|
|
No, fair enough.
The request also says a lot.
The series is many things, but I think it's ressurection would do best to take influences from Tom Baker's first four seasons (creepy horror) and Sylvester McCoy's last two seasons (bizzare quirky tales... at best).
I dislike JNT because his eras were more glitzy and plastic rayguns. I adore most of the series (except for Davison, but that's my opinion) and recognize that it has many many different 'takes' as different producers and Doctors took the helm. For example you had Troughton's alien of the week pulp (which I love), Pertwee under Barry Letts, which was action alien invasion, then space opera, followed by yet more Doctors and producers, etc etc.
My point is that there are several eras and several takes, but most fans or casual viewers have some idea of what Who is and what it isn't. I do agree that the 1996 film is NOT Who. But one of its main faults is a heavy reliance on mythology (Gallifrey, the Master, cameos of the Daleks, regeneration, etc etc).
This reliance on mythology is also my problem with JNT's time on the show.
But I'm not so pig-headed to say he was a terrible producer. I think he kept it on the air, but also did a lot of harm as well.
But what can you do? It's a mixed bag and it's in the past.
I'd just like to see the creepy Robert Holmes/Philip Hinchliff influence on the new series if it should ever happen. Stories like "Talons of Weng Chiang," "Brain of Morbius" and "Pyramids of Mars" are amongst my all-time favorites and I think that 'take' could flow quite well nowadays. |
|
|