BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Sell Out?!!!

 
  

Page: 1(2)34567... 8

 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:34 / 14.09.05
I think the latter involves the single mindedness of generating revenue more, while the former is more about the fun of doing a version of a song that you dig.

But why do you think that? What is it that has led you to believe this? And does this mean that Girls Aloud's version of 'Jump' is more, um, noble or whatever than, for example, their Xenomania-penned material?

There's a thread on Girl Aloud which you might find... interesting.
 
 
ZF!
10:07 / 14.09.05
But why do you think that? What is it that has led you to believe this? And does this mean that Girls Aloud's version of 'Jump' is more, um, noble or whatever than, for example, their Xenomania-penned material?

Noble? That depends, was it their idea to cover "Jump" because they all loved it or if it was their producer/manager/whatever who thought, "Yeah let's market this to some 9 yr olds".

Why do I feel like this? I suppose my reponse will seem cliched and probably similar to many others in this thread.

For me it comes down to believing that the people who created this music that I like, did it because it means something to them, and so can mean something to me.

I don't want to feel like I've been manipulated into creating an emotional attachment to something a board decided and engineered would do just that.

It's more the philosophy that the business leads the music, rather than the other way around, that I find so objectional.

Saying that, I liked the Girls Aloud version of "Jump" mroe than The Pointer Sisters version. :-)

Z

Will take a further look at that thread
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
10:17 / 14.09.05
For me it comes down to believing that the people who created this music that I like, did it because it means something to them, and so can mean something to me.

I think you've misunderstood me - what I was asking was why you believe that one or more people writing a song for a band "involves the single mindedness of generating revenue more" and precludes that song "meaning something" to the people involved. It's just one way of doing things, one structure or system of creative endeavour, and this idea that it is inherently soulless, or inferior to singer/songwriter auteurism, is a relatively recent (and usually inconsistently applied) one.

When Bowie wrote 'All The Young Dudes' for Mott The Hoople, do you assume that meant nothing for any of the people involved? What of the songs written by Leiber & Stoller or Holland, Dozier & Holland for Motown artists?
 
 
ZF!
13:27 / 14.09.05
I think you've misunderstood me - what I was asking was why you believe that one or more people writing a song for a band "involves the single mindedness of generating revenue more" and precludes that song "meaning something" to the people involved.

It's not just writing songs for a band, it's *selling* songs, to *some* band. Sounds more greed inspired no? Why should something written for money mean more to a person than something written just for the hell of it? Well, that all depends on that persons perspective doesn't it? But I would hope that the artists I like and whose music I listen to, hold a similar philosophy and outlook on life that I do. I think my outlook on life or at least attitude has been influenced to some extent by the politics and philosophies in certain songs by certain bands. So yes in my mind something written by a person for money as opposed to something that was not, is superior.

...this idea that it is inherently soulless, or inferior to singer/songwriter auteurism, is a relatively recent (and usually inconsistently applied) one. When Bowie wrote 'All The Young Dudes' for Mott The Hoople, do you assume that meant nothing for any of the people involved? What of the songs written by Leiber & Stoller or Holland, Dozier & Holland for Motown artists?

Sure, a lot of yesteryears bands could be branded as sell-outs today. I don't know if it is fair to judge the past by standards that are held by some today though. I think we live in a much more sophisticated society than the 50's and 60's, and a much more overtly Capitalistic one, where everything is being aggressively marketed at you, I think it's only natural for some people to rebel against this and then consider everything "corporate" as less desirable. Since older bands from the 50's 60's etc don’t have this "corporate" stigma attached to them (well to me at least), then yeah, they may not suffer any "soulless" accusations, while bands in the exact same situations today, will.

Times change, I suppose

Z
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
13:34 / 14.09.05
Gaah.

Since older bands from the 50's 60's etc don’t have this "corporate" stigma attached to them

Eh? Explain this. It sounds like total hokum. The present dominant model in the music business is a return to the svengali business lead model of the 50's and 60's, not a departure from it. The most radical departure from that model being punk and house, which were genuine DIY stables, and, more recently, grime.

This notion that artists EITHER make music they love OR make music they hope will sell is so childishly simplistic.

Why do you what you do for a living?
 
 
Char Aina
13:44 / 14.09.05

Sounds more greed inspired no?

not necessarily.
you could be a songwriter without the performance skills or look to make it on the world stage, and feel that your art would best be done justice if you could get your work to someone with the necessary voice and style to carry your vision off.
writers and directors do this all the time for films.
chris nolan didnt play batman, did he?
does that make him a sellout?



I think it's only natural for some people to rebel against this and then consider everything "corporate" as less desirable.

do you really think that rebellion against music by the man is so common?
could you share some examples of this natural behaviour?
perhaps you could explain why U2 are still huge, despite their links with big money and big government?
 
 
illmatic
13:54 / 14.09.05
I don't want to feel like I've been manipulated into creating an emotional attachment to something a board decided and engineered would do just that.

It's worth pointing out that notions of "realness" and "authenticty" are huge marketing tools also. Swathes of bands - whole genres, almost - trade on this.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
13:56 / 14.09.05
I don't want to feel like I've been manipulated into creating an emotional attachment to something a board decided and engineered would do just that.

Sorry, but you should probably avoid music altogether then. And TV, film and theatre for that matter.

This old thread has the beginnings of a little theory you might want to engage with, on a related but different tack than this thread.

Even if it does 'have no place on Barbelith'.
 
 
haus of fraser
14:00 / 14.09.05
Why should something written for money mean more to a person than something written just for the hell of it?

Name a signed band that don't write songs for money- especially after the first album. Once they sign a record deal they are writing songs for money.

I believe that Blur were asked to write more commercial sounding songs for Modern Life is rubbish- they obliged with 'turn it up' and 'Chemical world'. These songs were hits and were written for money- although a succesful band not necessarily what you'd think of as 'sell outs' as they write their own music. Virtually all bands want a hit and success- and they write music accordingly dont they?

all music that you can buy in a record shop has been written for money- its been sold to the record label by the band/ musician- why not? Everyone has to make a living.
 
 
ZF!
14:18 / 14.09.05

Eh? Explain this...so childishly simplistic.

Whuh? I'm saying that in *my mind* The Supremes don't seem as much a corporate product as Girls Aloud. You dig?
No I'm not saying artists are making music they love OR making music that will sell, I'm saying *artists* only make music they love.

not necessarily. you could be a songwriter without the performance skills or look to make it on the world stage, and feel that your art would best be done justice if you could get your work to someone with the necessary voice and style to carry your vision off. writers and directors do this all the time for films chris nolan didnt play batman, did he? does that make him a sellout?

What? Films are something else entirely. But Nolan is probably a sellout in some people eyes for making a big budget superhero film.
Get someone else to carry off your vision? Yes that's sellout talk to me. If you're a songwriter and can't sing, maybe you get someone to sing for you, bring them into the equation, share with them, let them create, otherwise you are The Man.

do you really think that rebellion against music by the man is so common? could you share some examples of this natural behaviour? perhaps you could explain why U2 are still huge, despite their links with big money and big government?

I'm not just talking about music here, and I'm not saying it's common. I'm commenting on a group of people who are sick of corporate product and wan't as little as possible to do with it.

Z
 
 
Tom Paine's Bones
14:22 / 14.09.05
Whuh? I'm saying that in *my mind* The Supremes don't seem as much a corporate product as Girls Aloud. You dig?
No I'm not saying artists are making music they love OR making music that will sell, I'm saying *artists* only make music they love.


Why though, specifically, are The Supremes less of a corporate product then Girls ALoud?

Out of interest, do you think that most classical musicans are sellouts, being as they don't write their own material?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:40 / 14.09.05
I would very much like to avoid giving succour to the Man. Zenfroglet, could you give me the names of some bands who do not support the Man, and to whom I can therefore listen?
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
14:50 / 14.09.05
I'm saying that in *my mind* The Supremes don't seem as much a corporate product as Girls Aloud. You dig?

Do I dig the erroneous and laughably romantic and simplistic contents of *your mind*?

No, not really.

Girls Aloud and The Supremes, on the other hand, have both recorded some pretty catchy tunes (in order to make money and, no doubt, enjoy themselves throughly by expressing their artistic ability as singers, said tunes written, produced and largely performed by other people under the Guiding Hand of this Mysterious 'Man').
 
 
haus of fraser
15:00 / 14.09.05
i'm commenting on a group of people who are sick of corporate product

All music you are 'buying' is corporate product.

Was Beethoven a sellout for not performing in a band? Holland and dozier, Gershwin, how are these guys different from Cathy Dennis- once a medocre pop star- she was probably considered past it by her label so she turned her talents to writing songs... still making her living from music- next thing you know Kylies singing 'Can't get you out of my head' and Britneys singing 'Toxic'. surely this is a cause for celebration rather than narrow minded sneering.

Where do The Neptunes/ NERD fit in- producers songwriters and a band- Justin Timberlake was very grateful for their help- they still have their own band- and multiple guestings- are they sell outs or just working the system and making a very healthy living.

The beatles sold songs- the Rolling stones bought em!

I googled 'the man'- this is what i got.

I don't know what he's singing- but at least he plays an instrument!
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
15:00 / 14.09.05
I'm saying *artists* only make music they love.

*scratches head*

Fascinating. And how, pray, do you know this?

Ronnie Bond is a fantastic musician, with a great band, who rock the fuck out of their set list, though don't play that much anynmore. He loves it. He is a consummate musician and an artist, a multi instrumentalist and composer with more skill in his little finger than many people who claim similar title for themselves.

You've never heard of him though, I suspect. He was the drummer in the Troggs, many years back.

But even apart from that, you've heard some of his music. He wrote the Flake ad. The really famous one. And the Coco Pops ad. And the Quick Fit Fitter jingle. 80's ad jingle King.

So now what is he? A corporate whore who sold his ideals down the line to Evil Capitalists in exchange for 30 pieces of silver?

We live in different worlds, as Dire Straits sort of said once.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
15:02 / 14.09.05
Copey wins a stick of weasel for finally identifying TEH MAN!

I'm gonna print that out and stick it in the lab. At least then I can see The Enemy.
 
 
Char Aina
15:17 / 14.09.05

you said

Sounds more greed inspired no?

so i gave you a way in which the decision to sell your song to a singer might be less to do with greed, more to do with having your art heard by more folks and in the manner you envisioned.
you responded, kinda missing the point (i feel), with


Get someone else to carry off your vision? Yes that's sellout talk to me. If you're a songwriter and can't sing, maybe you get someone to sing for you, bring them into the equation, share with them, let them create, otherwise you are The Man.


why does the singer need to get involved with the writing process? not every member of a band writing original material gets input beyond the execution of their part, so why should the singer need to?

what if i am a producer and i get a singer in to do the two line hook i have already written?
no creative input, please, do what i tell you.
am i a sell out?
or are they?
who would be a sell out if i had employed them to make me a cup of coffee?

and what makes film so different?
 
 
illmatic
15:26 / 14.09.05
I'm saying that in *my mind* The Supremes don't seem as much a corporate product as Girls Aloud. You dig?

I know you're saying it's "in your mind" but I suspect the whole Motown Hit Machine was as much of a going commercial concern as whichever-facless-corporate-entity produced Girls Aloud. Do a bit of reading up on Berry Gordy et al, and how The Supremes records came about. They weren't recording for the pure love of music. Music and commerce are inextricable, really.

And how do you feel about Diana Ross's "Chain Reaction". TEH MAN or fan? At which point does she become a "sell out"?
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
15:54 / 14.09.05
Zenfroglet - don't know if you're UK based, but you should really watch this for an insight into just how wrong what's in your mind really is. Dunno if its available on DVD, but it was superb.

Also this is something of a classic now in its 5th edition, and should help considerably, if you care for it.

Music. Business.

Like I said upthread, you want 100% integrity, check out buskers.
 
 
ZF!
18:18 / 14.09.05
Firstly

toksik brought up the concept of The Man, there seems to be much confusion and unhapiness see here for an explanantion

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+man

Hope that helps.

I agree that if you can find a CD on the shelves of your local Virgin Megastore then there is no doubt there are Corporate fingerprints all over it. I’ve accepted that this is the way this world works. At least this music is, as I’ve already said music leading business, not business leading music. What do I mean by that? What I’m saying is that I can accept music that has reached me because some corporate body has thought that this band will sell and as a result has marketed it to me. I’m not happy that this has reached me in this way but I love music so I will accept it.
What I don’t have to accept though, is a corporate body saying, “we will create our own band and market them as well”. What is the difference? The difference is that this band that this corporate body has created is not an organic artistic expression. It is a completely calculated and negotiated business proposal.

“Wait!” I hear you cry, “do bands not negotiate business deals with large corporations as well?” Do large music Corporations not say to themselves, “Hehehehe yes YES, this will SELL!” whilst rubbing their hands with glee?
This is indeed true, bands do this. They sell their souls to the Corporate machine, the Man if you will, the so called Establishment so that they can make money and perhaps achieve fame. The music? Yes the music is tarnished by these transactions of filthy, filthy lucre, but hopefully, somehow the artistic integrity of this band remains strong and they do not collapse under the strain of fame and fortune. Sometimes bands manage this. Sometimes they do not. Sometimes bands remember the reason they make music, and continue making it. Sometimes they do not..

Who do I listen to then? How do I know that they have not lost their artistic integrity? You do not! You don’t know that at all. You can only hope and pray. But still, this, imho, is better than listening to music that has been drafted by a corporate music agent. The other options are indeed going to your local tube/subway station and listening to a busker or two. They’re actually pretty good. The other option is to go to your local and watch a live band. Yes! They too can be quite good.

To the person who sarcastically asked for music suggestions I can suggest the following bands:
ISAN, Neutral Milk Hotel, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah and Broken Social Scene. I hope if you decide to give them a listen your life will become enriched.. Please don’t go google them or got to allmusic.com and then report back to me telling me which label they belong to. *Yawn*

Why though, specifically, are The Supremes less of a corporate product then Girls ALoud?
To me? Solely because they’re not a current band and from a maybe less commercial era.

Out of interest, do you think that most classical musicans are sellouts, being as they don't write their own material?
Yes, yes they are.

Was Beethoven a sellout for not performing in a band?
What? Beethoven was one of the most “punk” men in history! Rock on!

Where do The Neptunes/ NERD… are they sell outs or just working the system and making a very healthy living.
They ARE sellouts when they appear in every music video under the sun. As NERD they’re not.

Fascinating. And how, pray, do you know this?
That’s how I define an artist, someone who enjoys creating.

You've never heard of him though, I suspect. He was the drummer in the Troggs, many years back… We live in different worlds, as Dire Straits sort of said once.
No, don’t know him specifically but I like The Troggs. No I don't think Ronnie Bond is a sellout. If he were selling songs to Girls Aloud then I'd have to reconsider.
And yes, we do all live in different worlds.

why does the singer need to get involved…
Huh? Bands that I know, all collaborate together on their music. Each write music for their own instrument.

what if i am a producer and i get a singer in to do the two line hook i have already written? no creative input, please, do what i tell you. am i a sell out? or are they?
for a song? All of you
for a jingle? None of you

And what makes film so different?
Variables and complexity. Oh you can draw parallels, but you can do that with any art medium can’t you?

And how do you feel about Diana Ross's "Chain Reaction". TEH MAN or fan? At which point does she become a "sell out"?
Diana Ross was a sell-out .from the beginning, but you can always try change. I think eventually most instruments of “The Man” feel the need to create for themselves.

Z
 
 
Essential Dazzler
18:34 / 14.09.05
They ARE sellouts when they appear in every music video under the sun. As NERD they’re not.

This is all getting a bit too Quantum for my liking. Schroedinger's hip-hop producers.
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
18:51 / 14.09.05
zenfroglet, here is some unasked for advice, assuming you are not a joke suit, or macrophage, or quimper666 or any of the numerous trolls that occasionally come and mucky the place up:

Because you think it, does not make it so. In order to avoid appearing ignorant, assuming that's what you strive for in a debate, you might like to back up your convictions with, you know, 'facts'. Curious little notion, I know, but people, especially some people here, can get quite fussy about such things.

Does that definition of 'the man' not strike you as...well, how does it strike you?

Also, do you actually know any musicians? Or artists of any description?

And what, if you don't mind, made Beethoven 'punk'?
 
 
Tom Paine's Bones
18:57 / 14.09.05
What I don’t have to accept though, is a corporate body saying, “we will create our own band and market them as well”. What is the difference? The difference is that this band that this corporate body has created is not an organic artistic expression. It is a completely calculated and negotiated business proposal.

So, should we also not accept bands who form through small ads in the music press? It's not an organic artistic expression after all.

And why not see your theories through to their logical conclusion. Refuse to participate in anything that gives succor to 'The Man' Don't listen to any music where a major label has anything to do with it, including distribution. Apply the same standards to music and books.

I think you'll be limited your options heavily, but you will at least be able to honestly say you're not upholding ver system.

Or is it simply a case of "bands you like- artists", "bands you don't like- corporate puppets"?
 
 
Scrambled Password Bogus Email
19:01 / 14.09.05
Possibly even simpler than that.

Struggling not to use the word 'moron'.

Irony may be no substitute for opinions, but opinions are definitely not a valid replacement for a brain.
 
 
ZF!
19:53 / 14.09.05

Because you think it, does not make it so.

Likewise friend. My *opinions*.
Don't take them so seriously. I'm not trying to offend anyone. Just voice another point of view.

In order to avoid appearing ignorant, assuming that's what you strive for in a debate, you might like to back up your convictions with, you know, 'facts'. Curious little notion, I know, but people, especially some people here, can get quite fussy about such things.

I'm just telling you how I feel, what do you want? A labelled sketch of how I think my heart and mind would appear in 3D virtual space?

Does that definition of 'the man' not strike you as...well, how does it strike you?

It strikes me as an answer to people carrying on like silly buggers. You needed a definition I gave one.

Also, do you actually know any musicians? Or artists of any description?

Yes I know a few musicians, a few artists, quite a few graphic artists and an actress. None you'll have heard of of course. I used to work as a graphic designer and am trying my hand at music again.
Of course I could have just made that up huh?

And what, if you don't mind, made Beethoven 'punk'?

Beethoven wrote and performed his own music. If that isn't punk, or emo or whatever I don't know what is. :-)

Z
 
 
Tryphena Absent
20:25 / 14.09.05
What I don't understand is why you think Girls Aloud have less artistic integrity because they were put together by someone else. Most of them have good voices, they clearly work their arses off, they haven't turned out a bad song. How are they any different from the guy in a band who met someone in a pub or through friends or answered an NME advert and doesn't write or produce any of the music, just plays his instrument?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
20:27 / 14.09.05
Actually if you based music purely on the accepted establishment's reaction than Beethoven would be punk. The problem is that zenfroglet clearly believes in a pure hierachy of music and that's not very punk at all.
 
 
Tom Paine's Bones
21:31 / 14.09.05
I'm just telling you how I feel, what do you want?

An explanation of why you feel how you do, and an attempt to engage with counter arguments people have put to you. Or the moon on a stick. Whichever you think is more likely.
 
 
Char Aina
21:51 / 14.09.05
so beethoven was punk until he went deaf?
because thats when he stopped playing, hey.
he only composed after that.
 
 
rhedking
06:19 / 15.09.05
I really dont understand how the the Supremes where less commercal in the 60's then thier contemporaries. And I dont understand how at the same time Diana Ross was a sell out. A manipulative, not very talented when compared to the chicks she had kicked out her group maybe....but I dont get sell-out.
 
 
ZF!
06:57 / 15.09.05
An explanation of why you feel how you do, and an attempt to engage with counter arguments people have put to you. Or the moon on a stick. Whichever you think is more likely.

What counter arguments? It's mostly been. "Don't be ridiculous, you're wrong! WRONG I SAY!!"
I have explained why I feel this way, read my posts.

Z
 
 
ZF!
07:21 / 15.09.05
...guy in a band who met someone in a pub or through friends or answered an NME advert and doesn't write or produce any of the music, just plays his instrument?

If all the guy is, is a session musician, then he is a sellout. Look I'm not gonna berate anobody for earning his bread, but I calls 'em like I sees 'em.

Some people sell out. I've sold out, I work for The Man. That's ok. I'd rather not have sold out. But I got to eat. I acknowledge that I've sold out. I'm trying to find ways that I won't be a sellout. That's all.

My musician friends haven't sold out, some of my artist friends have. They produce work for a company. They've sold out. They know it. They still do their own non- sellout work on the side though.

Z
 
 
ZF!
07:25 / 15.09.05
The problem is that zenfroglet clearly believes in a pure hierachy of music and that's not very punk at all.

What are you talking about? I don't believe in a hierarchy in anything except maybe when describing a species of life, or maybe identifying a rock etc.

I never said *I* was punk btw.

Z
 
 
ZF!
07:28 / 15.09.05
so beethoven was punk until he went deaf?
because thats when he stopped playing, hey.
he only composed after that.


Yeah, dude sold out, if you want to be technical. Besides I've already covered music from different era's in a previous post

Z
 
 
Ganesh
08:14 / 15.09.05
That depends, was it their idea to cover "Jump" because they all loved it or if it was their producer/manager/whatever who thought, "Yeah let's market this to some 9 yr olds".

Sounds like it's necessary to carry out a fair bit of research into the motivations behind a given band recording a cover version before deciding whether one 'approves' of it or not. How would one go about finding out whether all of Girls Aloud loved Jump? Write to them individually? They might lie. Wire them to a polygraph?
 
  

Page: 1(2)34567... 8

 
  
Add Your Reply