|
|
and with that in mind, this was widely reported this week as Stuart Pearce was pondering Lucas Neill's move to West Ham, allegedly spurning Liverpool:
Stuart Pearce was talking to a player recently when he posed what was intended as a rhetorical question. “I said: ‘What would you rather have, a Ferrari or an England cap.’ And they said: ‘Well definitely a Ferrari because they’re fantastic, aren’t they?” the Manchester City manager recalled with horror, shaking his head at the incredulity of it all.
And that's the problem right there. Not an original observation, I know - what fan wouldn't play for their country for free? - but still. Jesus.
That said, I'm a bit conflicted because I hate the idea of a salary cap. Or indeed any artificial leveller (like the draft system in American Football) because like it or not, big clubs (i.e. clubs with money) get the best players. That's harsh but legitimate and it gives greater significance to the acheivements of 'smaller' clubs. You have to have an underdog to properly invest in the contest (assuming you're a neutral fan.)
Also, an arbitrarily set salary cap just isn't fair. Yes, Ballack is disproportionally rewarded for his performances but that's what Chelsea value him at. Fine. Their mistake. Capping salary just means that Thierry Henry ends up getting paid the same as, I dunno, Yakubu.
And, it'd be impossible to police - the shortfall would be made up with gifts, perks, expenses and bonuses and the situation would remain.
If we're talking fantasy football utopia, I'd like to see not a salary cap but regional restrictions. Useful centreback born in Torquay? Tough luck son, it's the Gulls for you. Like the Yorkshire cricket team back in the day. |
|
|