BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Lost for Words

 
  

Page: 1(2)34567

 
 
grant
15:16 / 10.02.04
At the upper limit of tree growth balsam fir and black spruce form thigh-high, bonsai-like clumps called krummholz, a German term meaning — twisted wood.

Hmmm.

(totally off-topic: Liber Viridis must be updated!)
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:49 / 10.02.04
(Totally off-topic: I know. I'm on it.)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
18:48 / 10.02.04
Hibiscus?
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
19:04 / 10.02.04
No, not hibiscus.
 
 
grant
19:27 / 10.02.04
Hydrangea!
 
 
Olulabelle
14:22 / 11.02.04
How do I say I am familiar with the workings of the internet on my CV?

I want to say I understand lots of internet applications and am also very familiar with using the internet, but in a way that sounds right. And doesn't make me sound like a complete geek.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
16:26 / 11.02.04
"! 4m the l33t haxx0r & j00 w1ll 411 ph33r m3 cu2 ! wi11 pWn j00r 4ss".

Maybe not. What sort of skills are you talking about, olulabelle? Using browsers, using applications such as Blogger, web design?
 
 
grant
19:01 / 11.02.04
I think I've called that "internet fluency" before.
Probably "net savvy" wouldn't work....
 
 
Olulabelle
19:25 / 11.02.04
I quite like 'internet fluency'.

And although Mordant's hack speak would be far funnier, I am not sure it will get me a good job.

Mordant what I mean is; I've said in my employment history that I worked for a 'digital media agency' (which is just their wanky way of saying internet consultancy,) and described my previous job as being responsible for initiating brochureware content ideas, planning and implementing the site, controlling budget, timespan of the project and all client liaison, but in my 'skills' section I want to make clear that I know my way around the net, understand the language, recognise the plug-in's necessary to run webpages, can trouble shoot web problems, can design and build web pages (that's maybe in Technical grounding; software knowledge) and regularly use (and abuse) the interwebnet.

I want them to know I don't just use it for the occasional search on google about the latest film.

NowotImean?
 
 
Jack Vincennes
08:38 / 12.02.04
I'd probably say something like "Thoroughly fluent in both the use of the internet and the technologies which underpin it" -but I suspect that my CV sounds amazingly pretentious, and there's probably a way of splitting that up into two sentences (as I've always read is The Done Thing)
 
 
pomegranate
16:16 / 12.02.04
is there a word for "audial hallucination," or is it just "audial halluncination?" what about a smell hallucination?
 
 
pomegranate
16:35 / 12.02.04
my god, is "audial" even a word? i think i mean "aural." jeez.
 
 
unheimlich manoeuvre
17:05 / 12.02.04
grant wrote earlier
The only Greek "H" that comes to mind is "halcyon," which doesn't work at all, and the only "wood" phrase that brings to mind confusion or complication is Imago Wood, the fantasy novel about the kind of interdimensional/collective unconsciousness forest. Which isn't what you're asking about either.

wasn't that robert holdstocks mythago wood?

...

i have a frustrating word related problem. i keep confusing emaciation with emancipation and vice versa. while this causes great hilarity amongst my friends, i keep getting very embarrassed. any suggestions?
 
 
ibis the being
17:08 / 12.02.04
hallucination: Perception of visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, or gustatory experiences without an external stimulus and with a compelling sense of their reality, usually resulting from a mental disorder or as a response to a drug.
 
 
unheimlich manoeuvre
17:18 / 12.02.04
or sleep.
 
 
rakehell
02:50 / 13.02.04
I don't know if people are aware of this, but I just found out that if you type in - without the quotes - "define: [any word or (not so)common expression]" into the Google search, it will bring up a surprising number of definitions. So now I use it as a dictionary and definition guide. Brilliant.
 
 
40%
03:07 / 13.02.04
The similarity between aural and oral could cause some problems, actually couldn't it? As in "this medicine should be taken aurally".

But aural means, like, hearing though, doesn't it? As opposed to of or relating to the ears. So that would mean you took the medicine by listening to it.

I hope that's of some help.
 
 
ibis the being
12:43 / 13.02.04
actually... and I only know this because I have ear-troubles myself, the medicine would be taken otically not aurally. unless it was radiohead and then it would be taken aurally.
 
 
illmatic
13:10 / 13.02.04
The old Streetsounds Electro albums used to have "Electro is Aural Sex" as their tagline. I used to think that was terribly clever when I was 11.

11... jeez, did I even know what oral sex was when I was 11?
 
 
grant
15:36 / 16.02.04
wasn't that robert holdstocks mythago wood?

Yes, you're right -- the title came from the smooshing of "myth" and "imago" together, if I'm (finally) remembering correctly.

Helical wood?
 
 
Jack Fear
02:08 / 17.02.04
Hellebore?

Anyway: found myself drawing a blank in another thread--What do you call it when something goes beyond the limits of its kind? Said usually of the arts: Like, a particularly good horror film that crosses the line into true cinematic art--it's "a horror film that ___________s the genre."

Not subverts, surmounts, redefines, surpasses, or exceeds. What's the fucking word? I've used it a zillion times and it's on the tip of my tongue...
 
 
Jack Fear
02:09 / 17.02.04
TRANSCEND.

Sorry. Back to Mordant's problem.
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
18:46 / 22.02.04
I found it! I found it! It took me fucking forever, but I found it! Hyrcynian wood! I typed a whole string of synonyms into Google, and then it was in Webster's all along! Yay!
 
 
Olulabelle
19:34 / 22.02.04
Woo Yay! Proof that the thread works! Although Mordant did solve her own problem...
 
 
luminocity
23:04 / 22.02.04
This one is really bugging me, I've tried the usual searching methods:
What is the word for a ring (finger-ring) which has been made from a single piece of gemstone? I'm sure there is one, but I have no clue what it is or where I might have heard of it. Any ideas?
 
 
Olulabelle
10:37 / 25.02.04
This is a horrible paragraph. It's horrible because of the bits in bold.

Show them somewhere good to go for lunch, because lunchtimes are always horrid in new places when you don't know anyone. And don't gossip. Not that I imagine for a minute you do, but nothing makes you feel more uncomfortable than hearing office gossip when you are new.

But what I want to know is, what are these? Are they Second Person Pronouns? And if they are, which is the Noun that they are the Pronoun of? Or have I got this all wrong and they're not called that at all?
 
 
Jack Fear
13:46 / 25.02.04
"You" is sometimes used for an impersonal pronoun, when the writer wishes to speak of "people in general." A more grammatically correct way to do this is to use "one," and shift the verbs to third-person tense, thusly--

"Show the new person somewhere good to go for lunch, because lunchtimes are always horrid in new places when one doesn't know anyone. And don't gossip. Not that I imagine for a minute you do, but nothing makes one feel more uncomfortable than hearing office gossip when one is new."

Note that the "Not that I imagine for a minute that you do" keeps its "you," because it is clearly directed at the person to whom I am speaking, the reader of the article.

This approach is useful precisely because it makes clear that "you," the reader of the article, and "one," the new hire, are two separate people. Its only drawback is that, to the average reader, it can appear precious and over-literary.
 
 
Olulabelle
16:31 / 25.02.04
But you're right, it makes far more sense and is heaps more pleasant to read.

So how do I/does one/does a person/do you avoid the pitfall of sounding over-literary, but still make sense grammatically?
 
 
ibis the being
17:12 / 25.02.04
Well, I find that when I've got a stuffy or unwieldy sentence on my hands, it usually means it needs a more thorough revision - it has overarching problems, like redundancy or clumsy syntax. So, for example, if I were to fix your paragraph to be both readable and correct...

OLD: Show them somewhere good to go for lunch, because lunchtimes are always horrid in new places when you don't know anyone. And don't gossip. Not that I imagine for a minute you do, but nothing makes you feel more uncomfortable than hearing office gossip when you are new.

NEW: Show them somewhere good to go for lunch, because lunchtimes are always horrid for someone in a new place. And don't gossip. Not that I imagine for a minute you do, but nothing makes a new person feel more uncomfortable than office gossip.
 
 
Saveloy
14:56 / 20.04.04
Ice cream lollies / fractures

You know that hard ice-cream they use in ice-cream lollies, such as Mini-Milks and Mivvies? If it's fresh out of the freezer and you snap a piece off (instead of biting through it) then the surfaces that are created where the two pieces were once joined will have a very satisfying jiggedy-jaggedy texture. Can anyone come up with a nice way to describe that jiggy-jaggy texture? It's definitely cystalline, but in a Fingal's Cave / Giant's Causeway kinda way. I reckon layers or laminates might come into it somewhere. Or, in the case of the Mini-Milk, staircases. Any ideas?
 
 
Ethan Hawke
15:12 / 20.04.04
What's the word for hearing a sound in your head? Like, if I ask you to imagine you hear a gunshot, is there a word that condenses "imagine you hear"? "Imagine" seems to be wrong for this usage, as it implies vision, whereas what I'm looking for is a word that is strictly auditory in implication.
 
 
Olulabelle
15:16 / 20.04.04
Saveloy: Striated? I know it really means parallel grooves but mini-milks always bring that word to mind for me.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
15:17 / 20.04.04
Yes, like layers of sedimentary rock. Sandstone!
 
 
Jub
15:26 / 20.04.04
Okay this isn't exactly within the remit of this thread but it's a wordy issue so bear with me. In this thread someone refers to women as a species.

I am not trying to involve this thread with that in any other way but this: that is wrong isn't it? I mean I hear people saying, "tsk! the male species just doesn't get it" - or - "women are a completely different species" - and that's just plain wrong semantically no? Homo Sapiens is the species right? Or is there some definition of species that has been eluding me? I've always wondered why people say this when it is just, well, wrong! Am I being incredibly pedantic for asking this?

(Let me further caveat this question by stating that this isn't a dig at anyone, - I'm just curious.)
 
 
Saveloy
15:28 / 20.04.04
olulabelle, Kit-Cat Club> You two bloody rule, with the fists. Thanks!
 
  

Page: 1(2)34567

 
  
Add Your Reply