BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


What exactly does get you banned on Barbelith?

 
  

Page: 1 ... 1112131415(16)1718192021... 42

 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:25 / 19.03.06
I don't think there's ever been any need for him to apologise about the seraphim - eye-bleedingly awful prose is not an offence. He got huffy when he was asked not then to clog up the Head Shop with his diary entries, but that's not really a bannable offence either. Let's maintain focus, eh?
 
 
*
17:23 / 19.03.06
Could someone please check me and see if I'm being a jackass in Head Shop? I'd appreciate a second opinion or two.
 
 
Cat Chant
17:50 / 19.03.06
If you mean your responses to hoatzin (sp?), I was about to respond quoting your disclaimer 'not a moderator' and asking 'why not?'

By which I mean, I certainly don't think so.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:24 / 19.03.06
Absolutely exemplary behaviour. If you'd like to be a moderator of the Head Shop, I'll shout you.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
18:31 / 19.03.06
3rded.
 
 
*
19:06 / 19.03.06
Thanks, gentlefolk... feel free to add to the threads. I think I see where ze wants to go with them but I'm not entirely sure.
 
 
grant
17:57 / 20.03.06
Your approach to Vladimir's cock-rotting Indians, to Sensitive Rapist's name change and indeed to this thread has involved going off on a whimsical tangent, and I'm not sure it makes it seem as if you're taking the issues very seriously, or feel that others should be.

Actually, I felt I was being a little rotty here, but less so elsewhere. I generally have some kind of point.

With the Sensitive Rapist thing (if it's the Stephen Donaldson poetry you're referring to), I didn't feel at all whimsical -- that was my first & strongest reaction to the name. It was, in a way, what I thought the name was about, if that makes any sense. Likewise, Vlad's original joke, which I didn't think was about venereal disease, but a rather bizarre psychological syndrome I'd been reading about in Fortean Times. Was it? I don't know, and I'm not sure it makes much of a difference at this point. (If these are the things you're talking about.)

I'll try to be less tangential in the future.
 
 
Ganesh
19:13 / 20.03.06
Likewise, Vlad's original joke, which I didn't think was about venereal disease, but a rather bizarre psychological syndrome I'd been reading about in Fortean Times.

If you're talking about some notional Indian variant of koro, I'd say that's a major reach from the original "joke".
 
 
grant
20:42 / 20.03.06
Well, sometimes I don't read the way other people read. Or, well, I have different first-associations. It wasn't a reach for me at the time. By now, though, I think it's kind of moot. (Actually, at the time, it was kind of moot too -- being an exchange of one kind of racism for another, fluffier variety.)

Anyway, the last thing I want to do here is drag discussion off the topic of bannable offenses. Stick fighting: somewhat rotty. My reading style: more rotty.

Or, well -- hmm. There's a point to be made somewhere in there about consensus vs. individual interpretations/intentions of posts and controversial posters bowing to the bigger sticks of the majority vs. persisting in obnoxiousness.

Is Vlad (whatever digits ze use now) still dropping the ball? Or, is there a long enough away-time (name change, period of inactivity) that can be viewed as a... what, proper penance, for want of a better word?

The old policy used to be if a troll returned disguised enough that no one knew ze was the same troll and didn't engage in trollish behavior anymore, it really didn't matter. Effectively, that was a new user.

Still in effect?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:54 / 20.03.06
Not relevant in this case, I believe. That was a reference to people coming back with new suits. If it has been done successfully, we don't know about it, by definition. Vladimir doesn't have a new suit. He has linked to a wishlist in the name of Vladimir J Baptiste, Jr.. There is no attempt to conceal. Therefore, your scenario does not apply.

As for due penance - well, if somebody made a racist comment in your local pub, got rude and aggressive when challenged, then wandered off for a bit before coming back in without apology or mention of the way he behaved, and how he abused and belittled other people in the bar who questioned his behaviour, expecting to be served and made much of, as if he had done nothing wrong and would be within his rights to do it again, would you go along with this? Would it seem right?

Depending on your answer to that question, you have your answer. Your answer may not be my answer. My answer is still that Vladimir apparently does not see anything wrong with making racist comments about Indians, even when a person of Indian origin is standing in front of him saying that this is offensive and upsetting to her. Without understanding that, I don't see how we can have any faith that he is not going to make further hateful statements, with no understanding that he is causing offence and no toolkit for dealing with the idea that he is. With the utmost respect, as white men we are not in great danger of feeling bad about that. The best Vladimir can manage is "humourless". However, to quote Persephone from elsewhere, with reference to the use of racist language applicable to herself and the then Bengali in Platforms, and how her reaction to it differed from my reaction to it:

It's telling to me that the verb you use is "recoil," but bengali and I say "stab."

So, no. To talk about "penance" is to make this about Vladimir, or about Undulating Spine or Sensitive Nobwit or Shadowsax or whoever. It is not about them. It's about the people who have to wonder if they are going to be feeling that stabbing sensation if they choose to continue to read a board wich gives house room to those who continue to treat all attempts to get them to behave better as invalid inputs.

Right now, on Barbelith, gay people and Jewish people get some protection extended to them to protect them from that stabbing sensation. Whether we want to broaden that umbrella is one of the questions key to this thread.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
22:55 / 20.03.06
I don't really know that there is a long enough away-time in this case, grant. It was a racist remark that has never been recognised as such by the poster responsible. There either has to be that recognition or (or more preferably 'and') there should be an apology for posting it in a public forum. Without either of those things, I don't think it particularly matters how long Vlad stays away before returning - it'll follow him around like a bad smell. And so it should.
 
 
grant
23:44 / 20.03.06
Vladimir doesn't have a new suit. He has linked to a wishlist in the name of Vladimir J Baptiste, Jr.. There is no attempt to conceal. Therefore, your scenario does not apply.

Hmm. I wouldn't say *no* attempt, but a pretty lame one. I didn't know about the wishlist, just that I don't know what the user's name is now (other than a bunch of numbers) (if indeed it still is a bunch of numbers).

I totally agree that any user still identified & identifiable as the same person shouldn't be getting any slack. I shouldn't have said time, but distance, I suppose. This person not being that person. I kind of thought that was part of the function of having flexible usernames to begin with -- the idea of being someone else, wiping out the past, all that.
 
 
Lurid Archive
09:11 / 21.03.06
Absolutely exemplary behaviour. If you'd like to be a moderator of the Head Shop, I'll shout you.

Has Tom been contacted?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:22 / 21.03.06
AS far as I know, id hasn't volunteered yet...
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:27 / 21.03.06
I totally agree that any user still identified & identifiable as the same person shouldn't be getting any slack. I shouldn't have said time, but distance, I suppose. This person not being that person. I kind of thought that was part of the function of having flexible usernames to begin with -- the idea of being someone else, wiping out the past, all that.

Never to my knowledge. Everyone's identifiable by suit number, after all. In Vlad's case, since he signs his posts, subterfuge would be more difficult again.

Way back when, one could have multiple suits and use different identities within that. So, Alki Pepoithos was a suit I used to be nice, Dao Jones one Nick used to be nasty, and so on. However, we've had one person one suit for a while now.

Some time ago, it was said of one troll who was demanding that he be allowed back onto the board that the only way he would be able to interact with Barbelith without being banned again would be to convince everyone that he was not he - that is, he would have to perform a brilliant sleight of mind which would mean his online identity did not give anyone even an iota of suspicion that he was the same person who was bannned. However, the meaning there was that his _person_, not his suit, was excluded. In another case, a troll was allowed to return in an ill-fitting new suit and indulged, until his troll tendencies began to resurface and he was banned again in the new suit. Again, ultimately the person rather than the suit (and certainly the suit name) was excluded.

I don't think that there has ever been a redemptive element to changing suit names, although at times as a statement of intent they might have encouraged members to give people more of a break - say, "Rage is Quiet and Relaxed". Think of it as cross-dressing, maybe. If somebody generally male-identifying dresses as and self-represents as a woman one day, that's fine. If they do so in an attempt to leave the scene of a crime they have committed, the fact that they are operating under a different identity does not change their accountability for what they have done.
 
 
Char Aina
17:20 / 21.03.06
Is Vlad (whatever digits ze use now) still dropping the ball? Or, is there a long enough away-time (name change, period of inactivity) that can be viewed as a... what, proper penance, for want of a better word?

i think he is.
the penance can hardly begin, i feel, if the offence is still being comitted.
i think he's still fumbling the apology pass from those posters who challenged his comments.


if a troll returned disguised enough that no one knew ze was the same troll and didn't engage in trollish behavior anymore, it really didn't matter. Effectively, that was a new user.

that reads like terrible policy, if a good description of reality.
as soon as a user is revealed as a banned poster they get chopped out straight away, usually, right?
wasnt the ignoring of past exploits only accidental?
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
23:34 / 21.03.06
as soon as a user is revealed as a banned poster they get chopped out straight away, usually, right?
wasnt the ignoring of past exploits only accidental?


Pretty much - as I said above, you can't really do that if it's the same suit being used. So, it was more a recognition that when the board was open, a troll could theoretically come back, and if they behaved totally unlike a troll they might be able to stay because nobody recognised them. Once exposed, usually by trolling, they were banned. These days, with access more controlled, it's harder to get on in the first place, whether for the first or second or tenth time.
 
 
*
04:56 / 22.03.06
I wasn't planning on it. In fact I was planning on NOT being a mod, ever, or at least until I have more free time. But maybe there should be more Head Shop mods on US time. So go ahead, sign me up, if you still think I would be a good one.

Stupid twit. Er. Not you good gentlepeople.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:24 / 22.03.06
So I guess we now know the answer to this question. I'd quite like to bump the David Irving thread to confirm for posterity that zoemancer turned out, surprise sur-fucking-prise, not to be saying "I believe in free speech so absolutely that I will defend even someone's right to say something I think is abhorrent and untrue", but to be saying "what's so bad about saying the Holocaust didn't happen WHEN IT DIDN'T, AHA, DO YOU SEE?" - then again, if I bump the thread, he may start posting to it again. Until he's banned, if he's going to be.
 
 
Cat Chant
09:01 / 22.03.06
It's not barbelith's day, is it?

In answer also to the 'what exactly does get you banned' question in the title of this thread, wouldn't this - deliberate impersonation of another poster with a view to an offline meet - be something to consider? My own feeling is that this is so fucked that the person (who is it, btw? Registered March 2004, with 19 posts to its name - just a hacked suit?) should be banned outright and immediately.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
09:06 / 22.03.06
Oh good grief. What?
 
 
Smoothly
09:08 / 22.03.06
Has anyone PMed the user to find out what ze's playing at?
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
09:14 / 22.03.06
As creepy things go, that's pretty fucking creepy.
 
 
Quantum
09:15 / 22.03.06
Banned outright and immediately. WTF is going on?
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:15 / 22.03.06
Thread about it here.
 
 
Cat Chant
09:16 / 22.03.06
I'm too scared.
 
 
Quantum
09:19 / 22.03.06
Right, I can keep an eye on the Temple and Headshop with Mordant and Haus during the day, can we all keep a weather eye on the mod request thread?
 
 
Cat Chant
09:29 / 22.03.06
I should be around a fair bit of the time to keep an eye on Headshop and Gathering.
 
 
Smoothly
09:52 / 22.03.06
I'll keep tabs on Convo, Policy and Gathering. Are we operating a scortched earth policy as far as posts from this user go?
 
 
Cat Chant
10:02 / 22.03.06
Pending a ban, I'd say yes.
 
 
Goodness Gracious Meme
10:31 / 22.03.06
Agreed.
 
 
Jawsus-son Starship
10:52 / 22.03.06
I just can't believe that zoemancer used the Irving argument that "The Germans are really efficent, so if they want to whipe out a race of people they bloody well do!" That's just a whole 'nother level of crazy.

I think this whole thing might have been the work of a mad man - look at the recent posts. Starts of with defending free speech, then becoming a real live were-tiger, and then we hit the holocaust denial. When they find zoemancer's diary, after he's gone on a six day killing spree and turned the gun on himself, I think they're gonna find pictures of women with knives in their faces, discusions about the aliens trying to steal his brain, and then that he's a real live were-tiger. I feel sure we won't here from him again, as I doubt there's a broadband connection in the bell tower he's currently sitting in. With a rifle. And the fake Haus.
 
 
Cat Chant
11:19 / 22.03.06
this whole thing might have been the work of a mad man

See here (Mordant's post and Illmatic's response a few posts down).
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
11:42 / 22.03.06
In answer also to the 'what exactly does get you banned' question in the title of this thread, wouldn't this - deliberate impersonation of another poster with a view to an offline meet - be something to consider?

Well phrased. I say that because (IMHO) we should be careful about banning people for impersonation alone. A while back another member changed hir name so that it appeared that they were "paranoidwriter", and though I was perturbed, ze explained via PM that ze was only screwing around and I accepted this explanation. Indeed, I'm certainly not having a go at this member (I have a soft for the ol prankster), and I'd have hated to see hir banned for what is, after all, just a crap prank.

However, as deva put it, deliberate impersonation of another poster with a view to an offline meet, is a different matter. Fucking scary 'Face Off'/'The Talented Mr. Ripley' territory.
 
 
paranoidwriter waves hello
11:52 / 22.03.06
Er, sorry, I meant, "soft spot".
 
  

Page: 1 ... 1112131415(16)1718192021... 42

 
  
Add Your Reply