|
|
What the idiot in the Guardian ignored was the fact that in the good old days the average Doctor Who adventure was cumulatively between 90 minutes and anything up to 180 minutes. When you've got to tell a story in 40 minutes (presumerably that length to make it easy to sell to the US market) you don't have the time for the 'landing somewhere new, getting mistrusted by the locals, locked up, getting free, companion twists her ankle, someone gets killed in a grisly manner' part of the story). Plus, compare a story from say, mid-period Tom Baker with a William Hartnell story, the Baker story will move a lot quicker, and work to a completely different set of rules than the Hartnell story.
So basically, shut up stupid Guardian journo, you smell of poo!
I'll hold off on more profound comment until the new series is shown on TV, but I thought that, as it has to effectively reintroduce the concepts of the Doctor, the TARDIS and so on, (in much the same way as Next Gen reintroduces the Star Trek universe) it did a pretty good job. And I presume that the scene with Mark Benton in his shed is giving a heads up for some of the stories we can expect to see this season?
Time Out has a much better article (not only because Time Out are wee) from Russell about how he's waited his whole life to write this, and Chris Eccleston is doing this because he wants to do something that isn't grim involving dead babies and stuff.
The Guardian blog is also pushing the idea that the show has been allowed to 'escape' to drum up enthusiasm, but who knows? |
|
|