BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Matrix Revolutions (Spoilers)

 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
 
doglikesparky
11:12 / 10.11.03
As i think about the film it occurs to me that I now believe that the cat-glitch at the end was not only a nice reference to the first film but was also showing us Neo being re-born (as it were) into the little girl (Safi - was that her name?) which is why when she asks the Oracle if we'll ever see Neo again, the oracle gives her a knowing smile and says she expects she will, one day. It probably also explains why Safi has made such a beautiful sky in honour of Neo although I'm not sure I can explain it using sensible words...something to do with his skill in the matrix and a memory of the real sky I expect.
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
13:48 / 10.11.03
Um.

I think you're putting a lot more into this than the W. brothers, to say the least.
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
14:02 / 10.11.03
Saw this on Saturday as I had brain fatigue and nothing better to occupy myself with. I thought the cod-philosophy speak was ludicrous and the only 'good' character I gave two hoots about was the battle commander who died in his robot-suit. I didn't believe in any of the relationships at all, but some of the action scenes were all right. I really couldn't be less fussed about the underlying schema of the intricacies of what might have happened where, how and why... film wasn't engaging enough to make me interested in that, and that I thought was its chief fault: I just didn't care.

Hugo Weaving was good - at least he looked as if he was enjoying himself, which is more than I can say for any of the other actors.
 
 
cusm
14:13 / 10.11.03
Christianity: Please, if its so overtly Christian, then why does the Goddess of Chaos win in the cosmic chess game vs the Patriarch of Order in the end? Hail Eris! Neo was just a pawn, the real war being between the Oracle and the Archetecht.

As for Morpheus, its not his time to be important. The first movie was all about him, really, more so than even it was Neo. Morpheus was the real central character, the one who finds the Messiah. In Christian terms, he's John the Baptists. Father archetype. The second movie was all about Trinity, the mother/lover. While the first movie was about freedom, the second was themed on love. In the third, Neo finally takes center stage as son, both in Christian and Thelemic (crowned and conquering child) senses. Theme: choice. If Neo does one thing in all these movies, its demonstrate that free will is valid to the machines.

It also pleases me greately on some level that in effect the machine world is "heaven", and machine programs akin to angels (and supernaturals of all sorts, but most notably the ones which lack free will. Agent Michael, Agent Raphael...) Its a lovely sort of bitter gnostic horror that God is a soulless machine superintelligence that seeks only to keep the books balanced.
 
 
Scrubb is on a downward spiral
17:39 / 10.11.03
I liked Monica Belucci's cleavage.
Seconded. Highlight of the film for me (closely followed by the sunshine).
 
 
The Strobe
18:00 / 10.11.03
I totted up the number of good things in this film, and basically, it came to about 60-120 seconds of film.

Seconds.

That's not a good start.

I don't even think it was tied to the last one that well. So many loose ends - and not in the way that dAb and the rest of the, well, lunatics, are expressing, but things that seemed like a good idea that have passed without trace. Such as: the entirely white Zion computer room. Where the fuck is that? Why the fuck do the machines have a city? Do they need to go to the machine gym having been to the machine office?

(As I continue, I have decided to refuse to structure my post like I normally would, linking paragraphs and themes, and instead throw ideas at you. This is not because I advocate this principle as a moderate - I abhor it, and I prefer sentences, correct spelling, and something approaching logical flow. However, as the film we are discussing ignored any sense of coherency, I shall just throw ideas at you and see how it goes).

Lame-ness of explaining new Oracle - lots of people mumbling about "it's a shame that happens" and "did you survive the change OK?" Just enough for us to know that Morpheus et al are not retards, and have noticed it is a new actress, but not enough to stop the audience being treated like retards.

Thought: where did all the budget go? I thought the film looked pretty average for half of a $320million film. CGI, Schmee-g-i. Crappy stompy mechas. Crappy "if we double the number of sentinels, it will be better!"

A gunfight, quite nice, but still no lobby-scene, no explanation of why the bad guys can walk on the ceiling but our heroes cannot.

No dialogue. No motivation.

Agent Smith: great. Great pantomime villain, actually, but I love him all the same, even if his end fight was too long.

People in woolen jumpers and with beads in their hair. I sighed every time I saw that fucking council. Not as bad as when, just as we (a Saturday afternoon multiplex audience, full of all those "normal people" so derided already in this post) were fed up with the entire thing, and felt the end must be near, the fucking Architect pops up and the entire cinema groaned in unison.

It's not Christian. It's confused. We have this messianic saviour and Christian imagery (delivering the word, I said word (did you get that? Clever boys!) to the unbelievers, crosses, sacrifice, blah-di-blah... and then aspects of Buddhism and Hinduism and basically surfer-philosophy start popping up, not to mention all the classical mythology. What a mess.

I still loved the daylight, but 5 seconds of film does not anything remotely worth my afternoon make.

The first film was self-contained, and I don't even think the latter two bore any resemblance to it. And I am fed up of wasting my life writing about this fucking thing. I had to go just to get it over with. Fuck, it hurt. Waste of my time and money. And it didn't even end.

Finally, a trend I have noticed: every time I read nice things being said about the film by what I can only fairly call fanboys, as there is no other way anyone could enjoy this preposterous heap of shit, I am deafened by the sound of that barrel scraping.

Deafened.
 
 
Tamayyurt
20:18 / 10.11.03
A lot of people here have said that the movie doesn't end. I'm not being confrontational I just don't understand. What do you mean by this? For me, the movie ended. I don't expect or want anymore from this franchise. Now, I can understand that you weren't happy with the ending... but I don't understand that it lacked an ending. Explain... if you've still got interest in writing about this, that is.
 
 
The Strobe
20:30 / 10.11.03
I need some time to recover strength to write about it, but basically:

I disagree. It didn't end; it just stopped. Nothing was concluded. And we were basically promised conclusion. Or is it foolish of me to expect conclusion?

The Matrix concluded perfectly.
 
 
Chaos is relative
00:01 / 11.11.03
How can anyone call another beings art "unforgivable". Are there people out there who are so hopelessly dependant on entertainment that when a movie does not meet individual expectations it inspires anger and resentment?

I enjoyed the film. I agree wholeheartedly with brother Iao Adonai. The film was a fertile ground for my imagination to mold into what I needed at the time, much the same as the first film. The first film was unexpected, and bearing the element of surprise, easily won the heart of anyone who suspects there is something wrong with the world.

This film, Revolutions, also caught me off guard. I winced as I purchased the ticket somewhat expecting the same disappointment I experienced with Reloaded. It did not disappoint. I was at the very least equally impressed with this story as I was the first. The Wachowski brothers managed to conclude the trilogy by answering every question to which they are entitled to do so. The ending defies convention. The film is ripe with symbolism at a global level. No one seems to mention the Hindu man in the train station between two worlds. The script manages to portray every character in a thouroughly believable manner. The hindu man speaks from a hindu perspective as accurately as any I can recall since Ben Kingsley. It seems every religion is represented, even Christianity. And hats off to the filmmakers for not excluding Christianity. I believe pearls of wisdom can be found in any religion despite those corrupt individuals who would defile one religion or another for political and social gain.

Much like Dab, I viewed this film from the perspective of a practical occultist, magickian, and Thelemite. I was not disappointed. I never had to remind myself to keep an open mind once the film began. I was entranced despite my reluctance. I knew it would not be as entertaining or mind altering as the first film before I set foot in the theatre and now I am delighted at how I could be so wrong. Study the Book of Thoth for a week or so and go see it! It has the potential to be whatever it is you want it to be. Like the oracle who tells those who seek her council exactly what they need to hear, this film is only what you allow it to be. I saw it as a beautiful analogy of fulfilling one's own path as every character in the film seems to have done, especially the nearly hopeless, and self doubting Morpheus.

end rant...
Lani
 
 
Iao Adonai
00:17 / 11.11.03
The Matrix I never promised "conclusion". It only ""ends"" with Neo telling us "I'm _not_ telling you how it will end, I'm _only_ telling you how it will begin." -did some of you forget that?

Also, from a Taoist point of view: the I-Ching "ends" with the hexagram 64 "Before the End" (#63 is "After the End" -by the way) And it is implicit in the I-Ching (Book of Changes) that HEX #64 cycles back into HEX #1 "forever and ever into Eternity".

Life is not a prison of "definitions" if the definitions are themselves "open-ended" and allowed to "Change" you. (It's not the spoon that bends..)

Hmm...
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
00:32 / 11.11.03
My problem with the "Philosophy 101" thing was not so much whether or not the ideas were simplistic- I actually thought they were pretty fucking good for an action movie. It was more that they were elucidated so badly- ie the script sucked.

Once the assault on Zion began, and dialogue dropped to a minimum, the film started to really work.

Overall, I liked it. The action scenes were every bit as wonderful as they should be (and none of them induced the boredom of the multiple-Smiths fight in "Reloaded", which I HATED), and the actual plot, while badly scripted, did make a lot of the really dumb shit from "Reloaded"- well, not so much make sense, as seem to have a purpose. (I've never found the problem was that I couldn't follow them- just that they seem to have been making it up as they go along.)

Other criticisms- not enough Niobe, DEFINITELY not enough Link (who with his wife are my favourite characters in the entire fucking trilogy), and the Merovingian was if anything even more irritating than in "Reloaded".

I LOVED the fact that even the action scenes played up the dichotomy- to fight the robots, men have to get into big fuck-off robots (and the robots themselves, the squid, are mimicking organic life). Smith shows more emotion in one expression than Neo has in his life.

The Tube station was a nice idea- kind of made me think of Spirited Away and Jacob's Ladder simultaneously, which is a neat trick- but I thought it could have been done better.

Overall, a good movie. I went expecting it to be shit, and was pleasantly surprised. I think I may even go back and watch "Reloaded" again in light of this. I do think, though, that with tighter editing (for example, the Oracle, fun though she is, has very little purpose in the third movie, and in the second, mostly she's just the "bit at the beginning of a video game level that tells you what you're supposed to do") and a better writer (although the dialogue is still head and shoulders above "Attack Of The Clones"), Reloaded and Revolutions could have been made as one pretty damn long movie that would have been absolutely fucking brilliant.

Roll on the "Directors' Splice".
 
 
at the scarwash
00:50 / 11.11.03
This was my first Matrix experience. I (correctly) assumed that I'd gotten all of this before from PKD, studies of Valentinian Gnosticism, The Invisibles, and playing Metroid The only thing that this gave me that I didn't quite expect all of the above to be chopped, diced, sprinkled, and served up as a steaming platterfull of Skyy vodka ad. But my friends were going, I was bored, and I had the cash to blow.

What I liked about this:

The absolutely shameless appropriation of the plot from the corpus of science fiction film. I don't have to lay it out, because I've read several reviews that have done it in detail, but it was diverting to spot the swipes.

Keanu enters briefing room on the Hammer (decorated by the people who brought you Alien 3: "Hi." God, I was doubled up in my seat. God bless the slacker Messiah.

The Oracle's apartment set.

The train station set.

The fight scene, with all the silly CGI shockwaves. YWP did much better work here than in Kill Bill

Okay, now some of my unfavoritest parts:

The writing. Occasionally hilarious, more often lead shot streaming from the mouths of slightly-uncomfortable actors.

Trinity. What are we supposed to think that the Savior of Us All finds in this tree stump of a character?

Neo. 'Nuff said on that.

The bad-guys. Ladies and gentlemen, on aisle twelve we have decomissioned Imperial Probe Droids half off. They're sure to go fast, so act now! If you take advantage of this very special offer, we'll throw in five hundred bales of Dr. Octapus's used tentacles.

The point that the bad guys had no value as characters has been made. Now, of course seeing as the bad guys represent the Black Iron Prison, I can understand that they should be somewhat anonymous. Shouldn't they have at least been scary? It was nice that they got the MPC to come out of retirement for that cameo, though.

Oy gevalt. Bald kid with big ears. "Zion, the war is over."

Oy yoy yoy.

Oh yeah, and the guys with the Aliens exo-skeletons with the big guns held gangsta-rapper style looked like fucking valet-parking attendants in those tapestried vests. In fact, the costume design for everyone in Zion was pretty awful. The town looked like one big Babylon 5 convention, apart from the mid 80s Commes des Garcons look of the Space Marines, or whatevern they were in the distressed sweaters and jazzercize warmups.
 
 
--
01:09 / 11.11.03
Actually, I think the most interesting thing about the Matrix now is the story that larry wachowski divorced his wife after the first film and married a British dominatrix who made him her sex slave... And that he likes to wear women's underwear. Damn, they should have put some of that in the movie!

The best ending would have been if Neo discovered that the machine leader was in fact Larry and Andy Wachowski, who revealed that the whole purpose of the Matrix was simply, by this point, to make money and nothing else. It could have been like Animal Man or something...
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:21 / 11.11.03
The first film... easily won the heart of anyone who suspects there is something wrong with the world.

See, this is what really bugs me about the prevalent attitude amongst people who really like the Matrix films: the assumption that liking them has some kind of connection to being clued in to some kind of higher knowledge, coupled with the tendency to grossly over-estimate the films' importance. I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm afraid I KNOW there is something wrong with the world, and the first film did not 'win my heart'. I quite liked it. Still do. The first half or so is really rather good, and the rest is pretty fun no-brainer action movie stuff. I know a fair amount of people who feel the same way - these are, again, people who seem very aware of the fact that there are things wrong with the world - I mean, hello, they've been posting in the threads about these films. Ah, but maybe our collective mindset has not yet transcended to a more evolved paradigm... Bleurgh.
 
 
foot long subbacultcha
08:38 / 11.11.03
Is it pretty much a done deal that Oracle was the mother of the matrix? I'm not sure that we can come to that conclusion.

Actually I'm not sure you can come to any conclusions apart from the one you feel like at the time of watching. I think Revolutions is fine as an ending, and am slightly curious about the need for where the fourth movie and online game will go.
 
 
Jack Vincennes
09:19 / 11.11.03
I just wanted the shoal of machines to start talking like Cliff from Cheers.

("Say, ma'am, is he bothering you?")
 
 
Hieronymus
12:32 / 11.11.03
According to Joel Silver, the producer of the Matrix films, "[A fourth sequel] will never happen....there will be other areas of Matrix material [the videogames, etc], but there will not be any more movies."
 
 
The Strobe
12:48 / 11.11.03
Actually I'm not sure you can come to any conclusions apart from the one you feel like at the time of watching. I think Revolutions is fine as an ending...

I do not see how "coming to any conclusion apart from the one you feel like" is "fine as an ending".

"It means what you want it to mean" is not an acceptable statement of intent, frankly. For other reference: see things Flyboy and JtB have said, too.

Vincennes: yes! "Hey, and buddy? Try to lighten up?"
 
 
foot long subbacultcha
14:56 / 11.11.03
Ok now I'm finding this thread more confusing than the movies. Are we implying that an ending can only be satisfying if there is a definite conclusion that everyone can agree on, audiences and creators alike?

Surely not?
 
 
The Strobe
16:03 / 11.11.03
Are we implying that an ending can only be satisfying if there is a definite conclusion that everyone can agree on, audiences and creators alike?

For a start, we are not implying anything. I am. dAb and Iao Adonai certainly wouldn't agree with me, though, so let's not use we.

Satisfying endings may be interpreted differently by audience, and maybe by the creators too, but they usually always conclude something. Revolutions did not conclude; it stopped. The war stopped. Great. That's one ending. The character arcs were left hanging. More than the forgivable-few loose ends were left hanging. Concepts which begged for explanation (having only until now essentially having had the explanation "it exists because it is cool") were left hanging, stylistic statements without substance to back them up. Odd murmurings of metaphors do not an explanation make.

I don't personally think that all films need a definite conclusion to satisfy audiences; I do think that Matrix Revolutions needed one, though. It promised to be a conclusion. It all, as I said earlier, depends on how satisfying you find an author and director of a $380million budget trilogy telling you "it means what you want it to mean". That just doesn't hold together for me. I mean, many films say "this has happened, this has happened, this means this, there can be no more that, the balance is restored - and interpret all these definites as you will". Cool. MR just essentially says "interpret it all as you will". Not cool.

I am surprised by how much I'm posting to this thread given how little I cared about the film.
 
 
Chaos is relative
16:42 / 11.11.03
"MR just essentially says "interpret it all as you will". Not cool."

Personally, I got the same freedom of interpretation with The Invisibles.

No two beings have identical perceptions about anything being seperate entities with diverse experience. I don't know what to say about the vague arguements being posted. They seem to be fits of self indulgence and egotism without specific intent. Flyboy says " It did not win my heart, I quite liked it." These are synonymous in my mind. See, different perspective. Also, knowing people who feel the same way does not convince me of anything. We could converse about specific points and perhaps turn this into a fruitful thread instead of worrying about who is right and wrong.

I thought the story of Morpheus, Trinity, Neo, and Smith were all very plainly concluded.


Lani
 
 
We're The Great Old Ones Now
16:56 / 11.11.03
In the sense that Trinity is dead (again), Morpheus probably gets the girl, Smith has been exploded (again) and Neo has been taken into the Informational City via a digital Viking Fire Ship, with the implication that he'll be back?

I love clarity.

But the real problem is that no one cares.
 
 
at the scarwash
21:25 / 11.11.03
Is it pretty much a done deal that Oracle was the mother of the matrix? I'm not sure that we can come to that conclusion.

The Oracle is Sophia. Seraph is somewhat of a Horos/boundary/guardian figure. The Architect is JHVH or the demiurge. The problem is that Canoe should be the Alien Stranger, the Gnostic Christ. He's not. He obtains salvation for some from the Matrix into what? A Babylon 5 convention in a sewer? How transcendent is that? What makes the films supposed real material world qualitatively better than the Matrix? Still the same silly cycles of love and death and war and peace. The machines were developed for war. How can any peace be lasting?

The reason I thought that this film fizzled out at the end is because it built these transcendent structures of Gnostic salvation and then fell back into the mundane, claming all the time that it was paying the viewer off. Don't get me wrong, there aren't many filmic representations of enlightenment that have worked (2001 an exception, I think), but this most emphatically was not one of them, no matter how much it pretends to be.

If I want to work really hard just to find meaning in a silly sci fi film, I'll just get really blazed and watch The Cube next time.
 
 
foot long subbacultcha
07:46 / 12.11.03
I saw Persephone as Sophia at the time of reloaded. Oracle could be seen as the Omega to the Architect's Alpha (beginning to end, but also in the context of mathematical and computing problems of incompletness and halting anomalies).

I guess Oracle can be mapped to Sophia in the sense that she ushered in the Neo/Smith saviour?

Also, is the gnostic transcendence really ruled out? We end Revolutions with what is possibly a new iteration of the matrix(sorry if that makes you cringe, Paleface). Transcendence as a revolution?

I hear what Paleface is saying. There is a lot to wade through in Revolutions to get to its end. I didn't have as much fun watching it as I had with Reloaded. Then I saw revolutions a second time and had a blast. Can't be arsed to go see it a third time though.

I'm not happy with applying the term "bathos" to this movie, though. I enjoy the ending of the matrix trilogy in the same way I enjoyed the ending to the Invisibles.
 
 
Professor Silly
16:45 / 12.11.03
What really surprises me about this thread is the egocentrism.

"But the real problem is that no one cares."

I can't imagine a sillier conclusion! Maybe this one poster doesn't care...but then why post? If anyone did go see the film, and didn't care, they'd probably stay silent.

What we really have here are several different emotional reactions. We have some people expressing delight, others ranting with all the anger of a "woman scourned." The former seem to want to point out what they liked with others that shared their view, while the latter can't seem to imagine how anyone can disagree with them...as if their views were "right" and they are, in fact, better critics of art than anyone else. This reminds me of Christian fundamentalists--"we're right, you're wrong, and you and everyone else will burn in hell...then you'll be sorry."

I haven't seen anyone say "this film was great! If you didn't like it you must be dumb." Really--maybe someone wants to go back and search every post for such a statement...but I don't think it's there. On the other hand I've been called names by those who didn't like it and felt cheated...simply because I enjoyed the film and want to talk with others who enjoyed it. I'm trying my damnedness to keep my Mars in check and not sink to these levels of name-calling...because I don't see this as contributing to the overall conversation. And yet it's so hard....

Obviously my Zen riddle didn't strike home. If you hated this film, why continue to express your anger? You won't convince someone like me that my enjoyment was "wrong"...I respect your opinion, but I don't think either side will convince the other of this. It seems to me that if you didn't like the film, you'd be better off forgetting it and going to a movie you will like.

...but maybe some people are masochists and enjoy feeling cheated...and more that they need others to justify their feelings of persecution by agreeing--"you're right, this film sucked: let's make sure nobody else enjoys the film either."

Lani hit the nail on the head--we all have different tastes in art. To lambast those with different opinions and assume that they are wrong while you're right only says one thing: that you have an egocentric point-of-view. This isn't name-calling, it's a description of your tactics. Get over yourself. You aren't "right" and you won't convince those you see as "wrong." You're entitled to your opinion like everyone else, and calling those who have a different opinion names does not change anything other than raise the levels of animosity.

Now: group hug...or else
 
 
at the scarwash
18:29 / 12.11.03
Well, dAb, the thing is, we think we're right. You think you're right. Let's discuss it and make our cases. I've been convinced that my opinions are wrong before. I doubt that that's going to happen here, but I'm willing to be told I'm wrong. Basically, I think that it sucks because it's a failure as film. All of the good ideas in the multiverse can't make a bad film good. I don't think anyone can make a case for the script. Ditto the acting. The sets and costumes were stylish but very much done to death. I didn't like the CGI. It looked like a Sci Fi Channel original with a bit of budget. The editing and pacing were ragged. The OST was generic. I'm definitely of the view that content is secondary: you can tell any story you want; telling it well is the difficult part.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
09:47 / 13.11.03
Posted by dizfactor
i disagree with Benjamin Birdie that Neo got played by the Machines. Neo, Smith, the Machines, and the Zionistas all got played by the Oracle and the Architect as part of the ongoing cycle of chaos and order.

With Smith as the entropic/destruction, death figure required to pull everything down for the Oracle inspired rebirth/boot. And I think it was only the programmes that wanted to be free that were going to be set free into the Matrix, which is er… a prison.

Posted by scoobyjah
Is it pretty much a done deal that Oracle was the mother of the matrix? I'm not sure that we can come to that conclusion.

There seemed to be a whole male destroyer/controller, female creator thing running throughout the film. Zion as the mother, the phallic symbolism of the drills etc.

Religion wise this reminded me much more of Hindu, with the whole Dharma thing, than Christian. But I suppose you could read whatever you want into it.

Also if the machines are dumb enough not to invent EMP hardening put EMP generators just outside the walls of Zion. When the machines come, switch them off, see? Machines invade, switch them off, repeat, very simple.

I enjoyed the fight for Zion, it was Battletech writ large, but I can’t help thing they made some design errors in Reloaded. I like Zion, very steampunk but if the soldiers where going to sustain a huge long scene then surely a bit less Star Wars episode 1 and bit more Colonial marines? Small detail but for some reason it really bugged me. Still giant robots shooting each other!

For some reason when I was watching the fight in the muddy crater all I could think of was Batman and the mutant leader from Dark Knight returns.

There’s nothing in the film that suggest Seraph was a previous "One", he’s previously described as a programme, the Merovingian describes him as such when calling him Judas and the only thing that suggests he is a programme is Smith saying he use to hunt him but in Reloaded its made clear that agents hunt exiled programmes as well. He was previously an angel in the same way as the twins were previously Chinese Ghosts.

Ultimately I was a disappointed I think they made a mistake basing so much of it in the ‘real world’, I also felt they left out much of (pseudo) ‘philosophical’ for want of another word, dialogue that was present in the first two. The Wachowski Brothers have some visual skills but cannot write dialogue or pace films at all. It felt a bit like they had lost interest and though I commend them for attempting to make the move from a core to ensemble cast, the characters were not nearly strong enough to support that.

What do people make of the so-called ‘real world’ looking more machine like than the Matrix?

Posted by dAB
But again, most people obviously don't really want peaceful endings. They want murder and the death of one race or the other. Win-win situations are apparently beyond the scope of most people.

That’s actually a good point, I think I would have preferred the genocide ending myself but that is a good point.

To Flux & Flyboy remember the Matrix is beneath you, you are better than the Matrix, you are to good for this thread, in fact your presence on the thread may even encourage the Wachowski Brother’s to make another Matrix sequel that you will have to waste more of your valuable life explaining to us all why you’re to cool to go and see it

And Tarantino still rocks, because two hours of women being brutalised, coma rape played for laughs and cartoon child molesting, that’s entertainment!

Posted by Nick
Um.

I think you're putting a lot more into this than the W. brothers, to say the least.

So? Isn’t that part of the enjoyment of a film? Adding your own meaning?

Posted by Paleface
A gunfight, quite nice, but still no lobby-scene, no explanation of why the bad guys can walk on the ceiling but our heroes cannot.

Sticky shoes?
 
 
The Strobe
11:10 / 13.11.03
I doubt it. Notice how they get to the ceiling, and their behaviour on it; they behave as if gravity is dragging them upwards. Not sticky shoes. Just peculiar laws. Also, I don't see why walking on the ceiling makes you any less of a target; a guy walking on the ceilingis still the same size as a guy on the floor.

well enough alone is pretty right on about the genericness and sci-fi channellness of it. I wasn't really convinced by the CGI - especially the ragdoll puppets in the APUs.
 
 
The resistable rise of Reidcourchie
11:55 / 13.11.03
Sorry, Pale I wasn't being entirely serious.

Question, do people feel that the Matrix has opened mainstream film for elements that they would like to see more of in film from giant robots to pop philosophy to more sci fi in sci fi films rather than just as a setting for action film (if you see what I mean)?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:48 / 13.11.03
Right I have two things to say in response to a couple of posts

I thought the cod-philosophy speak was ludicrous

This movie seems to reference itself entirely on the back of determinism vs. free will, a philosophical argument that any philosophy BA student is taught in the first term. Kid yourselves not, the entire theme is based on Western (and really the American dream) thought. Sure it might reference a little bit of Eastern myth etc. but in no way has it grown from it. This is evident, if you care to recognise that this is a trilogy, from the first film that basically referred to Christian myth, free will and Descartes' mind/body split (sorry, obsessed atm). Frankly that's just deplorable... these are ideas that are consistently used in the media, on television and in Hollywood cinema and another film that represents them is simply not needed. When the first film came out people were whining about it being a masterpiece and that was tosh- images from Blade, ideas from various sources over the last 150 odd years. Another action thriller that presents basic, old philosophical thought... great.

Secondly The first film... easily won the heart of anyone who suspects there is something wrong with the world.

Unlike Flyboy I found the first film boring, tedious and long winded. The main character pathetic, undiscplined, without focus. If you're going to make a film about spiritualism and philosophy you need to portray the protagonist as someone who learns, not a man with these hidden talents that emerge suddenly and without any real hard work. A couple of fights blah blah and suddenly he's awake and awake to what precisely, computer code. That's great, why couldn't they just say he was so good with machines that he could beat them? Am I the only person who thinks that would have been far, far more interesting and insightful? There's reference to buddhism in there but it took Buddha a lifetime to reach enlightenment. These things aren't fantasy as the film shows them to be, zen monks spend years accomplishing the type of awakening that Neo manages in god-knows-how-long and I think it does the whole basic idea of enlightenment a terrible disservice. To be a messiah you have to fight for it. Neo isn't even a Jesus figure, he doesn't help anyone, he trots around and spouts bullshit to people who are meant to be his friends. We're meant to think this antisocial twat is cool. Agent Smith is far more interesting because he's more human and doesn't have any friends to treat like shit.
 
 
Suedey! SHOT FOR MEAT!
13:08 / 13.11.03
%How can you say that about another beings art? It seems some people have trouble understanding the concepts behind this film, you are not "right", get over yourself, this film was not made with the masses in mind, people who cannot deal with "peace". This film is for people who look for things that aren't there in a film which ignores some pretty standard rules of film making/writing/fiction (because it transcends them). I am not "right", but I am not "wrong", but I am quite condescending%

Whoops.
 
 
Rawk'n'Roll
07:43 / 16.11.03
This film is for people who look for things that aren't there in a film which ignores some pretty standard rules of film making/writing/fiction (because it transcends them).

Ok so I really can't be bothered to read this entire thread but this last post really struck a dischord with me. This film is a blockbuster Hollywood movie. Always has been always will be. Its made for the masses who like guns and uber violence. There are other levels (at least in the first film and at the end of reloaded) that give you guys enough of a grip hold to theorise the shit out of the trilogy but ultimately if you have to resort to using metaphor to explain why this film should be good the makers have obviously failed.
I was incredibly excited after the final scene with the architect in Relaoded, I honestly thought that these movies might go somewhere interesting but I was sorely disappointed. The final film just doesn't make sense. The war with the machines is laughable as the machines hardly notice the humans or attack in a way that would be considered offensive. The crux of Neo's peace treaty is ridiculous and ignores the finer points of the repurcussions of Smith inhabiting all of the Matrix residents. The actual peace treaty is absurd as only Neo and the baby-head machine are aware of it and NEO IS DEAD!
Logic is totally ignored in favour of some really cool fight scenes and some testosterone fuelled violence.
This film fails to conclude anything, I'd be happy if the war continued at least then I could see what may happen once the credits role. Now its another matter. Neo may as well have not ever existed but this isn't a reboot in the way the architect describes.

I don't know. I guess I was sorely disappointed and to come on here and see so many of you defending the film shocks me. I thought barbelith posters had some ounce of taste and could see through this pathetic playground philosophy.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
17:31 / 16.11.03
Holy shit, but this thread's funny. What's remarkable is that it's both funny ha-ha and funny hmmm at exactly the same time.
 
 
Murray Hamhandler
20:50 / 16.11.03
I should say first that I haven't seen this movie. And, given critical/fan reaction I probably won't see this movie until some friend of mine or other buys it on DVD (despite the fact that I saw the first two). But I'm gonna talk about it anyway. Sue me.

This should have been the movie that Last Action Hero wanted to be. Neo strips away the onion layers of reality to finally peer out into the audience, Purple Rose Of Cairo stylee, and utter a confused "Whoa" as he realizes that he's been overpaid actor Keanu Reeves the whole time.

Or it should have ended w/Keanu pitching the Matrix story to his agent, maybe drawing it all out very badly on a dry-erase board.

"...Then I die, like Jesus or somebody like that! Fuckin' rad idea, huh?"

"Okay, sure. Sounds good, Big K. One thing: could we maybe not use your real name in the movie?"

There are so many fun things they could have done w/this.
 
 
I'm Rick Jones, bitch
01:14 / 17.11.03
I thought barbelith posters had some ounce of taste

They do. Just not the same taste as you.
 
  

Page: 123(4)567

 
  
Add Your Reply