so, what did you do? How many people participated? How did it feel?

Because it looks an awful lot like we've had 4 pages of thread and not a single bit of magic actually done. If you are interested in getting tangible empirical results then I suggest you might start by doing some tangible, actual magic. I can't really see much evidence of that having taken place here. Correct me if I'm wrong.

As far as subjects go, I think the human factor is where it's at, as suggested above. Are you all such brilliant Magicians that none of you have any problems in your lives that you could do with a bit of help on? Because if you aren't, then perhaps someone could suggest a working that will bring direct aid to the lives of someone involved in the project - the results of which would be self-evident and directly verifiable. If it is a success, then the whole project could become a really effective, creative platform for mutual aid, where the people who benefit are the people involved, and they benefit in the ways that count in their actual day-to-day lives.

It stops being a half-assed parlour game and becomes a tool for survival in the world. You stop standing on the sidelines pretending to be magical benefactors to an amorphous, homogenous mass of humanity, fighting a battle against an amorphous, homogenous notion of "The Man". And you start doing things that will help actual people in specific ways in their actual daily lives. Magic is about survival in the jungle. We might not have to contend with lions and tigers and bears, oh my! But we all face hardships, challenges and difficulties in our lives. Magic is a tool that can give us an edge on that. Sort it out.

* Fnording: A term used to describe the activity of people on occult internet message boards who have replaced their capacity for critical analysis with a series of soundbytes culled from the works of Robert Anton Wilson and the publishing output of New Falcon. This activity is pernicious as it often manifests as jovial back-slapping, in-joking and procrastination - at the expense of ever actually doing a single fucking thing to help anybody (and I mean anybody that you could actually point to in a room) with the alleged magical abilities to tip the scales of reality that are under debate.
 
 
Sekhmet
12:45 / 16.03.06
I really hate to follow up Gypsy's post with this, but to answer an earlier question...

What`s with all those fields that look like pie charts?

It's to do with one type of irrigation system they use. There's a central hookup for water supply and a long arm with sprinklers that rotates around it on wheels, which comprises the radius of the circle you're seeing. That's the area that gets watered, so that's the area that gets planted.


Okay, that's all. Now go back and read Gypsy's post again, everyone. It's important.
 
 
Unconditional Love
13:48 / 16.03.06
Did mr kipling live in a perpetual monday for a time, because there was a time when that was all he could write. a perpetual monday what a nightmare.

Why not help an ill person instead, go on. Have a cake.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
13:52 / 16.03.06
eh?
 
 
Kylark
14:33 / 16.03.06
This is an interesting aspect of the discussion that seems to have been glossed over amid rampant fnording.* Can we just backtrack a moment and ask whether anybody involved in this project actually did any magic to make it rain? Or are you claiming that you are such great adepts that you can manipulate the weather merely by talking about it on the internet. Did anyone actually do any magic? If so, what did you do? How many people participated? How did it feel?

I helped make it rain in Phoenix the same way I raise my right arm. I think about it and it goes up. It worked because some magically-inclined people were primed to make something happen. Zoemancer suggested a tangible outcome - rain - I suggested a worthy target - Phoenix - and voila. And it worked not because we're a bunch of adepts, but because the energy and intent were there.

It may have been coincidence. But then again, look at the title of the thread.

It's my understanding that all the trappings of magic are just that - trappings. They're tools to help you hone, direct, and refine the power that's already in your head.

I wouldn't dream of calling myself an adept. I'm just starting at magick. I do the LBRP, I meditate, and I do a bit of Tarot divination every day, as well as a LOT of reading. I have the same potential to cause "change in reality in accordance with the will" as any magician on this board. Which is precisely why I haven't done many specific workings yet. I don't really know what I'm doing.

Because it looks an awful lot like we've had 4 pages of thread and not a single bit of magic actually done. If you are interested in getting tangible empirical results then I suggest you might start by doing some tangible, actual magic. I can't really see much evidence of that having taken place here. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Could've been magic, could've been coincidence. Where do you draw the line? Is it magic if you do a ritual? Are certain rituals included, but not others? Maybe the collaborative act of setting a goal, naming a target, and directing intent was ritual enough.


As far as subjects go, I think the human factor is where it's at, as suggested above. Are you all such brilliant Magicians that none of you have any problems in your lives that you could do with a bit of help on? Because if you aren't, then perhaps someone could suggest a working that will bring direct aid to the lives of someone involved in the project - the results of which would be self-evident and directly verifiable. If it is a success, then the whole project could become a really effective, creative platform for mutual aid, where the people who benefit are the people involved, and they benefit in the ways that count in their actual day-to-day lives.

Maybe we should start a "magickal favors" thread.

It stops being a half-assed parlour game and becomes a tool for survival in the world. You stop standing on the sidelines pretending to be magical benefactors to an amorphous, homogenous mass of humanity, fighting a battle against an amorphous, homogenous notion of "The Man". And you start doing things that will help actual people in specific ways in their actual daily lives. Magic is about survival in the jungle. We might not have to contend with lions and tigers and bears, oh my! But we all face hardships, challenges and difficulties in our lives. Magic is a tool that can give us an edge on that. Sort it out.

Um, I think most of us in the Western world have the survival bit down. You may not have noticed, but the world is in dire shape right now. I know, I know, Voltaire said "tend your garden," and Gandhi said "you must be the change you wish to see in others." Getting one's own shit together is an important part of making the world a better place. (And I'm *working* on this. I'm in therapy. I'm going back to school - either fall or spring semester - so that I can get work I'm happier with and that is more in alignment with my values. I'm learning to take better care of myself so I can start to offer help to those around me.)

BUT

There are a lot of motivations for wanting to improve "the world," some good, some bad, some complicated. A bad one: people want to be the hero in a great drama. A complicated one: a lot of people who have comfortable lives have gained that comfort at the expense of the well-being of others (e.g., Enron executives, anybody who buys slave-labor products from WalMart). People like me - and others in this thread maybe - look at that and say, "I don't want to be like them." So instead of thinking of ways to help ourselves, we think of ways to help everybody, even if some of those ways may be misguided. A good one: we see that the world is in dire condition and we want to help.

Going back to the "are you all such brilliant Magicians that none of you have any problems in your lives" comment, the obvious answer for anybody in this forum would be no. Magic can only help with some problems, anyway. For some, you need plain-ol' work (which is a form of magic in itself, maybe).

I'm sorry about the comment about me being sick. Part of it was immature attention-seeking, part of it was genuine curiosity. I did think Trouser the Trouserian's comment was funny, though.
 
 
Kylark
14:34 / 16.03.06
p.s. - my nomination for group working to change the world is (1) to increase everybody's awareness; especially for those with the most power to become aware of how their actions and decisions influence every human being, plant, animal, and ecosystem that contributed to or is being affected by said decisions and actions, and (2) to kindle a spirit of empathy and compassion to go along with that awareness that will in turn (3) guide their actions and decisions. Not an appropriate working for this particular thread, tho', as it is not measurable.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:39 / 16.03.06
So in other words, you actually are claiming that 6 people talking about something on the internet made it happen? I'm sorry, but if I was the hypothetical person who this experiment was supposed to convince of the existence of magic, I would be leaving the room with a slightly bemused smirk on my face right about now.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:52 / 16.03.06
Kylark: Do you honestly think that you are the first magician who has had the idea to try and change the whole world through magic, according the criteria you have just set out?

Loads of people try to do this all the time, and have done so for decades and decades of history, if not centuries. Does it appear to ever, ever, ever, fucking ever work in any noticeable way or to any extent at all? No. It really doesn't seem to do a damned thing but tie up the resources of magicians who might be better placed to use their magic more locally and help individual people sort out their shit - rather than putting their finite and limited energy into totally ineffectual large scale workings to create world peace and fluffy bunnies for everybody. It doesn't work. There are too many variables. You have to break it down. You have to act locally in order to impact on anything. There is no magic wand that will sort it after a bit of ritualising. People have been trying this since the 60s at the very least - and it doesn't work. A 40 year test period is enough time for me to form the reasonable opinion that this sort of magic. Does. Not. Work.


Um, I think most of us in the Western world have the survival bit down. You may not have noticed, but the world is in dire shape right now

Really? Which borough of Utopia are you living in at the moment? That "world in dire shape" is made up of individual lives that are in dire shape. Look after the pennies and the pounds will take care of themselves.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
14:57 / 16.03.06
Sorry for being a bit combative there. I get a bit passionate about this subject, as you might have guessed...
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:14 / 16.03.06
To elaborate further, I've formed the opinion - based on my experiences of doing a lot of results magic over a period of several years - that magic is most effective if it is kept simple, blunt and to the point. The more complex it gets, the less chance you have of making it work.

To give an example: If I was unhappy with the culture of my office and wanted to create a more pleasant and productive working environment - there are two approaches I could take. On the one hand, I could cast a sigil for "happy work place" and hope all the complex variables and individual personalities that cause the office to be problematic somehow sort themselves out.

Or else, I could look closely at all of those factors and try to change the individual predicaments contributing to the larger problem of me being pissed off at work. It might be that one person is frustrated at being passed up for promotion, another isn't getting enough sleep cos they are worrying about their sick child, another is really unhappy about having to work late on tuesdays.

By breaking the situation down into its smaller component parts, we are given specific finite things that we can direct blunt, effective magic towards. Rather than trying to go for a "magic bullet" approach whereby you simple smile and wave your wand and hope it all sorts itself in the wash. Trying to tackle things in such broad strokes is often tricky if all you're talking about is an office of 15-30 people - let alone the entire world...
 
 
zoemancer
15:19 / 16.03.06
Has anybody noticed that we are in the middle of a working RIGHT NOW...TODAY? Please, please can we keep focused on the intent of this thread?

The idea Gypsy is that we each employ our own magical methods, rituals etc focused on the current target which is making it rain in the Texas panhandle to put out those wild fires which are causing alot of damage right now. That is something we can measure.

I know we all want to change the world and I truly believe that mass intention can do it but we have to start out small and build our egregore up bit by bit with small successes and lots of focus.

This thread is a magical tool. It is a magical space in which we each inject a part of our consciousness and intention everytime we post. It could be compared to a makeshift cyber temple at present. From this space we grow our group spirit which is what will be doing the work. The stronger and bigger we can get it the more powerful a working we can handle.

We are all tethered into this thing now so we best better tend the garden well.

Gypsy after this Texas Rain working I move that we make you the next target. Is there anything that you need help with at present that we could make manifest for you in your life?

P.S. -- Texas Rain is the current working please donate some intention today towards this end.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:23 / 16.03.06
Gypsy after this Texas Rain working I move that we make you the next target. Is there anything that you need help with at present that we could make manifest for you in your life?

No thanks.
 
 
Sam T.
15:23 / 16.03.06
Does it appear to ever, ever, ever, fucking ever work in any noticeable way or to any extent at all? No.

How do you know?

Don't you think that the world has some incredible luck most of the time? That we are pretty often on the brink of disaster and that mostly, things turns out ok in the end? (That's a lopsided argument, we are here because everything went well. Duh)

But then. Maybe Hitler was defeated because of Crowley and Dion Fortune. Maybe there wasn't a thermonuclear war because of some Unknown Discordians. Maybe Katrina was a working by Illuminated Adepts to change the public perception of Global Warning, State dependence, GWB, Peak Oil problem. Who knows?

Do you think that if people are working on that, they'll publish it in the Sorcerer's Gazetteer to have it peer reviewed? Do you think that anybody would believe them anyway?: 'Look, I've just saved the world again yesterday, and nobody's even paying me for it'...

What would you do if you were doing this and that it usually worked, for Christ sake?

Oh, and things are suddenly getting better in Texas.

As for what happened to Phoenix, I think everybody is very much conscious that from a scientific point of view, the proof isn't there. At all. You asked if anybody did anything, and Kylark answered ze did. Point.

(Damn Zoe! you stole the 123rd post from me! It's a double with that! Shame on you! )
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:28 / 16.03.06

What would you do if you were doing this and that it usually worked, for Christ sake?

What would I do if I was trying to make a type of magic that patently obviously doesn't work, somehow work?

And I rather think the onus is on you to prove how having a conversation on an internet message board can lead to world peace and shining cosmic orgasms for everyone - not the other way around...
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:30 / 16.03.06
Hitler was not defeated because of Aleister Crowley and Dion Fortune, as much as I love the pair of them.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:32 / 16.03.06
You asked if anybody did anything, and Kylark answered ze did. Point.

Actually, Kylark answered saying that ze didn't actually do anything and it happened anyway just by talking about it on the internet...
 
 
Sam T.
15:34 / 16.03.06
Hitler was not defeated because of Aleister Crowley and Dion Fortune, as much as I love the pair of them.

You can't either prove or disprove it, and that's my point.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:38 / 16.03.06
Oh good grief. No, you can't prove a negative (even an unbelivably stupid negative). You can't prove that Hitler wasn't stopped by a bloody Care Bear Stare either but that doesn't mean we have to seriously entertain the possibility.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
15:41 / 16.03.06
I also can't prove that Santa Claus doesn't exist, that David Icke isn't spot on about the lizards, and that Noddy Holder from Slade isn't the living incarnation of Aiwas. This is a very silly argument you are making.
 
 
trouser the trouserian
15:56 / 16.03.06
You can't either prove or disprove it, and that's my point.

No but yeah but yeah but yeah no but yeah no but yeah - y'know I think Vicky Pollard is running this thread.

I thought the whole point of this experiment was about, er, proof?

The purpose of this thread is to get a group of Barb members and come up with an event vector, something easy and non tactical like making it rain in a certain town on a certain day when there is no rain in the forecast or somethign similar as a proof of concept.

What would help the whole Phoenix weather thing would be if someone could perhaps look into the weather patterns over the time period - i.e. at what point did the forecasters start predicting the rain? If it turns out that the 'sudden' outbreak was totally out of the blue, unexpected and had the weather chaps scratching their heads in bafflement, then I'd say that you do have a good case for treble gin & tonics all round.
 
 
Sam T.
16:02 / 16.03.06
Not any sillier than this:

Does it appear to ever, ever, ever, fucking ever work in any noticeable way or to any extent at all? No.

How do you know that some people didn't do a working? Unprobable? Certainly.

That it never appeared to ever ever fucking work? Hell no! You can't prove that it never fucking worked, since by definition this is intangible, contrary to a Care Bear Stare (whatever that is).

Don't say this is totally out of question. That it never and cannot ever work. It is very unlikely, but you cannot rule it out. Affirming in a peremptory fashion that all The Global Working of the past have failed is as irrelevant as saying that they all worked.

(But I think you can reasonably argue that Santa doesn't exist. Because now, you are the one putting the presents under the tree.)
 
 
Sam T.
16:21 / 16.03.06
At what point did the forecasters start predicting the rain?

7 March: Odds on rain? Slim to none could be winner

8 March: The chance of rain peaks at 50 percent Saturday but is in the 20 to 30 percent range from Friday night through Monday night,

Couldn't find anything else.
 
 
electric monk
16:23 / 16.03.06
...a Care Bear Stare (whatever that is).

Fucking amateur.
 
 
zoemancer
16:25 / 16.03.06
Gypsy -- are you participating in today's working?
 
 
Wombat
16:28 / 16.03.06
Gypsy - Agreed. But it would have been interesting to participate in a group working anyhow.

Since the weather in the panhandle has much improved I`m abandoning effort at this point. ( DEM complete and partial fluid... still several hours of hard work to go before I get anything to play with). The forecast was for hot , windy ( Southerly) weather in the region for 2 days before the working. It`s now not so windy and the fires are being blown back toward burnt zones. The Storm front that generated the cloud cover was there days before this was even mentioned.

I`m claiming a resounding no result. No-one actually did anything. Thread rot rules. Perhaps a new thread in the convo about what magic we should be attempting rather than wasting our time is in order.

The weather should do what I want WHEN I tell it to...and not a moment before
 
 
zoemancer
16:34 / 16.03.06
Wombat -- I dare say that the day has not ended just yet and calling the quit is a bit premature perhaps.
 
 
Wombat
16:43 / 16.03.06
Hmmmm. Your right. I`ll get working. Worst case scenario is I get several bits of software i can re-use in other projects. It`s gonna be impossible to judge results though. What more can we as for?...rain I guess.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
16:48 / 16.03.06
People like me - and others in this thread maybe - look at that and say, "I don't want to be like them." So instead of thinking of ways to help ourselves, we think of ways to help everybody, even if some of those ways may be misguided.

Hmm. I suppose my question, then, would be whether it's more effective, in a way, to cast spells to make Christopher Williams a better person or to work to encourage fair trade, cruelty-free, non-sweatshop labour... of course, these aren't mutually excusive, and since magic is the only way one is likely to be able to affect Christopher Williams, one might want to cantrip the might fantastic.

However, if the aim of this thread was to provide some proof that magic has the power to alter reality, it's not doing a very good job of it. In part because... well, if people did affect reality just by thinkign about it, in what sense is that magic? That's just chaos theory. If "magician" simply means "somebody with the power to alter reality by thinking about it", then it is pretty much impossible to demonstrate that magic has results, because it's happening all the time - every time somebody with the term "magician" around their necks thinks something, there goes reality again...
 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
  
Add Your Reply