|
|
That's optimal human behavior? Trying to follow. Wouldn't an optimal human have integrated both those perspectives and acknowledge both, similar your Achilles kill Agamemnon scenario? An optimal Achilles would know that Athena is his good sense and vice versa?
Well, if optimal equates to comprehensible and sensible to thems of us who think that way, yes. Otherwise, not necessarily. It may well just be something that Morrison hasn't thought through, but Ystin and co,. are optimal humans - far superior to the standard weal of modern humanity. Ergo, if they don't have a corpus callosum/internalised consciousness, then optimal humanity does not have a corpus callosum/internalised consciousness. QED.
Also, of course, the gods do lots of things in Homer besides represent states of mind. It's a complex text, so if Achilles saw Athena and thought "Ah! That's my good sense, then," he would not be accurate and complete in his understanding - much as the mood 7 mind destroyer can be a side-effect of Ystin's travel through time, a Sheeda weapon, a hallucination, an externalised emotion... |
|
|